What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

When Marcus Mason gets cut, and he probably will (1 Viewer)

Hoss_Cartwright

Footballguy
I can see a RB starved team nabbing him if Washington tries to put him on their practice squad.

Rich Tandler's Real Redskins

A blog for sophisticated Redskins Fans.

Marcus Mason

The second-year back, who spent all of last year on the Washington Redskins' practice squad, looked good running the ball. He was decisive, quick to the hole, and he had a sneaky way of dodging through traffic to make the most out of each carry. He wound up with 98 yards on 18 carries. Mason also caught a touchdown pass from Colt Brennan, improvising like a veteran as the rookie QB rolled out of the pocket.

Naturally, such a performance has some calling Mason a lock to make the final roster.

Not so fast, my friend.

Barring injury, Mason has a very small chance of making the final 53. It's a numbers game, as simple as that.

The Redskins will carry 25 players on offense. Three will be quarterbacks, three will be tight ends. Nine offensive linemen is the bare minimum and even at that at least one of your reserves has to be ready to play two positions, more if one of them is inactive.

That leaves ten spots for backs and receivers. Five wide receivers will make the team; six is a possibility, as discussed here earlier. If that happens, the extra spot is likely to come out of the allotment for the defense and there will be 26 offensive layers.

Portis, Betts, and Cartwright all will make it and none of them is well-suited to play fullback. That means that either Nemo Broughton or a player to be named later has to stick as the backup to Mike Sellers.

The end result is that there is no room for Marcus Mason. The best his supporters can hope for is that he lands on the practice squad again.

Join me for a live blog of Saturday's preseason game. Go here for details.

Posted by Rich Tandler at 8/04/2008 06:09:00 PM

Labels: Preseason games 2008

8 comments:

Travis J. said...

Rich,

Don't be so suprised if 'the Rock' gets cut in the end...

J.Gibbs is GONE now if you hadn't noticed... [ROCK be a 'core' Redskin]... Times be A'Changin - are they not. When Portis starts to fade - M.Mason has the potential to be 'The Man' in the backfield! [Certainly wont be R.C. - & Betts is Portis' age too]

Never say never. Marcus Mason [after Portis] might be the NEXT TRUTH!

8/05/2008 07:50:00 AM

Ben Folsom said...

Curly R has been a big proponent of Marcus Mason since last preseason (as seen here , here, here and here) and I see him sticking with this team. Despite Rock's performance on Sunday's HOF game and because of Marcus' strong showing, I still do not see Rock as an every down option at tailback, meaning that no matter Rock's designation on the depth chart, if it comes to that he won't be an option and Marcus will get his shot.

Based on practice squad rules Marcus could be cut by the Redskins and still serve up to two more seasons on the practice squad, he has accrued only one game of active service. I think the Redskins might lose him before they need him, that's my concern.

Marcus certainly does not feature into the Redskins' plans for this season, barring injury, though going forward it's Jim Zorn's team now, the prejudices toward Ladell and Clinton are eroding.

8/05/2008 11:53:00 AM

Dustin M. Czarny said...

Rich,

Sellers will be backed up by Fred Davis and Todd Yoder. The way the West coast offense works iis that the reserve TEs seem to be lining up as the FB. note that NEMO did not play at all during the HOF game and I am pretty sure neither did Sellers. I am not sure we need a backup FB on the roster.

We may need 4 RBs though with the injury history of Betts and Portis. I am not totally sold on Mason, and I love Rock. But We have seen it before where both Portis and Betts were out with injuries. We need 2 quality RBs backing them up for depth alone.

8/05/2008 02:52:00 PM

Rich Tandler said...

I'm aware that Gibbs is gone, Travis. I also know that all coaches like players such as Cartwright and Thrash because they help keep coaches employed by doing the dirty work.

Ben, thanks for dropping by. Most third-string players are not "every down options" by conventional standards. At that level of the depth chart, you look at what else the player can do. As noted, Rock is one of the better kick returners in the league and he is generally a special teams stud. Mason? Don't know.

