As I said in the sentence directly following the one you're commenting on, they are not the same receiver. And in the sentence following that, they have a similar opportunity. If you don't like the Boldin comparison, how about Keenan Allen, who was drafted as the fourth receiver on the Chargers and got an opportunity because of injuries ahead of him. And before you start missing the point again, I know Keenan Allen's game isn't the same as Hurns'.Cherry picking Anquan Boldin because you may remember him off the top of your head is meaningless.CalBear said:Completely irrelevant to the question, as the 1st game is obviously not the same thing as an arbitrarily chosen nth game. Cherry-picking the results of an nth game is arbitrary and meaningless. Looking at the results of the first game isn't arbitrary; it's all the data we have to go on. (Well, that and the pre-season data, which also looks good for Hurns.)Xue said:Find two random WRs who had similar college careers and had a similar n-th game and call them alike. That's very flawed and meaningless analysis.
Hurns is .17 seconds faster in the 40 than Boldin. They're not the same receiver. But Hurns in 2014 has a similar opportunity to the one that Boldin had in 2003. Is there any other WR in the league you can say that about? (Well, Kelvin Benjamin, but he's not on your waiver wire).
Hurns ran faster because he is lighter. Hurns has opportunity due to guys ahead of him being injured. Benjamin was a 1st rounder and was drafted to be the lead guy.
Route running is similar? Hurns' routes were not at all considered a strength pre-draft. I'm not even sure there's enough evidence out there to consider them a strength now.Please explain what is so different between Hurns and Boldin. Draft pick status? Ok, once the games start that is a completely meaningless data point. Boldin is thicker. Hurns is faster. But both are comparable height and their Combine measurables are much more similar than not. Their college stats are similar. Their first game as a Pro stats are similar. Their hands and route running are similar. But...there are not at all comparable?Xue said:And that's all it is. A description. A narrative. An arbitrary, subjective, and biased one at that.First of all, they had relatively similar college careers. Second, they had the opportunity to start as rookies on an offense that didn't have any established receiving threats. Third, when given that opportunity, they kicked butt in their first game.They both had a great first career NFL game. Can you tell me the logic that says Allen Hurns will have the same career outlook as Boldin based on an arbitrary, non-random, minuscule sample of 1 game? Can you quantify it? And it just happens to be the 1st career game only because that's as much that Hurns has played so far.Except for the fact that they are.Anquan Boldin and Allen Hurns are nowhere comparable.Replace this with Anquan Boldin in his rookie year after week 1. Same thing.Every year, week 1 waivers has a hot WR that came out of nowhere, that everyone overbids on, and then does squat rest of the season. In my money league full of sharks nobody claimed him.
Remember these guys after week 1?
2013: Leonard Hankerson
2012: Kevin Ogletree (honorable mention to Stephen Hill)
I'm in a small roster league (no flex) so I'm not dropping my backup WRs like Boldin or Floyd (ARI). I'd rather go get Floyd on SD who is also on waivers.
JAX is a putrid offense so the opportunities just aren't there on a weekly basis, and you won't see defenses completely ignore Hurns again, just look at the 2nd half of week 1.
It would be like picking a random player who had a great game in their 5th game and then picking out another random player who had the same great 5th game and calling them alike.
Sorry it doesn't work that way.
There are no receivers in the league who fit that description better than Boldin. Their actual receiving games aren't similar, but their opportunities are.
Boldin was drafted in the 2nd. You don't draft a WR in the 2nd hoping to get lucky. That's what UDFA's are for.
Hurns is in a situation where everything is going right for him to get snaps. There is talent there, but he is nowhere near comparable to Boldin.
How many other WRs have similar college careers to Boldin and Hurns?
Find two random WRs who had similar college careers and had a similar n-th game and call them alike. That's very flawed and meaningless analysis.
Boldin also has 15-20 lbs on Hurns. That's a huge difference which further makes the comparison senseless.
Right on. I have a feeling many are simply trying to be right rather than get it right with this. I feel I've said that before in this thread, actually. Like Hurns or not, the guy has opportunity. For an undrafted rookie that is near impossible to come by. Better yet, he is taking FULL advantage of that opportunity. All this bickering about why he wasn't drafted and why he has the opportunity doesn't change the fact that it exists and he is playing well. Will that continue? I don't know. How can it possibly hurt to roster this guy and find out though? Oh, wait, many refused to do that when given the chance months ago. That's right.Todem said:Jurb...you and I were on Hurns before the herd. I picked him up in every league I am in except one where I actually had no room for him. Drafted him in a redraft in the 16th round and people were like.....who???? I actually started him in my one and only redraft (where I drafted him) last week after I saw Ellington questionable on Monday Night as a flex starter.I have received no trade offers as of yet...but after week 2 they will pour in. Kid is for real. Legit WR. We watched his entire career at UM. He is a great route runner and has exceptional hands. Big things for Allen going forward this year IMO. Wish I could say the same for Lamar Miller....Doh!!! (although he looked pretty damn good last week despite Knowshon getting all the press and rightfully so).People can keep ignoring this guy. I love it. His got a near monopoly on the WR targets right now, assuming Lee is limited. Even if Lee comes back I don't see how Jax justifies taking Hurns out of. WR2 role, at worst. All he's done is light up the field every time he's been on it.
And that exactly what they went to halfway through the 2nd quarter. Held him to 9 yards after that."WEAKNESSES
Narrow-framed and non-physical. Struggles to separate against tight man coverage.
No one is saying he's a bad player. For the Jags he was a great signing. All I'm talking about in this thread is his fantasy outlook, which I don't think is as great as other people do.I sense some some negativity from those who didn't draft (stretch but not crazy given the guy's preseason performance) or grab him off the waiver wire this week.
He could be this year's Frisman Jackson or...Anquan Boldin. Hell...he could be Josh Gordon sans weed convictions.
