My guess as wellWelker?You have to take number of targets into account. Drop ratio is really the only valid stat measuring drops.
Not a Garcon hater, but:Wayne has a lot more targets than Wayne, thus, Garcon does drop a lot more balls. Not only that, his catch rate is low too, especially for a WR playing with Manning. Some of that is because of the deep routes, but a lot of it is on Garcon.I was correct, but I remember checking this around week 10 when Garcon was getting BLASTED only to find him down around 10 or 12, and tied with Reggie Wayne.
Wonder what the Garcon haters have to say about that link now.
He only caught about 57% of passes thrown to him, which is one of the worst percentages in the league. Compare that to 63% for Wayne, 63% for Blair White, 70% for Clark, 72% for Tamme, and 80% for Collie (#1 in the NFL).I was correct, but I remember checking this around week 10 when Garcon was getting BLASTED only to find him down around 10 or 12, and tied with Reggie Wayne.Wonder what the Garcon haters have to say about that link now.
The 5 guys are targeted more. Drops, alone, are a misleading stat.Im surprised not only that 5 guys are ahead of Garcon, but that all 5 have made the pro bowl (I think, maybe Welker hasnt ever)
I have not watched enough Colts games this year to be a Garcon hater or lover, but I don't see how a list ranking Garcon 6th in the NFL in drops while having fewer receptions than anyone above him is all that favorable for Garcon.I was correct, but I remember checking this around week 10 when Garcon was getting BLASTED only to find him down around 10 or 12, and tied with Reggie Wayne.Wonder what the Garcon haters have to say about that link now.
I'm not a hater - I just don't think Garcon is a good WR. But if you meant those who think Garcon was WAY overrated as an NFL WR, first we start with this:I was correct, but I remember checking this around week 10 when Garcon was getting BLASTED only to find him down around 10 or 12, and tied with Reggie Wayne.
Wonder what the Garcon haters have to say about that link now.
Then we'd point to a stat page like THIS.For those that don't want to follow the link it's a stat sheet that has the NFL WRs that had at least 65 targets sorted by catch %. Garcon is 42nd out of 71. While that might not seem horrible (and some would even protest that Garcon is thrown the ball deep more often) it is actually worse when you look at deep pass %. There are only 5 WRs that have a worse catch % that have been thrown the ball deep the same % or less often than Garcon. In fact, if you sort the list by "Yards Per Target", the Garcon-lovers might be suprised to find him near the bottom of the list (12th from the bottom, to be exact). What that indicates to me (the low catch % combined with the relatively low YPT) is that he is not only a poor pass catcher, but poor at creating seperation on intermediate routes as well.You have to take number of targets into account. Drop ratio is really the only valid stat measuring drops.
Jets fans alike are not surprised that Cotchery ranks up there - it shows how bad of a year he had. Normally as sure-handed as they come, considering how much less involved he was in terms of targets vis-a-vis Holmes, Edwards and Keller, that drop number is brutal.Well, I knew for sure is Was NOT Braylon Edwards not even on the Jets alone.
Player Drops Targets % DroppedFred Jackson 8 54 15%Aaron Hernandez 7 64 11%Wes Welker 13 123 11%Brent Celek 8 80 10%Devin Hester 7 73 10%Jerricho Cotchery 8 86 9%Brandon LaFell 7 77 9%Brandon Gibson 8 91 9%Miles Austin 10 119 8%Donald Driver 7 86 8%Steve Smith 8 99 8%Steve Breaston 7 87 8%Terrell Owens 11 139 8%Pierre Garcon 9 118 8%Brandon Marshall 11 145 8%Brandon Pettigrew 8 111 7%Dustin Keller 7 101 7%Michael Crabtree 7 101 7%Reggie Wayne 12 176 7%Danny Amendola 8 123 7%Tony Gonzalez 7 109 6%Chad Ochocinco 8 126 6%Stevie Johnson 8 142 6%Mike Williams 7 129 5%Andre Johnson 7 138 5%
He only caught about 57% of passes thrown to him, which is one of the worst percentages in the league. Compare that to 63% for Wayne, 63% for Blair White, 70% for Clark, 72% for Tamme, and 80% for Collie (#1 in the NFL).I was correct, but I remember checking this around week 10 when Garcon was getting BLASTED only to find him down around 10 or 12, and tied with Reggie Wayne.Wonder what the Garcon haters have to say about that link now.
