What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Where do you play? (1 Viewer)

LionBastards

Footballguy
Just curious where the Sharks play? I've been at Yahoo for about 10 years with our main money league.

This year I took a team at NFL.com and I'm not impressed.

I played at FleaFlicker years ago and never went back...don't really remember why.

I think I played at CBS once too (can't remember if that was a pick em challenge or FF team) and never went back there either.

Interested to hear what you guys think the best FREE site is...as I said my money league resides on Yahoo and I don't think they'd be interested in leaving/paying, but I like to try different free leagues.

I know its a bit late in the year but I'm just not liking the NFL.com league so that's what made me ask.

 
I'm in several Yahoo (money) leagues, and I like it there. their interface and navigation are nice, and it's pretty easy to do whatever you want to do, or view whatever info you want to see. this season they also came out with a cell phone app, so you can track all of your teams on your phone easily. they have projections and recommendations and all that, but I don't rely on that too much as I use FBG for that stuff.

I have tried online leagues in ESPN and CBS, and both of those were much less user friendly than Yahoo.

 
I'm in several Yahoo (money) leagues, and I like it there. their interface and navigation are nice, and it's pretty easy to do whatever you want to do, or view whatever info you want to see. this season they also came out with a cell phone app, so you can track all of your teams on your phone easily. they have projections and recommendations and all that, but I don't rely on that too much as I use FBG for that stuff.

I have tried online leagues in ESPN and CBS, and both of those were much less user friendly than Yahoo.
I have not tried it but I know Facebook has one that I think started as the EA Sports site...http://apps.facebook.com/fbfantasy/start?r.../fbfantasy/tour

 
myfantasyleague.com hands down. Yahoo is fine for my free leagues but for total control I like in money leagues at a good price MFL is the way to go.

 
I played in leagues on CBS and Fox Sports for one season and never went back after I tried ESPN, which remains my favorite place online to play Fantasy Football.

 
I'm sure I am in the minority here, but I prefer Yahoo over MFL. As commissioner, I moved one of my leagues to MFL last year. They have great features and options for customizations, but it's not intuitive, and the customizations are time-intensive and not for amateurs. I have a fairly extensive IT background and still did not feel the time required was worth the effort. Yahoo, while lacking in some of MFL's features (integrated survivor, pick 'em, league stories and polls, to name a few), is definitely more user friendly. This year Yahoo started offering free live scoring as well (had to pay in years past). Members of my leagues are involved in other leagues as well. In aggregate, we have tried MFL, ESPN, CBS, NFL.com, FOX (i think it's integrated with MSN now), and Yahoo. A vast majority of us prefer Yahoo. It seems to be the most well-rounded, even if it could use a few more features.

*Edited to add: Both my leagues are money leagues, if that makes any difference.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I'm sure I am in the minority here, but I prefer Yahoo over MFL. As commissioner, I moved one of my leagues to MFL last year. They have great features and options for customizations, but it's not intuitive, and the customizations are time-intensive and not for amateurs. I have a fairly extensive IT background and still did not feel the time required was worth the effort. Yahoo, while lacking in some of MFL's features (integrated survivor, pick 'em, league stories and polls, to name a few), is definitely more user friendly. This year Yahoo started offering free live scoring as well (had to pay in years past). Members of my leagues are involved in other leagues as well. In aggregate, we have tried MFL, ESPN, CBS, NFL.com, FOX (i think it's integrated with MSN now), and Yahoo. A vast majority of us prefer Yahoo. It seems to be the most well-rounded, even if it could use a few more features.*Edited to add: Both my leagues are money leagues, if that makes any difference.
I guess I am sharper than I thought. I have no IT background and I have no problem at all running my league on MFL. And as the poster said, the features and flexibility just blow away Yahoo or Sportsline or ESPN.
 
This is my 9th year in my main fantasy league and we've always used Yahoo. Was in an ESPN league a few years back but didn't care for it. Yahoo is great and the only other league service I would consider switching to is MFL.com

 
I've tried them all and MFL is superior.

That being said, if you go with a very standard league, no blind bidding system, no progressive scoring, no keepers, etc etc, then yahoo is adequate.

 
Been using Fanball for 6 years in my primary money league. It was OK at first then absolutely horrible for 2 years and this year is probably just meh.

 
I have a fairly extensive IT background and still did not feel the time required was worth the effort.
Maybe you can help yahoo figure out their blind bid system, because their IT certainly has no clue when players are awarded to the wrong owners.
 
