What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

WHAT A AWFUL GAME FOR VICK (1 Viewer)

Mad he cost you a title?
Real life? Horrible game. Fantasy? Vick still put up 23 in my league and was again among the leaders at the qb position this week. This is another reason why Vick is the number 1 qb next year. His floor is high even when he plays terrible.
Apparently YOU have never had Vick on your fantasy squad before.
Apparently YOU are still living in 2006 where he sometimes relied on ONLY his rushing as ATL would only throw 16 or 17 times a game. That aint happening in Philly. This was an awful game for Vick by any standard. And he put up 20+ points in fantasy. Those 12 points he gave you rushing make up for his bad passing day and turnovers. How does Vick putting up 20+ in a stinker like this not re-enforce his high floor?
I believe he continued his streak of 24+ fpts (standard FBG scoring) in each game he has started and finished this year. Something no other QB accomplished this year.
 
Vick is the #1 QB and maybe the #1 overall going into 2011.

How can he not be. He is a dual threat on a offense that is loaded and now built around him.

I would not blink taking him Number one overall.

 
you guys do realize that using PPG glosses over the fact that his style of play leads to more injuries - so he's much more likely to get injured - that has to be facorted in when you are discussing 1st round picks . . .

 
I think it was also a bad day for the Eagles offensive line, the offensive coordinator. Ever think of some quick passes before the blitz was on top of Vick?
seriously the run (rb runs/planned qb runs) to pass ratio must've been 3-1. what an awful gameplan for a team that has shown it can't stop the run, but has a fearsome passrush.
 
Mad he cost you a title?
Real life? Horrible game. Fantasy? Vick still put up 23 in my league and was again among the leaders at the qb position this week. This is another reason why Vick is the number 1 qb next year. His floor is high even when he plays terrible.
Apparently YOU have never had Vick on your fantasy squad before.
I guess you could cop out with 'he didn't play terrible at all this year"But other than the injury that put him out (at the half yd line I may add, that was damn close to being a 10.5 floor-- in about 1/4) in week 4 your arg falls pretty flat

Code:
Wk	Date	Opp	Comp-Att	Yds	TD-Int	Fum	Pts1	09/12/10	GB	16-24	175	1-0	0	23.052	09/19/10	@DET	21-34	284	2-0	0	25.93	09/26/10	@JAC	17-31	291	3-0	0	35.554	10/03/10	WAS	5-7	49	0-0	0	4.155*	10/10/10	@SF	-	-	-	-	-6*	10/17/10	ATL	-	-	-	-	-7*	10/24/10	@TEN	-	-	-	-	-8	BYE9	11/07/10	IND	17-29	218	1-0	0	28.310	11/15/10	@WAS	20-28	333	4-0	0	52.6511	11/21/10	NYG	24-38	258	0-0	1	24.312	11/28/10	@CHI	29-44	333	2-1	0	28.0513	12/02/10	HOU	22-33	302	2-1	0	32.914	12/12/10	@DAL	16-26	270	2-2	0	27.115	12/19/10	@NYG	21-35	242	3-1	0	42.116	12/28/10	MIN	25-43	263	1-1	2	28.4517	01/02/11 4:15pm
 
Last edited by a moderator:
you guys do realize that using PPG glosses over the fact that his style of play leads to more injuries - so he's much more likely to get injured - that has to be facorted in when you are discussing 1st round picks . . .
true dat. but when you can get a backup in the 17-18th round or 14th if you really wanna ensure no one snakes you, who can put up 70% of his astronomical numbers (low-normal qb1 at best/high qb2 at worst) it makes it that much of a no brainer. Depending on bye weeks (ie if eagles get bye week 9 or 10) I could see just going vick 1.1, kolb 14 and not having another backup qb (pick up one of the backups of the guys who get killed in the middle of the tear e.g kitna/stanton/hill/flynn etc)But that's a fine risk when the upside inlcudes rushing #'s like he is putting up.573 rushing and 9 tds in the better part of 11 games.even if the same thing happens again. I think the year end totals of 12 games of vick and 5 games of kolb > than any other qb tandem out there (and with a much worse backup option in almost every respect)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
He was Vick just being Vick. Did anybody really think the way he was playing was going to last.
So who was Vick being in all those great games he played this year?
All the Vick haters have been waiting ALL SEASON for a game like this. Let them have their moment.
Oh, and that's fine. If they want to say he played poorly last night, that's one thing. But to make a stupid statement like 'this was Vick being Vick' when he has been in everyone's MVP discussions all season just makes the dude look like he's clueless about football. I try to help the less knowledgable out. :towelwave:
 
