What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Who has more talent? (1 Viewer)

Ohio St. is going to get whooped by SC

  • Cutler

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Leinart

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • undecided

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    0

LHUCKS

Footballguy
Leinart has the superior talent, ability and upside IMHO and I would like to take this opportunity to prove most of the Shark Pool "sharks" wrong by taking an extremely unpopular stance.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Leinart has the superior talent, ability and upside IMHO and I would like to take this opportunity to prove most of the Shark Pool "sharks" wrong by taking an extremely unpopular stance.
Cutler and I wouldn't say its even close.DIAGF Denny Green for drafting Matt over Jay.Jay would have been so sick in our offense right now
 
As already stated, it is Cutler and it's not even close. As a Titans fan..........I am still pissed that we took V.Young over Jay back then, much less Leinart.

 
Depends on which Leinart we get. Is it the ultra confident guy (think MNF vs. Bears) who looked like he had been in the league for years when he stepped in his rookie year under Denny Green. Or will it be the confused hesitant guy who looked like he had never been on a football field before when he started '07 under Whisenhunt.

Under Green, I think he was told to go out there and do what you do best. Under Whiz I think he was asked to carefully manage a game and work within the game plan. If he can master what Whiz asks of him, I think his long term upside is amazing. If he doesn't commit and chooses to ride on his credentialed past, then he wont be in the league long.

Cutler is lower risk, but less upside. I think he will be good, but not great.

 
Leinart has the superior talent, ability and upside IMHO and I would like to take this opportunity to prove most of the Shark Pool "sharks" wrong by taking an extremely unpopular stance.
You have an interesting definition of "prove". LHUCKS: I voted Leinart in my own poll.LHUCKS: Case closed.It's shocking a jury of your peers is disagreeing with that rock solid case. LHUCKS is so good he doesn't need facts, statistics, or even sentences! I hope you're not a lawyer; you'd lose out big time on billable hours. When someone says they are going to take this opportunity to prove someone wrong, they usually follow it up with verbal or written communication. Like I said, pretty much a slam dunk. Keep truckin LHUCKS!
 
Cutler is lower risk, but less upside. I think he will be good, but not great.
The only reason this isn't a completely moronic post is because Arizona has two dynamite WRs. Other than that, Cutler's upside is much higher than Leinart's. Mattyboy has game manager written all over him with that noodle arm and generally mediocre everything.
 
Leinart has the superior talent, ability and upside IMHO and I would like to take this opportunity to prove most of the Shark Pool "sharks" wrong by taking an extremely unpopular stance.
talent - debatable. draft position differed by one pick, and who was better was very hotly contested. IIRC, Fisher wanted Cutler @ 3 but was pressured to take Young by managment - he thought that Cutler had better talent than Leinhart.opportunity - Leinart has better WR's but presently is not a starting QB. I fail to see how riding the pine is a better situation than starting.upside - upside for 2008: Cutler has top 5 upside. Leinart has "I hope Kurt gets hurt again" upside. Upside for career - probably very similar. Cutler is on a team with a 2x SB winning coach who puts his team in the playoffs on an almost yearly basis. Leinart is on a team who has won one playoff game in over 50 years...if I were to guess who would win a SB first, I'd have to think Cutler, and it's not even close.Plus, SEC >>> PAC-10. it's a fact.
 
Cutler is lower risk, but less upside. I think he will be good, but not great.
The only reason this isn't a completely moronic post is because Arizona has two dynamite WRs. Other than that, Cutler's upside is much higher than Leinart's. Mattyboy has game manager written all over him with that noodle arm and generally mediocre everything.
I don't really disagree, Leinart is more of a game manger and his upside rests on his surroundings. I'm not saying he's near Joe Montanna (noodle armed game manager), but in that mold of QB that excels at getting the most of his situation.When I think of Cutler, I think Kerry Collins
 
I don't see how having inferior footwork and arm strength makes Leinart the more talented quarterback. As far as ability goes, despite having two excellent receivers and a proven running back, Leinart has a worse QB rating, TD/INT ratio, INT %, and yards per attempt than Cutler. And Cutler has been the better runner as well. And he's done more than Leinart despite having diabetes. When Leinart's entire offense is better than their defensive counterparts, as was the case at USC, he's a very productive quarterback. When the talent is more evenly distributed, his flaws are more pronounced.

