msudaisy26
Footballguy
I think it is funny how much of the voting is based on what have you done lately. This is the closet the vote has been in a while.
Brady was ahead in this poll a few months ago. Then bassnbrew bumped it when Brady had started slow and manning was on fire. Then someone else bumped it after manning's playoff loss and it's gone the other way. And bass even came back to say he was wrong, brady is better. Long time manning guy Just Win Baby just put brady a tier above manning. In 2003 this discussion had started, after brady had a couple rings and manning had better stats. Bradys head to head victory over the Colts in the playoffs helped fuel the debate.I think it is funny how much of the voting is based on what have you done lately. This is the closet the vote has been in a while.
Take out the regular season for Manning and all other QBs. Now compare him to the HOF QBs. It's bloody. Really bloody.oh come on nowI think at this point with all these high quality QBs with huge stats retiring you are almost going to have to make a pitch as to whether he belongs in the HOF. One more playoff stinker and I could easily see HOF passing on him the first time for some other names that could actually perform on the big stage, not stat padding against the AFC West.
Your reasons are irrelevant. The guy who's been the most statistically dominant QB of the big stats era, who has been the face of the NFL for a decade and a half, and who seems to be just about the most beloved player in league history simply isn't going to be fighting any battles to get enshrinement.Take out the regular season for Manning and all other QBs. Now compare him to the HOF QBs. It's bloody. Really bloody.oh come on nowI think at this point with all these high quality QBs with huge stats retiring you are almost going to have to make a pitch as to whether he belongs in the HOF. One more playoff stinker and I could easily see HOF passing on him the first time for some other names that could actually perform on the big stage, not stat padding against the AFC West.
At some point playoff performance matters. I realize he's getting in, but people that know, know he's got some serious choke issues.
The regular page shows regular season passing stats, so I was assuming the difference might be adding postseason but didn't attempt to verify.Weird. Look at this page - same site, different page - and it lists his numbers differently.http://www.pro-football-reference.com/leaders/gwd_career.htm?mobile=falseWhy did you change what I posted about Unitas' 4Q comebacks and game winning drives? As I posted, Unitas had 36 and 40, respectively.Interesting to put them side by side. It's always hard to compare across eras - being top five in a smaller nfl is easier, but compiling stats is easier today for example. I think brady compares more favorably than you might have expected, but Johnny u is clearly incredibly impressive. Thanks for taking the time.As for Unitas, it seems to me that those asking why he would be in the top tier don't have an appreciation of what he accomplished.
1. 3 NFL championships and a Super Bowl championship 5 afc championships, 9 afccg, 3 super bowl championships so far
2. Led team to comeback win in 1958 NFL championship in "the greatest game ever played" which is credited for increasing the popularity of pro football led game winning drives against rams and panthers and played in five superbowl games decided by one score.
3. 3 time MVP and 5 time first team All Pro 2 time mvp 3 time first team all pro
4. 27 4Q comebacks and 29 game winning drives 34 4q comebacks and 45 game winning drives
5. Held record for most consecutive games with a TD for 52 years until Brees broke it; that is staggering when considering the evolution of the NFL passing rules over that span[tied that record
6. Led league in passing yards 4 times, passing TDs 4 times, yards per game 4 times, YPA 3 times, interception percentage 2 times, and passer rating 3 times Led larger league in yards 2x, tds 3x, QB rating 2x
7. Top 5 in the league in passing yards 11 times, passing TDs 9 times, passer rating 11 times 5, 8 and 4, respectively, but in much larger league. Expand to top six or more and those numbers go way up
8. First QB to pass for 40K yards first QB to pass for 50 tds. Has over 53k passing yards to date
9. Still #10 all time in YPA, #19 all time in YPC and passing TD percentage, and #11 all time in total offense; again, IMO that is staggering given the evolution of NFL rules and the QB position top five in all categories and counting
10. Called his own plays same
11. Made the NFL's 50th and 75th anniversary teams seems likely to make the 100th
So he won titles, won impressive honors/awards, put up great statistics, set a new standard at the QB position, and helped popularize football at a time when it did not enjoy the popularity it enjoys today.