I thought it was a pretty gutless performance. Once he got rattled, the tires came off pretty quickly. You just don't see that type of mental weakness from Brady. It is laughable how people were saying he was a legit MVP candidate. He's a good player while the team is ahead, but a little adversity pulls back the veneer pretty quickly.
Is that what happened during the 4th quarter of the Giants game? Seriously, I am not a Vick fan, but this statement :lol:
I actually missed it. I had my kids Christmas program at church. So I can't comment on it. I didn't see any guts at all last night though.
What were you doing with your kids when they came from behind to beat the Texans and Cowboys the 2 weeks prior to the Giants comeback?
 
My leagues scoring:

Week Date Opp Status Fan Pts

1 Sep 12 GB L, 27-20 21

2 Sep 19 @Det W, 35-32 22

3 Sep 26 @Jac W, 28-3 32

4 Oct 3 Was L, 17-12 2 (11 Minutes/injured)

5 Oct 10 @SF W, 27-24 0 (injured)

6 Oct 17 Atl W, 31-17 0 (injured)

7 Oct 24 @Ten L, 37-19 0 (injured)

9 Nov 7 Ind W, 26-24 25

10 Nov 15 @Was W, 59-28 49

11 Nov 21 NYG W, 27-17 21

12 Nov 28 @Chi L, 31-26 25

13 Dec 2 Hou W, 34-24 30

14 Dec 12 @Dal W, 30-27 25

15 Dec 19 @NYG W, 38-31 40

16 Dec 28 Min L, 24-14 26

I will not count week 4 when Vick got injured (don't know what he would have wound up with & I can)

QBs season ave:

Vick 28.7

Rodgers 21.5

Brees 18.75

RBs season ave:

Foster 19

Peterson 17

McFadden 16

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I thought it was a pretty gutless performance. Once he got rattled, the tires came off pretty quickly. You just don't see that type of mental weakness from Brady. It is laughable how people were saying he was a legit MVP candidate. He's a good player while the team is ahead, but a little adversity pulls back the veneer pretty quickly.
Is that what happened during the 4th quarter of the Giants game? Seriously, I am not a Vick fan, but this statement :thumbdown:
I actually missed it. I had my kids Christmas program at church. So I can't comment on it. I didn't see any guts at all last night though.
You should go watch that Giants game on Replay or something. Maybe the greatest comeback performance I've seen out of a QB.You know what I love: Vick had a horrible game, turned the ball over three times, and put up high QB1 numbers. Who does that? And even if the Vikings had picked off three more passes, he still puts up mid-to-low QB1 numbers, with SIX turnovers. Is this guy the number one pick next year or just top 5?
 
Didn't see the entire press conference, but Reid took responsibility for not having his players ready to go. Sometimes, you have to give credit to the other guys - which Reid did.
LOLReid does this EVERY SINGLE PRESS CONFERENCE.Its why many fans and media members dislike him. He gives the same bull#### responses after every loss.Never any details, never any emotion. Just "ill take responsibility, next week we will be better, hats off to the opponent, blahblahblah"
 
Didn't see the entire press conference, but Reid took responsibility for not having his players ready to go. Sometimes, you have to give credit to the other guys - which Reid did.
LOLReid does this EVERY SINGLE PRESS CONFERENCE.Its why many fans and media members dislike him. He gives the same bull#### responses after every loss.Never any details, never any emotion. Just "ill take responsibility, next week we will be better, hats off to the opponent, blahblahblah"
So does Belichick and they are probably the two most consistantly successful coaches in the NFL over the last decade. Jim Mora Sr. gave great press conferences. So did Jerry Glanville. But they sucked as coaches.
 