Dustin, thanks for coming by as well. I'm not sure what "injury history" you're talking about. Betts hasn't missed a game in two years. Portis didn't miss one last year and the eight he missed on '06 was more than he missed in his other five seasons in the league combined.

8/05/2008 04:54:00 PM

houseman said...

In all fairness, regardless what Mason does on the field it appears to me that most of you are ok with the backs we currently have. Well, I don't know if you all are watching the same TV or you are in la la land but excuse me this kid is a player. I hope no I pray this kid gets a chance in Washington because if he doesn't. I bet almost anything he will land on another team and be a star and guess what we will be saying then. Man, we should have given this kid a chance. No disrespect to the current running backs but it time to put up or shut up period!

8/05/2008 05:45:00 PM

Anonymous said...

If you think the skins are going to cut a team leader, a guy who was top five in the NFL in kick return yards, and a viable backup running back think again. Rock is a leader and a great option as a #3 running back. And if you don't think so go back to the Rams game in 05.. him and portis put up 100 yards. Mason is a great player.. he'll just have to find another team to do it with. That or we keep him and trade betts.

I always hate when bloggers bring up the idea of trading betts but if the team thinks mason is starter/2nd string material its not a bad idea. Carry 4 running backs throughout the first quarter of the season. When a running back goes down in the league trade betts and recoop that 2nd we lost for JT55.

8/06/2008 05:05:00 PM

Rich Tandler said...

Betts just redid his deal to help Taylor's salary fit in,adding a year and guaranteeing a roster bonus, so that makes a trade unlikely, although certainly not impossible.

Zorn is a rookie head coach. I don't see him taking too many gambles with untested personnel. Out with the old and in with the new is a nice, romantic notion but when push comes to shove, the Z-man is going to play it safe. That means sticking with Betts and Cartwright.

8/06/2008 05:16:00 PM

houseman said...

Don't get me wrong I truly understand salary cap as well as your research of Cartwright past performance but honestly if he was as great as a kickoff returner and option back don't you think another team would has snatched him when they had a chance? I'm not questioning his ability because it's proven and I'm not here to bash any player but sometimes in life you have to take a risk. Look at the Wright brothers if they didn't keep trying to fly there would be no airplanes....This is just opinion and I understand that people will never see the things as you would. Cartwright, Portis, Betts, and Mason I wish you all the best....Houseman:)

8/06/2008 05:46:00 PM

 
Rich Tandler's a good local Redskin writer. He's been following them for years and I enjoy reading his stuff. But I think he's wrong about Mason getting cut. My guess is that Mason's good enough on special teams that they'll find a way to keep him.

 
fatness said:
Rich Tandler's a good local Redskin writer. He's been following them for years and I enjoy reading his stuff. But I think he's wrong about Mason getting cut. My guess is that Mason's good enough on special teams that they'll find a way to keep him.
You would think they would keep him, but I'm not so sure they will. Looks like he may be a victim of the numbers game.
 
We'll find out tomorrow when Zorn announces the cuts. I think he's already done enough to make the team. "Numbers" are not set in stone.

 
We'll find out tomorrow when Zorn announces the cuts. I think he's already done enough to make the team. "Numbers" are not set in stone.
Oh, I agree with that, but sometimes having "done enough to make the team" doesn't guarantee he will make the team. It will be very interesting if they try to stash him on their practice squad. It's a about a 100% chance he gets plucked if they do try it.
 
We'll find out tomorrow when Zorn announces the cuts. I think he's already done enough to make the team. "Numbers" are not set in stone.
Oh, I agree with that, but sometimes having "done enough to make the team" doesn't guarantee he will make the team. It will be very interesting if they try to stash him on their practice squad. It's a about a 100% chance he gets plucked if they do try it.
They know he will not make it to the practice squad, therefore, they know they have to roster him or lose him, one of the two. I am guessing they will find a way to keep him.

 
We'll find out tomorrow when Zorn announces the cuts. I think he's already done enough to make the team. "Numbers" are not set in stone.
Oh, I agree with that, but sometimes having "done enough to make the team" doesn't guarantee he will make the team. It will be very interesting if they try to stash him on their practice squad. It's a about a 100% chance he gets plucked if they do try it.
They know he will not make it to the practice squad, therefore, they know they have to roster him or lose him, one of the two. I am guessing they will find a way to keep him.
That would be the smart thing to do, but are you convinced they will be smart about it?
 
