What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

what is Tremlay smoking (1 Viewer)

cowpie

Footballguy
OK ,

I just pulled up the rankings onthe site and see that Maurile Tremblay has Palmer... That is Carson Palmer... (You know, the guy who had over 3800 passing yards in each of the last 2 years with over 28 td and has great wrs johnson and houshmenzadeh.) ranked #11 out of all qbs. Is there some spot on the site where he justifies this.

I mean he has garcia ranked ahead of him. What gives. Not only that, but he has both chad johnson and TJ Housh.... both ranked in the top 10 in WRS. How can this be?? Is he predicting an injury, or is he smoking crack. If it is an injury prediction, is that what the rankings are meant for?? topredict injuries.

If it is not an injury prediction, Maurile, please lay off the pipe and let us know how you can have 2 top 10 wrs on your team and a #11 qb

and please don't update your ranking showing manning as the #1QB with harrison and wayne being ranked 40th and 41st as wrs.

:goodposting: :bow:

 
He has him projected as tied for 8th in the projections section. I have not seen or heard his rationale, so we'll have to wait until he checks in.

 
OK ,

I just pulled up the rankings onthe site and see that Maurile Tremblay has Palmer... That is Carson Palmer... (You know, the guy who had over 3800 passing yards in each of the last 2 years with over 28 td and has great wrs johnson and houshmenzadeh.) ranked #11 out of all qbs. Is there some spot on the site where he justifies this.

I mean he has garcia ranked ahead of him. What gives. Not only that, but he has both chad johnson and TJ Housh.... both ranked in the top 10 in WRS. How can this be?? Is he predicting an injury, or is he smoking crack. If it is an injury prediction, is that what the rankings are meant for?? topredict injuries.

If it is not an injury prediction, Maurile, please lay off the pipe and let us know how you can have 2 top 10 wrs on your team and a #11 qb

and please don't update your ranking showing manning as the #1QB with harrison and wayne being ranked 40th and 41st as wrs.

:shrug: :help:
Where does he have CJ and House ranked?
 
I agree....I had to limit his projections on the DD.......I wish there was a way to us Yudkins rankings (don't know if he has projections)

 
OK ,

I just pulled up the rankings onthe site and see that Maurile Tremblay has Palmer... That is Carson Palmer... (You know, the guy who had over 3800 passing yards in each of the last 2 years with over 28 td and has great wrs johnson and houshmenzadeh.) ranked #11 out of all qbs. Is there some spot on the site where he justifies this.

I mean he has garcia ranked ahead of him. What gives. Not only that, but he has both chad johnson and TJ Housh.... both ranked in the top 10 in WRS. How can this be?? Is he predicting an injury, or is he smoking crack. If it is an injury prediction, is that what the rankings are meant for?? topredict injuries.

If it is not an injury prediction, Maurile, please lay off the pipe and let us know how you can have 2 top 10 wrs on your team and a #11 qb

and please don't update your ranking showing manning as the #1QB with harrison and wayne being ranked 40th and 41st as wrs.

:shrug: :help:
Where does he have CJ and House ranked?
3/10
 
If you look at his projections you can see that he is projecting a fairly significant drop in passing touchdowns for the Bengals. I don't think this is unreasonable considering the suspension of Chris Henry. I don't necessarily agree but you can see where his argument is coming from.

 
I agree....I had to limit his projections on the DD.......I wish there was a way to us Yudkins rankings (don't know if he has projections)
No good would ever come from that, believe me.(And to answer your question, no, I do not do complete projects so I would not be able to help folks with the Data Dominator.)
 
I agree....I had to limit his projections on the DD.......I wish there was a way to us Yudkins rankings (don't know if he has projections)
No offense but I couldn't disagree more. Especially looking at RB I think Tremblay has the best set of projections on the site.
 
OK ,

I just pulled up the rankings onthe site and see that Maurile Tremblay has Palmer... That is Carson Palmer... (You know, the guy who had over 3800 passing yards in each of the last 2 years with over 28 td and has great wrs johnson and houshmenzadeh.) ranked #11 out of all qbs. Is there some spot on the site where he justifies this.

