Wheelhouse
Footballguy
Statistic per Colin Cowherd... Nearly 80% of the time the home team wins in this round of the playoffs coming off a bye week. (51 of last 64 games in this round have been won by the home team coming off the playoff bye)

Agreed. But I would rank them more like:1. Saints....2. Chargers3. Ravens4. BearsI like all the home teams this week, and the statistic backs that up.If I had to rank which home teams were most likely to lose it would be:1) Saints2) Chargers3) Ravens4) BearsIn my opinon the Saints are the "weakest" of the four home teams, and the Eagles are red hot right now, otherwise I'd say it would be a toss up between the Saints and the Chargers.
I'm truly afeared of the Pats mystique - maybe more objective people can see things more clearly than I, but right now I find the Pats extremely threatening.Agreed. But I would rank them more like:1. Saints....2. Chargers3. Ravens4. Bears
You're kidding, right? They're playing a mediocre team -- who doesn't deserve to be still alive -- at home, in the snow. Grossman can have 3 INT and a fumble and Chicago would still win by 10.Anyway, I wanted to pick Philly, but the Sheppard injury and the short week is turning me against them. I don't see Baltimore or Chicago losing, so that leaves NE by default.Correct me if I'm wrong, but if Grossman underperforms drastically can the Bears really win?
Why are you convinced that people "hate" the Saints? Isn't it possible that they honestly believe the Saints have a better chance of losing than some of the other teams?Big thanks to all you haters keeping the Saints number at -5
they didn't match up well in the blowout earlier this year. That isn't to say they can't win this game - anyone can beat anyone in this league in any given week, as is proven with upsets throughout the season.I picked Philly over the Saints, but The Seahawks matchup really good against the Bears. Expect Grossman to be rushed like crazy this week and expect alot of short passes by the Seahawks and a lot of 4 and 5 receiver sets. If the Seahawks wanna win, they'll have to dink and dunk on the passing game to set up the run at try to suprise them with the deep pass.
Maybe I'm just too close to the subject matter. I think the general impression that the common sports fan has is that these are "the same old Saints". I've been a Saints fan for nearly 30 years, and I don't ever remember a Saints team being this focused or this professional. These are not the "same old Saints".I think the concensus that the Saints are the likeliest first round loser among home teams is a reflection of that misconception.Why are you convinced that people "hate" the Saints? Isn't it possible that they honestly believe the Saints have a better chance of losing than some of the other teams?Big thanks to all you haters keeping the Saints number at -5![]()
So how does all of that equate to "hating" the Saints?Maybe I'm just too close to the subject matter. I think the general impression that the common sports fan has is that these are "the same old Saints". I've been a Saints fan for nearly 30 years, and I don't ever remember a Saints team being this focused or this professional. These are not the "same old Saints".I think the concensus that the Saints are the likeliest first round loser among home teams is a reflection of that misconception.Why are you convinced that people "hate" the Saints? Isn't it possible that they honestly believe the Saints have a better chance of losing than some of the other teams?Big thanks to all you haters keeping the Saints number at -5![]()
If he is playing like that, he will be pulled early. Obviously, an early pick will not force Lovie to take him out but if he looks like he has at his worst over the first few possesions, I don't think there will be any question that Lovie will bench him.However, Grossman has shown that he bounces back from bad performances. In addition, he feels like he let his team down against the Packers so I think everything points to him having a good game. Now, as for the NFC title game, who knows? As a Bears fan, I especially fear the Eagles and Jim Johnson's defense whether it is Grossman or Griese. I just don't think the Seahawks or Saints generate the kind of pressure that will rattle Grossman.Surprised at how low Seattle is in this poll. Correct me if I'm wrong, but if Grossman underperforms drastically can the Bears really win? So now the question really is - Will Grossman rise to the occasion or fall?
Seattle gave up 4.6 yards per carry on the season. In their last 4 games, they gave up 4.5, 5.2, 5.1, and 6.0 ypc respectively to Dallas, Tampa Bay, San Diego, and San Fransisco. And while the Bears only averaged 3.8 ypc on the season, they averaged 4.6 ypc during the last four games of the year (stl, tb, det, and gb allowed around 4.1 ypc combined this year) and two of those games were without John Tait.It would be very surprising if Seattle could stop the Bears from getting consistent yardage on the ground. The Seahawk defense just isn't that good and the Bears running game improved significantly over the course of the season.Correct me if I'm wrong here, but I think the Seahawks DL will totally control the Bears OL. Am I off base here?