They know he will not make it to the practice squad, therefore, they know they have to roster him or lose him, one of the two. I am guessing they will find a way to keep him.
:goodposting: They would be dumb to cut him outright. They could probably get a 6th-7th round pick for him in a trade if it came down to that.
 
They know he will not make it to the practice squad, therefore, they know they have to roster him or lose him, one of the two. I am guessing they will find a way to keep him.
:kicksrock: They would be dumb to cut him outright. They could probably get a 6th-7th round pick for him in a trade if it came down to that.
Please , thats pushing it . They would get nothing for him if they were trying to trade him.If they cut someone would take him as a 4th RB or special team player, dont think he would get a shot to start somewhere .
 
They know he will not make it to the practice squad, therefore, they know they have to roster him or lose him, one of the two. I am guessing they will find a way to keep him.
:goodposting: They would be dumb to cut him outright. They could probably get a 6th-7th round pick for him in a trade if it came down to that.
Please , thats pushing it . They would get nothing for him if they were trying to trade him.If they cut someone would take him as a 4th RB or special team player, dont think he would get a shot to start somewhere .
He's not much of a special teams player. That's part of the reason why his roster spot is in jeopardy. Washington already has two good backs who don't play special teams (Betts, Portis) and one who's a special teams ace (Cartwright), so there's no roster spot available for a fourth back. Maybe it's a stretch to think a team would give up a draft pick to get him, but there are a number of teams who could use him. Last year the Packers gave up a 6th round pick for Ryan Grant, a practice squad guy who had never carried the ball in an NFL game. I don't think it's absurd to expect Mason to command a similar price.
 
They know he will not make it to the practice squad, therefore, they know they have to roster him or lose him, one of the two. I am guessing they will find a way to keep him.
:lmao: They would be dumb to cut him outright. They could probably get a 6th-7th round pick for him in a trade if it came down to that.
Please , thats pushing it . They would get nothing for him if they were trying to trade him.If they cut someone would take him as a 4th RB or special team player, dont think he would get a shot to start somewhere .
He's not much of a special teams player. That's part of the reason why his roster spot is in jeopardy. Washington already has two good backs who don't play special teams (Betts, Portis) and one who's a special teams ace (Cartwright), so there's no roster spot available for a fourth back. Maybe it's a stretch to think a team would give up a draft pick to get him, but there are a number of teams who could use him. Last year the Packers gave up a 6th round pick for Ryan Grant, a practice squad guy who had never carried the ball in an NFL game. I don't think it's absurd to expect Mason to command a similar price.
:lmao:
 
Hoss_Cartwright said:
Posted by Rich Tandler at 8/04/2008 06:09:00 PM
I was wondering why Tandler had changed his mind again. Turns out he didn't; the article you cited is a bit out of date. Here are newer ones from Tandler concerning Marcus Mason. I hope someone didn't read the older one and drop Mason. Rich Tandler's blog, August 11 2008

I'm starting to change my mind about Marcus Mason. I think the kid has a shot.

He's not a lock to make the Washington Redskins' roster by any stretch. But it seems like each carry he adds to his resume makes it harder and harder for the coaching staff to leave him off of the roster.

Mason was very impressive in that final Redskins drive that burned all but 23 seconds off of the final 10:07 of the game. He carried 11 times for 62 yards during that clinching advance.

Yes, he was running against players in Buffalo uniforms who will be working at Best Buy in September. But he also was running behind an offensive line that was slapped together from spare parts due to injuries.



I was reminded that Mason actually did make the 53-man roster at the start of last season. His tenure with the Redskins lasted one game; they released him after the season opener to make way for receiver Reche Caldwell. But the fact is that the team did open the season with four running backs on the roster and Marcus Mason was one of them.

I still don't think it's a good idea to keep a fourth running back. With injuries an issue at cornerback and depth a problem at linebacker, it's risky to short another position to keep a player just for the sake of keeping him.