Ease up on the naysaying and give the guy his due. How many TDs have you made on your first two catches in the NFL? Oh wait...NONE.
I haven't really seen anyone give an outlook here so I'm not sure what this means. What do you see his outlook as?No one is saying he's a bad player. For the Jags he was a great signing. All I'm talking about in this thread is his fantasy outlook, which I don't think is as great as other people do.I sense some some negativity from those who didn't draft (stretch but not crazy given the guy's preseason performance) or grab him off the waiver wire this week.
He could be this year's Frisman Jackson or...Anquan Boldin. Hell...he could be Josh Gordon sans weed convictions.
Ease up on the naysaying and give the guy his due. How many TDs have you made on your first two catches in the NFL? Oh wait...NONE.
Understood.No one is saying he's a bad player. For the Jags he was a great signing. All I'm talking about in this thread is his fantasy outlook, which I don't think is as great as other people do.I sense some some negativity from those who didn't draft (stretch but not crazy given the guy's preseason performance) or grab him off the waiver wire this week.
He could be this year's Frisman Jackson or...Anquan Boldin. Hell...he could be Josh Gordon sans weed convictions.
Ease up on the naysaying and give the guy his due. How many TDs have you made on your first two catches in the NFL? Oh wait...NONE.
It looks like Lee is fine and Robinson is healthy, so I think around 4 catches for 60 yards would be typical. He's not going to surprise defenses like he did week 1.I haven't really seen anyone give an outlook here so I'm not sure what this means. What do you see his outlook as?No one is saying he's a bad player. For the Jags he was a great signing. All I'm talking about in this thread is his fantasy outlook, which I don't think is as great as other people do.I sense some some negativity from those who didn't draft (stretch but not crazy given the guy's preseason performance) or grab him off the waiver wire this week.
He could be this year's Frisman Jackson or...Anquan Boldin. Hell...he could be Josh Gordon sans weed convictions.
Ease up on the naysaying and give the guy his due. How many TDs have you made on your first two catches in the NFL? Oh wait...NONE.
Hurns had looked good, but long-term I don't think he's athletic enough to be a valuable fantasy guy. Especially when he's on the same team as two other more talented rookie WR's.Understood.
However, it is extremely difficult for me to ignore the potential production versus cost. I would bet that 99% of owners out there did not draft this guy and picked him up on the cheap. Grab and stash potential is huge especially if Bortles gets his shot. They looked in sync during preseason and most likely work out after practices. Just guessing but Hurns seems like a hungry guy and willing to put in extra work.
All of the other Jax receivers are either in trouble or injury prone. He's in a great situation.
Chances are good Hurns won't do much the rest of the way.
Chad JohnsonI'm not talking pedigree or past production I'm talking straight up physical tools. What is the best comparison for Hurns to a relatively successful WR sometime in the league? I think we all know Hurnn's attributes, sub par 4.50, maybe has a hard time separating in tight coverage, small compared to typical NFL standards. Pros are that he does all the right things, has great hands, and adjust well to the catch.
As Chad would say, "Child please." Ocho was super talented. Far more than Hurns IMO.Chad JohnsonI'm not talking pedigree or past production I'm talking straight up physical tools. What is the best comparison for Hurns to a relatively successful WR sometime in the league? I think we all know Hurnn's attributes, sub par 4.50, maybe has a hard time separating in tight coverage, small compared to typical NFL standards. Pros are that he does all the right things, has great hands, and adjust well to the catch.
If in the remaining 15 games he puts up 60 catches for 900 yards, he will have been among the top free-agent pickups for the year. And he could do that, which is why people are excited about him.It looks like Lee is fine and Robinson is healthy, so I think around 4 catches for 60 yards would be typical. He's not going to surprise defenses like he did week 1.
History - recent or otherwise - of injury is now "injury prone"? Lee played hurt last year but was still pretty effective. Robinson didn't miss a game the last two years at Penn St. He's nursed a hamstring injury this offseason and has been getting into game shape the last few weeks. Neither player is injury prone.Understood.No one is saying he's a bad player. For the Jags he was a great signing. All I'm talking about in this thread is his fantasy outlook, which I don't think is as great as other people do.I sense some some negativity from those who didn't draft (stretch but not crazy given the guy's preseason performance) or grab him off the waiver wire this week.
He could be this year's Frisman Jackson or...Anquan Boldin. Hell...he could be Josh Gordon sans weed convictions.
Ease up on the naysaying and give the guy his due. How many TDs have you made on your first two catches in the NFL? Oh wait...NONE.
However, it is extremely difficult for me to ignore the potential production versus cost. I would bet that 99% of owners out there did not draft this guy and picked him up on the cheap. Grab and stash potential is huge especially if Bortles gets his shot. They looked in sync during preseason and most likely work out after practices. Just guessing but Hurns seems like a hungry guy and willing to put in extra work.
All of the other Jax receivers are either in trouble or injury prone. He's in a great situation.
The problem here is that you are basing his route running on some pre-draft analysis by some talking head. I am basing it on observation during preseason and now 1 regular season game.Route running is similar? Hurns' routes were not at all considered a strength pre-draft. I'm not even sure there's enough evidence out there to consider them a strength now.Please explain what is so different between Hurns and Boldin. Draft pick status? Ok, once the games start that is a completely meaningless data point. Boldin is thicker. Hurns is faster. But both are comparable height and their Combine measurables are much more similar than not. Their college stats are similar. Their first game as a Pro stats are similar. Their hands and route running are similar. But...there are not at all comparable?Xue said:And that's all it is. A description. A narrative. An arbitrary, subjective, and biased one at that.First of all, they had relatively similar college careers. Second, they had the opportunity to start as rookies on an offense that didn't have any established receiving threats. Third, when given that opportunity, they kicked butt in their first game.They both had a great first career NFL game. Can you tell me the logic that says Allen Hurns will have the same career outlook as Boldin based on an arbitrary, non-random, minuscule sample of 1 game? Can you quantify it? And it just happens to be the 1st career game only because that's as much that Hurns has played so far.Except for the fact that they are.Anquan Boldin and Allen Hurns are nowhere comparable.Replace this with Anquan Boldin in his rookie year after week 1. Same thing.Every year, week 1 waivers has a hot WR that came out of nowhere, that everyone overbids on, and then does squat rest of the season. In my money league full of sharks nobody claimed him.
