What is the worst dynasty trade you have been offered? (6 Viewers)

[Hot Sauce Guy]

Definitely not the worst I've ever been offered, but woke up to this one today:
2023 late 2nd (favored to win in 2022)
2023 late 2nd (also a team favored to win in 2022)
Pickens

for

Tee Higgins.

Hardest of passes, but thank you for the offer.

 

[eighsse2]

Definitely not the worst I've ever been offered, but woke up to this one today:
2023 late 2nd (favored to win in 2022)
2023 late 2nd (also a team favored to win in 2022)
Pickens

for

Tee Higgins.

Hardest of passes, but thank you for the offer.

It's definitely a very bad one, but I will say, it's not quite up in the stratophere of insane offers. I mean, so much hype on Pickens, he could be hoping some people are crazy for him, and could be hoping to snag Higgins at value because "but Chaaase is gonna get allll the tarrrgets". Fairness-wise, horrible offer, but I guess it's somewhere in the ballpark of plausibility if he's hoping the guy on the other end is blinded by hype.

 

[3quinox825]

Just entered a league where someone offered me CEH for JT. PPR Dynasty

 

[Hot Sauce Guy]

Fairness-wise, horrible offer, but I guess it's somewhere in the ballpark of plausibility if he's hoping the guy on the other end is blinded by hype.

He and I have made more than a couple of deals. I am reasonably sure he knew this was a terrible offer.

 

[Hot Sauce Guy]

Just entered a league where someone offered me CEH for JT. PPR Dynasty

This may actually win this topic.

 

[eighsse2]

Just entered a league where someone offered me CEH for JT. PPR Dynasty

O_O

 

[wlwiles]

Forgot about this thread. Had this one happen during my rookie draft. We're all logged in, chatting and shooting the breeze right before the draft starts, and I made the comment that I couldn't believe I didn't get one single offer all off-season for my 1.01 pick. About 2 minutes later I get two simultaneous offers:

My 1.01 for:

Offer A: 2024 1st and 2022 3.10
Offer B: Hopkins

This is why it always cracks me up when people mention in these boards and elsewhere "just flip Player X for a pick later, or I'll turn these two picks into a first..." as if they can make whatever trade they need to whenever they want. Trading ain't easy folks.

 

[Hot Sauce Guy]

I may have a legitimate contender.

16 team, PPR, TE-P, must-start 2 TE (no, seriously)

His juwan Johnson & Jeffery Simmons

For my Kmet & Dalton Schultz

Bear in mind, 3 weeks ago or so I paid Higbee, a top 12 S, ‘23 2nd & ‘23 3rd for Schultz.

I-

 

[Shawnky]

Haven't had 1 in a while. New guy to my league just offered Zeke for 2023 1st

 

[wlwiles]

Amari Cooper for my Pitts. Cooper would be my WR6....no thanks buddy

 

[DexterDew]

posted on league chat last week that i needed a startable RB, then got this doozy:

Give Amon Ra St Brown
Get Patterson and Shenault

 

[wlwiles]

Benched Pitts for Higbee last night. Apparently my leaguemates get a Sleeper alert when I adjust my lineup because over the course of today I've received these gems.

Offer #1:
I give Pitts
I get Bellinger and a 2023 2nd (random).

Offer #2:
I give Pitts and 2023 3rd (likely 3.01-3.02)
I get 2023 1st (likely 1.10-1.12)

Offer #3:
I give Pitts and Damien Harris
I get Keenan Allen

I used to complain about nobody wanting to trade in this league so I'm focusing on the positive - at least 3 other people are actively thinking about trades today .

 

[bro1ncos]

Give
Waddle, early 2023 1st, mid 2023 1st

Get,
Chase Edmonds, Damien Harris, Chris Godwin, Michael Thomas, OJ Howard, 2 random 2023 3rds

 

[eighsse2]

Give
Waddle, early 2023 1st, mid 2023 1st

Get,
Chase Edmonds, Damien Harris, Chris Godwin, Michael Thomas, OJ Howard, 2 random 2023 3rds

Wow. Give me the first set. Not even close.