I'm not really a shark- more of a crazed carnivorous giraffe hybrid- but all but one of my leagues are on Fleaflicker. I put my dynasty league on there 3 years ago, and in the intervening time, almost all of my other leagues have transitioned over because the commissioners liked the interface in my dynasty league better than in their leagues. The last holdout is an ESPN league where the owners are pretty resistant to change and the commissioner doesn't want to abandon our league history.

 
I play on ESPN, yahoo and MFL. The biggest thing I like about MFL is that it is more customizeable and it integrates with FBG tools, ie mfl import, my fbg, etc.

I will say Yahoo is more user friendly, but me being lazy and not liking to enter everyone's moves into LD all the time, I love the integration with MFL.

 
I'm sure I am in the minority here, but I prefer Yahoo over MFL. As commissioner, I moved one of my leagues to MFL last year. They have great features and options for customizations, but it's not intuitive, and the customizations are time-intensive and not for amateurs. I have a fairly extensive IT background and still did not feel the time required was worth the effort. Yahoo, while lacking in some of MFL's features (integrated survivor, pick 'em, league stories and polls, to name a few), is definitely more user friendly. This year Yahoo started offering free live scoring as well (had to pay in years past). Members of my leagues are involved in other leagues as well. In aggregate, we have tried MFL, ESPN, CBS, NFL.com, FOX (i think it's integrated with MSN now), and Yahoo. A vast majority of us prefer Yahoo. It seems to be the most well-rounded, even if it could use a few more features.*Edited to add: Both my leagues are money leagues, if that makes any difference.
I guess I am sharper than I thought. I have no IT background and I have no problem at all running my league on MFL. And as the poster said, the features and flexibility just blow away Yahoo or Sportsline or ESPN.
I should clarify. If all you want to do is change the theme, or move a few boxes around in the layout, it is pretty straight forward. What I find lacking is the site navigation. In order to change how that works, it requires implementing CSS templates and coding knowledge. I applaud MFL for offering the capability for such in-depth customizations, but it really is time-intensive and not worth the effort.
 
I'm not really a shark- more of a crazed carnivorous giraffe hybrid- but all but one of my leagues are on Fleaflicker. I put my dynasty league on there 3 years ago, and in the intervening time, almost all of my other leagues have transitioned over because the commissioners liked the interface in my dynasty league better than in their leagues. The last holdout is an ESPN league where the owners are pretty resistant to change and the commissioner doesn't want to abandon our league history.
This.Every year I make an effort to get all my non-flea leagues to convert to fleaflicker. Its so simple, and easy, and very customizable...and always tends to be a step ahead of the other free sites. Some examples in years past were the roster size allowed was much higher than yahoo, espn, etc. They were one of the first free league sites to allow you to name "keepers" making it easy for dynasty and keeper leagues.I pretty much refuse to join a league unless its on fleaflicker, unless its a "special league" such as my one contract + IDP league, The IBL challenge, and some pay leagues.Espn and Yahoo I just don't like having to go through so many links on the site to get to it. I rarely am on the same computer, and they arent mine anyways so bookmarking does no good. And frankly I just don't see a single benifit over fleaflicker (unless drag and drop counts....lol).Rtsports.com isn't too bad it just is a bit diffucult at times to find exactly what you want quickly, similar gripe I have with MFL.I just like my host site to be very simple, similar to why i prefer google over other search engines. I type google.com i have my fairly empty screen with a search box. boom, done. Fleaflicker is the google of host sites. You type it fleaflicker.com boom, your either at the sign in page or a simple run down of my leagues and some stats. I'm in, I do my business, don't need to screw around with pointless links.
 
I'm sure I am in the minority here, but I prefer Yahoo over MFL. As commissioner, I moved one of my leagues to MFL last year. They have great features and options for customizations, but it's not intuitive, and the customizations are time-intensive and not for amateurs. I have a fairly extensive IT background and still did not feel the time required was worth the effort. Yahoo, while lacking in some of MFL's features (integrated survivor, pick 'em, league stories and polls, to name a few), is definitely more user friendly. This year Yahoo started offering free live scoring as well (had to pay in years past). Members of my leagues are involved in other leagues as well. In aggregate, we have tried MFL, ESPN, CBS, NFL.com, FOX (i think it's integrated with MSN now), and Yahoo. A vast majority of us prefer Yahoo. It seems to be the most well-rounded, even if it could use a few more features.*Edited to add: Both my leagues are money leagues, if that makes any difference.
I thought I was the only one. I have always heard about how great MFL is. I've been the commish of a league for about 10 years. This year, we switched from Yahoo to MFL. There may be more reports that you can do on MFL, but they are all extraneous to what most people need. I find the MFL interface to be exceptionally clunky - at least compared to Yahoo. Several of my league-mates have complained about not being able to find things easily. Also, I really miss having the stat-tracker to use on game days. The MFL Gameday just doesnt seem to be worth using.I will say that smack talk is much better on MFL with the ability to use pictures, videos & sound. Because of this, I dont see us switching back to Yahoo, but I wouldnt mind seeing them overhaul their entire interface. I think the league cost something like $45. I know its not technically free, but its pretty darn close.
 
