Giants - one SB, two missed play-offsPackers - one SB, two 1-and-done playoffsRavens - one SB, 1 AFC Championship game, one 2-game play-off runRavens have been more competitive since 2010 than either the Packers or Giants.Out of the choices available (New York, Green Bay, Baltimore), I'll say the Packers. They are competitive and in the hunt every year. In a quarterback driven league, Aaron Rodgers is a guy you want on your team.
And they are losing Lewis and likely Reed from the defense...possibly more.This is about going forward.Giants - one SB, two missed play-offsPackers - one SB, two 1-and-done playoffsRavens - one SB, 1 AFC Championship game, one 2-game play-off runRavens have been more competitive since 2010 than either the Packers or Giants.Out of the choices available (New York, Green Bay, Baltimore), I'll say the Packers. They are competitive and in the hunt every year. In a quarterback driven league, Aaron Rodgers is a guy you want on your team.
Great team, Great Coach, Great QB ?Sounds like they are either overrated or the Bills/Losers of the 2010s if you ask me.Giants are already 14 or 15 million under the cap with plenty of dead weight to drop another 10 to 15 million. They are brilliantly restructuring right now which is part of the master plan that went into effect immediately after New Jersey won the bid to host the 2014 Superbowl. They are cutting old and injured players to be replace with youth and depth.Giants have proven that they own SF & GB.I'll take the 49ers. Flukey loss in the semis, nailbiter loss in the finals, have a top QB, a great coach and an organization that seems to be hitting a lot of homeruns in the draft right now.
Aaron Rodgers is a terrible 2-2 against New York.Giants have proven that they own SF & GB.
Other notables to date: New Orleans 31 wins, Chicago 29 wins and NYG 28 winsNew England is going to be tough to catch. I think GB or Atlanta are the only teams that have a realistic shot at more regular season wins than NE (assuming Brady is healthy for 3 more seasons).Green Bay does have talent and a top 5 QB. Baltimore has a pretty good, young offense but an aging Defense. Giants will pop up every couple of years to make runs.
I don't think any of them will be the team of the 20 teens though. I still think we've yet to see the dominant team of the decade. SF has a shot with a young core group and a promising QB. Need to get the first ring though. NE will go down when Brady goes down. Indy may rise again depending on how well they draft for defense.
I'd say it would look like this.
2010s - regular season wins to date:
1. San Fran = 30
2. Green Bay = 36
3. New England = 39
4. Seattle = 25
5. Baltimore = 34
6. Pittsburgh = 32
7. Indy = 23
8. Denver = 25
9. Houston = 28
10. Atlanta = 36
I was looking more at the teams with a shot at being the dominant team in terms of Super Bowls and Championship game appearances.Other notables to date: New Orleans 31 wins, Chicago 29 wins and NYG 28 winsNew England is going to be tough to catch. I think GB or Atlanta are the only teams that have a realistic shot at more regular season wins than NE (assuming Brady is healthy for 3 more seasons).Green Bay does have talent and a top 5 QB. Baltimore has a pretty good, young offense but an aging Defense. Giants will pop up every couple of years to make runs.
I don't think any of them will be the team of the 20 teens though. I still think we've yet to see the dominant team of the decade. SF has a shot with a young core group and a promising QB. Need to get the first ring though. NE will go down when Brady goes down. Indy may rise again depending on how well they draft for defense.
I'd say it would look like this.
2010s - regular season wins to date:
1. San Fran = 30
2. Green Bay = 36
3. New England = 39
4. Seattle = 25
5. Baltimore = 34
6. Pittsburgh = 32
7. Indy = 23
8. Denver = 25
9. Houston = 28
10. Atlanta = 36
Regular season wins don't mean crap as long as you get into the dance.I was looking more at the teams with a shot at being the dominant team in terms of Super Bowls and Championship game appearances.Other notables to date: New Orleans 31 wins, Chicago 29 wins and NYG 28 winsNew England is going to be tough to catch. I think GB or Atlanta are the only teams that have a realistic shot at more regular season wins than NE (assuming Brady is healthy for 3 more seasons).Green Bay does have talent and a top 5 QB. Baltimore has a pretty good, young offense but an aging Defense. Giants will pop up every couple of years to make runs.
I don't think any of them will be the team of the 20 teens though. I still think we've yet to see the dominant team of the decade. SF has a shot with a young core group and a promising QB. Need to get the first ring though. NE will go down when Brady goes down. Indy may rise again depending on how well they draft for defense.
I'd say it would look like this.
2010s - regular season wins to date:
1. San Fran = 30
2. Green Bay = 36
3. New England = 39
4. Seattle = 25
5. Baltimore = 34
6. Pittsburgh = 32
7. Indy = 23
8. Denver = 25
9. Houston = 28
10. Atlanta = 36
Sure...and IMO...if we are talking about teams to repeat...it may end up having to be an AFC team right now.Just because I think the NFC is getting stronger.SF and Seattle out West...GB...NYG...even ATL.It is tough trucking to be able to do it multiple times in the NFC right now.I don't like any of these teams to be the team of the decade. I'm thinking that team has not emerged yet. If forced to choose, I guess I'd go with NYG.
there is a high correlation between team's regular season records, and times in the play-offs, and there is an even higher correlation between teams that won championships and those that made the playoffs. Incredibly, every team in the super-bowl era that has won the Super Bowl also, made the playoffs that year.Regular season wins don't mean crap as long as you get into the dance.I was looking more at the teams with a shot at being the dominant team in terms of Super Bowls and Championship game appearances.Other notables to date: New Orleans 31 wins, Chicago 29 wins and NYG 28 winsNew England is going to be tough to catch. I think GB or Atlanta are the only teams that have a realistic shot at more regular season wins than NE (assuming Brady is healthy for 3 more seasons).Green Bay does have talent and a top 5 QB. Baltimore has a pretty good, young offense but an aging Defense. Giants will pop up every couple of years to make runs.
I don't think any of them will be the team of the 20 teens though. I still think we've yet to see the dominant team of the decade. SF has a shot with a young core group and a promising QB. Need to get the first ring though. NE will go down when Brady goes down. Indy may rise again depending on how well they draft for defense.
I'd say it would look like this.
2010s - regular season wins to date:
1. San Fran = 30
2. Green Bay = 36
3. New England = 39
4. Seattle = 25
5. Baltimore = 34
6. Pittsburgh = 32
7. Indy = 23
8. Denver = 25
9. Houston = 28
10. Atlanta = 36
None of them.As much as I hate to say it, the Redskins have the best chance of making a dynasty. So young. So talented. Good coach.