What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

When do we go in and wipe out ISIS? (3 Viewers)

I'd say targeted raids by a coalition. Bomb specific targets. Cut off their money. There isn't a quick fix.

Even if you killed all the ones from Syria and Iraq today, there could be an attack tomorrow by their supporters that are all around the world already. Then what? Kill more people in Syria? Bomb some innocents?

Terrorism is here to stay whether it is by ISIS, another group or random nutjobs.
See this defeatist attitude is bull####. I'm not taking Otis' side here but incremental action significantly reducing their power and effectiveness is a great starting point. We don't have to perfectly and surgically remove every individual terrorist to claim we are making strides.Sure there will 'always be terrorists.' But there won't always be groups as strong as Daesh or AQ. And those little cells around the world - they won't do #### if the head of the organization is chopped off.
So you agree with everything but call it a bull#### attitude? mmmkay.
No. I agree with you prescriptive ideas. I disagree with the follow up attitude (even if you killed all the terrorists in Iraq and Syria terrorism still exists). Maybe I misunderstood.
You can call it 'defeatist'. I'll call it reality.
It's true but not a good enough reason to remove any options off the table.
Never said it should. Just implied that wackos like Otis will be screaming to nuke everyone while progress is being made.

 
Jewish teacher stabbed in French city of MarseilleA teacher at a Jewish school in the southern French city of Marseille has been stabbed by three people who shouted anti-Semitic insults at him.

One of them was wearing an Islamic State (IS) T-shirt, Marseilles prosecutor Brice Robin told Reuters.

Police said the teacher's life was not in danger. A hunt is under way for the attackers.

...
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-34864509?ocid=socialflow_facebook&ns_mchannel=social&ns_campaign=bbcnews&ns_source=facebook

 
Ok fine. Will you guys at least approve use of a couple hundred thousand mini-nukes, each one only big enough to nuke an individual terrorist? Because we really need to nuke 'em, and we don't seem to be making any progress in here.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Ok fine. Will you guys at least approval a couple hundred thousand mini-nukes, each one only big enough to nuke an individual terrorist? Because we really need to nuke 'em, and we don't seem to be making any progress in here.
When are you getting together with emminence, RBM, TPW and Grandpa Rox for the big slumber party?

 
Ok fine. Will you guys at least approval a couple hundred thousand mini-nukes, each one only big enough to nuke an individual terrorist? Because we really need to nuke 'em, and we don't seem to be making any progress in here.
When are you getting together with emminence, RBM, TPW and Grandpa Rox for the big slumber party?
I understand I'm not in great company here. But sometimes you just need to brave when you're right.

 
Ok fine. Will you guys at least approval a couple hundred thousand mini-nukes, each one only big enough to nuke an individual terrorist? Because we really need to nuke 'em, and we don't seem to be making any progress in here.
When are you getting together with emminence, RBM, TPW and Grandpa Rox for the big slumber party?
I understand I'm not in great company here. But sometimes you just need to brave when you're right.
Brave from your Long Island front porch sipping wine?

 
Ok fine. Will you guys at least approval a couple hundred thousand mini-nukes, each one only big enough to nuke an individual terrorist? Because we really need to nuke 'em, and we don't seem to be making any progress in here.
When are you getting together with emminence, RBM, TPW and Grandpa Rox for the big slumber party?
I understand I'm not in great company here. But sometimes you just need to brave when you're right.
Brave from your Long Island front porch sipping wine?
It's dark and threatening to drop under 50 degrees. Let's see you brave those elements

 
Ok fine. Will you guys at least approval a couple hundred thousand mini-nukes, each one only big enough to nuke an individual terrorist? Because we really need to nuke 'em, and we don't seem to be making any progress in here.
When are you getting together with emminence, RBM, TPW and Grandpa Rox for the big slumber party?
I understand I'm not in great company here. But sometimes you just need to brave when you're right.
I am not sure brave means what you think it means. At least not when posting in a message board on the internet.

 
Couple questions I had not meant to bother anyone...

The likelihood that something will happen in the US is pretty great I'd suppose at this point? The method seems pretty easy, if even just 20 of the thousands of refugees coming here have bad intentions, it seems like homemade explosives are easy enough to make this point (not to mention, guns are easy enough to get)...the likelihood has to be some sort of crude suicide bomb, yes? This seems to not be a matter of if, but of when and where...or am I way off base? Pick up standard materials used to create a chemical reaction, walk into a crowded place during a crowded event and set it off. What am I missing there?