ETA: Forgot what thread I was in.

That's a bad one.

 

[zaner75]

Got this today in a 14 team SF league. I went productive struggle in the startup last year and have a youthful roster. This offer is antithetical to my team build and just goes to show that most people don't think about what might make sense for the other person.

Give: 2023 1st (mine - likely 1.04-1.06), 2023 1st (his - likely 1.03-1.05)
Receive: Dalvin Cook, Alexander Mattison, Keenan Allen

 

[zaner75]

12 team SF league. I'm 7-0 with a win-now roster.

Give: Kirk Cousins (My other QBs are Kyler Murray and Carson Wentz)
Receive: 2023 4th and $40 FAAB

 

[Buckna]

I imagine there’s gonna be some doozies offered with Chase hurt

 

[kutta]

Got this today in a 14 team SF league. I went productive struggle in the startup last year and have a youthful roster. This offer is antithetical to my team build and just goes to show that most people don't think about what might make sense for the other person.

Give: 2023 1st (mine - likely 1.04-1.06), 2023 1st (his - likely 1.03-1.05)
Receive: Dalvin Cook, Alexander Mattison, Keenan Allen

He may not have taken your goals into account, but that’s not a bad offer on the surface.

 

[efactor]

I imagine there’s gonna be some doozies offered with Chase hurt

Got offered a couple 1sts for Higgins today. They are probably in the 10 range in a 16 teamer, but not enough IMO for a 24 year old with a young QB.

 

[Cjw_55106]

• Hunt, Kareem CLE RB; Montgomery, David CHI RB; Metcalf, DK SEA WR
• for Johnson, Diontae PIT WR; Year 2023 Round 1 Draft Pick; Year 2023 Round 1 Draft Pick; Year 2023 Round 2 Draft Pick

The way I see it, this guy thinks Montgomery and Hunt are both worth first round picks? GTFO

 

[irish eyes]

This clown sends trade offers all the time like this. Check out this jewel, his Kareem Hunt for my Tua. Instant reject. Not seconds later, he counters with his Kareem Hunt for my Justin Fields. Another reason I will be done with fantasy after this season.

 

[barackdhouse]

This thread hasn't popped up in a bit but I have a new candidate:

FFPC SuperFlex

I give Javonte Williams, McLaurin, Mike Williams, Hayden Hurst
I get ... actually not sure I'm getting anything but it is... Jeff Wilson, MVS, Toure, Juwan Johnson and a 3rd and a 4th...so I guess a 3rd and a 4th.

What to do.

 

[wgoldsph]

This thread hasn't popped up in a bit but I have a new candidate:

FFPC SuperFlex

I give Javonte Williams, McLaurin, Mike Williams, Hayden Hurst
I get ... actually not sure I'm getting anything but it is... Jeff Wilson, MVS, Toure, Juwan Johnson and a 3rd and a 4th...so I guess a 3rd and a 4th.

What to do.

Call the person responsible and be really concerned. Ask them a bunch of times if they're okay. Make sure they are.

Then tell them that you were sure they had suffered a major brain injury because of that trade.

 

[ghostguy123]

FFPC.
Someone offered me Mahomes. Awesome. Problem is, I would have to give up Tyreek Hill, Michael Pittman, Alvin Kamara, and some mid round draft picks.
This is NOT a superflex league, and yes it was a serious offer.

 

[eighsse2]

This thread hasn't popped up in a bit but I have a new candidate:

FFPC SuperFlex

I give Javonte Williams, McLaurin, Mike Williams, Hayden Hurst
I get ... actually not sure I'm getting anything but it is... Jeff Wilson, MVS, Toure, Juwan Johnson and a 3rd and a 4th...so I guess a 3rd and a 4th.