I thought it was a pretty gutless performance. Once he got rattled, the tires came off pretty quickly. You just don't see that type of mental weakness from Brady. It is laughable how people were saying he was a legit MVP candidate. He's a good player while the team is ahead, but a little adversity pulls back the veneer pretty quickly.
Is that what happened during the 4th quarter of the Giants game? Seriously, I am not a Vick fan, but this statement :excited:
I actually missed it. I had my kids Christmas program at church. So I can't comment on it. I didn't see any guts at all last night though.
What were you doing with your kids when they came from behind to beat the Texans and Cowboys the 2 weeks prior to the Giants comeback?
Where was this magic last night? He's whipped. He's all done. Midnight Cinderella.
 
Sabertooth said:
Sludge said:
Sabertooth said:
MikeDoherty said:
Sabertooth said:
I thought it was a pretty gutless performance. Once he got rattled, the tires came off pretty quickly. You just don't see that type of mental weakness from Brady. It is laughable how people were saying he was a legit MVP candidate. He's a good player while the team is ahead, but a little adversity pulls back the veneer pretty quickly.
Is that what happened during the 4th quarter of the Giants game? Seriously, I am not a Vick fan, but this statement :tumbleweed:
I actually missed it. I had my kids Christmas program at church. So I can't comment on it. I didn't see any guts at all last night though.
What were you doing with your kids when they came from behind to beat the Texans and Cowboys the 2 weeks prior to the Giants comeback?
Where was this magic last night? He's whipped. He's all done. Midnight Cinderella.
Isn't it just more likely that he and the rest of the team suffered an emotional letdown the week after playing their bitter rival for the division and logging an unbelievable fourth quarter comeback?
 
duaneok66 said:
thehornet said:
it's clear some didnt watch the game. sure it wasn;t his sharpest game, but it was a long way from being his fault. the eagles were outschemed and the o-line was manhandled all night. andy reid didnt adjust to the corner blitzes and vick was getting destroyed. he literally had no chance most of the game. as soon as he dropped back there was someone coming at him. even in the gun he had 3 men baring down immediately. djax didnt even have a chance to run his routes fully.
it was a bad game - please quit making excuses . . . the OL stunk but Vick had his share in the bad performance of the Eagles offense . . .
huh excuses? I am a Pats and Niners fan. I dont even care. I have Vick in fantasy and he had a really good game.
 
duaneok66 said:
thehornet said:
it's clear some didnt watch the game. sure it wasn;t his sharpest game, but it was a long way from being his fault. the eagles were outschemed and the o-line was manhandled all night. andy reid didnt adjust to the corner blitzes and vick was getting destroyed. he literally had no chance most of the game. as soon as he dropped back there was someone coming at him. even in the gun he had 3 men baring down immediately. djax didnt even have a chance to run his routes fully.
it was a bad game - please quit making excuses . . . the OL stunk but Vick had his share in the bad performance of the Eagles offense . . .
huh excuses? I am a Pats and Niners fan. I dont even care. I have Vick in fantasy and he had a really good game.
a good fantasy game but not a good game for the Eagles - we weren't even dicussing fantasy numbers . . .
 
Sabertooth said:
Where was this magic last night? He's whipped. He's all done. Midnight Cinderella.
Isn't it just more likely that he and the rest of the team suffered an emotional letdown the week after playing their bitter rival for the division and logging an unbelievable fourth quarter comeback?
Maybe. We'll see this weekend.
 
Sabertooth said:
Where was this magic last night? He's whipped. He's all done. Midnight Cinderella.
Isn't it just more likely that he and the rest of the team suffered an emotional letdown the week after playing their bitter rival for the division and logging an unbelievable fourth quarter comeback?
Don't bother trying to reason with him. He thinks one bad game erases an MVP type season. lol. He's obviously bitter about Vick's success this season.
 
duaneok66 said:
thehornet said:
it's clear some didnt watch the game. sure it wasn;t his sharpest game, but it was a long way from being his fault. the eagles were outschemed and the o-line was manhandled all night. andy reid didnt adjust to the corner blitzes and vick was getting destroyed. he literally had no chance most of the game. as soon as he dropped back there was someone coming at him. even in the gun he had 3 men baring down immediately. djax didnt even have a chance to run his routes fully.
it was a bad game - please quit making excuses . . . the OL stunk but Vick had his share in the bad performance of the Eagles offense . . .
huh excuses? I am a Pats and Niners fan. I dont even care. I have Vick in fantasy and he had a really good game.
a good fantasy game but not a good game for the Eagles - we weren't even dicussing fantasy numbers . . .
and that's why i said he wasn't sharp.
 
