Cutler and I wouldn't say its even close.DIAGF Denny Green for drafting Matt over Jay.Jay would have been so sick in our offense right nowLeinart has the superior talent, ability and upside IMHO and I would like to take this opportunity to prove most of the Shark Pool "sharks" wrong by taking an extremely unpopular stance.
You have an interesting definition of "prove". LHUCKS: I voted Leinart in my own poll.LHUCKS: Case closed.It's shocking a jury of your peers is disagreeing with that rock solid case. LHUCKS is so good he doesn't need facts, statistics, or even sentences! I hope you're not a lawyer; you'd lose out big time on billable hours. When someone says they are going to take this opportunity to prove someone wrong, they usually follow it up with verbal or written communication. Like I said, pretty much a slam dunk. Keep truckin LHUCKS!Leinart has the superior talent, ability and upside IMHO and I would like to take this opportunity to prove most of the Shark Pool "sharks" wrong by taking an extremely unpopular stance.
The only reason this isn't a completely moronic post is because Arizona has two dynamite WRs. Other than that, Cutler's upside is much higher than Leinart's. Mattyboy has game manager written all over him with that noodle arm and generally mediocre everything.Cutler is lower risk, but less upside. I think he will be good, but not great.
talent - debatable. draft position differed by one pick, and who was better was very hotly contested. IIRC, Fisher wanted Cutler @ 3 but was pressured to take Young by managment - he thought that Cutler had better talent than Leinhart.opportunity - Leinart has better WR's but presently is not a starting QB. I fail to see how riding the pine is a better situation than starting.upside - upside for 2008: Cutler has top 5 upside. Leinart has "I hope Kurt gets hurt again" upside. Upside for career - probably very similar. Cutler is on a team with a 2x SB winning coach who puts his team in the playoffs on an almost yearly basis. Leinart is on a team who has won one playoff game in over 50 years...if I were to guess who would win a SB first, I'd have to think Cutler, and it's not even close.Plus, SEC >>> PAC-10. it's a fact.Leinart has the superior talent, ability and upside IMHO and I would like to take this opportunity to prove most of the Shark Pool "sharks" wrong by taking an extremely unpopular stance.
I don't really disagree, Leinart is more of a game manger and his upside rests on his surroundings. I'm not saying he's near Joe Montanna (noodle armed game manager), but in that mold of QB that excels at getting the most of his situation.When I think of Cutler, I think Kerry CollinsThe only reason this isn't a completely moronic post is because Arizona has two dynamite WRs. Other than that, Cutler's upside is much higher than Leinart's. Mattyboy has game manager written all over him with that noodle arm and generally mediocre everything.Cutler is lower risk, but less upside. I think he will be good, but not great.
Do you even watch football?Leinart has the superior talent, ability and upside IMHO and I would like to take this opportunity to prove most of the Shark Pool "sharks" wrong by taking an extremely unpopular stance.
That's pretty harsh. Cutler can make a lot more throws (not just the touch deep ball), and is much, much more mobile. And while he may not be the most cerebral QB in the league, he does appear to have a good head on his shoulders. I don't get the basis of your thought process.When I think of Cutler, I think Kerry Collins
quicker release too. one of KC's biggest downfalls has always been his wind-upThat's pretty harsh. Cutler can make a lot more throws (not just the touch deep ball), and is much, much more mobile. And while he may not be the most cerebral QB in the league, he does appear to have a good head on his shoulders. I don't get the basis of your thought process.When I think of Cutler, I think Kerry Collins
HahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahaNuff said right there.Do you even watch football?Leinart has the superior talent, ability and upside IMHO and I would like to take this opportunity to prove most of the Shark Pool "sharks" wrong by taking an extremely unpopular stance.
