What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Who led the NFL in dropped passes this season? (1 Viewer)

I was correct, but I remember checking this around week 10 when Garcon was getting BLASTED only to find him down around 10 or 12, and tied with Reggie Wayne.

Wonder what the Garcon haters have to say about that link now.

 
Im surprised not only that 5 guys are ahead of Garcon, but that all 5 have made the pro bowl (I think, maybe Welker hasnt ever)

 
I was correct, but I remember checking this around week 10 when Garcon was getting BLASTED only to find him down around 10 or 12, and tied with Reggie Wayne.

Wonder what the Garcon haters have to say about that link now.
Not a Garcon hater, but:Wayne has a lot more targets than Wayne, thus, Garcon does drop a lot more balls. Not only that, his catch rate is low too, especially for a WR playing with Manning. Some of that is because of the deep routes, but a lot of it is on Garcon.

 
I was correct, but I remember checking this around week 10 when Garcon was getting BLASTED only to find him down around 10 or 12, and tied with Reggie Wayne.Wonder what the Garcon haters have to say about that link now.
He only caught about 57% of passes thrown to him, which is one of the worst percentages in the league. Compare that to 63% for Wayne, 63% for Blair White, 70% for Clark, 72% for Tamme, and 80% for Collie (#1 in the NFL).
 
I was correct, but I remember checking this around week 10 when Garcon was getting BLASTED only to find him down around 10 or 12, and tied with Reggie Wayne.Wonder what the Garcon haters have to say about that link now.
I have not watched enough Colts games this year to be a Garcon hater or lover, but I don't see how a list ranking Garcon 6th in the NFL in drops while having fewer receptions than anyone above him is all that favorable for Garcon.
 
thats a pretty sweet site.....some cool stuff in there....saw that Best ranked 3rd in YAC....was kind of surprised with the amount of time he missed....I know he broke off a couple of big ones but was still surprised to see him that high.....would love to see what he could do in a full year and healthy....think he will represent some value next year

 
I was correct, but I remember checking this around week 10 when Garcon was getting BLASTED only to find him down around 10 or 12, and tied with Reggie Wayne.

Wonder what the Garcon haters have to say about that link now.
I'm not a hater - I just don't think Garcon is a good WR. But if you meant those who think Garcon was WAY overrated as an NFL WR, first we start with this:
You have to take number of targets into account. Drop ratio is really the only valid stat measuring drops.
Then we'd point to a stat page like THIS.For those that don't want to follow the link it's a stat sheet that has the NFL WRs that had at least 65 targets sorted by catch %. Garcon is 42nd out of 71. While that might not seem horrible (and some would even protest that Garcon is thrown the ball deep more often) it is actually worse when you look at deep pass %. There are only 5 WRs that have a worse catch % that have been thrown the ball deep the same % or less often than Garcon. In fact, if you sort the list by "Yards Per Target", the Garcon-lovers might be suprised to find him near the bottom of the list (12th from the bottom, to be exact). What that indicates to me (the low catch % combined with the relatively low YPT) is that he is not only a poor pass catcher, but poor at creating seperation on intermediate routes as well.

One might be tempted to blame the QB (Manning, who has had an "off" year - by his standards). Wayne, however, has a higher deep target %, a higher yards per target and has been targetted 176 times to Garcon's 118. Translation: despite having being targetted deep more often than Garcon, Wayne's catch % is still strongly higher. Also, as previously stated, Collie actually leads all NFL WRs in catch % - so it's not a function of Manning.

Now, if you're talking FF, 784 yards and 6 TDs is decent for a WR - but as far as actual NFL WRs go, Garcon simply isn't very good when compared to others playing the same position at the NFL level. Which is likely part of the reason Manning doesn't target him much - he's not open, when he is he drops the ball (he's still 6th on the drop list despite being targetted less than all other WRs above him) and there are at least two other WRs on the same team that are better at it than he is.

 
I'm surprised the total number is so low. Must be a rigid definition... some games I swear I'd see the same Giants WR dropping eight or nine passes a game.

 
Well, I knew for sure is Was NOT Braylon Edwards not even on the Jets alone.
Jets fans alike are not surprised that Cotchery ranks up there - it shows how bad of a year he had. Normally as sure-handed as they come, considering how much less involved he was in terms of targets vis-a-vis Holmes, Edwards and Keller, that drop number is brutal.
 
The same site shows that for the AFC Welker was the 3rd best WR regarding the % of passes thrown to him that he caught. There were a lot of RBs and a few TEs, but he was the #3 WR for catch percentage.

Just more fun with stats.

 
Code:
Player		   Drops		Targets		% DroppedFred Jackson	   8		 54		15%Aaron Hernandez   7		  64		 11%Wes Welker	   13		 123		11%Brent Celek	   8		 80		10%Devin Hester	  7		 73		10%Jerricho Cotchery  8		86		9%Brandon LaFell	7		77		9%Brandon Gibson	8		91		9%Miles Austin	 10		119		8%Donald Driver	 7		86		8%Steve Smith	   8		 99		 8%Steve Breaston	7		87		8%Terrell Owens	11		139		8%Pierre Garcon	 9		118		8%Brandon Marshall  11		145		8%Brandon Pettigrew  8		111		7%Dustin Keller	 7		101		7%Michael Crabtree  7		101		7%Reggie Wayne	  12	   176		7%Danny Amendola	8		123		7%Tony Gonzalez	 7		109		6%Chad Ochocinco	8		126		6%Stevie Johnson	8		142		6%Mike Williams	 7		129		5%Andre Johnson	 7		138		5%
 
The appropriate way to measure is % drops per reception. Suprisingly, Welker (@15%) is still around 5th for the WRs on this list... who would have thunk? Cotchery (20%), Hester (18%), and TOcho (15/12%) confirmed what we already thought of them. SSmith (17%) and LaFell (18) can blame their QB(s)? As well known, FredJax (26%) sucks coming out of the backfield Any thoughts from PHI fans regarding Celek's (19%) apparent dropsy-itis?