Either way, brady has more. But it's weird that the numbers come out different. Must use different criteria or something.
This is true. Early on, I thought Manning's postseason performance would even out and he would end up with 2-3 championships. And I thought Brady's success would also inevitably even out and his postseason success would flatten out. I figured he would end up with the same 3 championships he accumulated early. And so far that last part has been true.Long time manning guy Just Win Baby just put brady a tier above manning.
Too soon really to be discussing this, I feel bad for Manning, it was tuff to watch such a great competitor and perfectionist struggle like that.If Bill Bellichek had coached Peyton Manning, they'd have about 8 rings right now.
Wins and loses are a team stat. So, if you're going to use that to back Brady than Rob Johnson and Trent Dilfer are better than Dan Marino. And Terry Bradshaw and Joe Montana are the unquestioned two best QBs of all time.Look at these numbers too:
Brady: 19-8
Manning: 11-13... and doesn't Manning have 9 years one and done?
Brady has won 3, Manning 1
They've both laid some eggs for sure but bringing up the most important playoff "number" is key.
didn't realize those guys had comparable stats (or ability)Wins and loses are a team stat. So, if you're going to use that to back Brady than Rob Johnson and Trent Dilfer are better than Dan Marino. And Terry Bradshaw and Joe Montana are the unquestioned two best QBs of all time.Look at these numbers too:
Brady: 19-8
Manning: 11-13... and doesn't Manning have 9 years one and done?
Brady has won 3, Manning 1
They've both laid some eggs for sure but bringing up the most important playoff "number" is key.
Wow... one of the worst articles I have read on the matter.I am going to go out on a limb and suggest this guy would vote for Manning over Brady . . .
Tom Brady: The Most Overrated QB of This Generation
http://fantasyknuckleheads.com/tom-brady-the-most-overrated-qb-of-this-generation/?utm_source=taboola&utm_medium=referral
Best part of the article: ( while describing how Brady needs great players to have great stats )I am going to go out on a limb and suggest this guy would vote for Manning over Brady . . .
Tom Brady: The Most Overrated QB of This Generation
http://fantasyknuckleheads.com/tom-brady-the-most-overrated-qb-of-this-generation/?utm_source=taboola&utm_medium=referral
Why no mention of Welker with Manning, who elevates average players like Reggie Wayne, Marvin Harrison and DT?The story is the same for Wes Welker, Brady averaged 8.13 YPA and had a 4.2 TD: INT Ratio with Welker in the lineup from 2007-2012. When Welker left for Denver in 2013, Brady saw his YPA drop to 6.9 and his TD: INT ratio was only 2.3. This suggests Brady needs great players around him to be great, while other elite QBs elevate their receivers to a higher level.
Ray Lewis was a great football player, but he is a moron. Did that play give them momentum into the super bowl? Maybe. I don't believe in momentum from year to year though. There is too much change. I should take back my moron comment and say, Ray Lewis should be happy that they don't have concussion protocols for being an analyst or he wouldn't have a job.The hits keep on coming on Brady . . .
Ray Lewis Says the Tuck Rule is the Only Reason We Know Who Tom Brady Is
Ray Lewis is a BIG believer in momentum. That extends to believing that a quarterback benefiting from one call eventually propels that quarterback to throw 50 touchdown passes, lead the league in touchdowns thrice, and get selected to the all-decade team by the Pro Football Hall of Fame. Nothing was stopping that momentum.
CBS Boston has the transcription:
“Listen, not to go all totally out of conscious [i believe he meant ‘context’], but just think about this, Stephen A., honest to God,” Lewis said. “When we — the first time we created something called a tuck rule, it’s the only reason we know — I’m just being honest! — the only reason we know who Tom Brady is, because of a tuck rule! There’s no such thing as a tuck rule! If the ball is in your hand, and I knock it out your hand, whether it’s going backwards, forwards, lateral, sideways, however it’s coming out, that’s a freaking fumble! […]
“They don’t go to that championship game — they don’t go to that championship game if that tuck rule, if that ball is not called a tuck! That’s a fumble!” Lewis shouted. “Charles Woodson made that man clearly fumble the ball and they named it the tuck rule, something that we’ve never heard in today’s game. So now you’ve got to ask yourself: When did the legacy really start?”
baltimore probably knows who brady is this weekThe hits keep on coming on Brady . . .