Sabertooth said:
Where was this magic last night? He's whipped. He's all done. Midnight Cinderella.
Isn't it just more likely that he and the rest of the team suffered an emotional letdown the week after playing their bitter rival for the division and logging an unbelievable fourth quarter comeback?
Don't bother trying to reason with him. He thinks one bad game erases an MVP type season. lol. He's obviously bitter about Vick's success this season.
No, I don't think that. We'll revisit this when he flounders in the playoffs.
 
atl3695 said:
DarkManX said:
Mad he cost you a title?
Real life? Horrible game. Fantasy? Vick still put up 23 in my league and was again among the leaders at the qb position this week. This is another reason why Vick is the number 1 qb next year. His floor is high even when he plays terrible.
i finished watching the game saying "man, that was vicks worse game so far". i go check his ff numbers and he still puts up 26 points.i locked him into my 1.1 for next year after that
 
Sabertooth said:
Where was this magic last night? He's whipped. He's all done. Midnight Cinderella.
Isn't it just more likely that he and the rest of the team suffered an emotional letdown the week after playing their bitter rival for the division and logging an unbelievable fourth quarter comeback?
Don't bother trying to reason with him. He thinks one bad game erases an MVP type season. lol. He's obviously bitter about Vick's success this season.
No, I don't think that. We'll revisit this when he flounders in the playoffs.
And what difference will that make? Still doesn't erase anything he's accomplished this year. Philly was picked third in their division by most people. I'd be surprised if they win a playoff game. Vick almost single-handedly got them in. Doubt they'd have done it with Kolb. This was supposed to be a rebuilding year.You made a stupid statement and have spent the rest of this thread back pedaling. You said Vick only does well when Philly's ahead. You were given three examples that prove how wrong you are.
 
BusterTBronco said:
It's called Karma. The Eagles did not want Vick playing in a blizzard on Sunday night and got the NFL to move the game to Tuesday. The football gods were not pleased. Hence, last night's stinker.
You need to get over itOh and its funny how fast you can spot the Vick haters.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
BusterTBronco said:
It's called Karma. The Eagles did not want Vick playing in a blizzard on Sunday night and got the NFL to move the game to Tuesday. The football gods were not pleased. Hence, last night's stinker.
You need to get over itOh and its funny how fast you can spot the Vick haters.
The postponment means the Eagles play 3 games in twelve days, including their first playoff game. Plus it gave Adrian Peterson two more days to get healthy. Please tell me that there aren't people who think the Eagles' wanted that game pushed back. :link: I know there are some extremely unintelligent people here, but come on. Use common sense.
 
Sabertooth said:
Where was this magic last night? He's whipped. He's all done. Midnight Cinderella.
Isn't it just more likely that he and the rest of the team suffered an emotional letdown the week after playing their bitter rival for the division and logging an unbelievable fourth quarter comeback?
Don't bother trying to reason with him. He thinks one bad game erases an MVP type season. lol. He's obviously bitter about Vick's success this season.
No, I don't think that. We'll revisit this when he flounders in the playoffs.
And what difference will that make? Still doesn't erase anything he's accomplished this year. Philly was picked third in their division by most people. I'd be surprised if they win a playoff game. Vick almost single-handedly got them in. Doubt they'd have done it with Kolb. This was supposed to be a rebuilding year.You made a stupid statement and have spent the rest of this thread back pedaling. You said Vick only does well when Philly's ahead. You were given three examples that prove how wrong you are.
Go back and read what I wrote. That he came back against three teams that are in shambles and are replacing their coaches most likely doesn't change that. He reverts to his old habits when the chips are down. He's a frontrunner. He's pretty gutless when the chips are down.
 
atl3695 said:
DarkManX said:
Mad he cost you a title?
Real life? Horrible game. Fantasy? Vick still put up 23 in my league and was again among the leaders at the qb position this week. This is another reason why Vick is the number 1 qb next year. His floor is high even when he plays terrible.
Agreed. Watching that game, you'd have never guessed that Vick still put up very good fantasy numbers. 3 turnovers, and still over 23 points...
 
