Seymour Corn
it=info
Who will win?
The Chargers are 20-4 at home over the last three years, including an undefeated home record this year.San Diego never really has a home field advantage.
I think he means weather wise, or the fact that Radier,Steeler, Packer, etc., fans seem to come to the stadium in large numbers.The Chargers are 20-4 at home over the last three years, including an undefeated home record this year.San Diego never really has a home field advantage.
My head can't really make a decision as I could see it going either way for a ton of reasons.So I went with my heart too and took the Chargers.I think this may be the best game of this postseason, and I'd like whoever wins this one to win it all, as they seem like the two most complete teams in the NFL (no offense intended to the Ravens, Bears or Saints).Workhorse said:I voted with my heart, not my head.
What? The AFC East had 35 wins. The AFC West had 34 wins. That sound a bit even to me. Even if you want to say the AFC East is better because of having one more win, saying it was a much harder division is more than just a bit of a stretch.NE also played in a much harder division
The AFCE opponents NE played had 23 wins; the AFCW opponents SD played had 20 wins. The AFCE also had a harder schedule than the AFCW.Rankings off that site: Buffalo/NYJ/MIA: 10/11/15; Den/KC/Oak: 13/18/32.The Dolphins are obviously much, much better than the Raiders. I think the Jets and Bills are slightly better than the Chiefs and Broncos. Much was probably an overstatement, but there's no denying that six games against NYJ/BUF/MIA is a good deal harder than six against KC/DEN/OAK.What? The AFC East had 35 wins. The AFC West had 34 wins. That sound a bit even to me. Even if you want to say the AFC East is better because of having one more win, saying it was a much harder division is more than just a bit of a stretch.NE also played in a much harder division
Buffalo had the hardest schedule in the league this year. The Jets had the 6th hardest. KC and Denver had just slightly above average schedules in terms of difficulty. Denver lost to two terrible teams, STL and SF, and a team that wasn't very good, Seattle. (Seattle played the single easiest schedule in the league and got oustcored this year. They were a below average team this year. I don't believe this to be debatable. KC lost to Miami (who both the Jets and Bills swept) and a bad Cleveland team.The Jets lost to Cleveland, and that was their only bad loss this year. The Bills lost to the Lions, who are terrible, but that's it.Losing to STL, SF, Sea, Mia, Cle is worse than losing to Cleveland and Detroit.I'm pretty confident that the Jets and Bills were better than the Broncos and Chiefs. Cutler and Plummer had a combined 74.7 QB Rating; let's not forget that Denver couldn't pass the ball at all. Losman had an 84.9 QBR and Pennington had an 82.6 rating.i like this type of analysis, but it's very difficult for me to believe that the Bills and Jets are better than the Broncos and Chiefs.I'd rank them: Broncos, Chiefs, Jets, Bills.And of course the Phins are light years better than the Raiders, which makes the two divisions about equal, IMO.
Hasn't the home team won every playoff game so far this year? Or am I delusional?Even factoring in HFA (which is incredibly irrelevant this year),
Home teams have a .531 winning percentage this year; that's really, really low.Hasn't the home team won every playoff game so far this year? Or am I delusional?Even factoring in HFA (which is incredibly irrelevant this year),
Home teams have a 1.000 winning percentage in the playoffs this year.Home teams have a .531 winning percentage this year; that's really, really low.Hasn't the home team won every playoff game so far this year? Or am I delusional?Even factoring in HFA (which is incredibly irrelevant this year),
Is that good? That sounds good.Home teams have a 1.000 winning percentage in the playoffs this year.
Agree with both of you.Gonna go with a clutch kick by Kaeding to win it for the Bolts.My head can't really make a decision as I could see it going either way for a ton of reasons.So I went with my heart too and took the Chargers.I think this may be the best game of this postseason, and I'd like whoever wins this one to win it all, as they seem like the two most complete teams in the NFL (no offense intended to the Ravens, Bears or Saints).Workhorse said:I voted with my heart, not my head.
Faulk averaged 4.5 YPC and 11.5 YPR in that game.I specifically did not choose LT in the playoff contest because of this matchup.I just think Belichick knows that to beat SD, you have to stop LT - but more importantly, I think he knows how to. I can see them defending LT the same way they played Marshall Faulk in their first SB win over the Rams. They used defensive speed on the sides to eliminate any kind of seam on the outside that LT has made a career of running. Stop LT, stop San Diego's offense. I will say that losing Rodney Harrison (against his old team too) will be a setback that could wind up hurting New England. We'll see... Most anticipated game of the weekend IMO
![]()
Rivers is 14-2 as a NFL starter.SeniorVBDStudent said:Rivers makes more mistakes than Brady, and the Pats win with another defensive TDats 34Bolts 24(I was hoping the Chiefs would beat the Colts, as the Bolts are much better than the Ravens).