Ray Lewis Says the Tuck Rule is the Only Reason We Know Who Tom Brady Is
Ray Lewis is a BIG believer in momentum. That extends to believing that a quarterback benefiting from one call eventually propels that quarterback to throw 50 touchdown passes, lead the league in touchdowns thrice, and get selected to the all-decade team by the Pro Football Hall of Fame. Nothing was stopping that momentum.
CBS Boston has the transcription:
“Listen, not to go all totally out of conscious [i believe he meant ‘context’], but just think about this, Stephen A., honest to God,” Lewis said. “When we — the first time we created something called a tuck rule, it’s the only reason we know — I’m just being honest! — the only reason we know who Tom Brady is, because of a tuck rule! There’s no such thing as a tuck rule! If the ball is in your hand, and I knock it out your hand, whether it’s going backwards, forwards, lateral, sideways, however it’s coming out, that’s a freaking fumble! […]
“They don’t go to that championship game — they don’t go to that championship game if that tuck rule, if that ball is not called a tuck! That’s a fumble!” Lewis shouted. “Charles Woodson made that man clearly fumble the ball and they named it the tuck rule, something that we’ve never heard in today’s game. So now you’ve got to ask yourself: When did the legacy really start?”
Lewis is such a bitter #####. Brady threw for over 300 yards in a virtual blizzard in that game. Also, the tuck rule drive only allowed them to tie the game and send it into overtime. On the winning overtime drive he was 8 for 8 and drove them to the Raider 5 before they kicked a field goal on third down to win it. Tom Brady was huge that day.Ray Lewis was a great football player, but he is a moron. Did that play give them momentum into the super bowl? Maybe. I don't believe in momentum from year to year though. There is too much change. I should take back my moron comment and say, Ray Lewis should be happy that they don't have concussion protocols for being an analyst or he wouldn't have a job.The hits keep on coming on Brady . . .
Ray Lewis Says the Tuck Rule is the Only Reason We Know Who Tom Brady Is
Ray Lewis is a BIG believer in momentum. That extends to believing that a quarterback benefiting from one call eventually propels that quarterback to throw 50 touchdown passes, lead the league in touchdowns thrice, and get selected to the all-decade team by the Pro Football Hall of Fame. Nothing was stopping that momentum.
CBS Boston has the transcription:
“Listen, not to go all totally out of conscious [i believe he meant ‘context’], but just think about this, Stephen A., honest to God,” Lewis said. “When we — the first time we created something called a tuck rule, it’s the only reason we know — I’m just being honest! — the only reason we know who Tom Brady is, because of a tuck rule! There’s no such thing as a tuck rule! If the ball is in your hand, and I knock it out your hand, whether it’s going backwards, forwards, lateral, sideways, however it’s coming out, that’s a freaking fumble! […]
“They don’t go to that championship game — they don’t go to that championship game if that tuck rule, if that ball is not called a tuck! That’s a fumble!” Lewis shouted. “Charles Woodson made that man clearly fumble the ball and they named it the tuck rule, something that we’ve never heard in today’s game. So now you’ve got to ask yourself: When did the legacy really start?”
I think the point of it is that, if the Raiders get the ball there the Pats don't tie it up then Brady doesn't go on to win the Super Bowl. If Brady doesn't have that Super Bowl (and everyone remembers him blowing the game with a costly fumble) then how much different does the football world view him? I'm guessing that's what he would say if he didn't get smashed in the head for most of his adult life.Lewis is such a bitter #####. Brady threw for over 300 yards in a virtual blizzard in that game. Also, the tuck rule drive only allowed them to tie the game and send it into overtime. On the winning overtime drive he was 8 for 8 and drove them to the Raider 5 before they kicked a field goal on third down to win it. Tom Brady was huge that day.Ray Lewis was a great football player, but he is a moron. Did that play give them momentum into the super bowl? Maybe. I don't believe in momentum from year to year though. There is too much change. I should take back my moron comment and say, Ray Lewis should be happy that they don't have concussion protocols for being an analyst or he wouldn't have a job.The hits keep on coming on Brady . . .