What to do.

6 scrubs for 2 likely studs, a quality but aging guy, and a decent TE. Good luck haha. Consolidating trades are hard to make, it's hard to even package two equal guys together to get 1.2x the value of one of them alone. But sure. 6 scrubs equals 2 very possible studs.

 

[Hot Sauce Guy]

This thread hasn't popped up in a bit but I have a new candidate:

FFPC SuperFlex

I give Javonte Williams, McLaurin, Mike Williams, Hayden Hurst
I get ... actually not sure I'm getting anything but it is... Jeff Wilson, MVS, Toure, Juwan Johnson and a 3rd and a 4th...so I guess a 3rd and a 4th.

What to do.

Call the person responsible and be really concerned. Ask them a bunch of times if they're okay. Make sure they are.

Then tell them that you were sure they had suffered a major brain injury because of that trade.

Ask them if they smell toast.

Apparently this is a sign of a stroke.

 

[Hot Sauce Guy]

FFPC.
Someone offered me Mahomes. Awesome. Problem is, I would have to give up Tyreek Hill, Michael Pittman, Alvin Kamara, and some mid round draft picks.
This is NOT a superflex league, and yes it was a serious offer.

In SF I’d jump on that.

1-QB, notsomuch.

 

[eighsse2]

FFPC.
Someone offered me Mahomes. Awesome. Problem is, I would have to give up Tyreek Hill, Michael Pittman, Alvin Kamara, and some mid round draft picks.
This is NOT a superflex league, and yes it was a serious offer.

In SF I’d jump on that.

1-QB, notsomuch.

Yeah. Considering the likely cliff that Hill and Kamara are starting down ... it's not insane ... If you're a contender, with a good QB? No way. If your time to win has run out, or you're deep but need a top option at QB? Would be something to at least think about.

 

[ghostguy123]

FFPC.
Someone offered me Mahomes. Awesome. Problem is, I would have to give up Tyreek Hill, Michael Pittman, Alvin Kamara, and some mid round draft picks.
This is NOT a superflex league, and yes it was a serious offer.

In SF I’d jump on that.

1-QB, notsomuch.

Yeah. Considering the likely cliff that Hill and Kamara are starting down ... it's not insane ... If you're a contender, with a good QB? No way. If your time to win has run out, or you're deep but need a top option at QB? Would be something to at least think about.

Ummmm, no, no it wouldn't be anything to think about under ANY circumstance in a one QB league. Absolutely dreadful.
It's never a good idea to pay almost triple value for a player. Overpaying is one thing, paying 300% is another.
Look at startup draft value. Tyreek will surely be drafted a full round or two ahead of Mahomes, and Pittman will likely be drafted right near Mahomes. Then also add in Kamara and picks? C'mon now, you would think about that?

 

[eighsse2]

FFPC.
Someone offered me Mahomes. Awesome. Problem is, I would have to give up Tyreek Hill, Michael Pittman, Alvin Kamara, and some mid round draft picks.
This is NOT a superflex league, and yes it was a serious offer.

In SF I’d jump on that.

1-QB, notsomuch.

Yeah. Considering the likely cliff that Hill and Kamara are starting down ... it's not insane ... If you're a contender, with a good QB? No way. If your time to win has run out, or you're deep but need a top option at QB? Would be something to at least think about.

Ummmm, no, no it wouldn't be anything to think about under ANY circumstance in a one QB league. Absolutely dreadful.
It's never a good idea to pay almost triple value for a player. Overpaying is one thing, paying 300% is another.
Look at startup draft value. Tyreek will surely be drafted a full round or two ahead of Mahomes, and Pittman will likely be drafted right near Mahomes. Then also add in Kamara and picks? C'mon now, you would think about that?