I mean he has garcia ranked ahead of him. What gives. Not only that, but he has both chad johnson and TJ Housh.... both ranked in the top 10 in WRS. How can this be?? Is he predicting an injury, or is he smoking crack. If it is an injury prediction, is that what the rankings are meant for?? topredict injuries.

If it is not an injury prediction, Maurile, please lay off the pipe and let us know how you can have 2 top 10 wrs on your team and a #11 qb

and please don't update your ranking showing manning as the #1QB with harrison and wayne being ranked 40th and 41st as wrs.

:shrug: :help:
Where does he have CJ and House ranked?
3/10
Unless he's predicting and injury I don't see how a QB with two Top 10 WR's doesn't himself crack the Top 10.I'm open for an explanation on this one.

 
OK ,

I just pulled up the rankings onthe site and see that Maurile Tremblay has Palmer... That is Carson Palmer... (You know, the guy who had over 3800 passing yards in each of the last 2 years with over 28 td and has great wrs johnson and houshmenzadeh.) ranked #11 out of all qbs. Is there some spot on the site where he justifies this.

I mean he has garcia ranked ahead of him. What gives. Not only that, but he has both chad johnson and TJ Housh.... both ranked in the top 10 in WRS. How can this be??
while i don't agree with Palmer at 11th, i don't think having two top 10 WRs and yet the QB not in the top 10 is as impossible as you may think.edit: i remember having this argument several years ago about 2002/2003 Steelers and Tommy Maddox

 
Last edited by a moderator:
OK ,

I just pulled up the rankings onthe site and see that Maurile Tremblay has Palmer... That is Carson Palmer... (You know, the guy who had over 3800 passing yards in each of the last 2 years with over 28 td and has great wrs johnson and houshmenzadeh.) ranked #11 out of all qbs. Is there some spot on the site where he justifies this.

I mean he has garcia ranked ahead of him. What gives. Not only that, but he has both chad johnson and TJ Housh.... both ranked in the top 10 in WRS. How can this be??
while i don't agree with Palmer at 11th, i don't think having two top 10 WRs and yet the QB not in the top 10 is as impossible as you may think.
Your example?
 
OK ,

I just pulled up the rankings onthe site and see that Maurile Tremblay has Palmer... That is Carson Palmer... (You know, the guy who had over 3800 passing yards in each of the last 2 years with over 28 td and has great wrs johnson and houshmenzadeh.) ranked #11 out of all qbs. Is there some spot on the site where he justifies this.

I mean he has garcia ranked ahead of him. What gives. Not only that, but he has both chad johnson and TJ Housh.... both ranked in the top 10 in WRS. How can this be??
while i don't agree with Palmer at 11th, i don't think having two top 10 WRs and yet the QB not in the top 10 is as impossible as you may think.edit: i remember having this argument several years ago about 2002/2003 Steelers and Tommy Maddox
In 2002, Kordell Stewart threw 166 passes. Maddox and Stewart combined for 4000 yards and 26 TDs; if that had been one QB, he would have wound up #6 overall.In 2003, Burress had just 860 yards and 4 TDs.

 
OK ,

I just pulled up the rankings onthe site and see that Maurile Tremblay has Palmer... That is Carson Palmer... (You know, the guy who had over 3800 passing yards in each of the last 2 years with over 28 td and has great wrs johnson and houshmenzadeh.) ranked #11 out of all qbs. Is there some spot on the site where he justifies this.

I mean he has garcia ranked ahead of him. What gives. Not only that, but he has both chad johnson and TJ Housh.... both ranked in the top 10 in WRS. How can this be?? Is he predicting an injury, or is he smoking crack. If it is an injury prediction, is that what the rankings are meant for?? topredict injuries.