Obama will block any bill passed by the House that would make refugee admittance stricter. This seems off to me...don't we want a stricter vetting process? I'm not against refugees and (laugh now) but I didn't read the entire article but what's the downside to the bill if it's truly just to vet refugees we take in more closely? I'm not thinking "close the borders". I'm not thinking: "don't take refugees." I am of the mindset, let's be a bit more careful and I can't see where I'm going wrong there.

ETA: on the 2nd point...we can't do NOTHING. We have to do SOMETHING. Wouldn't the most humane SOMETHING being a middle ground as proposed by the house by vetting a lot more intensively? This seems crazy to me that we can't at least meet in that middle.

Open to changing both mindsets...and more just for discussion as someone who can't seem to come to a conclusion.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Couple questions I had not meant to bother anyone...

The likelihood that something will happen in the US is pretty great I'd suppose at this point? The method seems pretty easy, if even just 20 of the thousands of refugees coming here have bad intentions, it seems like homemade explosives are easy enough to make this point (not to mention, guns are easy enough to get)...the likelihood has to be some sort of crude suicide bomb, yes? This seems to not be a matter of if, but of when and where...or am I way off base? Pick up standard materials used to create a chemical reaction, walk into a crowded place during a crowded event and set it off. What am I missing there?
You are not missing anything. This one is going to happen eventually unless they run out of low IQ sub-humans to carry out the task.

 
Couple questions I had not meant to bother anyone...

The likelihood that something will happen in the US is pretty great I'd suppose at this point? The method seems pretty easy, if even just 20 of the thousands of refugees coming here have bad intentions, it seems like homemade explosives are easy enough to make this point (not to mention, guns are easy enough to get)...the likelihood has to be some sort of crude suicide bomb, yes? This seems to not be a matter of if, but of when and where...or am I way off base? Pick up standard materials used to create a chemical reaction, walk into a crowded place during a crowded event and set it off. What am I missing there?

Obama will block any bill passed by the House that would make refugee admittance stricter. This seems off to me...don't we want a stricter vetting process? I'm not against refugees and (laugh now) but I didn't read the entire article but what's the downside to the bill if it's truly just to vet refugees we take in more closely? I'm not thinking "close the borders". I'm not thinking: "don't take refugees." I am of the mindset, let's be a bit more careful and I can't see where I'm going wrong there.

ETA: on the 2nd point...we can't do NOTHING. We have to do SOMETHING. Wouldn't the most humane SOMETHING being a middle ground as proposed by the house by vetting a lot more intensively? This seems crazy to me that we can't at least meet in that middle.

Open to changing both mindsets...and more just for discussion as someone who can't seem to come to a conclusion.
the low bar isn't refugees it is people traveling on tourist visas. How do we stop European citizens from coming here on a tourist visa and doing what you are worried about?

 
Ok fine. Will you guys at least approval a couple hundred thousand mini-nukes, each one only big enough to nuke an individual terrorist? Because we really need to nuke 'em, and we don't seem to be making any progress in here.
When are you getting together with emminence, RBM, TPW and Grandpa Rox for the big slumber party?
I understand I'm not in great company here. But sometimes you just need to brave when you're right.
Brave from your Long Island front porch sipping wine?
I'd put a cap in a Syrian for a front porch. It's really my one biggest gripe about our new house.

 
Ok fine. Will you guys at least approval a couple hundred thousand mini-nukes, each one only big enough to nuke an individual terrorist? Because we really need to nuke 'em, and we don't seem to be making any progress in here.
When are you getting together with emminence, RBM, TPW and Grandpa Rox for the big slumber party?
I understand I'm not in great company here. But sometimes you just need to brave when you're right.
Brave from your Long Island front porch sipping wine?
It's dark and threatening to drop under 50 degrees. Let's see you brave those elements
Oh yeah, and I'm not on Long Island right now.

Oh and not sipping wine.