Remember these guys after week 1?
2013: Leonard Hankerson
2012: Kevin Ogletree (honorable mention to Stephen Hill)
I'm in a small roster league (no flex) so I'm not dropping my backup WRs like Boldin or Floyd (ARI). I'd rather go get Floyd on SD who is also on waivers.
JAX is a putrid offense so the opportunities just aren't there on a weekly basis, and you won't see defenses completely ignore Hurns again, just look at the 2nd half of week 1.
It would be like picking a random player who had a great game in their 5th game and then picking out another random player who had the same great 5th game and calling them alike.
Sorry it doesn't work that way.
There are no receivers in the league who fit that description better than Boldin. Their actual receiving games aren't similar, but their opportunities are.
Boldin was drafted in the 2nd. You don't draft a WR in the 2nd hoping to get lucky. That's what UDFA's are for.
Hurns is in a situation where everything is going right for him to get snaps. There is talent there, but he is nowhere near comparable to Boldin.
How many other WRs have similar college careers to Boldin and Hurns?
Find two random WRs who had similar college careers and had a similar n-th game and call them alike. That's very flawed and meaningless analysis.
Boldin also has 15-20 lbs on Hurns. That's a huge difference which further makes the comparison senseless.
From his NFL draft profile:
"WEAKNESSES
Narrow-framed and non-physical. Struggles to separate against tight man coverage. Lacks polish and precision in his routes. Average burst out of his breaks. Is not a burner -- limited long speed. Soft blocker.
DRAFT PROJECTIONRound 7-Priority free agent
BOTTOM LINE
An underneath, zone receiver, Hurns emerged as the Hurricanes' top go-to receiver as a senior. Runs a lot of simple, stationary, short-to-intermediate routes and could have a more difficult time shaking NFL cornerbacks."
Almost everyone had Boldin pegged as a high draft pick in spite of his combine. Almost everyone had Hurns as borderline draftable after his combine. Combine numbers and college stats aside, there was a huge divide in how these two prospects were viewed by the collective scouting community before their rookie years.
I don't think that's the be-all-end-all of the discussion, but I don't think that's something that should be brushed aside as inconsequential, either.
That's fine. I have my own personal impressions of his route running as well.The problem here is that you are basing his route running on some pre-draft analysis by some talking head. I am basing it on observation during preseason and now 1 regular season game.Route running is similar? Hurns' routes were not at all considered a strength pre-draft. I'm not even sure there's enough evidence out there to consider them a strength now.Please explain what is so different between Hurns and Boldin. Draft pick status? Ok, once the games start that is a completely meaningless data point. Boldin is thicker. Hurns is faster. But both are comparable height and their Combine measurables are much more similar than not. Their college stats are similar. Their first game as a Pro stats are similar. Their hands and route running are similar. But...there are not at all comparable?Xue said:And that's all it is. A description. A narrative. An arbitrary, subjective, and biased one at that.First of all, they had relatively similar college careers. Second, they had the opportunity to start as rookies on an offense that didn't have any established receiving threats. Third, when given that opportunity, they kicked butt in their first game.They both had a great first career NFL game. Can you tell me the logic that says Allen Hurns will have the same career outlook as Boldin based on an arbitrary, non-random, minuscule sample of 1 game? Can you quantify it? And it just happens to be the 1st career game only because that's as much that Hurns has played so far.Except for the fact that they are.Anquan Boldin and Allen Hurns are nowhere comparable.Replace this with Anquan Boldin in his rookie year after week 1. Same thing.Every year, week 1 waivers has a hot WR that came out of nowhere, that everyone overbids on, and then does squat rest of the season. In my money league full of sharks nobody claimed him.
Remember these guys after week 1?
2013: Leonard Hankerson
2012: Kevin Ogletree (honorable mention to Stephen Hill)
I'm in a small roster league (no flex) so I'm not dropping my backup WRs like Boldin or Floyd (ARI). I'd rather go get Floyd on SD who is also on waivers.
JAX is a putrid offense so the opportunities just aren't there on a weekly basis, and you won't see defenses completely ignore Hurns again, just look at the 2nd half of week 1.
It would be like picking a random player who had a great game in their 5th game and then picking out another random player who had the same great 5th game and calling them alike.
Sorry it doesn't work that way.
There are no receivers in the league who fit that description better than Boldin. Their actual receiving games aren't similar, but their opportunities are.
Boldin was drafted in the 2nd. You don't draft a WR in the 2nd hoping to get lucky. That's what UDFA's are for.
Hurns is in a situation where everything is going right for him to get snaps. There is talent there, but he is nowhere near comparable to Boldin.
How many other WRs have similar college careers to Boldin and Hurns?
Find two random WRs who had similar college careers and had a similar n-th game and call them alike. That's very flawed and meaningless analysis.
Boldin also has 15-20 lbs on Hurns. That's a huge difference which further makes the comparison senseless.
From his NFL draft profile:
"WEAKNESSES
Narrow-framed and non-physical. Struggles to separate against tight man coverage. Lacks polish and precision in his routes. Average burst out of his breaks. Is not a burner -- limited long speed. Soft blocker.
DRAFT PROJECTIONRound 7-Priority free agent
BOTTOM LINE
An underneath, zone receiver, Hurns emerged as the Hurricanes' top go-to receiver as a senior. Runs a lot of simple, stationary, short-to-intermediate routes and could have a more difficult time shaking NFL cornerbacks."
