gman8343 said:
I was just thinking logically about this. Why in the world would Green Bay draft two RBs--one in the second round--if it thought Morency would be the starter in 2007? There might be a reason for this, but it seems like madness to spend a second rounder on a guy you think will be a good backup to your starter. Green Bay must believe that Brandon Jackson can and will be their featured back.
So we should pencil in Chris Henry and Kenny Irons in as the starters in Tennessee and Cincy, respectively? They both went 2nd round...
Okay I probably should have clarified a bit. I think you need to consider the quality of the starter in front of the player drafted in the second round. Kenny Irons is replacing Chris Perry and is probably the running back of the future for Cincy, thus justifying picking him in the second round. Regarding Chris Henry, I think it is safe to assume that the management is not sold on LenDale White. That doesn't mean that Henry is the opening day starter, but he likely will be given every chance to compete.I think the Henry situation is a decent analogy to Jackson, although I think Jackson is a better back than Henry.My point is that teams don't typically waste second round picks on backups. They expect those picks to come in and contribute in a meaningful way to the football team. There seems to be a lot of Morency owners on this forum and that's great, but I think they should be realistic and not going into the season with blinders on. Morency might keep his job, but there is legitimate reason to be concerned.And yes, I did just draft Jackson yesterday in our rookie draft, so I'm biased, but I think what I'm saying makes sense, right?