If it is not an injury prediction, Maurile, please lay off the pipe and let us know how you can have 2 top 10 wrs on your team and a #11 qb

and please don't update your ranking showing manning as the #1QB with harrison and wayne being ranked 40th and 41st as wrs.

:tfp: :lmao:
Where does he have CJ and House ranked?
in the top 10 - johnson is #2 in projections and #3 in rankings sections and housh is 10th in both.
 
OK ,

I just pulled up the rankings onthe site and see that Maurile Tremblay has Palmer... That is Carson Palmer... (You know, the guy who had over 3800 passing yards in each of the last 2 years with over 28 td and has great wrs johnson and houshmenzadeh.) ranked #11 out of all qbs. Is there some spot on the site where he justifies this.

I mean he has garcia ranked ahead of him. What gives. Not only that, but he has both chad johnson and TJ Housh.... both ranked in the top 10 in WRS. How can this be??
while i don't agree with Palmer at 11th, i don't think having two top 10 WRs and yet the QB not in the top 10 is as impossible as you may think.edit: i remember having this argument several years ago about 2002/2003 Steelers and Tommy Maddox
In 2002, Kordell Stewart threw 166 passes. Maddox and Stewart combined for 4000 yards and 26 TDs; if that had been one QB, he would have wound up #6 overall.In 2003, Burress had just 860 yards and 4 TDs.
right, there was and injury /split season. Is that what he is predicting. we need to see where a QB played the whole season and was not in the top 10 even though he had 2 top 10 wrs.

I mean you really think garcia will out play palmer

 
any one have a history of where the qb finishes when he has 2 top 10 wrs considering he plays the whole year?

has it ever happened to where that qb finished outside the top 10?

i know in 2006

manning had 2 top 10 wrs and finished #1

Palmer almost had 2 top 10 wrs (housh was 11TH) and finished 5th.

that was evan after he he had a slow start due to that injury.

can anyone go back further than that?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Outside the top ten, probably not, but definitely outside the top five.

Remember, most QBs also throw to TEs and RBs -- Cincinnati is not particularly blessed in that area -- or get rushing yards. So there's no reason why a QB#11 couldn't have two top-10 WRs if they account for 80-90% of the passing yardage and if the QB doesn't run very much.

 
Here is a link to Maurile's Bengal projections. Basically he is saying that the Bengals are not going to score as many touchdowns as they have in the last two years and that nearly all of the passing game production will go to CJ and Housh. Again, this isn't unreasonable. Their RBs and TEs are not generally invovled in the passing game and outside of CJ and Housh they don't really have any WR that are very talented. I personally think his passing TD projection is off but it certainly isn't out of the realm of possibility.

 
What's this? Someone with individualized projections?Get back in line! We like homogenized and pasteurized lists.
The issue isn't that the projections are different; the issue is that they don't pass the smell test. If Palmer has over 500 passes (as Tremblay projects) and 3800 yards, it's very unlikely he'd throw only 23 TDs. Palmer threw 28 TDs last year coming back from a major ACL injury, and the only thing the offense lost was a #3 WR. For that matter, there's no way that Palmer will finish outside the top 10 if he throws for 3800 yards and 23 TDs. Last year that would have been QB#7, in 2005 it would have been QB#5.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
any one have a history of where the qb finishes when he has 2 top 10 wrs considering he plays the whole year?has it ever happened to where that qb finished outside the top 10?i know in 2006 manning had 2 top 10 wrs and finished #1Palmer almost had 2 top 10 wrs (housh was 11TH) and finished 5th.that was evan after he he had a slow start due to that injury. can anyone go back further than that?
Elway ranked #13 in 1998 had McCaffrey#11/R Smith #12 (B Brister was a factor that year though)Brad Johnson ranked #13 in 1997 had Cris Carter#4/Jake Reed#16The worst a QB has finished with having 2 top 10 WRs though is around #7 (assuming they played the whole year)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Here is a link to Maurile's Bengal projections. Basically he is saying that the Bengals are not going to score as many touchdowns as they have in the last two years and that nearly all of the passing game production will go to CJ and Housh. Again, this isn't unreasonable. Their RBs and TEs are not generally invovled in the passing game and outside of CJ and Housh they don't really have any WR that are very talented. I personally think his passing TD projection is off but it certainly isn't out of the realm of possibility.
His projections are pretty crappy too. He says that total QB passing yards will be 4019 and 24 tds