Almost everyone had Boldin pegged as a high draft pick in spite of his combine. Almost everyone had Hurns as borderline draftable after his combine. Combine numbers and college stats aside, there was a huge divide in how these two prospects were viewed by the collective scouting community before their rookie years.
I don't think that's the be-all-end-all of the discussion, but I don't think that's something that should be brushed aside as inconsequential, either.
Just giving a physical comp:As Chad would say, "Child please." Ocho was super talented. Far more than Hurns IMO.Chad JohnsonI'm not talking pedigree or past production I'm talking straight up physical tools. What is the best comparison for Hurns to a relatively successful WR sometime in the league? I think we all know Hurnn's attributes, sub par 4.50, maybe has a hard time separating in tight coverage, small compared to typical NFL standards. Pros are that he does all the right things, has great hands, and adjust well to the catch.
It seems like a lazy comparison, but I think Hurns has some similarities to Shorts. Perhaps not as compact or explosive. Both guys are marginal athletes who compensate with good fluidity. I think Hurns is a solid vertical route runner. Not really a daunting athlete, but smooth and efficient.
I have him on two teams and I'd sell if I got a good offer, but thus far I've only received weak nibbles, so I'm holding. With the way the situation has gone in Jax, he could put together a few more solid games and maybe pump up his trade value a bit more. That's what I'm hoping for, as he's probably not a long term hold in my view despite looking like a pretty decent player. Too likely that he winds up being another mediocrity ala Kenbrell Thompkins and I don't like his chances of holding off Lee and Robinson permanently.
Marvin Jones, Rod Streater, Laurent Robinson, Domenik Hixon. Hurns is a lot closer to these guys than he is to Boldin.I'm not talking pedigree or past production I'm talking straight up physical tools. What is the best comparison for Hurns to a relatively successful WR sometime in the league? I think we all know Hurnn's attributes, sub par 4.50, maybe has a hard time separating in tight coverage, small compared to typical NFL standards. Pros are that he does all the right things, has great hands, and adjust well to the catch.
I'm pretty sure this was directed at me. But I'm probably not sharp enough to know. LOL.I wonder if you're willing to say Hurns is better than Lee. Try reconciling that with your belief of what Lee is to you vs what he actually is as pointed out by me.Hurns and Noldin are definitely compatible. Anyone saying otherwise is being obtuse... Perhaps intentionally.
Boldin was a round 2 pick. I'm not sure anyone was underestimating him. Sure, most people still liked Bryant Johnson and Peter Warrick more but Boldin was a heralded prospect.Folks are still underestimating Hurns. Amazing to me. This feels every bit like after week 1 of Anquan Boldin's pro career.
It's not directed towards anyone in-particular. I'm willing to say Hurns could be better than Lee. Maybe he is. Actually I've already said that. This is about opportunity and who is going to capitalize on that opportunity. I don't get points for being right on a call of Lee. Nor do you get points for a call on Robinson. I get points for what the players actually do in games. Therefor, I've rostered Hurns in as many leagues as I possibly can and after week 1, a small sample for sure, reaped a strong reward. While many people, likely you considering your stance in here, have been ignoring the signs that Hurns might just be a player, I was rostering him just in case. He was like a cheap insurance policy months and weeks ago. Now, not so much. This whole thread wreaks of people justifying their reasons for not buying Hurns weeks ago when the price was almost 0. It's laughable to me because even if Hurns never catches a single pass again what he did in week 1 has already out produce the cost I spent to pick him up.I'm pretty sure this was directed at me. But I'm probably not sharp enough to know. LOL.I wonder if you're willing to say Hurns is better than Lee. Try reconciling that with your belief of what Lee is to you vs what he actually is as pointed out by me.Hurns and Noldin are definitely compatible. Anyone saying otherwise is being obtuse... Perhaps intentionally.
Anyone making comparisons to Boldin is about as arbitrary and shortsighted as it gets.
Nah, to be like Boldin they'd have to promote him to starter after week one.Folks are still underestimating Hurns. Amazing to me. This feels every bit like after week 1 of Anquan Boldin's pro career.
Making a comparison to Anquan Boldin after one game is the extreme. Comparing Hurns to the names I've mentioned is much closer to any meaningful analysis.It's not directed towards anyone in-particular. I'm willing to say Hurns could be better than Lee. Maybe he is. Actually I've already said that. This is about opportunity and who is going to capitalize on that opportunity. I don't get points for being right on a call of Lee. Nor do you get points for a call on Robinson. I get points for what the players actually do in games. Therefor, I've rostered Hurns in as many leagues as I possibly can and after week 1, a small sample for sure, reaped a strong reward. While many people, likely you considering your stance in here, have been ignoring the signs that Hurns might just be a player, I was rostering him just in case. He was like a cheap insurance policy months and weeks ago. Now, not so much. This whole thread wreaks of people justifying their reasons for not buying Hurns weeks ago when the price was almost 0. It's laughable to me because even if Hurns never catches a single pass again what he did in week 1 has already out produce the cost I spent to pick him up.I'm pretty sure this was directed at me. But I'm probably not sharp enough to know. LOL.I wonder if you're willing to say Hurns is better than Lee. Try reconciling that with your belief of what Lee is to you vs what he actually is as pointed out by me.Hurns and Noldin are definitely compatible. Anyone saying otherwise is being obtuse... Perhaps intentionally.
Anyone making comparisons to Boldin is about as arbitrary and shortsighted as it gets.
The comparison to Boldin wasn't so much about their actual game skill being linear. It was about the opportunity to produce and circumstances. Even still Hurns has at least some similarities to Boldin. Lack of ideal physical ability, strong hands and crafty players in zone space. Does he offer a perfect match to Boldin? No, of course not. Saying there are no similarities at all is an extreme stance that attempts to discredit the people making it and it's unnecessary IMO.