I don't know ... now, keeptradecut is not the Bible, and I think for whatever reason, QB's are far too highly ranked (maybe SF rankers don't realize there is a SF on/off switch??). But, on there Mahomes is #6 overall, and the other the guys mentioned are #22, #51, and #85. (Also the strange way they insert picks into the rankings causes oddities.) So that might be way off, but even if it is, you think it's so far off that #6 is nearly equivalent to #85?

However, the more I think about it, the more I am with you. Hill is not as old as I thought, but he is getting there. And even though Kamara is old for a running back and has potential problems coming, he may have more tread on his tires that a typical back considering his great ratio of receptions to touches.

ETA: Also my fault for not reading closely, I did not notice the picks you mentioned. Yeah, it is a very bad offer unless your roster makeup absolutely screamed for such a trade. I mean, if you were totally stacked everywhere but QB, you could afford it and it could make you better overall. But as you're indicating, there's got to be a better deal to make.

 

[ghostguy123]

FFPC.
Someone offered me Mahomes. Awesome. Problem is, I would have to give up Tyreek Hill, Michael Pittman, Alvin Kamara, and some mid round draft picks.
This is NOT a superflex league, and yes it was a serious offer.

In SF I’d jump on that.

1-QB, notsomuch.

Yeah. Considering the likely cliff that Hill and Kamara are starting down ... it's not insane ... If you're a contender, with a good QB? No way. If your time to win has run out, or you're deep but need a top option at QB? Would be something to at least think about.

Ummmm, no, no it wouldn't be anything to think about under ANY circumstance in a one QB league. Absolutely dreadful.
It's never a good idea to pay almost triple value for a player. Overpaying is one thing, paying 300% is another.
Look at startup draft value. Tyreek will surely be drafted a full round or two ahead of Mahomes, and Pittman will likely be drafted right near Mahomes. Then also add in Kamara and picks? C'mon now, you would think about that?

I don't know ... now, keeptradecut is not the Bible, and I think for whatever reason, QB's are far too highly ranked (maybe SF rankers don't realize there is a SF on/off switch??). But, on there Mahomes is #6 overall, and the other the guys mentioned are #22, #51, and #85. (Also the strange way they insert picks into the rankings causes oddities.) So that might be way off, but even if it is, you think it's so far off that #6 is nearly equivalent to #85?

However, the more I think about it, the more I am with you. Hill is not as old as I thought, but he is getting there. And even though Kamara is old for a running back and has potential problems coming, he may have more tread on his tires that a typical back considering his great ratio of receptions to touches.

ETA: Also my fault for not reading closely, I did not notice the picks you mentioned. Yeah, it is a very bad offer unless your roster makeup absolutely screamed for such a trade. I mean, if you were totally stacked everywhere but QB, you could afford it and it could make you better overall. But as you're indicating, there's got to be a better deal to make.

You should avoid like the plague any 1QB rankings with Mahomes within even 25 picks of the #6 spot

 

[eighsse2]

FFPC.
Someone offered me Mahomes. Awesome. Problem is, I would have to give up Tyreek Hill, Michael Pittman, Alvin Kamara, and some mid round draft picks.
This is NOT a superflex league, and yes it was a serious offer.

In SF I’d jump on that.

1-QB, notsomuch.

Yeah. Considering the likely cliff that Hill and Kamara are starting down ... it's not insane ... If you're a contender, with a good QB? No way. If your time to win has run out, or you're deep but need a top option at QB? Would be something to at least think about.

Ummmm, no, no it wouldn't be anything to think about under ANY circumstance in a one QB league. Absolutely dreadful.
It's never a good idea to pay almost triple value for a player. Overpaying is one thing, paying 300% is another.
Look at startup draft value. Tyreek will surely be drafted a full round or two ahead of Mahomes, and Pittman will likely be drafted right near Mahomes. Then also add in Kamara and picks? C'mon now, you would think about that?