BusterTBronco said:
How about YOU use common sense? Everyone knows that bad weather is the great equalizer. It takes away the advantage of athleticism. I am sure that the Eagles thought (and rightly so) that Vick would not have a good game in a snowstorm. And if the Eagles had won last night, they would likely have a first round bye (oops! your theory of 3 games in 12 days just went out the window!)
Actually the Bears would still be the 2 seed whether the Eagles won or lost, as they beat the Eagles earlier this season, so I'm not sure how you reach your conclusion there. And Vick wouldn't be good in the snow? This is based on what, that he put up 49 in the rain against Wash or 38 in the rain against NY? That was the game I was looking most forward to, Vick in the snow. I thought he might just go crazy in those conditions. I seem to recall Brady, Moss, and Chris Johnson all having pretty big days in that snowstorm in NE last year. Funny how you and I see it totally opposite. I'm pretty sure the Eagles wanted to play on Sunday.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
duaneok66 said:
you guys do realize that using PPG glosses over the fact that his style of play leads to more injuries - so he's much more likely to get injured - that has to be facorted in when you are discussing 1st round picks . . .
Even using total points, Vick is still #1 overall in my league. :thumbup:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
BusterTBronco said:
How about YOU use common sense? Everyone knows that bad weather is the great equalizer. It takes away the advantage of athleticism. I am sure that the Eagles thought (and rightly so) that Vick would not have a good game in a snowstorm. And if the Eagles had won last night, they would likely have a first round bye (oops! your theory of 3 games in 12 days just went out the window!)
Actually the Bears would still be the 2 seed whether the Eagles won or lost, as they beat the Eagles earlier this season, so I'm not sure how you reach your conclusion there. And Vick wouldn't be good in the snow? This is based on what, that he put up 49 in the rain against Wash or 38 in the rain against NY? That was the game I was looking most forward to, Vick in the snow. I thought he might just go crazy in those conditions. I seem to recall Brady, Moss, and Chris Johnson all having pretty big days in that snowstorm in NE last year. Funny how you and I see it totally opposite. I'm pretty sure the Eagles wanted to play on Sunday.
You can also look at a certain playoff game in Lambeau in the snow that Vick lead the Falcons to victory in 2002. This ended the Packers undefeated record at Lambeau in the playoffs.

 
BusterTBronco said:
How about YOU use common sense? Everyone knows that bad weather is the great equalizer. It takes away the advantage of athleticism. I am sure that the Eagles thought (and rightly so) that Vick would not have a good game in a snowstorm. And if the Eagles had won last night, they would likely have a first round bye (oops! your theory of 3 games in 12 days just went out the window!)
Actually the Bears would still be the 2 seed whether the Eagles won or lost, as they beat the Eagles earlier this season, so I'm not sure how you reach your conclusion there. And Vick wouldn't be good in the snow? This is based on what, that he put up 49 in the rain against Wash or 38 in the rain against NY? That was the game I was looking most forward to, Vick in the snow. I thought he might just go crazy in those conditions. I seem to recall Brady, Moss, and Chris Johnson all having pretty big days in that snowstorm in NE last year. Funny how you and I see it totally opposite. I'm pretty sure the Eagles wanted to play on Sunday.
You can also look at a certain playoff game in Lambeau in the snow that Vick lead the Falcons to victory in 2002. This ended the Packers undefeated record at Lambeau in the playoffs.
I can see why playoff scenerios would be a foreign language to "Buster Bronco". (Oops. There goes your credibility.)
 
I absolutely despised Vick as a player (well his former self). I will fully admit that there is no way that I would have thought Vick would do what he did this year.

I am still wanting to see the consistency first and some playoff success before I annoint him into the upper echelon of qb's going forward. The one thing that Vick needed for his game to make the jump into an elite player was being able to become a some what adequate pocket passer to go along with his crazy athetlicisim. It appears he is well on his way to doing so.