I'm not really sure why you are trumpeting around that your take on this or Lee is correct. Had anyone listened to your recommendation on the Jax WR situation they'd have missed out on both the WR1 and WR2 on the team right now. Reverse engineer that however you want it doesn't change the actual results to date.
How is my shotgun approach to rostering several WR in Jax because I acknowledge that I'm not sure who will be the break out more obtuse than your ignoring of Hurns and Lee for months? Again, the main comp to Boldin is opportunity. Making a skill set call concrete is extreme. Seeing that there are similarities in opportunity is just paying attention.Making a comparison to Anquan Boldin after one game is the extreme. Comparing Hurns to the names I've mentioned is much closer to any meaningful analysis.If anyone had listened to me, they'd miss out on the WR1 and WR2 through the first 2 games. Unfortunately, the NFL season is 16 games. And my assessment of the Jaguars WR situation has always been rooted from a Dynasty perspective.It's not directed towards anyone in-particular. I'm willing to say Hurns could be better than Lee. Maybe he is. Actually I've already said that. This is about opportunity and who is going to capitalize on that opportunity. I don't get points for being right on a call of Lee. Nor do you get points for a call on Robinson. I get points for what the players actually do in games. Therefor, I've rostered Hurns in as many leagues as I possibly can and after week 1, a small sample for sure, reaped a strong reward. While many people, likely you considering your stance in here, have been ignoring the signs that Hurns might just be a player, I was rostering him just in case. He was like a cheap insurance policy months and weeks ago. Now, not so much. This whole thread wreaks of people justifying their reasons for not buying Hurns weeks ago when the price was almost 0. It's laughable to me because even if Hurns never catches a single pass again what he did in week 1 has already out produce the cost I spent to pick him up.I'm pretty sure this was directed at me. But I'm probably not sharp enough to know. LOL.I wonder if you're willing to say Hurns is better than Lee. Try reconciling that with your belief of what Lee is to you vs what he actually is as pointed out by me.Hurns and Noldin are definitely compatible. Anyone saying otherwise is being obtuse... Perhaps intentionally.
Anyone making comparisons to Boldin is about as arbitrary and shortsighted as it gets.
The comparison to Boldin wasn't so much about their actual game skill being linear. It was about the opportunity to produce and circumstances. Even still Hurns has at least some similarities to Boldin. Lack of ideal physical ability, strong hands and crafty players in zone space. Does he offer a perfect match to Boldin? No, of course not. Saying there are no similarities at all is an extreme stance that attempts to discredit the people making it and it's unnecessary IMO.
I'm not really sure why you are trumpeting around that your take on this or Lee is correct. Had anyone listened to your recommendation on the Jax WR situation they'd have missed out on both the WR1 and WR2 on the team right now. Reverse engineer that however you want it doesn't change the actual results to date.
Certain turn of events have happened for Hurns and Lee to be the top 2 WRs right now. How incredibly shortsighted to believe this will stay the same all season and for their Jaguars career all based on 1 game and possibly another this week.
Who is being obtuse here?
Isn't Hurns 6-3? They list him as 195lb so that number is probably closer to 180-something. He does seem on the skinny side for his height.cstu said:Hurns had looked good, but long-term I don't think he's athletic enough to be a valuable fantasy guy. Especially when he's on the same team as two other more talented rookie WR's.Bad_Mo said:Understood.
However, it is extremely difficult for me to ignore the potential production versus cost. I would bet that 99% of owners out there did not draft this guy and picked him up on the cheap. Grab and stash potential is huge especially if Bortles gets his shot. They looked in sync during preseason and most likely work out after practices. Just guessing but Hurns seems like a hungry guy and willing to put in extra work.
All of the other Jax receivers are either in trouble or injury prone. He's in a great situation.
I like what Hurns has done in spite of not being drafted but the reality is that 6-1, 200 lb. WR's who run a 4.5 are a dime a dozen. However, if he can get bigger and more physical without losing speed he has potential.
Maybe I'm wrong and he's the next Chad Johnson.
I haven't stated an opinion on your strategy nor do I care what strategy you use. Your continued support of the Boldin comparison is what's obtuse. You continue to ignore the fact or fail to mention fact that Robinson and Shorts have been out for weeks off and on with hamstring issues. Anyone paying attention saw the opportunity. What is the point of making a Boldin comparison? Plenty of offer WRs have had opportunities.How is my shotgun approach to rostering several WR in Jax because I acknowledge that I'm not sure who will be the break out more obtuse than your ignoring of Hurns and Lee for months? Again, the main comp to Boldin is opportunity. Making a skill set call concrete is extreme. Seeing that there are similarities in opportunity is just paying attention.Making a comparison to Anquan Boldin after one game is the extreme. Comparing Hurns to the names I've mentioned is much closer to any meaningful analysis.If anyone had listened to me, they'd miss out on the WR1 and WR2 through the first 2 games. Unfortunately, the NFL season is 16 games. And my assessment of the Jaguars WR situation has always been rooted from a Dynasty perspective.It's not directed towards anyone in-particular. I'm willing to say Hurns could be better than Lee. Maybe he is. Actually I've already said that. This is about opportunity and who is going to capitalize on that opportunity. I don't get points for being right on a call of Lee. Nor do you get points for a call on Robinson. I get points for what the players actually do in games. Therefor, I've rostered Hurns in as many leagues as I possibly can and after week 1, a small sample for sure, reaped a strong reward. While many people, likely you considering your stance in here, have been ignoring the signs that Hurns might just be a player, I was rostering him just in case. He was like a cheap insurance policy months and weeks ago. Now, not so much. This whole thread wreaks of people justifying their reasons for not buying Hurns weeks ago when the price was almost 0. It's laughable to me because even if Hurns never catches a single pass again what he did in week 1 has already out produce the cost I spent to pick him up.I'm pretty sure this was directed at me. But I'm probably not sharp enough to know. LOL.I wonder if you're willing to say Hurns is better than Lee. Try reconciling that with your belief of what Lee is to you vs what he actually is as pointed out by me.Hurns and Noldin are definitely compatible. Anyone saying otherwise is being obtuse... Perhaps intentionally.