 
Did Cutler recently bang your girlfriend or something? Why all the hate?

Maybe if he went to ASU, WSU, or CAL you'd come to your senses.

 
When I think of Cutler, I think Kerry Collins
That's pretty harsh. Cutler can make a lot more throws (not just the touch deep ball), and is much, much more mobile. And while he may not be the most cerebral QB in the league, he does appear to have a good head on his shoulders. I don't get the basis of your thought process.
 
When I think of Cutler, I think Kerry Collins
That's pretty harsh. Cutler can make a lot more throws (not just the touch deep ball), and is much, much more mobile. And while he may not be the most cerebral QB in the league, he does appear to have a good head on his shoulders. I don't get the basis of your thought process.
quicker release too. one of KC's biggest downfalls has always been his wind-up
 
joffer said:
The Jacket said:
Federal said:
When I think of Cutler, I think Kerry Collins
That's pretty harsh. Cutler can make a lot more throws (not just the touch deep ball), and is much, much more mobile. And while he may not be the most cerebral QB in the league, he does appear to have a good head on his shoulders. I don't get the basis of your thought process.
quicker release too. one of KC's biggest downfalls has always been his wind-up
Hey Collins wasn't such a bad QB, didn't he get the Panthers to a NFC Championship game in '96. The Comparison wasn't well thought out, I just think of Cutler as a strong armed guy who has never done anything special. There is nothing about him that gets me excited. I like Cutler, just see nothing that is remarkable about him (yes he has a great arm, he has some mobility, still I am not enthused). The basis of the comparison was that I had the same unenthusiastic feelings about Kerry Collins. Good physical tools, lacks the "it" factor.Leinart on the other hand has shown me something in college (given he was surrounded by the nations top talent) and in his rookie year (Ryan Leaf didn't look so bad in the very beginning either). I'm going on gut, can't win on initial year stats, 40 times, or arm strength, just saying if I'm gonna invest, I like Leinart's potential upside vs. Cutler's. If I need a starter in 2008, I guess I'll go with Cutler. If I'm looking for a guy who I don't need to start, can POTENTIALLY take advantage of superior talent, POTENTIALLY manage a game, and POTENTIALLY put up big numbers on a consistent basis, I am gonna go with Leinart. I guess the best way to put it is, if Leinart wasn't my #1 QB, you offered me Cutler for Leinart in a Dynasty League, I would say no. Does that make any sense?
 
I thought this guy might be a homer based on his response in the AZ-KC gamethread, claiming Leinart actually looked like an NFL QB.

Seriously. The ONLY reason to even consider Leinart over Cutler is the WRs, and given that Leinart's noodle arm doesn't allow him to find them down the field, that advantage is more or less worthless. Cutler will find the likes of Eddie Royal for big plays.

 
I don't know how you're going to measure talent, but I'll leave that up to you. You can argue until you're blue in the face as to who has more talent but all that really matters is production.

There have been many talented players in the NFL that just didn't work out. Maybe it was because of injury, work ethic, lack of smarts........whatever the reason may be.

So, I'm not going to argue who has more talent.....because who cares, what matters is who is going to be the better and more productive NFL quarterback. That is something worth arguing.

I think that person is going to be Cutler. Jay Cutler had a solid season last year, he's shown leadership skills in the offseason by telling star wide receiver to basically get it together.

What leadership skills did our boy Leinart show? Having girls take pictures of him with their cell phones so that it can be placed on the internet?

The two guys appear to be in different places in how they can lead a team. One guy is a confident, outspoken young man while the other is reliving the glory days of USC.