Hey Collins wasn't such a bad QB, didn't he get the Panthers to a NFC Championship game in '96. The Comparison wasn't well thought out, I just think of Cutler as a strong armed guy who has never done anything special. There is nothing about him that gets me excited. I like Cutler, just see nothing that is remarkable about him (yes he has a great arm, he has some mobility, still I am not enthused). The basis of the comparison was that I had the same unenthusiastic feelings about Kerry Collins. Good physical tools, lacks the "it" factor.Leinart on the other hand has shown me something in college (given he was surrounded by the nations top talent) and in his rookie year (Ryan Leaf didn't look so bad in the very beginning either). I'm going on gut, can't win on initial year stats, 40 times, or arm strength, just saying if I'm gonna invest, I like Leinart's potential upside vs. Cutler's. If I need a starter in 2008, I guess I'll go with Cutler. If I'm looking for a guy who I don't need to start, can POTENTIALLY take advantage of superior talent, POTENTIALLY manage a game, and POTENTIALLY put up big numbers on a consistent basis, I am gonna go with Leinart. I guess the best way to put it is, if Leinart wasn't my #1 QB, you offered me Cutler for Leinart in a Dynasty League, I would say no. Does that make any sense?joffer said:quicker release too. one of KC's biggest downfalls has always been his wind-upThe Jacket said:That's pretty harsh. Cutler can make a lot more throws (not just the touch deep ball), and is much, much more mobile. And while he may not be the most cerebral QB in the league, he does appear to have a good head on his shoulders. I don't get the basis of your thought process.Federal said:When I think of Cutler, I think Kerry Collins
You can still save face by admitting now that you're the 1 vote that is undecided.PerfectCutler [ 87 ] [83.65%] Leinart [ 16 ] [15.38%] undecided [ 1 ] [0.96%]
i would've never guessed he has 15 aliases. 10 maybe, but 15?You can still save face by admitting now that you're the 1 vote that is undecided.PerfectCutler [ 87 ] [83.65%] Leinart [ 16 ] [15.38%] undecided [ 1 ] [0.96%]
What have you done to "prove" your stance? NOTHING!LHUCKS said:Leinart has the superior talent, ability and upside IMHO and I would like to take this opportunity to prove most of the Shark Pool "sharks" wrong by taking an extremely unpopular stance.
Uhhh...that's not something anyone can do right now...ace.What have you done to "prove" your stance? NOTHING!LHUCKS said:Leinart has the superior talent, ability and upside IMHO and I would like to take this opportunity to prove most of the Shark Pool "sharks" wrong by taking an extremely unpopular stance.
Right...these are educated guesses...obviously nobody is making a definitive statement.WAY TOO EARLY to tell.
Do YOU even watch football?Federal said:When I think of Cutler, I think Kerry Collins
Well, people are stating comments like "Cutler in a LANDSLIDE" or Cutler and it's not even close.
Uhhh....that's not the way "I would like to take this opportunity to prove most of the Shark Pool sharks wrong" reads.Uhhh...that's not something anyone can do right now...ace.What have you done to "prove" your stance? NOTHING!LHUCKS said:Leinart has the superior talent, ability and upside IMHO and I would like to take this opportunity to prove most of the Shark Pool "sharks" wrong by taking an extremely unpopular stance.
84% of the shark pool believes Cutler has more talent...I don't think you're accurately portraying the situation.who takes a contentious stance on a marginally debateable topic.
Yes, but it's better than watching dumb and dumber again.This is classic LHUCKS...if Leinart actually does something this year instead of look like a good college quarterback that came out of an elite system that will neer make it in the NFL, LHUCKS will be in here thumping his chest like a silverback gorilla.The fact is LHUCKS had one good run three years ago with his rankings/critiques only to follow up the next two years with an embarrassing display of misses that he still won't admit. It is a tragedy of sorts; the guy is a one trick pony who takes a contentious stance on a marginally debateable topic in the hope that he can bowl one more strike down the "I told you so/I'm smarter than you" lane. Worst shtick in the forums for a few years running, which in all probability isn't shtick at all.
Actually, I would call your stance contentious, and the topic: marginally debatable.I think Leinart would agree with the majority.84% of the shark pool believes Cutler has more talent...I don't think you're accurately portraying the situation.who takes a contentious stance on a marginally debateable topic.
Uhhh....that's not the way "I would like to take this opportunity to prove most of the Shark Pool sharks wrong" reads.Uhhh...that's not something anyone can do right now...ace.What have you done to "prove" your stance? NOTHING!LHUCKS said:Leinart has the superior talent, ability and upside IMHO and I would like to take this opportunity to prove most of the Shark Pool "sharks" wrong by taking an extremely unpopular stance.
On this point I agree, I wouldn't say 84 to 16 is marginal. The Shark Pool definately believes in Cutler over Leinart. What I would disagree on is the term talent. While some people may believe Cutler has more talent than Leinart, there are some people who really don't care about talent, but care about the output on the field. Although your post does use the word talent, I participated in the voting process and comments in who I think will be the better NFL quarterback, not for just this year but their careers.84% of the shark pool believes Cutler has more talent...I don't think you're accurately portraying the situation.who takes a contentious stance on a marginally debateable topic.
Why does LHUCKS continue to operate this way?Get off the "lhucks sucks / no I don't suck" shtick now. Stick to discussing the NFL Players. Not each other.J