Ray Lewis Says the Tuck Rule is the Only Reason We Know Who Tom Brady Is
Ray Lewis is a BIG believer in momentum. That extends to believing that a quarterback benefiting from one call eventually propels that quarterback to throw 50 touchdown passes, lead the league in touchdowns thrice, and get selected to the all-decade team by the Pro Football Hall of Fame. Nothing was stopping that momentum.
CBS Boston has the transcription:
“Listen, not to go all totally out of conscious [i believe he meant ‘context’], but just think about this, Stephen A., honest to God,” Lewis said. “When we — the first time we created something called a tuck rule, it’s the only reason we know — I’m just being honest! — the only reason we know who Tom Brady is, because of a tuck rule! There’s no such thing as a tuck rule! If the ball is in your hand, and I knock it out your hand, whether it’s going backwards, forwards, lateral, sideways, however it’s coming out, that’s a freaking fumble! […]
“They don’t go to that championship game — they don’t go to that championship game if that tuck rule, if that ball is not called a tuck! That’s a fumble!” Lewis shouted. “Charles Woodson made that man clearly fumble the ball and they named it the tuck rule, something that we’ve never heard in today’s game. So now you’ve got to ask yourself: When did the legacy really start?”
I understand what point he was trying to make. I also understand that it's a dumb point and there's no reason to believe it's true. It's like saying that if Dwight Clark wouldn't have made "the Catch" we wouldn't know who Joe Montana is.I think the point of it is that, if the Raiders get the ball there the Pats don't tie it up then Brady doesn't go on to win the Super Bowl. If Brady doesn't have that Super Bowl (and everyone remembers him blowing the game with a costly fumble) then how much different does the football world view him? I'm guessing that's what he would say if he didn't get smashed in the head for most of his adult life.Lewis is such a bitter #####. Brady threw for over 300 yards in a virtual blizzard in that game. Also, the tuck rule drive only allowed them to tie the game and send it into overtime. On the winning overtime drive he was 8 for 8 and drove them to the Raider 5 before they kicked a field goal on third down to win it. Tom Brady was huge that day.Ray Lewis was a great football player, but he is a moron. Did that play give them momentum into the super bowl? Maybe. I don't believe in momentum from year to year though. There is too much change. I should take back my moron comment and say, Ray Lewis should be happy that they don't have concussion protocols for being an analyst or he wouldn't have a job.The hits keep on coming on Brady . . .
Ray Lewis Says the Tuck Rule is the Only Reason We Know Who Tom Brady Is
Ray Lewis is a BIG believer in momentum. That extends to believing that a quarterback benefiting from one call eventually propels that quarterback to throw 50 touchdown passes, lead the league in touchdowns thrice, and get selected to the all-decade team by the Pro Football Hall of Fame. Nothing was stopping that momentum.
CBS Boston has the transcription:
“Listen, not to go all totally out of conscious [i believe he meant ‘context’], but just think about this, Stephen A., honest to God,” Lewis said. “When we — the first time we created something called a tuck rule, it’s the only reason we know — I’m just being honest! — the only reason we know who Tom Brady is, because of a tuck rule! There’s no such thing as a tuck rule! If the ball is in your hand, and I knock it out your hand, whether it’s going backwards, forwards, lateral, sideways, however it’s coming out, that’s a freaking fumble! […]
“They don’t go to that championship game — they don’t go to that championship game if that tuck rule, if that ball is not called a tuck! That’s a fumble!” Lewis shouted. “Charles Woodson made that man clearly fumble the ball and they named it the tuck rule, something that we’ve never heard in today’s game. So now you’ve got to ask yourself: When did the legacy really start?”