I'm sure I am in the minority here, but I prefer Yahoo over MFL. As commissioner, I moved one of my leagues to MFL last year. They have great features and options for customizations, but it's not intuitive, and the customizations are time-intensive and not for amateurs. I have a fairly extensive IT background and still did not feel the time required was worth the effort. Yahoo, while lacking in some of MFL's features (integrated survivor, pick 'em, league stories and polls, to name a few), is definitely more user friendly. This year Yahoo started offering free live scoring as well (had to pay in years past). Members of my leagues are involved in other leagues as well. In aggregate, we have tried MFL, ESPN, CBS, NFL.com, FOX (i think it's integrated with MSN now), and Yahoo. A vast majority of us prefer Yahoo. It seems to be the most well-rounded, even if it could use a few more features.

*Edited to add: Both my leagues are money leagues, if that makes any difference.
I thought I was the only one. I have always heard about how great MFL is. I've been the commish of a league for about 10 years. This year, we switched from Yahoo to MFL. There may be more reports that you can do on MFL, but they are all extraneous to what most people need. I find the MFL interface to be exceptionally clunky - at least compared to Yahoo. Several of my league-mates have complained about not being able to find things easily. Also, I really miss having the stat-tracker to use on game days. The MFL Gameday just doesnt seem to be worth using.I will say that smack talk is much better on MFL with the ability to use pictures, videos & sound. Because of this, I dont see us switching back to Yahoo, but I wouldnt mind seeing them overhaul their entire interface. I think the league cost something like $45. I know its not technically free, but its pretty darn close.
OP was referring to free....but I'll chime in on MFL. We've used Yahoo, CBS, Fanball, ESPN and MFL. Hands down MFL is the best for ~$60/year. $5/owner in a 12 team league. Yahoo too clunky, waivers were FCFS and game tracker cost extra (though it seems that has changed)

CBS was much more expensive than the rest.

ESPN was clunky and not very user friendly or flexible

Fanball was really good and then was so bad we actually bailed in the middle of last season to MFL.

There are 1000 threads in the SP discussing MFL - but I do want to say I love the Gameday. Having it announce scores is awesome :rant:

 
Our league has been on MFL.com for the past six (6) years and we all love it. I've played in other leagues on; Yahoo!, ESPN, and CBS, but not of those can touch MFL.com.

Have a look: Visit My Website

 
Been using Fanball for 6 years in my primary money league. It was OK at first then absolutely horrible for 2 years and this year is probably just meh.
My deepest condolences. It stresses me out even thinking about last year at Fanball. The worst ever. Maybe the reason the site is OK this year is because nobody is left to bring down the servers. They must have lost half their business.
 
Just curious where the Sharks play? I've been at Yahoo for about 10 years with our main money league.

This year I took a team at NFL.com and I'm not impressed.

I played at FleaFlicker years ago and never went back...don't really remember why.

I think I played at CBS once too (can't remember if that was a pick em challenge or FF team) and never went back there either.

Interested to hear what you guys think the best FREE site is...as I said my money league resides on Yahoo and I don't think they'd be interested in leaving/paying, but I like to try different free leagues.

I know its a bit late in the year but I'm just not liking the NFL.com league so that's what made me ask.
Child please
 
Antsports.....Go ahead, flame away.

Been there for about 10 years. Had 1 problem in 10 years

made 1 phone call, problem solved......(3 $50's, 2 $100's and a $250 this year)

(hands down most user friendly site out there)

(and nice live scoring page on gameday)

Also have a team or 2 on CBS and a handfull on MFL.

I know people here despise Ants, but hey, to each his own.

 
I have used Yahoo, CBS, MFL , RT Sports and Antsports

CBS and MFL the most as I play in 3 leagues each for several years.