"Haters" is urban slang. People see the Saints rollin, and they be hate'n. That kind of thing. It's probably just a terminology issue between us. I forget that not everyone is from the streets, like I am. My apologies for not putting it in the proper venacular (edit: vernacular? sp).So how does all of that equate to "hating" the Saints?Maybe I'm just too close to the subject matter. I think the general impression that the common sports fan has is that these are "the same old Saints". I've been a Saints fan for nearly 30 years, and I don't ever remember a Saints team being this focused or this professional. These are not the "same old Saints".I think the concensus that the Saints are the likeliest first round loser among home teams is a reflection of that misconception.Why are you convinced that people "hate" the Saints? Isn't it possible that they honestly believe the Saints have a better chance of losing than some of the other teams?Big thanks to all you haters keeping the Saints number at -5![]()
I was actually talking about their pass rush. Statorama made it sound like he didn't think they could pressure Grossman.Seattle gave up 4.6 yards per carry on the season. In their last 4 games, they gave up 4.5, 5.2, 5.1, and 6.0 ypc respectively to Dallas, Tampa Bay, San Diego, and San Fransisco. And while the Bears only averaged 3.8 ypc on the season, they averaged 4.6 ypc during the last four games of the year (stl, tb, det, and gb allowed around 4.1 ypc combined this year) and two of those games were without John Tait.It would be very surprising if Seattle could stop the Bears from getting consistent yardage on the ground. The Seahawk defense just isn't that good and the Bears running game improved significantly over the course of the season.Correct me if I'm wrong here, but I think the Seahawks DL will totally control the Bears OL. Am I off base here?
You should have seen how many waited until after week 17 to vote for the "Which is the Crappiest team in the NFL" poll that I started in week 4 with the week 4 records listed in the poll.Do people really go in to vote after the fact? Why nobody can see how you voted. Anyway thanks for locking it in despyser.
Both the Bears and Seahawks have rushed the QB effectively this year (about 2.5 sacks per game). However while the Bears have only given up 25 sacks on the year, the Seahawks have given up 49 sacks. Unless you have a schematic theme to back up your thoughts, there is no reason to think the Hawks will dominate the Bears OL in either the run or pass game. In fact, there is a much better reason to think the Bears will be the team to put consistent pressure on the QB and also that the Bears OL will be successful in both phases of the offense.I was actually talking about their pass rush. Statorama made it sound like he didn't think they could pressure Grossman.Seattle gave up 4.6 yards per carry on the season. In their last 4 games, they gave up 4.5, 5.2, 5.1, and 6.0 ypc respectively to Dallas, Tampa Bay, San Diego, and San Fransisco. And while the Bears only averaged 3.8 ypc on the season, they averaged 4.6 ypc during the last four games of the year (stl, tb, det, and gb allowed around 4.1 ypc combined this year) and two of those games were without John Tait.It would be very surprising if Seattle could stop the Bears from getting consistent yardage on the ground. The Seahawk defense just isn't that good and the Bears running game improved significantly over the course of the season.Correct me if I'm wrong here, but I think the Seahawks DL will totally control the Bears OL. Am I off base here?
Well, you're 1 for 2 so far, clearly underestimating the Colts..500 would be a great average if you were a baseball batter.It is what it is said:1 New England (wins)2 Seattle3 Philadelphia4 IndianapolisTake all the favorites and the Pats...
I thought they did a great job today, especially Wistrom.I was actually talking about their pass rush. Statorama made it sound like he didn't think they could pressure Grossman.Seattle gave up 4.6 yards per carry on the season. In their last 4 games, they gave up 4.5, 5.2, 5.1, and 6.0 ypc respectively to Dallas, Tampa Bay, San Diego, and San Fransisco. And while the Bears only averaged 3.8 ypc on the season, they averaged 4.6 ypc during the last four games of the year (stl, tb, det, and gb allowed around 4.1 ypc combined this year) and two of those games were without John Tait.It would be very surprising if Seattle could stop the Bears from getting consistent yardage on the ground. The Seahawk defense just isn't that good and the Bears running game improved significantly over the course of the season.Correct me if I'm wrong here, but I think the Seahawks DL will totally control the Bears OL. Am I off base here?