Anyone making comparisons to Boldin is about as arbitrary and shortsighted as it gets.
The comparison to Boldin wasn't so much about their actual game skill being linear. It was about the opportunity to produce and circumstances. Even still Hurns has at least some similarities to Boldin. Lack of ideal physical ability, strong hands and crafty players in zone space. Does he offer a perfect match to Boldin? No, of course not. Saying there are no similarities at all is an extreme stance that attempts to discredit the people making it and it's unnecessary IMO.
I'm not really sure why you are trumpeting around that your take on this or Lee is correct. Had anyone listened to your recommendation on the Jax WR situation they'd have missed out on both the WR1 and WR2 on the team right now. Reverse engineer that however you want it doesn't change the actual results to date.
Certain turn of events have happened for Hurns and Lee to be the top 2 WRs right now. How incredibly shortsighted to believe this will stay the same all season and for their Jaguars career all based on 1 game and possibly another this week.
Who is being obtuse here?
6'1-1/4" 198 at the CombineIsn't Hurns 6-3? They list him as 195lb so that number is probably closer to 180-something. He does seem on the skinny side for his height.cstu said:Hurns had looked good, but long-term I don't think he's athletic enough to be a valuable fantasy guy. Especially when he's on the same team as two other more talented rookie WR's.Bad_Mo said:Understood.However, it is extremely difficult for me to ignore the potential production versus cost. I would bet that 99% of owners out there did not draft this guy and picked him up on the cheap. Grab and stash potential is huge especially if Bortles gets his shot. They looked in sync during preseason and most likely work out after practices. Just guessing but Hurns seems like a hungry guy and willing to put in extra work.
All of the other Jax receivers are either in trouble or injury prone. He's in a great situation.
I like what Hurns has done in spite of not being drafted but the reality is that 6-1, 200 lb. WR's who run a 4.5 are a dime a dozen. However, if he can get bigger and more physical without losing speed he has potential.
Maybe I'm wrong and he's the next Chad Johnson.
Hey now...Nah, to be like Boldin they'd have to promote him to starter after week one.Folks are still underestimating Hurns. Amazing to me. This feels every bit like after week 1 of Anquan Boldin's pro career.
You are blurring the line here. I never said I agree with the comp to Boldin as a whole. I said that ignoring any similarities, as you did, is being obtuse. There is a major difference. I don't think Boldin, from a skill set, is a perfect comp to Hurns. That doesn't mean I can't see some things about their game and opportunity that are similar. I haven't ignored the injuries to Shorts and Robinson. As a matter of fact it was one of the main reasons any of us, early to Hurns crowd, starting picking him up and talking about him. Your just making things up. This is and has clearly been about opportunity from my end. I don't know how much more I can type that word... Hurns happens to be capitalizing on that opportunity.I haven't stated an opinion on your strategy nor do I care what strategy you use. Your continued support of the Boldin comparison is what's obtuse. You continue to ignore the fact or fail to mention fact that Robinson and Shorts have been out for weeks off and on with hamstring issues. Anyone paying attention saw the opportunity. What is the point of making a Boldin comparison? Plenty of offer WRs have had opportunities.How is my shotgun approach to rostering several WR in Jax because I acknowledge that I'm not sure who will be the break out more obtuse than your ignoring of Hurns and Lee for months? Again, the main comp to Boldin is opportunity. Making a skill set call concrete is extreme. Seeing that there are similarities in opportunity is just paying attention.Making a comparison to Anquan Boldin after one game is the extreme. Comparing Hurns to the names I've mentioned is much closer to any meaningful analysis.If anyone had listened to me, they'd miss out on the WR1 and WR2 through the first 2 games. Unfortunately, the NFL season is 16 games. And my assessment of the Jaguars WR situation has always been rooted from a Dynasty perspective.It's not directed towards anyone in-particular. I'm willing to say Hurns could be better than Lee. Maybe he is. Actually I've already said that. This is about opportunity and who is going to capitalize on that opportunity. I don't get points for being right on a call of Lee. Nor do you get points for a call on Robinson. I get points for what the players actually do in games. Therefor, I've rostered Hurns in as many leagues as I possibly can and after week 1, a small sample for sure, reaped a strong reward. While many people, likely you considering your stance in here, have been ignoring the signs that Hurns might just be a player, I was rostering him just in case. He was like a cheap insurance policy months and weeks ago. Now, not so much. This whole thread wreaks of people justifying their reasons for not buying Hurns weeks ago when the price was almost 0. It's laughable to me because even if Hurns never catches a single pass again what he did in week 1 has already out produce the cost I spent to pick him up.I'm pretty sure this was directed at me. But I'm probably not sharp enough to know. LOL.I wonder if you're willing to say Hurns is better than Lee. Try reconciling that with your belief of what Lee is to you vs what he actually is as pointed out by me.Hurns and Noldin are definitely compatible. Anyone saying otherwise is being obtuse... Perhaps intentionally.
Anyone making comparisons to Boldin is about as arbitrary and shortsighted as it gets.
The comparison to Boldin wasn't so much about their actual game skill being linear. It was about the opportunity to produce and circumstances. Even still Hurns has at least some similarities to Boldin. Lack of ideal physical ability, strong hands and crafty players in zone space. Does he offer a perfect match to Boldin? No, of course not. Saying there are no similarities at all is an extreme stance that attempts to discredit the people making it and it's unnecessary IMO.
I'm not really sure why you are trumpeting around that your take on this or Lee is correct. Had anyone listened to your recommendation on the Jax WR situation they'd have missed out on both the WR1 and WR2 on the team right now. Reverse engineer that however you want it doesn't change the actual results to date.