As of right now I am cautiously saying that he is going to be very good going forward. And maybe I am just being a little bit hard on a guy I used to hate, by not thinking he has already made the proper adjustments to his game to become elite.

 
BusterTBronco said:
BusterTBronco said:
How about YOU use common sense? Everyone knows that bad weather is the great equalizer. It takes away the advantage of athleticism. I am sure that the Eagles thought (and rightly so) that Vick would not have a good game in a snowstorm. And if the Eagles had won last night, they would likely have a first round bye (oops! your theory of 3 games in 12 days just went out the window!)
Actually the Bears would still be the 2 seed whether the Eagles won or lost, as they beat the Eagles earlier this season, so I'm not sure how you reach your conclusion there. And Vick wouldn't be good in the snow? This is based on what, that he put up 49 in the rain against Wash or 38 in the rain against NY? That was the game I was looking most forward to, Vick in the snow. I thought he might just go crazy in those conditions. I seem to recall Brady, Moss, and Chris Johnson all having pretty big days in that snowstorm in NE last year. Funny how you and I see it totally opposite. I'm pretty sure the Eagles wanted to play on Sunday.
You can also look at a certain playoff game in Lambeau in the snow that Vick lead the Falcons to victory in 2002. This ended the Packers undefeated record at Lambeau in the playoffs.
I can see why playoff scenerios would be a foreign language to "Buster Bronco". (Oops. There goes your credibility.)
Green Bay > Chicago

Philadelphia > Dallas

If Philadelphia had beaten Minnesota and the above holds true, the Eagles would have had a first round bye. It is unfortunate that I have to waste my time explaining these things to you.
Week 3 and overall record says different, but believe what you want.
 
BusterTBronco said:
BusterTBronco said:
How about YOU use common sense? Everyone knows that bad weather is the great equalizer. It takes away the advantage of athleticism. I am sure that the Eagles thought (and rightly so) that Vick would not have a good game in a snowstorm. And if the Eagles had won last night, they would likely have a first round bye (oops! your theory of 3 games in 12 days just went out the window!)
Actually the Bears would still be the 2 seed whether the Eagles won or lost, as they beat the Eagles earlier this season, so I'm not sure how you reach your conclusion there. And Vick wouldn't be good in the snow? This is based on what, that he put up 49 in the rain against Wash or 38 in the rain against NY? That was the game I was looking most forward to, Vick in the snow. I thought he might just go crazy in those conditions. I seem to recall Brady, Moss, and Chris Johnson all having pretty big days in that snowstorm in NE last year. Funny how you and I see it totally opposite. I'm pretty sure the Eagles wanted to play on Sunday.
You can also look at a certain playoff game in Lambeau in the snow that Vick lead the Falcons to victory in 2002. This ended the Packers undefeated record at Lambeau in the playoffs.
I can see why playoff scenerios would be a foreign language to "Buster Bronco". (Oops. There goes your credibility.)
Green Bay > ChicagoPhiladelphia > Dallas

If Philadelphia had beaten Minnesota and the above holds true, the Eagles would have had a first round bye. It is unfortunate that I have to waste my time explaining these things to you.
Enjoy watching the Eagles in the playoffs. Maybe you can call some Bronco players to come over. They're free. You're dodging the issue, slim. The Eagles did not benefit from having the two extra days. And the person who knows where he's going (ie the ball carrier) has the advantage in slippery conditions. For you to think the Eagles didn't want to play in the snow because of Vick just shows how clueless you are.

 
BusterTBronco said:
benson_will_lead_the_way said:
BusterTBronco said:


Green Bay > Chicago

Philadelphia > Dallas

If Philadelphia had beaten Minnesota and the above holds true, the Eagles would have had a first round bye. It is unfortunate that I have to waste my time explaining these things to you.
Week 3 and overall record says different, but believe what you want.
I guess that explains why Vegas has Green Bay as a 10 point favorite this week. Everyone knows that Green Bay is the better team and Chicago ain't nuttin but a pretender. In fact, I am going to thoroughly enjoy watching Green Bay beat the crap outta those snow averse Eagles in round 1.
isnt Chicago assured of a 2 seed - why would they bother showing up??

