JohnnyU
Footballguy
I got what ended up being the 2.01 for Sutton and I’m ecstatic.Juedy hasn’t done anything for one. It’s the off-season for a second thing and no one knows who the qb is. I offered a 2nd in season for Sutton and was denied.
I got what ended up being the 2.01 for Sutton and I’m ecstatic.Juedy hasn’t done anything for one. It’s the off-season for a second thing and no one knows who the qb is. I offered a 2nd in season for Sutton and was denied.
The other owner places very low values on QBs and is surprised that he can't get trades done. He posted in the league chat during the season that he offered a 2nd for Lawrence and a 4th for Wentz and couldn't believe that neither were accepted and then that he was glad that his "offer" for Lawrence wasn't accepted.Counter for a 1st. After all, that is a SF, where QBs cost you an arm and a leg.
That's cool if you are, but I wouldn't be. As someone who acquired the 2.01 in 2 leagues this past year, I landed Michael Carter and Terrace Marshall. I wouldn't trade Sutton for either at this point.I got what ended up being the 2.01 for Sutton and I’m ecstatic.
I would for Michael Carter.That's cool if you are, but I wouldn't be. As someone who acquired the 2.01 in 2 leagues this past year, I landed Michael Carter and Terrace Marshall. I wouldn't trade Sutton for either at this point.
I got Daniel Jones and the jury is out...SF, so he's a hold for at least 1 more season. Sigh.I got what ended up being the 2.01 for Sutton and I’m ecstatic.
I'd pay that for Deebo.Zealot PPR league
1.08 2.08 and a 3rd in '23 for Deebo
That’s…less than a good offer.New MFL league year brings this doozy in a TE Premium PPR:
I give: 1.01, Renfro, St Brown and Freiermuth
I get: CEH, 1.10 and 2023 2nd
  A-men brother Bill.You guys gotta stop using these calculators.
I am seeing far too many horrible trades where people say it's close on their calculator.
I have never seen a calculator that is even remotely close to valuing guys accurately.ghostguy123 said:You guys gotta stop using these calculators.
I am seeing far too many horrible trades where people say it's close on their calculator.
Uh, wut?ghostguy123 said:You guys gotta stop using these calculators.
I am seeing far too many horrible trades where people say it's close on their calculator.
 I have. Many many many times.I have never seen a calculator that is even remotely close to valuing guys accurately.
This is so bad I’m convinced it has to be some sort of collusion.DexterDew said:New MFL league year brings this doozy in a TE Premium PPR:
I give: 1.01, Renfro, St Brown and Freiermuth
I get: CEH, 1.10 and 2023 2nd
Uh wut? I didnt quote you.Uh, wut?
I said it wasn’t remotely close on calculator.
417-260 is close?![]()
Forgot what thread I was in. I thought this was completed trades.This is so bad I’m convinced it has to be some sort of collusion.
Oh, ok. Came right on the heels of my posting a calculator comment so seemed like it was related.Uh wut? I didnt quote you.
It was a general comment
 Here’s the thing about trade calcs: if you have league-mates who use them religiously, you can take advantage in trades.
When dealing away my aging assets for my current rebuild, I got WAY better value than I expected because my trade partners used trade calcs.
They’re not completely accurate, no. But that’s a 2-way street that sometimes works to your favor.
ETA: I actually asked each of them which calc they used. I paid $10 for Dynasty Dominator. Was worth every penny to maximize those deals in my favor.
And I love them for that .Well yeah, calcs are for nothing more than taking advantage of bad owners who actually use them
 I love when someone sends and offer of five average players for one stud and uses the trade calculator numbers to justify how I'm getting more "points".ghostguy123 said:You guys gotta stop using these calculators.
I am seeing far too many horrible trades where people say it's close on their calculator.
OUCHLehigh98 said:Not the worst ever but keeping the thread going...