Certain turn of events have happened for Hurns and Lee to be the top 2 WRs right now. How incredibly shortsighted to believe this will stay the same all season and for their Jaguars career all based on 1 game and possibly another this week.
Who is being obtuse here?
How would you know I've been ignoring Hurns and Lee for months? Are you in any leagues with me? Nope. Have you hacked into my computer?
Holy crap...maybe he has grown 1-3/4" since the combine. NFL.com lists him as 6-3 and 195lb. Maybe he weighs 225 now! Kid is morphing into a beast.6'1-1/4" 198 at the CombineIsn't Hurns 6-3? They list him as 195lb so that number is probably closer to 180-something. He does seem on the skinny side for his height.cstu said:Hurns had looked good, but long-term I don't think he's athletic enough to be a valuable fantasy guy. Especially when he's on the same team as two other more talented rookie WR's.Bad_Mo said:Understood.However, it is extremely difficult for me to ignore the potential production versus cost. I would bet that 99% of owners out there did not draft this guy and picked him up on the cheap. Grab and stash potential is huge especially if Bortles gets his shot. They looked in sync during preseason and most likely work out after practices. Just guessing but Hurns seems like a hungry guy and willing to put in extra work.
All of the other Jax receivers are either in trouble or injury prone. He's in a great situation.
I like what Hurns has done in spite of not being drafted but the reality is that 6-1, 200 lb. WR's who run a 4.5 are a dime a dozen. However, if he can get bigger and more physical without losing speed he has potential.
Maybe I'm wrong and he's the next Chad Johnson.
http://www.nfldraftscout.com/ratings/dsprofile.php?pyid=108798&draftyear=2014&genpos=wr
Ok, Oven Mitts.Its not just one game. It's one game plus a whole preseason.
You don't care what I do, yet you go as far as to speculate that I may be fishing? You are definitely reading into my posts way too much. I have already clearly stated what I think of Hurns and his situation and future outlook. I have even made, what I think are, some very optimistic comps for Hurns. I guess because none of then are Boldin, people seem to think its an insult. Because he's so much like Boldin.You are blurring the line here. I never said I agree with the comp to Boldin as a whole. I said that ignoring any similarities, as you did, is being obtuse. There is a major difference. I don't think Boldin, from a skill set, is a perfect comp to Hurns. That doesn't mean I can't see some things about their game and opportunity that are similar. I haven't ignored the injuries to Shorts and Robinson. As a matter of fact it was one of the main reasons any of us, early to Hurns crowd, starting picking him up and talking about him. Your just making things up. This is and has clearly been about opportunity from my end. I don't know how much more I can type that word... Hurns happens to be capitalizing on that opportunity.I haven't stated an opinion on your strategy nor do I care what strategy you use. Your continued support of the Boldin comparison is what's obtuse. You continue to ignore the fact or fail to mention fact that Robinson and Shorts have been out for weeks off and on with hamstring issues. Anyone paying attention saw the opportunity. What is the point of making a Boldin comparison? Plenty of offer WRs have had opportunities.How is my shotgun approach to rostering several WR in Jax because I acknowledge that I'm not sure who will be the break out more obtuse than your ignoring of Hurns and Lee for months? Again, the main comp to Boldin is opportunity. Making a skill set call concrete is extreme. Seeing that there are similarities in opportunity is just paying attention.Making a comparison to Anquan Boldin after one game is the extreme. Comparing Hurns to the names I've mentioned is much closer to any meaningful analysis.If anyone had listened to me, they'd miss out on the WR1 and WR2 through the first 2 games. Unfortunately, the NFL season is 16 games. And my assessment of the Jaguars WR situation has always been rooted from a Dynasty perspective.It's not directed towards anyone in-particular. I'm willing to say Hurns could be better than Lee. Maybe he is. Actually I've already said that. This is about opportunity and who is going to capitalize on that opportunity. I don't get points for being right on a call of Lee. Nor do you get points for a call on Robinson. I get points for what the players actually do in games. Therefor, I've rostered Hurns in as many leagues as I possibly can and after week 1, a small sample for sure, reaped a strong reward. While many people, likely you considering your stance in here, have been ignoring the signs that Hurns might just be a player, I was rostering him just in case. He was like a cheap insurance policy months and weeks ago. Now, not so much. This whole thread wreaks of people justifying their reasons for not buying Hurns weeks ago when the price was almost 0. It's laughable to me because even if Hurns never catches a single pass again what he did in week 1 has already out produce the cost I spent to pick him up.I'm pretty sure this was directed at me. But I'm probably not sharp enough to know. LOL.I wonder if you're willing to say Hurns is better than Lee. Try reconciling that with your belief of what Lee is to you vs what he actually is as pointed out by me.Hurns and Noldin are definitely compatible. Anyone saying otherwise is being obtuse... Perhaps intentionally.
Anyone making comparisons to Boldin is about as arbitrary and shortsighted as it gets.
The comparison to Boldin wasn't so much about their actual game skill being linear. It was about the opportunity to produce and circumstances. Even still Hurns has at least some similarities to Boldin. Lack of ideal physical ability, strong hands and crafty players in zone space. Does he offer a perfect match to Boldin? No, of course not. Saying there are no similarities at all is an extreme stance that attempts to discredit the people making it and it's unnecessary IMO.
I'm not really sure why you are trumpeting around that your take on this or Lee is correct. Had anyone listened to your recommendation on the Jax WR situation they'd have missed out on both the WR1 and WR2 on the team right now. Reverse engineer that however you want it doesn't change the actual results to date.
Certain turn of events have happened for Hurns and Lee to be the top 2 WRs right now. How incredibly shortsighted to believe this will stay the same all season and for their Jaguars career all based on 1 game and possibly another this week.
Who is being obtuse here?