I don't know ... now, keeptradecut is not the Bible, and I think for whatever reason, QB's are far too highly ranked (maybe SF rankers don't realize there is a SF on/off switch??). But, on there Mahomes is #6 overall, and the other the guys mentioned are #22, #51, and #85. (Also the strange way they insert picks into the rankings causes oddities.) So that might be way off, but even if it is, you think it's so far off that #6 is nearly equivalent to #85?

However, the more I think about it, the more I am with you. Hill is not as old as I thought, but he is getting there. And even though Kamara is old for a running back and has potential problems coming, he may have more tread on his tires that a typical back considering his great ratio of receptions to touches.

ETA: Also my fault for not reading closely, I did not notice the picks you mentioned. Yeah, it is a very bad offer unless your roster makeup absolutely screamed for such a trade. I mean, if you were totally stacked everywhere but QB, you could afford it and it could make you better overall. But as you're indicating, there's got to be a better deal to make.

You should avoid like the plague any 1QB rankings with Mahomes within even 25 picks of the #6 spot

Yeah, when I use that site, I sometimes question everything and think, am I insane? Should QB's be this highly valued? But yeah, I think maybe too many people using the site are just confused or crazy. Which is a hard problem to fix in crowd-sourced rankings.

 

[ghostguy123]

Fantasy pros seems to have a fairly solid dynasty ranking right now updated today.
Tyreek is 17. Pittman is 39.
Mahomes is 37.
That's about where Mahomes was drafted in the several FFPC startups I was either in or tracked last offseason. Right around early 4th round.
Yeah, teams needs be damned, that is abysmal value.
I probably wouldn't even deal Pittman straight up for Mahomes unless I had no QB and was very deep at WR.

 

[ghostguy123]

FFPC.
Someone offered me Mahomes. Awesome. Problem is, I would have to give up Tyreek Hill, Michael Pittman, Alvin Kamara, and some mid round draft picks.
This is NOT a superflex league, and yes it was a serious offer.

In SF I’d jump on that.

1-QB, notsomuch.

Yeah. Considering the likely cliff that Hill and Kamara are starting down ... it's not insane ... If you're a contender, with a good QB? No way. If your time to win has run out, or you're deep but need a top option at QB? Would be something to at least think about.

Ummmm, no, no it wouldn't be anything to think about under ANY circumstance in a one QB league. Absolutely dreadful.
It's never a good idea to pay almost triple value for a player. Overpaying is one thing, paying 300% is another.
Look at startup draft value. Tyreek will surely be drafted a full round or two ahead of Mahomes, and Pittman will likely be drafted right near Mahomes. Then also add in Kamara and picks? C'mon now, you would think about that?

I don't know ... now, keeptradecut is not the Bible, and I think for whatever reason, QB's are far too highly ranked (maybe SF rankers don't realize there is a SF on/off switch??). But, on there Mahomes is #6 overall, and the other the guys mentioned are #22, #51, and #85. (Also the strange way they insert picks into the rankings causes oddities.) So that might be way off, but even if it is, you think it's so far off that #6 is nearly equivalent to #85?

However, the more I think about it, the more I am with you. Hill is not as old as I thought, but he is getting there. And even though Kamara is old for a running back and has potential problems coming, he may have more tread on his tires that a typical back considering his great ratio of receptions to touches.

ETA: Also my fault for not reading closely, I did not notice the picks you mentioned. Yeah, it is a very bad offer unless your roster makeup absolutely screamed for such a trade. I mean, if you were totally stacked everywhere but QB, you could afford it and it could make you better overall. But as you're indicating, there's got to be a better deal to make.

You should avoid like the plague any 1QB rankings with Mahomes within even 25 picks of the #6 spot

Yeah, when I use that site, I sometimes question everything and think, am I insane? Should QB's be this highly valued? But yeah, I think maybe too many people using the site are just confused or crazy. Which is a hard problem to fix in crowd-sourced rankings.