I strongly prefer CBS, although it costs twice as much. Site is very intuitive and has 10 years of league history stored with easy access.

I like the quality standardization.

MFL site requires work. I play in 3 leagues, all commissioned by the same FBG person and all 3 home pages are different. Plus, there are some quirks that I don't like -- Commish has too much access and power to see waiver claims, etc, league history is not kept on the same site, players in accepted trades don't automatically get inserted into one's starting lineup for the vacated starting player at the same position.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I'm sure I am in the minority here, but I prefer Yahoo over MFL. As commissioner, I moved one of my leagues to MFL last year. They have great features and options for customizations, but it's not intuitive, and the customizations are time-intensive and not for amateurs. I have a fairly extensive IT background and still did not feel the time required was worth the effort. Yahoo, while lacking in some of MFL's features (integrated survivor, pick 'em, league stories and polls, to name a few), is definitely more user friendly. This year Yahoo started offering free live scoring as well (had to pay in years past). Members of my leagues are involved in other leagues as well. In aggregate, we have tried MFL, ESPN, CBS, NFL.com, FOX (i think it's integrated with MSN now), and Yahoo. A vast majority of us prefer Yahoo. It seems to be the most well-rounded, even if it could use a few more features.*Edited to add: Both my leagues are money leagues, if that makes any difference.
I'm with you. We just migrated from Fanball to MFL this year, and man it feels like a step back. Fanball was always good for early season hiccups, but at least the site was easy to use and intuitive. I'm no novice computer user, but the MFL navigation is abhorrent. And this is *after* we paid to have a skinned UI that was an improvement from the default.Honestly, it feels like that site was designed in 1998 and hasn't changed since. Sure, you can get all sorts of intricate with settings, but I'm kind of regretting our move.I'd say CBS is probably the best from a user experience, but not worth the $$$.
 
I have used Yahoo, CBS, MFL , RT Sports and Antsports

CBS and MFL the most as I play in 3 leagues each for several years.

I strongly prefer CBS, although it costs twice as much. Site is very intuitive and has 10 years of league history stored with easy access.

I like the quality standardization.

MFL site requires work. I play in 3 leagues, all commissioned by the same FBG person and all 3 home pages are different. Plus, there are some quirks that I don't like -- Commish has too much access and power to see waiver claims, etc, league history is not kept on the same site, players in accepted trades don't automatically get inserted into one's starting lineup for the vacated starting player at the same position.
I fit bothers you, ask commish to turn it off. Or trust your commish.
 
I'm sure I am in the minority here, but I prefer Yahoo over MFL. As commissioner, I moved one of my leagues to MFL last year. They have great features and options for customizations, but it's not intuitive, and the customizations are time-intensive and not for amateurs. I have a fairly extensive IT background and still did not feel the time required was worth the effort. Yahoo, while lacking in some of MFL's features (integrated survivor, pick 'em, league stories and polls, to name a few), is definitely more user friendly. This year Yahoo started offering free live scoring as well (had to pay in years past). Members of my leagues are involved in other leagues as well. In aggregate, we have tried MFL, ESPN, CBS, NFL.com, FOX (i think it's integrated with MSN now), and Yahoo. A vast majority of us prefer Yahoo. It seems to be the most well-rounded, even if it could use a few more features.

*Edited to add: Both my leagues are money leagues, if that makes any difference.
I thought I was the only one. I have always heard about how great MFL is. I've been the commish of a league for about 10 years. This year, we switched from Yahoo to MFL. There may be more reports that you can do on MFL, but they are all extraneous to what most people need. I find the MFL interface to be exceptionally clunky - at least compared to Yahoo. Several of my league-mates have complained about not being able to find things easily. Also, I really miss having the stat-tracker to use on game days. The MFL Gameday just doesnt seem to be worth using.I will say that smack talk is much better on MFL with the ability to use pictures, videos & sound. Because of this, I dont see us switching back to Yahoo, but I wouldnt mind seeing them overhaul their entire interface. I think the league cost something like $45. I know its not technically free, but its pretty darn close.
OP was referring to free....but I'll chime in on MFL. We've used Yahoo, CBS, Fanball, ESPN and MFL. Hands down MFL is the best for ~$60/year. $5/owner in a 12 team league. Yahoo too clunky, waivers were FCFS and game tracker cost extra (though it seems that has changed)
when was the last time you used Yahoo? waivers can be set up various ways (although no blind bidding yet, unfortunately), the UI layout and navigation is slick and easy, league hosting is free, and StatTracker is free. spending money to host a league seems like an unnecessary expense at this point.
 