I am, however, enjoying a delicious Spotted Cow. Can you guess there I am? #jeopardymusic #beernerdthread

 
Ok fine. Will you guys at least approval a couple hundred thousand mini-nukes, each one only big enough to nuke an individual terrorist? Because we really need to nuke 'em, and we don't seem to be making any progress in here.
When are you getting together with emminence, RBM, TPW and Grandpa Rox for the big slumber party?
I understand I'm not in great company here. But sometimes you just need to brave when you're right.
Brave from your Long Island front porch sipping wine?
It's dark and threatening to drop under 50 degrees. Let's see you brave those elements
Oh yeah, and I'm not on Long Island right now.

Oh and not sipping wine.

I am, however, enjoying a delicious Spotted Cow. Can you guess there I am? #jeopardymusic #beernerdthread
Wisconsin.

 
My significant other travels internationally for work 5 months out of the year.

This year her assignment is the middle east... Qatar, UAE, Oman, Iran, Uzbekistan (and one of the other stans).

I thought it was interesting, I feel safer that she has those countries to cover this year as opposed to Europe.

Not that we are really concerned about either but I just thought that was interesting.

 
My significant other travels internationally for work 5 months out of the year.

This year her assignment is the middle east... Qatar, UAE, Oman, Iran, Uzbekistan (and one of the other stans).

I thought it was interesting, I feel safer that she has those countries to cover this year as opposed to Europe.

Not that we are really concerned about either but I just thought that was interesting.
I could see that. The West isn't secure as it once was. These guys are just way dedicated nowadays.

 
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/isis-defector-explained-key-reason-180356055.html

Cut off their income and the losers that joined them, because they need $, will start to become angry that they are now terrorist working for free in conditions where they can't drink, smoke or look at hot chicks. They may as well turn gay at that point.

Seems as if Russia and France are working on that while Obama walks around with his thumb up his ###.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Couple questions I had not meant to bother anyone...

The likelihood that something will happen in the US is pretty great I'd suppose at this point? The method seems pretty easy, if even just 20 of the thousands of refugees coming here have bad intentions, it seems like homemade explosives are easy enough to make this point (not to mention, guns are easy enough to get)...the likelihood has to be some sort of crude suicide bomb, yes? This seems to not be a matter of if, but of when and where...or am I way off base? Pick up standard materials used to create a chemical reaction, walk into a crowded place during a crowded event and set it off. What am I missing there?

Obama will block any bill passed by the House that would make refugee admittance stricter. This seems off to me...don't we want a stricter vetting process? I'm not against refugees and (laugh now) but I didn't read the entire article but what's the downside to the bill if it's truly just to vet refugees we take in more closely? I'm not thinking "close the borders". I'm not thinking: "don't take refugees." I am of the mindset, let's be a bit more careful and I can't see where I'm going wrong there.

ETA: on the 2nd point...we can't do NOTHING. We have to do SOMETHING. Wouldn't the most humane SOMETHING being a middle ground as proposed by the house by vetting a lot more intensively? This seems crazy to me that we can't at least meet in that middle.

Open to changing both mindsets...and more just for discussion as someone who can't seem to come to a conclusion.
Meeting in the middle is a mistake when one side has gone bat#### crazy. We are already behind the curve in hosting Syrian refugees. Increasing the vetting process to make xenophobic conservatives feel better is silly policy.

 
Dumb question I'm sure, but with these bomb threats tonight -- how on earth would anybody get a bomb on a plane leaving someplace in America in 2015? The security measures seem (thankfully) really great.

I've never felt safer on a plane than I have this year, for whatever reason.
Its called "inside job".
Most of what the TSA does is worthless. We owe a lot more to good intelligence and the fact that we are more difficult to get to geographically than Europe.

 
Couple questions I had not meant to bother anyone...

The likelihood that something will happen in the US is pretty great I'd suppose at this point? The method seems pretty easy, if even just 20 of the thousands of refugees coming here have bad intentions, it seems like homemade explosives are easy enough to make this point (not to mention, guns are easy enough to get)...the likelihood has to be some sort of crude suicide bomb, yes? This seems to not be a matter of if, but of when and where...or am I way off base? Pick up standard materials used to create a chemical reaction, walk into a crowded place during a crowded event and set it off. What am I missing there?