Find rankings more in tune with league dynamics. No QB in history should be ranked #6 in one QB 12 team leagues

 

[Hot Sauce Guy]

I probably wouldn't even deal Pittman straight up for Mahomes unless I had no QB and was very deep at WR.

I was with you up until this sentence.

I would absolutely deal Pittman straight up for Mahomes in 1 QB if I needed a QB.

 

[ghostguy123]

I probably wouldn't even deal Pittman straight up for Mahomes unless I had no QB and was very deep at WR.

I was with you up until this sentence.

I would absolutely deal Pittman straight up for Mahomes in 1 QB if I needed a QB.

I just said I would if I didn't have a QB

 

[Hot Sauce Guy]

I probably wouldn't even deal Pittman straight up for Mahomes unless I had no QB and was very deep at WR.

I was with you up until this sentence.

I would absolutely deal Pittman straight up for Mahomes in 1 QB if I needed a QB.

I just said I would if I didn't have a QB

Sure - it would also be worth doing if you had a mid-level QB.

I’m just saying Mahomes is a valuable asset, even in 1-QB format. If I’ve got a 10-12th (or worse) ranked QB, I deal Pittman for Mahomes pretty easily.

If I have a top 5? I’ll hang onto the WR.

 

[Wigglytuff's Gruff]

Yeah that offer for Mahomes isn't that egregious. Not sure I'd trade my share of him for that offer if I don't have a more than solid backup.

Nobody ever wins that particular league without an elite level QB.

 

[ghostguy123]

Yeah that offer for Mahomes isn't that egregious. Not sure I'd trade my share of him for that offer if I don't have a more than solid backup.

Nobody ever wins that particular league without an elite level QB.

I won that exact league with waiver wire QBs all year and in the playoffs. I have done so several times in other FFPC leagues as well.
No idea what you are talking about. Elite level QBs are absolutely not vitally important in 12 team 1 QB leagues.
Mahomes was a mid 4th round startup pick in that league last year for crying out loud. Both Tyreek and Pittman were drafted WELL ahead of Mahomes.
Are you guys thinking of superflex or what here? Somethings off.

 

[Gally]

I won that exact league with waiver wire QBs all year and in the playoffs. I have done so several times in other FFPC leagues as well.
No idea what you are talking about. Elite level QBs are absolutely not vitally important in 12 team 1 QB leagues.
Mahomes was a mid 4th round startup pick in that league last year for crying out loud. Both Tyreek and Pittman were drafted WELL ahead of Mahomes.
Are you guys thinking of superflex or what here? Somethings off.

Previous draft slots are looking to the past. Mahomes just proved he is still top 5 even with Tyreek gone. That does help keep/increase his value for the future. Pittman had a not very good year and has a huge question at QB moving forward. I would say this has his arrow pointing down when looking into the future. Tyreek had a great year with Tua but now Tua is a huge question. What will Miami do at QB if Tua decides to hange them up. That makes Tyreek's value for the future kind of in limbo to some degree.

I understand that in 1 QB leagues you can generally cobble together a serviceable QB room if the rest of your team is stacked but that being said if the rest of your team is stacked then maybe parting with Tyreek/Pittman could be worth it. Adding in Kamara (which has his own negatives) pushes it more to unacceptable but I could see Kamara being polarizing with respect to future value/performance.

It's a poor offer but not in the realm of worst ever. Adding a piece to the Mahomes side and you likely have a deal that is close.

 

[DJackson10]

This past year someone tried offering Justin Fields, Mooney and 2 other players who were on a hot streak for Etienne and Hill and Herbert. I immediately declined. You don't accept sucker bet trades where the person is trying to hand you extra players. I had better players on my roster who I'd have to cut as well. Not a Fields fan and Mooney is so dependent on him. Etienne was my mid season IR stash from last year as no one wanted to waste an IR spot on a player till later in the year is when guys in my league seem to like the IR stash. For example I picked up Metchie as a IR stash late in the year.

