Who will win more games this year GB or OAK (1 Viewer)

[Hipple Long Ware & Peete]

these new polls are weird...

anyhoo what is the O/U on TOTAL wins for these two franchises? 7-8?

 

[Evilhomer3k]

Considering the play of Green yesterday I'm going to have to go with the Packers. The Raiders have been sacked more than they have completions so far. They can't run. They can't pass. They can't catch a pass.

 

[DoubleG]

GB.

Even old, bad Favre >>>>> Brooks.

 

[gman8343]

I can't see the Raiders beating anyone in their division. GB has a shot at Detroit at least.

 

[Avery]

GB.Even old, bad Favre >>>>> Brooks.

Hey!It's my QBBC for 2006! :X

 

[mr. furley]

GB has a shot at Detroit at least.

as a Packer homer i wish i could agree here

 

[10993]

This is just horrible.

They look like a community college team. Wow.

 

[LordHusker]

GB.Even old, bad Favre >>>>> Brooks.

Hey!It's my QBBC for 2006! :X

I'm sure a lot of FBG's subscribers wound up with one or both of these two. They are "steals." Just let the "value" come to you, remember?

 

[suchislife]

If the Raiders and Packers played a game, would they *have* to call it an NFL game?

Someone please tell me again how Brooks is a legit FFL QB? Never mind NFL QB. And Art Shell just looks clueless on the sideline.

 

[Avery]

GB.Even old, bad Favre >>>>> Brooks.

Hey!It's my QBBC for 2006! :X

I'm sure a lot of FBG's subscribers wound up with one or both of these two. They are "steals." Just let the "value" come to you, remember?

We have to carry three QBs so instead of taking a flyer on a guy like Brad Johnson or Alex Smith ,I was smart enough to grab Walter before someone else did so I could handcuff the QB position of the powerful Raiders offense.PURE GENIUS!

 

[cracKer]

null vote

neither will win a game. I'd be surprised if either scores a point this year.

 

[brainee]

I'm sure a lot of FBG's subscribers wound up with one or both of these two. They are "steals." Just let the "value" come to you, remember?

I did one better. My 3 QBs: Brooks, Favre, and Simms They were all "value steals". Losers by a combined 80-0 score.

 

[TitusIII]

As bad as the Packers looked, the Raiders looked worse. Gallery w/o roids=Mandarich w/o roids

 

[S.K.A.]

I think the Raider will win just enough games to convince Al Davis to stay the course and keep driving this franchise into the dirt.

I can just imagine Al Davis thinking that the problem is that the Raiders need to be more 'vertical' on offense and that penalties aren't that bid of deal.

 

[DoubleG]

GB.Even old, bad Favre >>>>> Brooks.

Hey!It's my QBBC for 2006! :X

I'm sure a lot of FBG's subscribers wound up with one or both of these two. They are "steals." Just let the "value" come to you, remember?

We have to carry three QBs so instead of taking a flyer on a guy like Brad Johnson or Alex Smith ,I was smart enough to grab Walter before someone else did so I could handcuff the QB position of the powerful Raiders offense.PURE GENIUS!

Hey, look at the bright side - he got to play last night too!

 

[Utter Chaos]

GB.

Even old, bad Favre >>>>> Brooks.

Hey!It's my QBBC for 2006 2001!

:X

Fixed.