yet when you add up all the receiving yards, the math doesn't work

RBs 399 rec yards 1 td

WRs 3254 rec yards 19 tds

TEs 310 rec yards 1 td

that is only 3963 total rec yards and 21 tds on the receiving side

yet he projects that team will pass 4019 and have 24 tds

does that mean palmer is gonna pass to himself and have 3 rec tds??

Until he is off the pipe, i am gonna have to ignore his projections.

ps, am i missing something on the addition side? do the numbers really not add up?

 
What's this? Someone with individualized projections?Get back in line! We like homogenized and pasteurized lists.
The issue isn't that the projections are different; the issue is that they don't pass the smell test. If Palmer has over 500 passes (as Tremblay projects) and 3800 yards, it's very ulnikely he'd throw only 23 TDs. Palmer threw 28 TDs last year coming back from a major ACL injury, and the only thing the offense lost was a #3 WR. For that matter, there's no way that Palmer will finish outside the top 10 if he throws for 3800 yards and 23 TDs. Last year that would have been QB#7, in 2005 it would have been QB#5.
Fine, step out of the lines, i just want to see the thought process and don't think his numbers add up. if you say something that is a little out of the ordinary based on past performances, then it would be helpful to know why and not say cause i felt like it which is where we stand today. again has it ever happened where your qb is not in the top 10 yet has 2 top ten WRs.
 
any one have a history of where the qb finishes when he has 2 top 10 wrs considering he plays the whole year?has it ever happened to where that qb finished outside the top 10?i know in 2006 manning had 2 top 10 wrs and finished #1Palmer almost had 2 top 10 wrs (housh was 11TH) and finished 5th.that was evan after he he had a slow start due to that injury. can anyone go back further than that?
Elway ranked #13 in 1998 had McCaffrey#11/R Smith #12 (B Brister was a factor that year though)Brad Johnson ranked #13 in 1997 had Cris Carter#4/Jake Reed#16The worst a QB has finished with having 2 top 10 WRs though is around #7 (assuming they played the whole year)
thank you. that is what i was looking for. so basically he is predicting something that has never happened ever and he is predicting #s for palmer(which are on the low side that would have put him at the 5th or 7th best QB over the past 2 years. so even if he does have an off year then based on the last few years he would have still been a top 5 or 7. So i guess he is thinking that all the other qbs are just gonna have great years then is unusual.
 
What's this? Someone with individualized projections?Get back in line! We like homogenized and pasteurized lists.
The issue isn't that the projections are different; the issue is that they don't pass the smell test. If Palmer has over 500 passes (as Tremblay projects) and 3800 yards, it's very ulnikely he'd throw only 23 TDs. Palmer threw 28 TDs last year coming back from a major ACL injury, and the only thing the offense lost was a #3 WR. For that matter, there's no way that Palmer will finish outside the top 10 if he throws for 3800 yards and 23 TDs. Last year that would have been QB#7, in 2005 it would have been QB#5.
Fine, step out of the lines, i just want to see the thought process and don't think his numbers add up. if you say something that is a little out of the ordinary based on past performances, then it would be helpful to know why and not say cause i felt like it which is where we stand today. again has it ever happened where your qb is not in the top 10 yet has 2 top ten WRs.
Can someone check the 2005 Cardinails. Well over 4000 yards passing, but 21 TD's and 21 INT's. Was that Top 10 worthy?
 