Hill has been with me since day 1 and I picked up Herbert in Waivers rookie year when I still had Aaron Rodgers. Plus the guy making the trade is a commissioner of his work league and my one buddy is friends with him. He told me about trades accepted in his league which I laughed and the fact they were picking up players off Waivers 4 or so weeks after the fact they should be picked up. They were clearly taking advantage of people who had almost zero idea how fantasy football or football in general worked and the worst part was this was a big $$ league.

I brought them in last minute as I needed 2 extra guys and I knew with my league they couldn't do their ********. I finally wanted to show them what playing in a real league was like as both thought they were great FF managers. The guy who tried the trade with me did well where my buddy did poorly. His biggest problem is he made a few bad moves and with this just being a fun league he was more concerned about 3 money leagues he was in. The sad part is I had to find a new manager for our one team who took over WK6 and made some really good roster moves just on the waiver wire and put a solid team together that if managed the other 4-5 weeks makes the playoffs and makes some noise. Had my buddy been better at his waivers he could've gotten into the playoffs.

 

[Hot Sauce Guy]

It's a poor offer but not in the realm of worst ever. Adding a piece to the Mahomes side and you likely have a deal that is close.

Agreed - like, adding 1 2023 1st, or maybe a 2024 1st, and I wouldn't have much issue with it.

 

[DJackson10]

This clown sends trade offers all the time like this. Check out this jewel, his Kareem Hunt for my Tua. Instant reject. Not seconds later, he counters with his Kareem Hunt for my Justin Fields. Another reason I will be done with fantasy after this season.

I had a guy In my old league that disbanded when guys didn't have time plus he was a major reason the league fell off who'd send absurd trades constantly. With ESPN we'd keep record of our picks as ESPN only allows pick trading before the draft so we had to record any in season trades with picks on a spread sheet. Start of the next year we just swapped the picks with the owner we owed picks too. It was a thankless process. My commissioner was a bit annoyed because this guy kept trading guys every 2 weeks. Had he not been so trigger happy he'd have won the league maybe 2-3 times. The problem was with the keeper league we had he was screwing worse teams out of their top 3 or so round picks by trading them players that weren't keeper worthy. It was originally a 4 man keeper keep as long as you wanted went to 6 our last few yrs. Him and about 2 others kept taking advantage of the poor teams. the final year 3 trades he made and 1 with the one guy he made we vetoed. Not because of how bad it was but it was obvious collusion involved.

Long story short both guys threw temper-tantrums with the other guy mash quitting after the draft releasing his entire team but not before being a baby calling my commissioner a bunch of names. After 2-4 weeks into the season the other guy left and we played with 2 teams that were bots. My commissioner only made line changes for bye's or injuries added a player if he had to only for the purposes if it was an emergency situation. After that year 2 others left. We had to find 4 new managers now or go to a 6 team league which non of us wanted.

I blame some of this on my commissioner as the guy who made all these trades before like to be confrontational and there were more then a few times we could've league voted for him to be ousted from the league and most of us wouldn't have had an issue with it. I had expressed concern with my commissioner before on the guy. I ended up blocking trade offers from him.

 

[eighsse2]

Etienne was my mid season IR stash from last year as no one wanted to waste an IR spot on a player till later in the year is when guys in my league seem to like the IR stash.

This is dynasty? How could Etienne be available mid-season in a dynasty league? If there were very short benches and  no IR spots whatsoever,  maybe. But with IR? No one stashed him until mid-season? That's nuts. I drafted him (post-injury) at 1.07.

 

[Lehigh98]

Probably not "the worst" but SMH...

Someone was shopping Lamar at the end of the season and I said I was interested, his immediate offer:
I receive: Jackson, Lamar BAL QB; Johnson, Diontae PIT WR; 2023 Early 3rd
I give up: Herbert, Justin LAC QB; Chase, Ja'Marr CIN WR; 2023 Mid 1st; Year 2023 Early 2nd

 

[Hot Sauce Guy]

Probably not "the worst" but SMH...