Obama will block any bill passed by the House that would make refugee admittance stricter. This seems off to me...don't we want a stricter vetting process? I'm not against refugees and (laugh now) but I didn't read the entire article but what's the downside to the bill if it's truly just to vet refugees we take in more closely? I'm not thinking "close the borders". I'm not thinking: "don't take refugees." I am of the mindset, let's be a bit more careful and I can't see where I'm going wrong there.

ETA: on the 2nd point...we can't do NOTHING. We have to do SOMETHING. Wouldn't the most humane SOMETHING being a middle ground as proposed by the house by vetting a lot more intensively? This seems crazy to me that we can't at least meet in that middle.

Open to changing both mindsets...and more just for discussion as someone who can't seem to come to a conclusion.
Meeting in the middle is a mistake when one side has gone bat#### crazy. We are already behind the curve in hosting Syrian refugees. Increasing the vetting process to make xenophobic conservatives feel better is silly policy.
Conservatives have nothing to do with my point. Maybe that's the issue... Everyone wants to jump first to a political side and then figure out where they stand. I'm looking for some feedback on the issue not a political pissing match that is presently occurring. Appeasing conservatives has nothing to do with anything when it comes to my thoughts. Jesus man.

You might as well say "we can't address this problem because it might make those damn conservatives satisfied!" you really care about that first and foremost?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
My significant other travels internationally for work 5 months out of the year.

This year her assignment is the middle east... Qatar, UAE, Oman, Iran, Uzbekistan (and one of the other stans).

I thought it was interesting, I feel safer that she has those countries to cover this year as opposed to Europe.

Not that we are really concerned about either but I just thought that was interesting.
This seems a little silly. Your wife is in more danger in Detroit than she is in Europe.

 
Ok fine. Will you guys at least approval a couple hundred thousand mini-nukes, each one only big enough to nuke an individual terrorist? Because we really need to nuke 'em, and we don't seem to be making any progress in here.
When are you getting together with emminence, RBM, TPW and Grandpa Rox for the big slumber party?
I understand I'm not in great company here. But sometimes you just need to brave when you're right.
Brave from your Long Island front porch sipping wine?
ouIt's dark and threatening to drop under 50 degrees. Let's see you brave those elements
Oh yeah, and I'm not on Long Island right now.

Oh and not sipping wine.

I am, however, enjoying a delicious Spotted Cow. Can you guess there I am? #jeopardymusic #beernerdthread
Somewhere in the best suburb Chicago has to offer, Wisconsin

 
Honduras arrests 5 Syrians with stolen passports.

http://news.yahoo.com/honduras-arrests-five-syrians-headed-us-stolen-passports-204536480.html

Tegucigalpa (AFP) - Honduran authorities have arrested five Syrians intending to make it to the United States with stolen Greek passports, triggering alarm Wednesday in the wake of the Paris attacks launched by Syria-linked jihadists.

The Syrians were arrested on Tuesday as they flew into Toncontin airport serving the Honduran capital and failed to make it past airport security checks, a police spokesman, Anibal Baca, told reporters.

"Five Syrian citizens have been detained and will be taken to our offices to be investigated because it is suspected they are carrying false documents, passports stolen in Greece," Baca said.

 
My significant other travels internationally for work 5 months out of the year.

This year her assignment is the middle east... Qatar, UAE, Oman, Iran, Uzbekistan (and one of the other stans).

I thought it was interesting, I feel safer that she has those countries to cover this year as opposed to Europe.

Not that we are really concerned about either but I just thought that was interesting.
This seems a little silly. Your wife is in more danger in Detroit than she is in Europe.
What are you on tonight?

Im comparing the ME to Europe. Not the ME to the US.

 
My significant other travels internationally for work 5 months out of the year.

This year her assignment is the middle east... Qatar, UAE, Oman, Iran, Uzbekistan (and one of the other stans).

I thought it was interesting, I feel safer that she has those countries to cover this year as opposed to Europe.

Not that we are really concerned about either but I just thought that was interesting.
This seems a little silly. Your wife is in more danger in Detroit than she is in Europe.
What are you on tonight?

Im comparing the ME to Europe. Not the ME to the US.
Gunz doesn't read well.

 
Couple questions I had not meant to bother anyone...