However, Jim Zorn may not agree. He has commented recently that the team just might have to find a spot for Mason.

A week ago, I would have put his chances of making the team at about 10% or less. Right now, I'd put it at around 40% and rising
Rich Tandler's blog, August 20, 2008
But with two games to go, the Redskins roster is as good as set.

Here are three sets of roster predictions. One is mine (as of today, 8/20), the other belongs to my friend Robert Large of WarpathInsiders.com (posted on 8/11), the other to Jason LaCanfora (posted on 8/19). I'm only going to discuss differences between them, which is the point here:

Quarterback (3): Campbell, Collins, Brennan

Running back (4): Portis, Betts, Cartwright, Mason—I added Mason from my original list. While I don't necessarily think it's a good idea as it will short another position, it looks like it's going to happen. There is something to be said for keeping the 53 best football players.
All 3 beat writers agreed on August 20 that they thought Mason would make the roster. That doesn't mean he will, but it reflects current thinking and information more than the older article originally cited.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Hoss_Cartwright said:
Posted by Rich Tandler at 8/04/2008 06:09:00 PM
I was wondering why Tandler had changed his mind again. Turns out he didn't; the article you cited is a bit out of date. Here are newer ones from Tandler concerning Marcus Mason. I hope someone didn't read the older one and drop Mason. Rich Tandler's blog, August 11 2008

I'm starting to change my mind about Marcus Mason. I think the kid has a shot.

He's not a lock to make the Washington Redskins' roster by any stretch. But it seems like each carry he adds to his resume makes it harder and harder for the coaching staff to leave him off of the roster.

Mason was very impressive in that final Redskins drive that burned all but 23 seconds off of the final 10:07 of the game. He carried 11 times for 62 yards during that clinching advance.

Yes, he was running against players in Buffalo uniforms who will be working at Best Buy in September. But he also was running behind an offensive line that was slapped together from spare parts due to injuries.



I was reminded that Mason actually did make the 53-man roster at the start of last season. His tenure with the Redskins lasted one game; they released him after the season opener to make way for receiver Reche Caldwell. But the fact is that the team did open the season with four running backs on the roster and Marcus Mason was one of them.

I still don't think it's a good idea to keep a fourth running back. With injuries an issue at cornerback and depth a problem at linebacker, it's risky to short another position to keep a player just for the sake of keeping him.

However, Jim Zorn may not agree. He has commented recently that the team just might have to find a spot for Mason.

A week ago, I would have put his chances of making the team at about 10% or less. Right now, I'd put it at around 40% and rising
Rich Tandler's blog, August 20, 2008
But with two games to go, the Redskins roster is as good as set.

Here are three sets of roster predictions. One is mine (as of today, 8/20), the other belongs to my friend Robert Large of WarpathInsiders.com (posted on 8/11), the other to Jason LaCanfora (posted on 8/19). I'm only going to discuss differences between them, which is the point here:

Quarterback (3): Campbell, Collins, Brennan

Running back (4): Portis, Betts, Cartwright, Mason—I added Mason from my original list. While I don't necessarily think it's a good idea as it will short another position, it looks like it's going to happen. There is something to be said for keeping the 53 best football players.
All 3 beat writers agreed on August 20 that they thought Mason would make the roster. That doesn't mean he will, but it reflects current thinking and information more than the older article originally cited.
The word on the street in the Dc Area, is that they will keep him and only carry 5 wr's S Moss, A Randel El, D Thomas, J Thrash and M Kelley.My guess is they realize that in October if they have an inury it'll be easier to find Anthony Mix or Billy McMullin sitting at home then Mason.

 
Rich Tandler's opinion, August 29

53-man roster final prediction

Cuts are coming soon; here is my final stab at who will make the Washington Redskins final 53-man roster

Quarterback (3): Campbell, Collins, Brennan—This has been set for a while.

Running back (4): Portis, Betts, Cartwright, Mason—At his Friday press conference, Zorn was noncommittal about Mason making it so he's still on the bubble to an extent.
 