Catch percentage is the perfect stat for comparing guys in exactly the same role, with exactly the same QB.Otherwise, damn near useless.He only caught about 57% of passes thrown to him, which is one of the worst percentages in the league. Compare that to 63% for Wayne, 63% for Blair White, 70% for Clark, 72% for Tamme, and 80% for Collie (#1 in the NFL).I was correct, but I remember checking this around week 10 when Garcon was getting BLASTED only to find him down around 10 or 12, and tied with Reggie Wayne.Wonder what the Garcon haters have to say about that link now.Catch % is a much more meaningful stat.
Great Post!Isn't it amazing how Peyton Manning's slot receivers continue to lead the league in catch % and how the slot receiving option in Indy doesn't seem to require the same 2-3 year learning curve that outside WR roles take to master?As I've stated elsewhere, time and time again... If you want to compare Peyton Manning's flanker to someone, it would have to be to Peyton Manning's former flanker. Comparing different roles in the offense, like the slot to the flanker is completely meaningless.Catch percentage is the perfect stat for comparing guys in exactly the same role, with exactly the same QB.Otherwise, damn near useless.He only caught about 57% of passes thrown to him, which is one of the worst percentages in the league. Compare that to 63% for Wayne, 63% for Blair White, 70% for Clark, 72% for Tamme, and 80% for Collie (#1 in the NFL).I was correct, but I remember checking this around week 10 when Garcon was getting BLASTED only to find him down around 10 or 12, and tied with Reggie Wayne.Wonder what the Garcon haters have to say about that link now.Catch % is a much more meaningful stat.
Garcon missed 2 games early in the season, and Collie started in his place. In those games, while playing Garcon's position, Collie caught 74% of passes thrown to him.As I've stated elsewhere, time and time again... If you want to compare Peyton Manning's flanker to someone, it would have to be to Peyton Manning's former flanker. Comparing different roles in the offense, like the slot to the flanker is completely meaningless.
Welker was added to the Pro Bowl this year and also made it in 08 and 09.Im surprised not only that 5 guys are ahead of Garcon, but that all 5 have made the pro bowl (I think, maybe Welker hasnt ever)
Luckily, we can do almost exactly that. From 2000 on, Marvin Harrison's catch% was 61.1% (despite being targetted deep over 30% of the time - compared to Garcon's 26%). So, despite being targetted deep more often, Harrison's catch % was still closer to Wayne and White's 63% than Garcon's 57%. Also keep in mind this includes stats from the end of Harrison's career, when he was riddled with injury. Next is someone going to suggest that YPC are a useless stat unless we look at RBs that run behind the same exact O-line?We get it. Everyone has heard the phrase "haters gonna hate" - well apparently "lovers are gonna love" no matter what the actual facts say. Like Garcon if you want - but statistically he is possibly the worst pass catching WRs on the Colts, and one of the worse in the league and somehow, I don't think this fact is lost on Peyton Manning. Will Garcon have big games? Sure - because Manning has to throw to who is open and occasionally, with Wayne, Tamme, Collie, etc. Garcon is going to be the one left weakly accounted for by a defense. I'm just saying the more I have looked into the stats, the less I would like Garcon as a WR in a dynasty format.Catch percentage is the perfect stat for comparing guys in exactly the same role, with exactly the same QB.Otherwise, damn near useless.He only caught about 57% of passes thrown to him, which is one of the worst percentages in the league. Compare that to 63% for Wayne, 63% for Blair White, 70% for Clark, 72% for Tamme, and 80% for Collie (#1 in the NFL).I was correct, but I remember checking this around week 10 when Garcon was getting BLASTED only to find him down around 10 or 12, and tied with Reggie Wayne.Wonder what the Garcon haters have to say about that link now.Catch % is a much more meaningful stat.
James Jones would have shattered that mark if he got a few more targets per game...![]()
Hands down for the Jets (literally?) was Jerricho Cotchery. Dunno WHAT happened to that dude this year. Was terrible.Well, I knew for sure is Was NOT Braylon Edwards not even on the Jets alone.