 
BusterTBronco said:
BusterTBronco said:
benson_will_lead_the_way said:
BusterTBronco said:


Green Bay > Chicago

Philadelphia > Dallas

If Philadelphia had beaten Minnesota and the above holds true, the Eagles would have had a first round bye. It is unfortunate that I have to waste my time explaining these things to you.
Week 3 and overall record says different, but believe what you want.
I guess that explains why Vegas has Green Bay as a 10 point favorite this week. Everyone knows that Green Bay is the better team and Chicago ain't nuttin but a pretender. In fact, I am going to thoroughly enjoy watching Green Bay beat the crap outta those snow averse Eagles in round 1.
isnt Chicago assured of a 2 seed - why would they bother showing up??
They wouldn't. No pride. (No talent, either)
wow . . . I see you glossed over the fact that GB lost to Chicago earlier this season . . .

 
Topes said:
eddy13 said:
He could of had 3 or 4 picks in that game his accuracy was all over the place,
While this is most certainly true, by the end of the game (though' it's could have or could've), Collinsworth twice said that he should have three picks by now after his third trow directly to a Vikes defender. Now, as two of those were on the same drive (back to back plays), only one could have been a pick.Yet, by the end of the game, he certainly should have (not should of) had 3 or 4 picks.

Poor NFL game. He was just off his game. They were playing to have a shot at a bye, so I'm surprised how flat he was.

Still not a bad fantasy line, though.
I felt compelled to point out your misspelling after the English teacher-like reply of yours. :lmao:
 
The Vikings made the blue print on how to beat Vick. Rush him hard and hit him on every possible play, sure he burn you for a play or two, but the hits take their toll on big Mike, and it showed in the fourth quarter. I sure all the NFC play off teams took note of what an old/average Viking defense did to Vick, hit hard every play will be the game plan going forward, and have your d rush to the max.

I shutter to think what the Saints defense would do to Vick with the type of hits they put out last year in the NFC championship game.

 
BusterTBronco said:
wow . . . I see you glossed over the fact that GB lost to Chicago earlier this season . . .
Oh, you mean that game where the officials called 18 penalties on Green Bay and Chicago still barely managed to win? I don't think anyone in their right mind who watched that game thinks that Chicago is a better team than Green Bay.
of course you would have an excuse - I'd love you to explain how Green Bay lost to Miami and Detroit . . .
 
BusterTBronco said:
benson_will_lead_the_way said:
BusterTBronco said:


Green Bay > Chicago

Philadelphia > Dallas

If Philadelphia had beaten Minnesota and the above holds true, the Eagles would have had a first round bye. It is unfortunate that I have to waste my time explaining these things to you.
Week 3 and overall record says different, but believe what you want.
I guess that explains why Vegas has Green Bay as a 10 point favorite this week. Everyone knows that Green Bay is the better team and Chicago ain't nuttin but a pretender. In fact, I am going to thoroughly enjoy watching Green Bay beat the crap outta those snow averse Eagles in round 1.
I find it interesting that all 3 other teams listed in your post above were beaten by the Bears this year. A sure sign that the Bears are the worst of the lot :shrug:
 
The Vikings made the blue print on how to beat Vick. Rush him hard and hit him on every possible play, sure he burn you for a play or two, but the hits take their toll on big Mike, and it showed in the fourth quarter. I sure all the NFC play off teams took note of what an old/average Viking defense did to Vick, hit hard every play will be the game plan going forward, and have your d rush to the max.

I shutter to think what the Saints defense would do to Vick with the type of hits they put out last year in the NFC championship game.
Vick spent time in prison- I'll guarantee he hates when this happens...
 
