Who has better dynasty potential (1 Viewer)

[Gordon Keith]

I think before the season this would have been easy...but what about now? Parker is coming into his own and Williamson can't seem to cut it as a #1. Will he ever get the confidence of his QB with those drops?

 

[Cleavage Connoisseur]

I think before the season this would have been easy...but what about now? Parker is coming into his own and Williamson can't seem to cut it as a #1. Will he ever get the confidence of his QB with those drops?

Taylor is the new # 1 on the Vikings due to Williamson's hands of stone. perker has one of the best pais of hands in the league. he cathces anything thrown near him.

 

[Biabreakable]

I think before the season this would have been easy...but what about now? Parker is coming into his own and Williamson can't seem to cut it as a #1. Will he ever get the confidence of his QB with those drops?

Taylor is the new # 1 on the Vikings due to Williamson's hands of stone. perker has one of the best pais of hands in the league. he cathces anything thrown near him.

Taylor is the #1 Wr for the Vikings according to who? What has happened over the bye week that would change his status? I have read nothing indicating that.Williamson leads the the Vikings with 38 targetsTaylor is 2nd with 30 targetsTaylor did get 7 targets in the Vikings last game vs. Detroit compared to Williamsons 4 targets. But that does not necessarily mean that Taylor has become the #1 Wr for the Vikings.For Dynasty potential I like Williamsons upside much more than Parkers.

 

[fruity pebbles]

Williamson.....not even close.

 

[broncofan13000]

Williamson.....not even close.

 

[ArcticEdge]

Williamson's speed combined with Parker's hands and you have a player. Troy Parker?

 

[cstu]

Parker is a pretty decent real-life receiver, but will never be a fantasy stud. Williamson is only in his 2nd year and has the potential to be a top-10 WR.

 

[Sigmund Bloom]

Williamson has considerably more upside than Parker.

 

[Buckle]

The only one who would pick Parker is his cousin.

 

[The Royal Jack]

Troy. No question.

 

[walkwithme]

I think you guys forgot to mention a couple key factors in this is the QB who will be throwing to him and the team around him. Brad Johnson has how many years left in him before they go with Tavarious Jackson or Brooks Bollinger and right now they are an average at best passing team. While Parker has a guy like Rivers to throw balls to him who is showing improvement and skills needed to compliment Parker's hands. SD has a TE like Gates to take some of the pressure off and a back like LT. We all know Parker has great hands all he needs is the chance to be the 2nd target behind gates and he could be a solid WR2. McCardell has maybe one good year left in him if that and Parker could be the featured WR. I would keep Parker over Troy because I see Parker having a better 3-5 year span.

 

[cstu]

I think you guys forgot to mention a couple key factors in this is the QB who will be throwing to him and the team around him. Brad Johnson has how many years left in him before they go with Tavarious Jackson or Brooks Bollinger and right now they are an average at best passing team. While Parker has a guy like Rivers to throw balls to him who is showing improvement and skills needed to compliment Parker's hands. SD has a TE like Gates to take some of the pressure off and a back like LT. We all know Parker has great hands all he needs is the chance to be the 2nd target behind gates and he could be a solid WR2. McCardell has maybe one good year left in him if that and Parker could be the featured WR. I would keep Parker over Troy because I see Parker having a better 3-5 year span.

So if you were a Williamson owner you'd trade him straight up for Parker? Somehow I find that hard to believe.

 

[PatsWillWin]

Williamson - "hands" down.

 

[The Man With No Name]

Williamson has very high (pro bowl) potential, Parker does not. Williamson and Jackson will become one of the top qb-wr combinations in the league, imo.

 

[walkwithme]

I think you guys forgot to mention a couple key factors in this is the QB who will be throwing to him and the team around him. Brad Johnson has how many years left in him before they go with Tavarious Jackson or Brooks Bollinger and right now they are an average at best passing team. While Parker has a guy like Rivers to throw balls to him who is showing improvement and skills needed to compliment Parker's hands. SD has a TE like Gates to take some of the pressure off and a back like LT. We all know Parker has great hands all he needs is the chance to be the 2nd target behind gates and he could be a solid WR2. McCardell has maybe one good year left in him if that and Parker could be the featured WR. I would keep Parker over Troy because I see Parker having a better 3-5 year span.

So if you were a Williamson owner you'd trade him straight up for Parker? Somehow I find that hard to believe.

No I would not. I see more value that I can get in return for Williamson that is different than who I think has the better dynasty potential. Of course I wouldn't trade him straight up for Williamson because I know that I can get Parker and someone else for Williamson. For those that say Troy has potential Pro bowl talent I don't know if I agree with that but he has a couple years to reach that level.

 

[Gordon Keith]

I think you guys forgot to mention a couple key factors in this is the QB who will be throwing to him and the team around him. Brad Johnson has how many years left in him before they go with Tavarious Jackson or Brooks Bollinger and right now they are an average at best passing team. While Parker has a guy like Rivers to throw balls to him who is showing improvement and skills needed to compliment Parker's hands. SD has a TE like Gates to take some of the pressure off and a back like LT. We all know Parker has great hands all he needs is the chance to be the 2nd target behind gates and he could be a solid WR2. McCardell has maybe one good year left in him if that and Parker could be the featured WR. I would keep Parker over Troy because I see Parker having a better 3-5 year span.

So if you were a Williamson owner you'd trade him straight up for Parker? Somehow I find that hard to believe.

No I would not. I see more value that I can get in return for Williamson that is different than who I think has the better dynasty potential. Of course I wouldn't trade him straight up for Williamson because I know that I can get Parker and someone else for Williamson. For those that say Troy has potential Pro bowl talent I don't know if I agree with that but he has a couple years to reach that level.