What's this? Someone with individualized projections?Get back in line! We like homogenized and pasteurized lists.
The issue isn't that the projections are different; the issue is that they don't pass the smell test. If Palmer has over 500 passes (as Tremblay projects) and 3800 yards, it's very ulnikely he'd throw only 23 TDs. Palmer threw 28 TDs last year coming back from a major ACL injury, and the only thing the offense lost was a #3 WR. For that matter, there's no way that Palmer will finish outside the top 10 if he throws for 3800 yards and 23 TDs. Last year that would have been QB#7, in 2005 it would have been QB#5.
Fine, step out of the lines, i just want to see the thought process and don't think his numbers add up. if you say something that is a little out of the ordinary based on past performances, then it would be helpful to know why and not say cause i felt like it which is where we stand today. again has it ever happened where your qb is not in the top 10 yet has 2 top ten WRs.
Can someone check the 2005 Cardinails. Well over 4000 yards passing, but 21 TD's and 21 INT's. Was that Top 10 worthy?
Warner #22/McCown #29 combined for 4549 yards 20tds 20int. They would have been #4.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
His projections are pretty crappy too.
Fine, then don't use them. Why do you need to get all indignant about them just because you don't like them???
Until he is off the pipe, i am gonna have to ignore his projections.
Good idea. See how simple that is?By the way, you've made several comments relating to smoking something, crack pipes, etc. Is it really that hard to just say you disagree without insulting references? These guys are supposed to post projections based on what they believe, not on what the mob consensus may believe. It's just one guy's projections, and if they don't fit your thinking then don't use them. If you want to express disagreement, fine, but do it with a little class. Show a little respect for the guy and his effort instead of being a jerk about it.
 
His projections are pretty crappy too.
Fine, then don't use them. Why do you need to get all indignant about them just because you don't like them???
Until he is off the pipe, i am gonna have to ignore his projections.
Good idea. See how simple that is?By the way, you've made several comments relating to smoking something, crack pipes, etc. Is it really that hard to just say you disagree without insulting references? These guys are supposed to post projections based on what they believe, not on what the mob consensus may believe. It's just one guy's projections, and if they don't fit your thinking then don't use them. If you want to express disagreement, fine, but do it with a little class. Show a little respect for the guy and his effort instead of being a jerk about it.
:lol:
 
Couch Potato said:
cowpie said:
His projections are pretty crappy too.
Fine, then don't use them. Why do you need to get all indignant about them just because you don't like them???
Until he is off the pipe, i am gonna have to ignore his projections.
Good idea. See how simple that is?By the way, you've made several comments relating to smoking something, crack pipes, etc. Is it really that hard to just say you disagree without insulting references? These guys are supposed to post projections based on what they believe, not on what the mob consensus may believe. It's just one guy's projections, and if they don't fit your thinking then don't use them. If you want to express disagreement, fine, but do it with a little class. Show a little respect for the guy and his effort instead of being a jerk about it.
Very :unsure: :bag: Maurile's a smart guy. He'll have a very good reason for this (unless he's made a mistake)
 
You're right construx! Tremblay will explain his rankings in time. If you don't like them, ignore them. It's not that difficult. If you want to know why, ask the man without throwing insults. Remember, no pissing in the shark pool!!!

 
cowpie said:
OK ,

I just pulled up the rankings onthe site and see that Maurile Tremblay has Palmer... That is Carson Palmer... (You know, the guy who had over 3800 passing yards in each of the last 2 years with over 28 td and has great wrs johnson and houshmenzadeh.) ranked #11 out of all qbs. Is there some spot on the site where he justifies this.

I mean he has garcia ranked ahead of him. What gives. Not only that, but he has both chad johnson and TJ Housh.... both ranked in the top 10 in WRS. How can this be?? Is he predicting an injury, or is he smoking crack. If it is an injury prediction, is that what the rankings are meant for?? topredict injuries.

If it is not an injury prediction, Maurile, please lay off the pipe and let us know how you can have 2 top 10 wrs on your team and a #11 qb

and please don't update your ranking showing manning as the #1QB with harrison and wayne being ranked 40th and 41st as wrs.

:suds: :bag:
Hi cowpie,I'm actually a big fan of Palmer and was surprised to see that my projections put him so low. Here's exactly the thinking that went into them.