The likelihood that something will happen in the US is pretty great I'd suppose at this point? The method seems pretty easy, if even just 20 of the thousands of refugees coming here have bad intentions, it seems like homemade explosives are easy enough to make this point (not to mention, guns are easy enough to get)...the likelihood has to be some sort of crude suicide bomb, yes? This seems to not be a matter of if, but of when and where...or am I way off base? Pick up standard materials used to create a chemical reaction, walk into a crowded place during a crowded event and set it off. What am I missing there?

Obama will block any bill passed by the House that would make refugee admittance stricter. This seems off to me...don't we want a stricter vetting process? I'm not against refugees and (laugh now) but I didn't read the entire article but what's the downside to the bill if it's truly just to vet refugees we take in more closely? I'm not thinking "close the borders". I'm not thinking: "don't take refugees." I am of the mindset, let's be a bit more careful and I can't see where I'm going wrong there.

ETA: on the 2nd point...we can't do NOTHING. We have to do SOMETHING. Wouldn't the most humane SOMETHING being a middle ground as proposed by the house by vetting a lot more intensively? This seems crazy to me that we can't at least meet in that middle.

Open to changing both mindsets...and more just for discussion as someone who can't seem to come to a conclusion.
Meeting in the middle is a mistake when one side has gone bat#### crazy. We are already behind the curve in hosting Syrian refugees. Increasing the vetting process to make xenophobic conservatives feel better is silly policy.
Conservatives have nothing to do with my point. Maybe that's the issue... Everyone wants to jump first to a political side and then figure out where they stand. I'm looking for some feedback on the issue not a political pissing match that is presently occurring. Appeasing conservatives has nothing to do with anything when it comes to my thoughts. Jesus man.

You might as well say "we can't address this problem because it might make those damn conservatives satisfied!" you really care about that first and foremost?
Sorry dude - you were talking about politics in your post so I don't think it was really off base to respond with a post that gave a political opinion.

In short, you're more likely to be struck by lightening while holding a winning powerball ticket than you are to be blown up by a Syrian refugee terrorist. I guess I'll let you pontificate on the need for legislation once you factor in Bayes theorem.

 
Gunz...my post had zero to do with politics. This is why I try to never post in any current events or political threads. It's impossible.

I think last time I tried to just ask a question, some conservative told me they hoped id die in a fire.

Awful

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Couple questions I had not meant to bother anyone...

The likelihood that something will happen in the US is pretty great I'd suppose at this point? The method seems pretty easy, if even just 20 of the thousands of refugees coming here have bad intentions, it seems like homemade explosives are easy enough to make this point (not to mention, guns are easy enough to get)...the likelihood has to be some sort of crude suicide bomb, yes? This seems to not be a matter of if, but of when and where...or am I way off base? Pick up standard materials used to create a chemical reaction, walk into a crowded place during a crowded event and set it off. What am I missing there?

Obama will block any bill passed by the House that would make refugee admittance stricter. This seems off to me...don't we want a stricter vetting process? I'm not against refugees and (laugh now) but I didn't read the entire article but what's the downside to the bill if it's truly just to vet refugees we take in more closely? I'm not thinking "close the borders". I'm not thinking: "don't take refugees." I am of the mindset, let's be a bit more careful and I can't see where I'm going wrong there.

ETA: on the 2nd point...we can't do NOTHING. We have to do SOMETHING. Wouldn't the most humane SOMETHING being a middle ground as proposed by the house by vetting a lot more intensively? This seems crazy to me that we can't at least meet in that middle.

Open to changing both mindsets...and more just for discussion as someone who can't seem to come to a conclusion.
I think the US has some moral responsibility here. First we invaded Iraq. Then we screwed up the security. Then we left, leaving these lunatics to run wild.

Otoh I don't what this 'vetting' is. People keep saying it like it means something, We have people with fake passports, no home addresses, no credit history, etc., what are we checking? This isn't like hiring a bank clerk. I said this before but I think it should take hold - it's a disaster, women, children and families first, and I'm guessing that would make up the whole 10,000 or whatever we're talking about. I think this would solve a lot of problems and concerns.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I'VE GOT IT.

What if we paint a mural. Or several murals. Really colorful ones that make you feel happy when you look at them. All over the major cities in Syria.

OH. Instead of putting warheads in the bombs we just put in different color paints, and they'll splat like giant paintballs all over the place.