Posted by Rich Tandler at 8/04/2008 06:09:00 PM
I was wondering why Tandler had changed his mind again. Turns out he didn't; the article you cited is a bit out of date. Here are newer ones from Tandler concerning Marcus Mason. I hope someone didn't read the older one and drop Mason.
You've got it backwards as far as fantasy appeal goes. He becomes more appealing if he is dropped, in the hopes he lands somewhere where he will be used. If he isn't cut, he's dropable in most leagues.
 
If Mason does make the Redskins, and either Portis or Betts is injured, I believe Mason will get playing time this year. Cartwright is just not that good at RB.

 
We'll find out tomorrow when Zorn announces the cuts. I think he's already done enough to make the team. "Numbers" are not set in stone.
Oh, I agree with that, but sometimes having "done enough to make the team" doesn't guarantee he will make the team. It will be very interesting if they try to stash him on their practice squad. It's a about a 100% chance he gets plucked if they do try it.
They know he will not make it to the practice squad, therefore, they know they have to roster him or lose him, one of the two. I am guessing they will find a way to keep him.
Now that he's been cut, will Houston come calling? Wherever he ends up I hope it's a good landing.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Duke1948 said:
Bizkiteer said:
It's official...Marcus Mason has now been cut.
:goodposting: now if he can just catch on with a team that needs a RB, this could turn out nicely !!!!!!!!!
I wish the Redskins would have kept him; I like the guy. Wherever he lands I hope he does well.
 
We'll find out tomorrow when Zorn announces the cuts. I think he's already done enough to make the team. "Numbers" are not set in stone.
Oh, I agree with that, but sometimes having "done enough to make the team" doesn't guarantee he will make the team. It will be very interesting if they try to stash him on their practice squad. It's a about a 100% chance he gets plucked if they do try it.
They know he will not make it to the practice squad, therefore, they know they have to roster him or lose him, one of the two. I am guessing they will find a way to keep him.
Now that he's been cut, will Houston come calling? Wherever he ends up I hope it's a good landing.
Good call, Detroit may be another option as they only have 2 RBs.
 
We'll find out tomorrow when Zorn announces the cuts. I think he's already done enough to make the team. "Numbers" are not set in stone.
Oh, I agree with that, but sometimes having "done enough to make the team" doesn't guarantee he will make the team. It will be very interesting if they try to stash him on their practice squad. It's a about a 100% chance he gets plucked if they do try it.
They know he will not make it to the practice squad, therefore, they know they have to roster him or lose him, one of the two. I am guessing they will find a way to keep him.
Now that he's been cut, will Houston come calling? Wherever he ends up I hope it's a good landing.
Good call, Detroit may be another option as they only have 2 RBs.
If he is a decent kick returner and decent on special teams, he very well might be a possibility here. He was pretty impressive in preseason from what I saw. Maybe a homer can chime in on his return abilities.

 
Ravens signed RB Marcus Mason to their practice squad.

Mason led the NFL in preseason rushing. He has a shot to join the active roster early if Willis McGahee's recovery from knee surgery continues slowly

 
Ravens signed RB Marcus Mason to their practice squad.Mason led the NFL in preseason rushing. He has a shot to join the active roster early if Willis McGahee's recovery from knee surgery continues slowly
Good fit. He has a lot in common with Ray Rice, so he could probably fill in admirably if Ray were to get hurt. That said, his FF prospects are very :yawn: as a practice squad player in Baltimore. I'm dropping him in my leagues.
 
Ravens signed RB Marcus Mason to their practice squad.Mason led the NFL in preseason rushing. He has a shot to join the active roster early if Willis McGahee's recovery from knee surgery continues slowly
Good fit. He has a lot in common with Ray Rice, so he could probably fill in admirably if Ray were to get hurt. That said, his FF prospects are very :yawn: as a practice squad player in Baltimore. I'm dropping him in my leagues.
Mason's upside is ~Ladell Betts, though I don't think he's quite as good of a receiver as Betts is (and he's certainly not the KR that Betts is). He couldn't beat out Rock Cartwright because he was not very good on special teams, and your RB3 absolutely needs to be. The Ravens only signed him because McGahee is hurting. Long term (meaning after McGahee returns) I'm not sure he's got much value.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top