I do my projections as a combination of bottum-up and top-down thinking.

First I project team numbers for pass attempts, rush attempts, passing yards, rushing yards, etc.

Then I divide the attempts up for the individual positions and players. For example, I project the Bengals to have 442 rushing attempts, I project the RBs as a group to get a little over 86% of those, and for Rudi Johnson to get about 82% of the RB attempts. So 442 * 0.864 * 0.82 = 313 rushing attempts for Rudi Johnson. I do the same for every other player, for both rushing attempts and (in the case of the passing game), targets.

I then project a reception rate for each receiver, and get receptions by multiplying the projected reception rate by the projected number of targets. I also project a yards per catch and touchdowns per catch for each player, and get yards and touchdowns by multiplying those projections by projected receptions.

For QBs, I divide pass attempts between the starter and backup (usually 15/16 for the starter and 1/16 for the backup unless there's a reason to do something different), then project yards per attempt, touchdowns per attempt, and INTs per attempt for each QB to get yards, TDs, and INTs.

At this point, the total pass attempts will equal the total targets, but the total passing yards will not equal the total receiving yards except by pure luck.

I try to bring the total passing yards (and TDs) into line with the total receiving yards (and TDs) by massaging yards and TDs per attempt (for QBs) and yards and TDs per reception (for receivers), making adjustments in the direction that brings them closer to the overall team projections.

In the Bengals case, my initial team projections were 539 pass attempts for 3845 yards and 22 TDs. I stress the word initial. There's a lot those initial projections don't take into account, so they are just a starting point. In the case of the Bengals, I think those figures are too low because they don't take into account Palmer's consistency over the last several years, and pedigree. But the team numbers don't come much into play unless the individual passer/receiver numbers disagree, so let's put those aside for now.

My projected YPA for Palmer was initially 7.7. That compares favorably with his career average of 7.4, but is a bit below is 7.8 average from last year. (The NFL average is 6.85.)

On 505 attempts (which is 15/16 of the Bengals' projected 539 attempts), that would give Palmer 3891 yards.

I also had Palmer initially projected for 0.053 TDs per attempt. That compares very favorably to the league average of 0.0395 TDs per attempt, and probably needs to be regressed down a bit.

Skip ahead to receivers . . .

I projected receptions per target, yards per reception, and TDs per reception for each WR, RB, and TE on the Bengals.

When I was finished, I had about 4120 passing yards and 28 passing touchdowns (between Palmer and Johnson) projected, and initially 4027 receiving yards and 23 receiving touchdowns for all receivers combined.

Close enough on the yardage, but TDs were a bit off. Since the receiving TDs were closer to the team projections than the QB projections were, the bulk of the adjustment came from the QBs.

I currently have the Bengals QBs throwing for 4019 yards and 23.9 TDs, and the Bengals players receiving for 4031 yards and 22.6 TDs. (There is a mistake here in that Gregg Guenther's 7 catches for 69 yards and 0.5 TDs are not showing up.)

The TDs are lower than the Bengals have had in previous years, but Palmer is still projected for 0.045 TDs per attempt, which is significantly higher than the NFL average of 0.0395.

Hope that helps.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Couch Potato said:
cowpie said:
His projections are pretty crappy too.
Fine, then don't use them. Why do you need to get all indignant about them just because you don't like them???
Until he is off the pipe, i am gonna have to ignore his projections.
Good idea. See how simple that is?By the way, you've made several comments relating to smoking something, crack pipes, etc. Is it really that hard to just say you disagree without insulting references? These guys are supposed to post projections based on what they believe, not on what the mob consensus may believe. It's just one guy's projections, and if they don't fit your thinking then don't use them. If you want to express disagreement, fine, but do it with a little class. Show a little respect for the guy and his effort instead of being a jerk about it.
Very :rolleyes: :fishing: Maurile's a smart guy. He'll have a very good reason for this (unless he's made a mistake)
I am sure he is . but not like any of you know me, i would say that to anyone i know that says something that doesn't add up. with writing/e-mail you can't always tell the sarcasm. as i said before, that is great if he has a reason for it, but the question was what is the reasoning especially since the two top wrs and not a top qb thing has never happened. it is pretty bold to predict something that has never happened before with out some sort of logic behind it.
 