 
I was correct, but I remember checking this around week 10 when Garcon was getting BLASTED only to find him down around 10 or 12, and tied with Reggie Wayne.Wonder what the Garcon haters have to say about that link now.
He only caught about 57% of passes thrown to him, which is one of the worst percentages in the league. Compare that to 63% for Wayne, 63% for Blair White, 70% for Clark, 72% for Tamme, and 80% for Collie (#1 in the NFL).
:wub: Catch % is a much more meaningful stat.
 
I was correct, but I remember checking this around week 10 when Garcon was getting BLASTED only to find him down around 10 or 12, and tied with Reggie Wayne.Wonder what the Garcon haters have to say about that link now.
He only caught about 57% of passes thrown to him, which is one of the worst percentages in the league. Compare that to 63% for Wayne, 63% for Blair White, 70% for Clark, 72% for Tamme, and 80% for Collie (#1 in the NFL).
:goodposting: Catch % is a much more meaningful stat.
Catch percentage is the perfect stat for comparing guys in exactly the same role, with exactly the same QB.Otherwise, damn near useless.
 
I was correct, but I remember checking this around week 10 when Garcon was getting BLASTED only to find him down around 10 or 12, and tied with Reggie Wayne.Wonder what the Garcon haters have to say about that link now.
He only caught about 57% of passes thrown to him, which is one of the worst percentages in the league. Compare that to 63% for Wayne, 63% for Blair White, 70% for Clark, 72% for Tamme, and 80% for Collie (#1 in the NFL).
:thumbup: Catch % is a much more meaningful stat.
Catch percentage is the perfect stat for comparing guys in exactly the same role, with exactly the same QB.Otherwise, damn near useless.
Great Post!Isn't it amazing how Peyton Manning's slot receivers continue to lead the league in catch % and how the slot receiving option in Indy doesn't seem to require the same 2-3 year learning curve that outside WR roles take to master?As I've stated elsewhere, time and time again... If you want to compare Peyton Manning's flanker to someone, it would have to be to Peyton Manning's former flanker. Comparing different roles in the offense, like the slot to the flanker is completely meaningless.
 
Roddy ... 115 receptions, 6 drops :goodposting:

Targets are also deceptive as some targets are uncatchable, throw aways, etc. For me, targets are only useful in showing how involved someone is in the offense.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
As I've stated elsewhere, time and time again... If you want to compare Peyton Manning's flanker to someone, it would have to be to Peyton Manning's former flanker. Comparing different roles in the offense, like the slot to the flanker is completely meaningless.
Garcon missed 2 games early in the season, and Collie started in his place. In those games, while playing Garcon's position, Collie caught 74% of passes thrown to him.
 
Got it confused with the completion percentage to said receiver. I know that it's about 50% to Larry which is turrible. I noticed it when looking at the abysmal percentage complete to Ocho and Chad. Then again, I guess if you run the wrong route you don't get a chance to drop it :jawdrop:

-QG

 
I was correct, but I remember checking this around week 10 when Garcon was getting BLASTED only to find him down around 10 or 12, and tied with Reggie Wayne.Wonder what the Garcon haters have to say about that link now.
He only caught about 57% of passes thrown to him, which is one of the worst percentages in the league. Compare that to 63% for Wayne, 63% for Blair White, 70% for Clark, 72% for Tamme, and 80% for Collie (#1 in the NFL).
:goodposting: Catch % is a much more meaningful stat.
Catch percentage is the perfect stat for comparing guys in exactly the same role, with exactly the same QB.Otherwise, damn near useless.
Luckily, we can do almost exactly that. From 2000 on, Marvin Harrison's catch% was 61.1% (despite being targetted deep over 30% of the time - compared to Garcon's 26%). So, despite being targetted deep more often, Harrison's catch % was still closer to Wayne and White's 63% than Garcon's 57%. Also keep in mind this includes stats from the end of Harrison's career, when he was riddled with injury. Next is someone going to suggest that YPC are a useless stat unless we look at RBs that run behind the same exact O-line?We get it. Everyone has heard the phrase "haters gonna hate" - well apparently "lovers are gonna love" no matter what the actual facts say. Like Garcon if you want - but statistically he is possibly the worst pass catching WRs on the Colts, and one of the worse in the league and somehow, I don't think this fact is lost on Peyton Manning. Will Garcon have big games? Sure - because Manning has to throw to who is open and occasionally, with Wayne, Tamme, Collie, etc. Garcon is going to be the one left weakly accounted for by a defense. I'm just saying the more I have looked into the stats, the less I would like Garcon as a WR in a dynasty format.
 
James Jones would have shattered that mark if he got a few more targets per game... :unsure:
:lmao: Agreed. Reminds me of Corey Bradford. Remember him? Neither does anyone else.You need to catch the ball if you're a WR, otherwise you're just a dude who can run fast and destined to be forgotten.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
13 for the year? My guess is to question how the stats were recorded. Is there an official record keeper on this?

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top