Although I appreciate a difference of opinion, my money is on Cutler over Leinart.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
This is one of LHUCKS better fishing expeditions.

The correct answer is Kurt Warner is a better QB than Lienart and he will prove it again this year.

 
LHUCKS said:
Leinart has the superior talent, ability and upside IMHO and I would like to take this opportunity to prove most of the Shark Pool "sharks" wrong by taking an extremely unpopular stance.
What have you done to "prove" your stance? NOTHING! :goodposting:
 
LHUCKS said:
Leinart has the superior talent, ability and upside IMHO and I would like to take this opportunity to prove most of the Shark Pool "sharks" wrong by taking an extremely unpopular stance.
What have you done to "prove" your stance? NOTHING!
Uhhh...that's not something anyone can do right now...ace.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
WAY TOO EARLY to tell. You can not judge on a QB's TRUE dynasty value based on their first two years performance. I would say this also goes for WR's. It takes a 3-4 years for them to reach their potential. This does not hold true to RB's as the studs usually breakout their 1st or 2nd year.

Would you want Aaron Brooks now? He did pretty good his 2nd year in the NFL- ranked #8, #6 his 3rd, #5 his 4th year.

Case in point, Brees ranked #48,#18 and #26 his first three years.

BTW, I voted for Leinart.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
LHUCKS said:
Leinart has the superior talent, ability and upside IMHO and I would like to take this opportunity to prove most of the Shark Pool "sharks" wrong by taking an extremely unpopular stance.
What have you done to "prove" your stance? NOTHING!
Uhhh...that's not something anyone can do right now...ace.
Uhhh....that's not the way "I would like to take this opportunity to prove most of the Shark Pool sharks wrong" reads.
 
This is classic LHUCKS...if Leinart actually does something this year instead of look like a good college quarterback that came out of an elite system that will neer make it in the NFL, LHUCKS will be in here thumping his chest like a silverback gorilla.

The fact is LHUCKS had one good run three years ago with his rankings/critiques only to follow up the next two years with an embarrassing display of misses that he still won't admit. It is a tragedy of sorts; the guy is a one trick pony who takes a contentious stance on a marginally debateable topic in the hope that he can bowl one more strike down the "I told you so/I'm smarter than you" lane. Worst shtick in the forums for a few years running, which in all probability isn't shtick at all.

 
This is classic LHUCKS...if Leinart actually does something this year instead of look like a good college quarterback that came out of an elite system that will neer make it in the NFL, LHUCKS will be in here thumping his chest like a silverback gorilla.The fact is LHUCKS had one good run three years ago with his rankings/critiques only to follow up the next two years with an embarrassing display of misses that he still won't admit. It is a tragedy of sorts; the guy is a one trick pony who takes a contentious stance on a marginally debateable topic in the hope that he can bowl one more strike down the "I told you so/I'm smarter than you" lane. Worst shtick in the forums for a few years running, which in all probability isn't shtick at all.
Yes, but it's better than watching dumb and dumber again.
 
LHUCKS said:
Leinart has the superior talent, ability and upside IMHO and I would like to take this opportunity to prove most of the Shark Pool "sharks" wrong by taking an extremely unpopular stance.
What have you done to "prove" your stance? NOTHING!
Uhhh...that's not something anyone can do right now...ace.
Uhhh....that's not the way "I would like to take this opportunity to prove most of the Shark Pool sharks wrong" reads.
:confused:
 
who takes a contentious stance on a marginally debateable topic.
84% of the shark pool believes Cutler has more talent...I don't think you're accurately portraying the situation.
On this point I agree, I wouldn't say 84 to 16 is marginal. The Shark Pool definately believes in Cutler over Leinart. What I would disagree on is the term talent. While some people may believe Cutler has more talent than Leinart, there are some people who really don't care about talent, but care about the output on the field. Although your post does use the word talent, I participated in the voting process and comments in who I think will be the better NFL quarterback, not for just this year but their careers.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top