 
Not taking in Syrian refugees because it sends a bad message to the Muslim world in insane to me. They don't get our message regardless. Someone could write a cartoon tomorrow and inflame the region.

If we do take refugees I would not want any single males under 30. You late-thirties married with kids? Start with those people first.

 
Not taking in Syrian refugees because it sends a bad message to the Muslim world in insane to me. They don't get our message regardless. Someone could write a cartoon tomorrow and inflame the region.
This. I also don't get the current strategy of "we can't go in with more force or it will piss them off and create more terrorists" yet we continue to use drone strikes that... guess what? ...piss them off and creates more terrorists.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Ok fine. Will you guys at least approval a couple hundred thousand mini-nukes, each one only big enough to nuke an individual terrorist? Because we really need to nuke 'em, and we don't seem to be making any progress in here.
When are you getting together with emminence, RBM, TPW and Grandpa Rox for the big slumber party?
I understand I'm not in great company here. But sometimes you just need to brave when you're right.
Brave from your Long Island front porch sipping wine?
It's dark and threatening to drop under 50 degrees. Let's see you brave those elements
Oh yeah, and I'm not on Long Island right now.

Oh and not sipping wine.

I am, however, enjoying a delicious Spotted Cow. Can you guess there I am? #jeopardymusic #beernerdthread
In a farm field in Iowa, hoping a bull doesn't sneak up on you from behind while you're occupied with that cow?

 
Just watched a video of Turkish fans chanting Alluha Akbar during a moment of silence. That's not good. It wasn't 10 guys either, more like a few thousand.
Nuke it. Seriously. Despicable.
Good internet rule: when you type the words "nuke it", stop, erase it, and go watch some porn.

It's even more offensive when smart folks who should know better use it.
Who else used that phrase?

 
Not taking in Syrian refugees because it sends a bad message to the Muslim world in insane to me. They don't get our message regardless. Someone could write a cartoon tomorrow and inflame the region.
This. I also don't get the current strategy of "we can't go in with more force or it will piss them off and create more terrorists" yet we continue to use drone strikes that... guess what? ...piss them off and creates more terrorists.
terrorists are creating more terrorists ...doesnt matter what we do...they start brain washing and recruiting children as young as 6...playing nice wont change a thing...we are and will always be the enemy infidels

 
Couple questions I had not meant to bother anyone...

The likelihood that something will happen in the US is pretty great I'd suppose at this point? The method seems pretty easy, if even just 20 of the thousands of refugees coming here have bad intentions, it seems like homemade explosives are easy enough to make this point (not to mention, guns are easy enough to get)...the likelihood has to be some sort of crude suicide bomb, yes? This seems to not be a matter of if, but of when and where...or am I way off base? Pick up standard materials used to create a chemical reaction, walk into a crowded place during a crowded event and set it off. What am I missing there?

Obama will block any bill passed by the House that would make refugee admittance stricter. This seems off to me...don't we want a stricter vetting process? I'm not against refugees and (laugh now) but I didn't read the entire article but what's the downside to the bill if it's truly just to vet refugees we take in more closely? I'm not thinking "close the borders". I'm not thinking: "don't take refugees." I am of the mindset, let's be a bit more careful and I can't see where I'm going wrong there.

ETA: on the 2nd point...we can't do NOTHING. We have to do SOMETHING. Wouldn't the most humane SOMETHING being a middle ground as proposed by the house by vetting a lot more intensively? This seems crazy to me that we can't at least meet in that middle.

Open to changing both mindsets...and more just for discussion as someone who can't seem to come to a conclusion.
Meeting in the middle is a mistake when one side has gone bat#### crazy. We are already behind the curve in hosting Syrian refugees. Increasing the vetting process to make xenophobic conservatives feel better is silly policy.
Conservatives have nothing to do with my point. Maybe that's the issue... Everyone wants to jump first to a political side and then figure out where they stand.I'm looking for some feedback on the issue not a political pissing match that is presently occurring. Appeasing conservatives has nothing to do with anything when it comes to my thoughts. Jesus man.

You might as well say "we can't address this problem because it might make those damn conservatives satisfied!" you really care about that first and foremost?
You've not met TGunz yet?? Not "everyone" wants to go the route of politics. I'm with you on this one :hifive:

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top