If Yahoo had updated yardage and scoring I would say Yahoo hands down. I have played CBS FOXS ESPN and YAHOO! FOXSPORTS has potential thats why I keep going there

 
If Yahoo had updated yardage and scoring I would say Yahoo hands down. I have played CBS FOXS ESPN and YAHOO! FOXSPORTS has potential thats why I keep going there
updated yardage and scoring like how? they provide stattracker for free which has up to date stats and scoring. they also have a phone app that provides the same info.
 
updated yardage and scoring like how? they provide stattracker for free which has up to date stats and scoring. they also have a phone app that provides the same info.

whats the phone APP name?

 
Been using Fanball for 6 years in my primary money league. It was OK at first then absolutely horrible for 2 years and this year is probably just meh.
My deepest condolences. It stresses me out even thinking about last year at Fanball. The worst ever. Maybe the reason the site is OK this year is because nobody is left to bring down the servers. They must have lost half their business.
I left Fanball after 8 years just last year to go to MFL. Hands down the best decision I ever made. I actually had pissed off owners that asked why we weren't using them sooner. It did take a little bit to get used to but it's easy now and well worth it. I actually didn't mind Fanball 3 years back but the last 2 years were obsolutley TERRIBLE!
 
I have played on several sites and my favorite is Rtsports. The reason is support. Good luck getting a response from CBS that is not automated. Several had to deal with MFL support but I cannot imagine it is any better than Rtsports is. I have had several issues over the years and have always found them to respond very very quickly with an answer. (several back and forths if necessary) They also provide a phone number in case of emergency. As commish, knowing that if something odd comes up and we need to have it checked out asap Rtsports will go the extra mile is most important to me. They may not have all the bells and whistles that some sites do but I come here and several other sites for FF information anyway.

 
MFL for me. If I didn't like paying for it, ESPN and Yahoo are fair but I like things customized.

CBS is sad. For that price, it should be able to do anything...and it cannot.

Here is one of my personal leagues Best of the Best

In regards to MFL customizing....some say it is time consuming but it is what you make of it really. They have skins for folks with no design interest. I spent a ridiculous amount of time and now I feel I know it forward and back. I cannot agree with those who say it is clunky or whatever because if you are willing to take the time to go through the setup options, it is easy. With the amount of options made available to you with MFL, it will not take 10 seconds like it does with those other sites that have only 1 or 2 ways of doing things.

Check out my sig link if interested in help...but fair warning we do charge, but read our testimonials.

Just stop paying so much for CBS people, they are raping you...and for nothing.

 
jimmy b said:
Antsports.....Go ahead, flame away.Been there for about 10 years. Had 1 problem in 10 yearsmade 1 phone call, problem solved......(3 $50's, 2 $100's and a $250 this year)(hands down most user friendly site out there)(and nice live scoring page on gameday)Also have a team or 2 on CBS and a handfull on MFL.I know people here despise Ants, but hey, to each his own.
:rolleyes: I play on Ants, and I like it. Definitely a big fan of the victory points system over straight win-loss record.
 
Dizzy said:
Our league has been on MFL.com for the past six (6) years and we all love it. I've played in other leagues on; Yahoo!, ESPN, and CBS, but not of those can touch MFL.com.

Have a look: Visit My Website
Nice Website, kind of random to run into a league made up of people who live 10 minutes from my house.
 
Been using Fanball for 6 years in my primary money league. It was OK at first then absolutely horrible for 2 years and this year is probably just meh.
My deepest condolences. It stresses me out even thinking about last year at Fanball. The worst ever. Maybe the reason the site is OK this year is because nobody is left to bring down the servers. They must have lost half their business.
Switched to Fanball from Yahoo (before Yahoo became anywhere close to Keeper friendly) and have very few regrets. Our league never experienced all the problems that others on Fanball supposedly had the past couple years.
 
I have been playing Fantasy Football for 18 years now, have been in 2 main leagues, 1 for 18 and another for over 10, and I have used pretty much every site that I have seen listed here.

I prefer MFL over all of them. I have been commissioner of our MFL league, which we moved there I believe 5 years ago? Before that we were using ESPN. I'm also currently in a league that uses fanball and yahoo.

I know NOTHING about coding and am actually not that great with computers. However, if you just take some time on the MFL community boards, you'll improve your league with some effort.

Others have displayed their league page, but I'm going to show you our improvements over the years at MFL.Com. Watch how a generic league can turn into one that is easy to navigate and appealing to the eyes, at least my leaguemates believe so.