Someone was shopping Lamar at the end of the season and I said I was interested, his immediate offer:
I receive: Jackson, Lamar BAL QB; Johnson, Diontae PIT WR; 2023 Early 3rd
I give up: Herbert, Justin LAC QB; Chase, Ja'Marr CIN WR; 2023 Mid 1st; Year 2023 Early 2nd

That's just horrible. lol

 

[jabarony]

I probably wouldn't even deal Pittman straight up for Mahomes unless I had no QB and was very deep at WR.

I was with you up until this sentence.

I would absolutely deal Pittman straight up for Mahomes in 1 QB if I needed a QB.

I just said I would if I didn't have a QB

Sure - it would also be worth doing if you had a mid-level QB.

I’m just saying Mahomes is a valuable asset, even in 1-QB format. If I’ve got a 10-12th (or worse) ranked QB, I deal Pittman for Mahomes pretty easily.

If I have a top 5? I’ll hang onto the WR.

Even if I had Josh Allen, I’d trade Pittman for Mahomes.

 

[Hot Sauce Guy]

I probably wouldn't even deal Pittman straight up for Mahomes unless I had no QB and was very deep at WR.

I was with you up until this sentence.

I would absolutely deal Pittman straight up for Mahomes in 1 QB if I needed a QB.

I just said I would if I didn't have a QB

Sure - it would also be worth doing if you had a mid-level QB.

I’m just saying Mahomes is a valuable asset, even in 1-QB format. If I’ve got a 10-12th (or worse) ranked QB, I deal Pittman for Mahomes pretty easily.

If I have a top 5? I’ll hang onto the WR.

Even if I had Josh Allen, I’d trade Pittman for Mahomes.

Well yes, same. You could then flip him for a truly elite WR. Good point.

 

[ghostguy123]

I probably wouldn't even deal Pittman straight up for Mahomes unless I had no QB and was very deep at WR.

I was with you up until this sentence.

I would absolutely deal Pittman straight up for Mahomes in 1 QB if I needed a QB.

I just said I would if I didn't have a QB

Sure - it would also be worth doing if you had a mid-level QB.

I’m just saying Mahomes is a valuable asset, even in 1-QB format. If I’ve got a 10-12th (or worse) ranked QB, I deal Pittman for Mahomes pretty easily.

If I have a top 5? I’ll hang onto the WR.

Even if I had Josh Allen, I’d trade Pittman for Mahomes.

Well yes, same. You could then flip him for a truly elite WR. Good point.

Which truly elite WRs do you think you can get straight up for either Allen or Mahomes. Just curious.

 

[Hot Sauce Guy]

I probably wouldn't even deal Pittman straight up for Mahomes unless I had no QB and was very deep at WR.

I was with you up until this sentence.

I would absolutely deal Pittman straight up for Mahomes in 1 QB if I needed a QB.

I just said I would if I didn't have a QB

Sure - it would also be worth doing if you had a mid-level QB.

I’m just saying Mahomes is a valuable asset, even in 1-QB format. If I’ve got a 10-12th (or worse) ranked QB, I deal Pittman for Mahomes pretty easily.

If I have a top 5? I’ll hang onto the WR.

Even if I had Josh Allen, I’d trade Pittman for Mahomes.

Well yes, same. You could then flip him for a truly elite WR. Good point.

Which truly elite WRs do you think you can get straight up for either Allen or Mahomes. Just curious.

I speculate you could get a Tyreek Hill, Waddle, Diggs, Higgins, Maybe kick in something else and get an AJB. Heck, might even be able to get the 1.01 with a 2.x or player added to Mahomes.

I doubt you’d get a top 4 WR, but 7-15? Sure, that feels close. Don’t feel like breaking out the calcs but could likely do better than Pittman is the point.