To the OP, I invest in 529 plans for each of my kids. I dumped the most money I could into the first kids, and am slowly building up the second's. Because of the ability to transfer money to family members, you only really need to fund one plan -- unless you want to contribute more than the maximum contribution -- which I believe is $55K every 5 years for a married couple.
My kids are 7 and 3 so I'm still pretty far away, but I'm hoping that the rules regarding distribution of money from 529 plans allow for some "creative accounting."
Most notably, if you find that you have excess money in your 529 plan, instead of withdrawing the money and taking the penalty, you may be able to do the following: Buy a condo where your kid goes to school and put the title into a new company - ABC Company. Then, your kid "rents" the condo (from ABC Company) while they are attending school. The housing payments are considered part of their education costs and allow you to get the excess money out of the 529 plan. I don't know if this works or not, it's just that I'm hoping this will work in the event it turns out I overfund my 529 plans (which, of course, given the cost of college, is unlikely).
turleyfan said:
3 kids and counting. Saving about $100 / month for each into Illinois' 529 plan. At this rate, we'll be able to fund about 3 semesters' worth of public school when the first one hits campus in 2019.
Which brings up a larger question... I am obviously not saving as much as most of you. But I am saving significantly more than most. I recently attended a company-sponsored 529 seminar. In the first 10 minutes, the guy gets out his charts, and shows that at the current rate of increase, college costs for a baby born today will average about $50k a year for state schools (in-state tuition), and $100k a year for private schools. On the average, of course, YMMV. To save that kind of money, parents need to be putting away $500 (state) to $1000 (private) each month.
I walked out, along with about 10 others.
Question for you... who the hell is going to be sending their kids to college in 20 years? To say nothing of graduate schools? The way I see it, here are the options (not mutually exclusive, mind you):
1. Things continue as they are, and 99% of graduates will leave school with a debt they'll take the rest of their lives to pay off. (Not good.)
2. Community and JUCO schools take a larger share of the tuition dollars. Parents send their kids to these alternates to take care of the basics, while students go to more prestigious schools for their specialized degree curricula. (Starting to happen already, but not a common path, as best as I can tell.)
3. Costs begin to taper in response to market pressures. (Yeah right.)
4. Enrollment declines, increasing the costs even further for those who still go.
Man, if I can just get my daughters to shoot 80, maybe they can claim one of those golf scholarships that go unused every year...
Apologies for the possible hijack.
More on this hijack -- I recall reading something about how, at some point, a child would be better off financially by having the college tuition invested for them, rather than actually going to college. I don't recall the exact hypothetical, but it was something along the lines of this:If you have 2 children, 18 yrs. old. The first goes to college at a cost of 100K/yr., then graduates with a salary of $?? (I don't remember what it was). The second has $100K/yr. invested for him for 4 years, and assumed interest on that money was ??%/annum, and that second child then immediately started working for a non-college grad wage. The scenario went on to show that even though the first child earned a higher salary after graduating from college, the second child was better off financially given the time value of his $400K savings account combined with his non-college grad salary.
If anybody has seen something like the above, please post a link. Or I am sure there are others hear who could do the math. Thanks.