BusterTBronco said:
BusterTBronco said:
benson_will_lead_the_way said:
BusterTBronco said:


Green Bay > Chicago

Philadelphia > Dallas

If Philadelphia had beaten Minnesota and the above holds true, the Eagles would have had a first round bye. It is unfortunate that I have to waste my time explaining these things to you.
Week 3 and overall record says different, but believe what you want.
I guess that explains why Vegas has Green Bay as a 10 point favorite this week. Everyone knows that Green Bay is the better team and Chicago ain't nuttin but a pretender. In fact, I am going to thoroughly enjoy watching Green Bay beat the crap outta those snow averse Eagles in round 1.
I find it interesting that all 3 other teams listed in your post above were beaten by the Bears this year. A sure sign that the Bears are the worst of the lot :sadbanana:
The Bears are living proof that it is better to be lucky than good. They are the worst 11-4 team in NFL history. Only the 15th best team in the league according to Football Outsiders DVOA.
I sense much hatred in you my young padawan :grad:
 
BusterTBronco said:
wow . . . I see you glossed over the fact that GB lost to Chicago earlier this season . . .
Oh, you mean that game where the officials called 18 penalties on Green Bay and Chicago still barely managed to win? I don't think anyone in their right mind who watched that game thinks that Chicago is a better team than Green Bay.
of course you would have an excuse - I'd love you to explain how Green Bay lost to Miami and Detroit . . .
:grad: But don't forget they also lost to Washington! If anybody is a pretender, it's Green Bay.
 
BusterTBronco said:
wow . . . I see you glossed over the fact that GB lost to Chicago earlier this season . . .
Oh, you mean that game where the officials called 18 penalties on Green Bay and Chicago still barely managed to win? I don't think anyone in their right mind who watched that game thinks that Chicago is a better team than Green Bay.
of course you would have an excuse - I'd love you to explain how Green Bay lost to Miami and Detroit . . .
:cry: But don't forget they also lost to Washington! If anybody is a pretender, it's Green Bay.
This is all you have left Scotty. Your team is a shambles. Your bravado proven false. You got nothing left but your hate. Which is all you ever had in the first place. Enjoy watching the playoffs when two teams from your division are playing and you are home in your purple Favre jersey eating Lutefisk. It's been great watching the Vikings crumble like the house of cards they always were. That Dallas imploded as well this season after facing the force of nature that is the Green Bay Packers is just icing on the cake.
 
BusterTBronco said:
BusterTBronco said:
benson_will_lead_the_way said:
BusterTBronco said:


Green Bay > Chicago

Philadelphia > Dallas

If Philadelphia had beaten Minnesota and the above holds true, the Eagles would have had a first round bye. It is unfortunate that I have to waste my time explaining these things to you.
Week 3 and overall record says different, but believe what you want.
I guess that explains why Vegas has Green Bay as a 10 point favorite this week. Everyone knows that Green Bay is the better team and Chicago ain't nuttin but a pretender. In fact, I am going to thoroughly enjoy watching Green Bay beat the crap outta those snow averse Eagles in round 1.
isnt Chicago assured of a 2 seed - why would they bother showing up??
They wouldn't. No pride. (No talent, either)
You talk a lot of smack for a fan of a team that didn't even sniff the playoffs. Is that your strategy every year? Root for a terrible team then talk badly of a bunch of playoff teams that left yours in the dust? LOL. Gotta love simpletons. :confused:
 
BusterTBronco said:
BusterTBronco said:
benson_will_lead_the_way said:
BusterTBronco said:


Green Bay > Chicago

Philadelphia > Dallas

If Philadelphia had beaten Minnesota and the above holds true, the Eagles would have had a first round bye. It is unfortunate that I have to waste my time explaining these things to you.
Week 3 and overall record says different, but believe what you want.
I guess that explains why Vegas has Green Bay as a 10 point favorite this week. Everyone knows that Green Bay is the better team and Chicago ain't nuttin but a pretender. In fact, I am going to thoroughly enjoy watching Green Bay beat the crap outta those snow averse Eagles in round 1.
I find it interesting that all 3 other teams listed in your post above were beaten by the Bears this year. A sure sign that the Bears are the worst of the lot :ptts:
The Bears are living proof that it is better to be lucky than good. They are the worst 11-4 team in NFL history. Only the 15th best team in the league according to Football Outsiders DVOA.
Great link. I hear the NFL is considering throwing out the records next season and going by some website's secret formula to determine playoff teams. :thumbdown: By the way, how do your mighty Broncos fare according to the magic rating system? :no:

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top