![]()
What's your point?Rivers is 14-2 as a NFL starter.SeniorVBDStudent said:Rivers makes more mistakes than Brady, and the Pats win with another defensive TDats 34Bolts 24(I was hoping the Chiefs would beat the Colts, as the Bolts are much better than the Ravens).
![]()
SD is 2-0 vs Bill in recent years.I specifically did not choose LT in the playoff contest because of this matchup.I just think Belichick knows that to beat SD, you have to stop LT - but more importantly, I think he knows how to. I can see them defending LT the same way they played Marshall Faulk in their first SB win over the Rams. They used defensive speed on the sides to eliminate any kind of seam on the outside that LT has made a career of running. Stop LT, stop San Diego's offense. I will say that losing Rodney Harrison (against his old team too) will be a setback that could wind up hurting New England. We'll see... Most anticipated game of the weekend IMO
![]()
As always, games of this magnitude will be decided by turnovers. I give the edge to the Bolts and say they help NE give the ball up 3 times (2 picks, 1 fumble).
How many INT's did Brady throw in his last road playoff game?As always, games of this magnitude will be decided by turnovers. I give the edge to the Bolts and say they help NE give the ball up 3 times (2 picks, 1 fumble).Brady has 5 picks in 12 career playoff games.
I'm not convinced that the Patriots will win this weekend, but I can say that this defense is MUCH better than last year's defense. Harrison was out, yes, but his replacements were much worse than his replacements this season - Harrison has been out a lot this seaosn, and safety hasn't been much of a problem at all. Also Bruschi was out for that Chargers game, and it was very much a defense in disaray. The defense this year is playing much better, the D-line is much better than last season, and most importantly, they're playing there best football right now for this game.Just my .02.Let's not forget the last time these teams met up, early in 2005. The Chargers won 41-17 and dominated the entire second half. Tomlinson and Turner combined for 178 rush yards and Gates tore it up, a lot of which had to do with Rodney Harrison not being around. San Diego's D got good pressure on Brady and pretty much stuffed the NE run game, and I think all of those factors should still be in play. San Diego has only improved since then, and I don't know that New England at this point is as physical as they'll need to be against a team that can beat you in so many ways.
Since the current playoff format was adopted in 1990, home teams in the divisional round are 51-13, a .796 winning figure. Usually the reason the home teams are home in the first place is that they are better than the wild-card teams. Equally important, in the divisional round the home teams have spent a bye week relaxing in hot tubs while their opponents were out in the cold being pounded.Home teams have a .531 winning percentage this year; that's really, really low.Hasn't the home team won every playoff game so far this year? Or am I delusional?Even factoring in HFA (which is incredibly irrelevant this year),
I'd love to take the Chargers and get 11 points for any amount of money in the world.Phillip Rivers was unimpressive in a pressure game against Seattle, whoat the time was decimated with injuries to theirsecondary.It's too much too soon for Rivers.He will be exposed by the best defensive unit in Patriots club history.Patriots 27Chargers 16![]()
Do you mean when Rivers led the team down the field for a game-winning TD in the last minute of the game? Oh, okay.Phillip Rivers was unimpressive in a pressure game against Seattle, whoat the time was decimated with injuries to theirsecondary.
And in the past 12 years, the top seed in the AFC has made the Super Bowl only 3 times.In the past 10 years or so, on average there has been one road team that wins in the Divisional Playoffs. last year there were two.And while I do think SD will win, 7 of the Chargers last 9 wins have come by a TD or less (really one possession as one or two were by 8 points).Since the current playoff format was adopted in 1990, home teams in the divisional round are 51-13, a .796 winning figure. Usually the reason the home teams are home in the first place is that they are better than the wild-card teams. Equally important, in the divisional round the home teams have spent a bye week relaxing in hot tubs while their opponents were out in the cold being pounded.Home teams have a .531 winning percentage this year; that's really, really low.Hasn't the home team won every playoff game so far this year? Or am I delusional?Even factoring in HFA (which is incredibly irrelevant this year),
Well, if we're not going to forget 2005, let's not forget 2004, 2003 or 2001 either.Does anyone outside of NE realize that the 2006 New England Patriots defense is the best in team history? Better than their SB teams. Better than the teams that befuddled Peyton Manning...Sleep well, Philip.Let's not forget the last time these teams met up, early in 2005. The Chargers won 41-17 and dominated the entire second half. Tomlinson and Turner combined for 178 rush yards and Gates tore it up, a lot of which had to do with Rodney Harrison not being around. San Diego's D got good pressure on Brady and pretty much stuffed the NE run game, and I think all of those factors should still be in play. San Diego has only improved since then, and I don't know that New England at this point is as physical as they'll need to be against a team that can beat you in so many ways.
