Marc Levin
Hangs out with Oscar Zeta Acosta
disagree - fair trade for both sides.
Fair enough. I was exaggerating a little but he had 150 targets last year and that'll be a pretty nice thing to take off my bench in a few weeks if he gets healthy...better than the 3-5 an unhealthy Smith with a lingreing injury might see.ready to get 15+ targets per game when he returns.Considering he had one game of 15 targets and one game of 20 last year (the only two times he has ever had 15 targets in any games in his career) I think you are shooting a little high.
He averaged under 10 per gam in 2005, so hoping for 10 targets per game is the high side.
And who exactly is going to take the SSmith injury risk and give you one of those players? Nobody.I'm thinking the key will be this week and the W-L records of the teams involved. Teams that are 2-0 will not move Smith. Teams that are 0-2 will have more incentive if Smith's next playdate isn't published.I'm hoping to trade RMoss, or LColes, or Burress for SSmith to an 0-2 team next week.If I could get another top tier WR for him (like CJ, Fitz, Boldin, Harrison) I'd probably do it.
Yup.Marc Levin said:disagree - fair trade for both sides.
I'm actually pleased that he is being prudent about this injury. Moss and Horn both struggled with hammys all last year because they wouldn't stay off the field. He will be a monster when he comes back, provided he is healthy. I just don't want this to linger all year.tombonneau said:I'm pretty sure I could get Smith in my league for a pretty good value, but I'm actually hesitant to make the move with him injuring *both* hammys.How are Steve Smith owners currently feeling? You obviously all paid a premium for the guy, so I can understand a reluctance to part with him. But going on 2 weeks with no output, how long before you cut bait and make him "someone else's problem."Just wondering the mood of the masses.What would it take to move him at this point? Or are you actively shopping?
There is a difference in motivation and conditioning. Smith could be hobbled if he tries to come back to soon. I think Moss is lazy and not in top condition. He's been getting by on his athletic ability. I think they are different types of athletes.davearm said:Kiddnets said:I'm kickingmyself for drafting him over Holt and TO. The warning signs were all there and I ignored them. Hammys are brutal on WRs - they can certainly linger all season. I actually hope he sits out a few weeks and comes back 100% than hobble around out there and have no value the entire season.JMHO, but those expecting Smith to be back to normal in a week or two are setting yourselves up for a disappointment, and weekly frustration.Smith *could* come back strong. Or, he could hobble along all year and finish WR20ish.Just ask the Moss owners from last year, who managed to finish WR17 in 2005, thanks to a meaningless wk17 blowup. When it counted, Moss averaged about 6 ppg from weeks 6 to 16 after getting dinged... good enough to where you can't risk benching him and missing a 140/2 game, but bad enough that you've got a WR on the bench outscoring him most weeks.Smith looks like he could very well be on the same road in 2006.
Agreed. This is why the better course for Smith owners who can wait should hope that he doesn't come back until healthy. If he misses 3 or 4 games, he won't finish with 150 targets, but if still got the same numer of targets per game upon his return he would be top 5 going forward. I'd be happy to have that from my 3rd rounder--though I realize many folks got him in the second though and want that production now since they could have had Holt, TO or maybe CJ when they picked him in the second.Marc Levin said:agreed - just recall that 160 targets in a year (10 per game) is a LOT of targets. And any receiver with that many targets should be a top-5 fantasy WR.
Right. But I am a Steve Smith owner and was giving my input as the original poster asked. So, if the Smith owner in your league is like me, he's not ready to give his likely 2nd round choice up for 3rd - 4th round talent after just one week. I still insist that when the guy is on the field he is top 3 and I'm not ready to give up on him after one week. If I go 0-2, my thinking is that I need to put a ton of wins together and trading for mediocre production may not help me. Frankly, if I have a bad record, I'm more open to getting risk-reward guys like Smith, Portis, Foster, and Moss.inca911 said:And who exactly is going to take the SSmith injury risk and give you one of those players? Nobody.I'm thinking the key will be this week and the W-L records of the teams involved. Teams that are 2-0 will not move Smith. Teams that are 0-2 will have more incentive if Smith's next playdate isn't published.I'm hoping to trade RMoss, or LColes, or Burress for SSmith to an 0-2 team next week.Woz said:If I could get another top tier WR for him (like CJ, Fitz, Boldin, Harrison) I'd probably do it.
eli or peyton? either way it was a bad deal thoughHue G said:Just trades Smth, Delhomme, and Dillon and I got Manning and Javon Walker.![]()
![]()
I could get Hines Ward for him right now - holding off - gonna see if I can hold out a few weeks. I like the way they are not rushing him back - I think there is a chance that he could be the old SS by week 5 or 6 and that is worth way more than Hines.....as long as I am not out of it by then!!! With R Moss, S Moss and D Jax I have the luxury of good backups. If I didn't I would probably make a deal
I would love to have him in my lineup but I think most SS owners would be pretty happy to have options like the Moss Bros and D Jax. Reading some threads today desperation is setting in - I should be ablr to hold the fort with these guys. Is H Ward really that much better? I'd rather gamble on SS returning. Of course, I may gamble my way to an 0-5 record by the time he does return!I could get Hines Ward for him right now - holding off - gonna see if I can hold out a few weeks. I like the way they are not rushing him back - I think there is a chance that he could be the old SS by week 5 or 6 and that is worth way more than Hines.....as long as I am not out of it by then!!! With R Moss, S Moss and D Jax I have the luxury of good backups. If I didn't I would probably make a dealwhat no Sinorice Moss..you have the other two..as for good backups yes they are but then again OAKLAND???R.Moss is not going to do good with Brooks at QB and Washington sch is not a cake walk..as for D jax..hmmm seems ok now..but the ijuries do linger on and with Branch in there in week 3..you better hope Smith gets well and FAST!!!
![]()