. . . especially since the two top wrs and not a top qb thing has never happened. it is pretty bold to predict something that has never happened before with out some sort of logic behind it.
I do think it happened a while ago with the Steelers. If a QB gets very little rushing yards, and throws very little to the TEs, RBs, and WRs3 and lower, it is possible for the WR1 and WR2 to be fantasy studs while the QB is middle of the pack. (Not that I think Palmer is middle of the pack. I would draft him higher than I'm listing him right now, so I'll probably be moving his projections higher in the near future.)
 
In other news, Matt Leinart is #11 in the consensus rankings right now. Fitz is #7 and Boldin is #11.
Missed that one.however, if that really happened where boldin and fitz were top 10, then i doubt leinart would be out of the 10 once the season was final. I think that any team that at 2 wrs in the top 10 that the qb will ultimately be there as wellI would love to see a piece on how many time a team has had 2 wrs in the top 10 and where the qbs finished. you could even add in split seasons and add the qb stats together and see where they would have ranked as well.
 
Maurile:

OK, here's how. In your projections by position, click the team link by the player's name. So, if you're looking at your own RB projections, if you want San Diego's team projections by you, click the "SD" next to Tomlinson's name (for example).

Edited for clarity.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
. . . especially since the two top wrs and not a top qb thing has never happened. it is pretty bold to predict something that has never happened before with out some sort of logic behind it.
I do think it happened a while ago with the Steelers. If a QB gets very little rushing yards, and throws very little to the TEs, RBs, and WRs3 and lower, it is possible for the WR1 and WR2 to be fantasy studs while the QB is middle of the pack. (Not that I think Palmer is middle of the pack. I would draft him higher than I'm listing him right now, so I'll probably be moving his projections higher in the near future.)
well that answers my questions. I think.what i am understanding is that you still have some tweaking to do whether it be that the bengals numbers go up or the other qbs #s go down. to move palmer up the list. heck even one td pass would move him up to 7th, which i could actually see happening.
 
In the Bengals case, my initial team projections were 539 pass attempts for 3845 yards and 22 TDs.
Here's your problem. In the past four years the Bengals passing attack has been:4066/283935/323520/233591/26Yardage looks reasonable, but you're predicting TD output to be the lowest in five years. I don't see any basis for that. Why would you assume such a huge decline?If you assume something closer to the four-year average of 27 TDs, based on your logic, you would have probably adjusted the QB numbers upward instead of the WR numbers downward. That puts Palmer in a more realistic position, imho.
 
CalBear said:
joffer said:
cowpie said:
OK ,

I just pulled up the rankings onthe site and see that Maurile Tremblay has Palmer... That is Carson Palmer... (You know, the guy who had over 3800 passing yards in each of the last 2 years with over 28 td and has great wrs johnson and houshmenzadeh.) ranked #11 out of all qbs. Is there some spot on the site where he justifies this.

I mean he has garcia ranked ahead of him. What gives. Not only that, but he has both chad johnson and TJ Housh.... both ranked in the top 10 in WRS. How can this be??
while i don't agree with Palmer at 11th, i don't think having two top 10 WRs and yet the QB not in the top 10 is as impossible as you may think.edit: i remember having this argument several years ago about 2002/2003 Steelers and Tommy Maddox
In 2002, Kordell Stewart threw 166 passes. Maddox and Stewart combined for 4000 yards and 26 TDs; if that had been one QB, he would have wound up #6 overall.
Pittsburgh's 4036 yards, 26 TDs, and 22 INTs put them eighth that year in passing fantasy points . . . only two points ahead of the 11th place team. (Ward was WR3 and Burress was WR7.)
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top