How would you know I've been ignoring Hurns and Lee for months? Are you in any leagues with me? Nope. Have you hacked into my computer?
What you do in your leagues is your business. I could care less. Maybe you are fishing in these threads and down playing the likes of Hurns and Lee so you can throw off league-mate scent who are also here. Not the first time it's been done around here. I do know what you've been saying about them in these threads though. It paints a picture of you not wanting them or owning them.
I know. I was being sarcastic.Nah, to be like Boldin they'd have to promote him to starter after week one.Folks are still underestimating Hurns. Amazing to me. This feels every bit like after week 1 of Anquan Boldin's pro career.
Hey now...
Coach Gus Bradley said that Allen Hurns will be the Jaguars' No. 2 receiver even when Cecil Shorts (hamstring) returns.
It's the first we've heard of Hurns being ahead of Marqise Lee on the depth chart. Jaguars reporter Mike DiRocco says it's because Hurns has a better grasp of the offense after playing for OC Jedd Fisch at the University of Miami. If true, it would make the UDFA a far more intriguing hold than previously thought. For now, however, it doesn't really matter as Shorts does not appear close to getting over his latest injury. Hurns is going to start opposite Lee against the bad Redskins secondary on Sunday and has some WR4 appeal.
weird. Espn, Rotoworld, NFL.com, University of Miami, and thr Jags website ALL list him at 6'3"Holy crap...maybe he has grown 1-3/4" since the combine. NFL.com lists him as 6-3 and 195lb. Maybe he weighs 225 now! Kid is morphing into a beast.6'1-1/4" 198 at the Combinehttp://www.nfldraftscout.com/ratings/dsprofile.php?pyid=108798&draftyear=2014&genpos=wrIsn't Hurns 6-3? They list him as 195lb so that number is probably closer to 180-something. He does seem on the skinny side for his height.cstu said:Hurns had looked good, but long-term I don't think he's athletic enough to be a valuable fantasy guy. Especially when he's on the same team as two other more talented rookie WR's.Bad_Mo said:Understood.However, it is extremely difficult for me to ignore the potential production versus cost. I would bet that 99% of owners out there did not draft this guy and picked him up on the cheap. Grab and stash potential is huge especially if Bortles gets his shot. They looked in sync during preseason and most likely work out after practices. Just guessing but Hurns seems like a hungry guy and willing to put in extra work.
All of the other Jax receivers are either in trouble or injury prone. He's in a great situation.
I like what Hurns has done in spite of not being drafted but the reality is that 6-1, 200 lb. WR's who run a 4.5 are a dime a dozen. However, if he can get bigger and more physical without losing speed he has potential.
Maybe I'm wrong and he's the next Chad Johnson.
did a quick google search of allen hurns draft and some of the same sources list him at 6'1" on the draft profile section of the site. Wikipedia has him at 6'3". WHATS GOING ON HERE?!weird. Espn, Rotoworld, NFL.com, University of Miami, and thr Jags website ALL list him at 6'3"Holy crap...maybe he has grown 1-3/4" since the combine. NFL.com lists him as 6-3 and 195lb. Maybe he weighs 225 now! Kid is morphing into a beast.6'1-1/4" 198 at the Combinehttp://www.nfldraftscout.com/ratings/dsprofile.php?pyid=108798&draftyear=2014&genpos=wrIsn't Hurns 6-3? They list him as 195lb so that number is probably closer to 180-something. He does seem on the skinny side for his height.cstu said:Hurns had looked good, but long-term I don't think he's athletic enough to be a valuable fantasy guy. Especially when he's on the same team as two other more talented rookie WR's.Bad_Mo said:Understood.However, it is extremely difficult for me to ignore the potential production versus cost. I would bet that 99% of owners out there did not draft this guy and picked him up on the cheap. Grab and stash potential is huge especially if Bortles gets his shot. They looked in sync during preseason and most likely work out after practices. Just guessing but Hurns seems like a hungry guy and willing to put in extra work.
All of the other Jax receivers are either in trouble or injury prone. He's in a great situation.
I like what Hurns has done in spite of not being drafted but the reality is that 6-1, 200 lb. WR's who run a 4.5 are a dime a dozen. However, if he can get bigger and more physical without losing speed he has potential.
Maybe I'm wrong and he's the next Chad Johnson.
They're all wrong.did a quick google search of allen hurns draft and some of the same sources list him at 6'1" on the draft profile section of the site. Wikipedia has him at 6'3". WHATS GOING ON HERE?!weird. Espn, Rotoworld, NFL.com, University of Miami, and thr Jags website ALL list him at 6'3"Holy crap...maybe he has grown 1-3/4" since the combine. NFL.com lists him as 6-3 and 195lb. Maybe he weighs 225 now! Kid is morphing into a beast.6'1-1/4" 198 at the Combinehttp://www.nfldraftscout.com/ratings/dsprofile.php?pyid=108798&draftyear=2014&genpos=wrIsn't Hurns 6-3? They list him as 195lb so that number is probably closer to 180-something. He does seem on the skinny side for his height.cstu said:Hurns had looked good, but long-term I don't think he's athletic enough to be a valuable fantasy guy. Especially when he's on the same team as two other more talented rookie WR's.Bad_Mo said:Understood.However, it is extremely difficult for me to ignore the potential production versus cost. I would bet that 99% of owners out there did not draft this guy and picked him up on the cheap. Grab and stash potential is huge especially if Bortles gets his shot. They looked in sync during preseason and most likely work out after practices. Just guessing but Hurns seems like a hungry guy and willing to put in extra work.
All of the other Jax receivers are either in trouble or injury prone. He's in a great situation.
I like what Hurns has done in spite of not being drafted but the reality is that 6-1, 200 lb. WR's who run a 4.5 are a dime a dozen. However, if he can get bigger and more physical without losing speed he has potential.
Maybe I'm wrong and he's the next Chad Johnson.