Make sure you click on team pages in the 2010 season.

MFL: 2006 Season

MFL: 2008 Season

MFL: 2010 Season (current)

Again, I knew nothing about cc, coding or whatever and still don't. I just borrow others ideas and actually love using paintshop pro for team pages.

 
Our league started on CBS but our Commish convinced us to move to MFL 2 years ago. He says that his effort is reduced for managing the league but there have been many that have complained about the site navigation and overall interface of the website. Sure, you can customize the heck out of it, but have you seen the page refreshes on the web gameday? Can someone inform these fools that full page loads to refresh data is expensive (costly to them in bandwidth and Server resources) and frustrates the $&@& out of users that are spoiled with websites that update in the background with AJAX?

I also got an iPhone a couple of months ago, and found that there was a free app and a paid app. Before last week, the free version would only give score summaries by team with no player scores. It now has player scores but no stats. I refuse to pay for the 'elite' version since I already paid for the service! Also, last week I stopped receiving updates on Sunday afternoon because it popped up a message stating that our league had exceeded its 5000 exports in a 24 HR period. If they knew how to program this would never be an issue!

Needless to say, I am fed up with MFL. Thanks to the OP for starting this thread. A couple of new ones were mentioned that I hadn't heard of. I also play in a yahoo league this year and I would take its web interface - and especially its iPhone app - over MFL any day of the week. The only downside of it is the lack of blind bidding, which is why I will be looking at some others. Auction formats have limited options in the past, but it seems like the free sites have done a good job at improving the functionality and capabilities of their offerings.

 
(1) MFL paid league

(2) Yahoo free leagues

(1) CBS College FF league

MFL is the best. It would be awesome to have those features and customization capability with a free site.

Yahoo is Yahoo. Used it forever and it's dependable and they've added decent features.

CBS for College FF is HORRIFIC. HORRIFIC interface and rules. I like College FF though, it forces me to learn about a wider range of players, I might try another site next year.

 
Our league started on CBS but our Commish convinced us to move to MFL 2 years ago. He says that his effort is reduced for managing the league but there have been many that have complained about the site navigation and overall interface of the website. Sure, you can customize the heck out of it, but have you seen the page refreshes on the web gameday? Can someone inform these fools that full page loads to refresh data is expensive (costly to them in bandwidth and Server resources) and frustrates the $&@& out of users that are spoiled with websites that update in the background with AJAX?I also got an iPhone a couple of months ago, and found that there was a free app and a paid app. Before last week, the free version would only give score summaries by team with no player scores. It now has player scores but no stats. I refuse to pay for the 'elite' version since I already paid for the service! Also, last week I stopped receiving updates on Sunday afternoon because it popped up a message stating that our league had exceeded its 5000 exports in a 24 HR period. If they knew how to program this would never be an issue!Needless to say, I am fed up with MFL. Thanks to the OP for starting this thread. A couple of new ones were mentioned that I hadn't heard of. I also play in a yahoo league this year and I would take its web interface - and especially its iPhone app - over MFL any day of the week. The only downside of it is the lack of blind bidding, which is why I will be looking at some others. Auction formats have limited options in the past, but it seems like the free sites have done a good job at improving the functionality and capabilities of their offerings.
I've never tried the iPhone app for MFL.Have you tried Gameday for MFL? I'd recommend it.MFL's web-based live scoring is pretty basic, so I mostly stick to using Gameday, but the web-based version is nice and quick to check once in a while. Yahoo's is pretty slow and buggy at times, but it's pretty.
 
myfantasyleague is far and away better than any other site I have used in the 13 years I have been playing. The gameday program is amazing. The I-phone app is awesome.

I have used CBS, ESPN and the worst site on the planet, fanball.com.

Anyone who uses fanball is missing out on using a quality site. Probably the worst run site available.

Cant recommend MFL enough.

 
Just curious where the Sharks play? I've been at Yahoo for about 10 years with our main money league. This year I took a team at NFL.com and I'm not impressed.I played at FleaFlicker years ago and never went back...don't really remember why.I think I played at CBS once too (can't remember if that was a pick em challenge or FF team) and never went back there either.Interested to hear what you guys think the best FREE site is...as I said my money league resides on Yahoo and I don't think they'd be interested in leaving/paying, but I like to try different free leagues.I know its a bit late in the year but I'm just not liking the NFL.com league so that's what made me ask.
WCOFF
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top