I give up:
Harris, Najee PIT RB
Waddle, Jaylen MIA WR
Year 2022 Draft Pick 2.03
Year 2022 Draft Pick 3.03
I receive:
Akers, Cam LAR RB
Edwards-Helaire, Clyde KCC RB
Brown, Marquise BAL WR
Classic case of let me give you my problem guys for your good guys.Not the worst ever but keeping the thread going...
I give up:
Harris, Najee PIT RB
Waddle, Jaylen MIA WR
Year 2022 Draft Pick 2.03
Year 2022 Draft Pick 3.03
I receive:
Akers, Cam LAR RB
Edwards-Helaire, Clyde KCC RB
Brown, Marquise BAL WR
That’s….not remotely close. Wow.14 team SF 1.5 TEP start 11
Give: Lance, 1.01
Get: Goff, M. Carter (RB-NYJ), 1.03
WOW... that is amazing! They could even consider that equitable? Did you counter asking if you needed to include your 1st Born in case they missed that part?New candidate:
FFPC SuperFlex
I give 1.02, Mitchell, 2023 2nd
I get Brady
Yes he holds some value now but get real.
Your should up your counter. Clearly you meant Mooney and the 2023 1st.14 team PPR SF 1.5 TEP start 11
Was offered: DJ Chark + 2023 2nd for E Moore
Countered with: Mooney + 2023 2nd for E Moore
Received counter of: DJ Chark + 2023 2nd for E Moore
I believe countering with the initial offer that was rejected belongs in this thread.C'mon man!
Maybe I should counter with my counter.![]()
You should absolutely counter with your same original counter.14 team PPR SF 1.5 TEP start 11
Was offered: DJ Chark + 2023 2nd for E Moore
Countered with: Mooney + 2023 2nd for E Moore
Received counter of: DJ Chark + 2023 2nd for E Moore
I believe countering with the initial offer that was rejected belongs in this thread.C'mon man!
Maybe I should counter with my counter.![]()
  WutDexterDew said:next offer is 2.08 for Higgins (who I put on the Trading Block to see what I might get)
his email explanation: I just thought if you wanted to move Higgins like you said that you might be willing to control the rookie you select![]()
Not that I'm saying you need to fight this person, but you may need to fight this person.DexterDew said:next offer is 2.08 for Higgins (who I put on the Trading Block to see what I might get)
his email explanation: I just thought if you wanted to move Higgins like you said that you might be willing to control the rookie you select![]()
I mean, they’re both old.Was offered Brady for Adams straight up. Logic in the comments was "Top QB for a top WR"
I resisted the urge to point out the flaws of the comment for dynasty
  True, but turning 45 during the season is older than turning 30 during the seasonI mean, they’re both old.![]()
Ran it through Dynasty Dominator & they gave the Brady side a 15% advantage.True, but turning 45 during the season is older than turning 30 during the season![]()
Note to self: Never consult Dynasty Dominator lolHot Sauce Guy said:Ran it through Dynasty Dominator & they gave the Brady side a 15% advantage.
Dynasty 101 heavily favors the Adams side.
I just did it for lol’s.Note to self: Never consult Dynasty Dominator lol
Only way I see doing that trade is a superflex and you want to win this year. Maybe if you have a terminal disease and know it will be your last season, then go for it.
But, I never use trade calculators so maybe I am off in some of my dynasty opinions. For me, the fun of FF is calculating value and trades myself. Have a friend who runs EVERYTHING through a trade calculator and accepts or declines based on that. Constantly complains FF isn't fun anymore.
Wow. I've been around this thread and these boards for a while, and that could be the flat worst I've seen.Parris Campbell/Robby Anderson for Deebo Samuel
If he throws in Marvin Jones, then maybe we have a dealWow. I've been around this thread and these boards for a while, and that could be the flat worst I've seen.
  Adams is 3rd round startup pick right now. Brady is like 11th.I just did it for lol’s.
i use calcs because a few league-mates do, and I’m able to occasionally get better deals as a result.
I could see doing the deal for Brady for a win-now team in either SF or 1-QB league. He’s old but he’s valuable so long as he’s a top QB.
At some point the wheels will fall off the bus, but I’m not sure the offer is bad enough for this topic either way.