I'm curious, of those 9 top seeds to not make the Super Bowl in the past 12 years, did any of them lose to say.... an underrated team that no one thought could possibly go to their home field and beat them?I give the Chargers all the respect in the world, but the 15-1 Steelers looked pretty tough once too. I feel confident about Sunday.And in the past 12 years, the top seed in the AFC has made the Super Bowl only 3 times.
I'm not convinced that the Patriots will win this weekend, but I can say that this defense is MUCH better than last year's defense. Harrison was out, yes, but his replacements were much worse than his replacements this season - Harrison has been out a lot this seaosn, and safety hasn't been much of a problem at all. Also Bruschi was out for that Chargers game, and it was very much a defense in disaray.Let's not forget the last time these teams met up, early in 2005. The Chargers won 41-17 and dominated the entire second half. Tomlinson and Turner combined for 178 rush yards and Gates tore it up, a lot of which had to do with Rodney Harrison not being around. San Diego's D got good pressure on Brady and pretty much stuffed the NE run game, and I think all of those factors should still be in play. San Diego has only improved since then, and I don't know that New England at this point is as physical as they'll need to be against a team that can beat you in so many ways.
I definitely think the Pats CAN win, especially if they protect Brady like they did against the Jets, force Rivers to be the driving force of the offense and really confuse him, and don't turn the ball over. IMO, LT will get his no matter what, but if you contain him to say 125 yards, SD will still need another250 yards to win. that being said, I think that the SD will be disruptive, the Pats defense will again give up a long TD, and in the end the Chargers this year have more talent than NE. But we will find out if a better coach and a better/seasoned QB can trump that advantage.I'm curious, of those 9 top seeds to not make the Super Bowl in the past 12 years, did any of them lose to say.... an underrated team that no one thought could possibly go to their home field and beat them?I give the Chargers all the respect in the world, but the 15-1 Steelers looked pretty tough once too. I feel confident about Sunday.And in the past 12 years, the top seed in the AFC has made the Super Bowl only 3 times.
That's nice. This year's Chargers offense is also much better than last years.I'm not convinced that the Patriots will win this weekend, but I can say that this defense is MUCH better than last year's defense. Harrison was out, yes, but his replacements were much worse than his replacements this season - Harrison has been out a lot this seaosn, and safety hasn't been much of a problem at all. Also Bruschi was out for that Chargers game, and it was very much a defense in disaray.Let's not forget the last time these teams met up, early in 2005. The Chargers won 41-17 and dominated the entire second half. Tomlinson and Turner combined for 178 rush yards and Gates tore it up, a lot of which had to do with Rodney Harrison not being around. San Diego's D got good pressure on Brady and pretty much stuffed the NE run game, and I think all of those factors should still be in play. San Diego has only improved since then, and I don't know that New England at this point is as physical as they'll need to be against a team that can beat you in so many ways.That was Harrison's first game out, no Bruschi, and Vrabel had been moved to the outside with Chad Brown and Monty Beisel playing the middle. The horrible Duane Starks at one corner. That was a much different defense.
While I agree with your post, the biggest collection of talent doesn't win SBs. The best TEAM does. See Indy if you disagree.That being said, I think that the SD will be disruptive, the Pats defense will again give up a long TD, and in the end the Chargers this year have more talent than NE. But we will find out if a better coach and a better/seasoned QB can trump that advantage.
The Chargers really have been great as a team all season long, not just on the field but off it as well. These guys are really playing for each other this year to a greater extent than I've seen possibly ever on a Charger squad. They've been through as much, if not more, adversity than the Pats (for instance) this year and they've never folded, never turned on each other and never quit.While I agree with your post, the biggest collection of talent doesn't win SBs. The best TEAM does. See Indy if you disagree.That being said, I think that the SD will be disruptive, the Pats defense will again give up a long TD, and in the end the Chargers this year have more talent than NE. But we will find out if a better coach and a better/seasoned QB can trump that advantage.
No one possibly thinks they can go home and beat them? Are you watching the national media at all? Rivers gets treated like Rex Grossman. Everyone seems to forget that the contain LT, force Rivers to beat you gameplan has been in place since week 1. Meanwhile LT had a career year, and Rivers finished the season with a 92 QB Rating and a Pro Bowl selection.I'm curious, of those 9 top seeds to not make the Super Bowl in the past 12 years, did any of them lose to say.... an underrated team that no one thought could possibly go to their home field and beat them?I give the Chargers all the respect in the world, but the 15-1 Steelers looked pretty tough once too. I feel confident about Sunday.And in the past 12 years, the top seed in the AFC has made the Super Bowl only 3 times.