I've backed Manning in this thread and Ray might have a point but it doesn't matter. Getting hung up on one call is useless. It happens in every game, every year. You can dispute the call but not the game. There's a couple threads about this years "bad" calls and it's the same thing.
That would certainly be a massive feather in Brady's cap, if he plays well against that Seattle D in the Super Bowl in a few weeks.If Brady were to win another championship, especially if he played well in the Super Bowl against the Seahawks defense, I would probably move him into the Montana tier.
You cannot leave Favre out of the 90s.If Bill Bellichek had coached Peyton Manning, they'd have about 8 rings right now.
You have to look at best QBs of an era. They are not comparable between eras.
Early days - Sammy Baugh, Otto Graham
60s - Unitas, Dawson, Starr
70s - Bradshaw, Staubach, Tarkenton
80s - Montana, Marino
90s - Elway, Young
00s - Brady, Manning
10s - Rodgers, ?
I really liked saying Brady is no Brees partly because he doesn't elevate his WRs. And proves it by saying Patten had only 1/2 YPR more with Brady than at NO. He forgot to mention the QB in NO was Brees.Best part of the article: ( while describing how Brady needs great players to have great stats )I am going to go out on a limb and suggest this guy would vote for Manning over Brady . . .
Tom Brady: The Most Overrated QB of This Generation
http://fantasyknuckleheads.com/tom-brady-the-most-overrated-qb-of-this-generation/?utm_source=taboola&utm_medium=referralWhy no mention of Welker with Manning, who elevates average players like Reggie Wayne, Marvin Harrison and DT?The story is the same for Wes Welker, Brady averaged 8.13 YPA and had a 4.2 TD: INT Ratio with Welker in the lineup from 2007-2012. When Welker left for Denver in 2013, Brady saw his YPA drop to 6.9 and his TD: INT ratio was only 2.3. This suggests Brady needs great players around him to be great, while other elite QBs elevate their receivers to a higher level.
Welker best years:
MIA - 67/687/1
NE - 122/1569/9
DEN - 73/778/10
And I never saw a WR's production measured by YPR, yet to prove that Deion Branch and David Patten were as good out of NE as with Brady in NE, that's the stat they used.
Awesome analysis throughout that piece.
awesome statIn the history of the NFL playoffs, all QBs not named Tom Brady have a 3-27 record when they have thrown 50 passes. All QBs named Tom Brady are 3-1.
Brady was ahead in this poll a few months ago. Then bassnbrew bumped it when Brady had started slow and manning was on fire. Then someone else bumped it after manning's playoff loss and it's gone the other way. And bass even came back to say he was wrong, brady is better. Long time manning guy Just Win Baby just put brady a tier above manning. In 2003 this discussion had started, after brady had a couple rings and manning had better stats. Bradys head to head victory over the Colts in the playoffs helped fuel the debate.I think it is funny how much of the voting is based on what have you done lately. This is the closet the vote has been in a while.
2004 saw manning take a decisive lead when he set an nfl record for touchdowns. But then brady best the Colts again while manning led the Colts to just three points, and people voted for brady and his undefeated playoff record again.
Then in 2005, brady finally lost his first playoff game, and people leaned towards manning. And momentum for manning picked up again in 2006 when the Colts finally won a superbowl - after beating the patriots in the afccg. All the people who had claimed manning would eventually have as many rings as brady seemed vindicated.
Then 2007 the patriots had the record setting undefeated season, and people leaned back towards brady, even after the superbowl loss.
Until 2008, when Brady got hurt in the first game, and manning had an mvp season that ended with yet another first round playoff exit.
And 2009, when manning went to another superbowl, he took a huge lead in the debate, even after the pick six that lost the game.
Then 2010, brady won his second mvp with a ridiculous 36 to 4 td to int ratio. And the scales tipped back, even after the pats lost in the divisional round to the jets. And in 2011, when manning was hurt, the pats wentto another superbowl. Brady took a decisive lead, until it was announced that manning was coming back.
A few bad games out of the gate, and people questioned whether manning would ever get his arm strength back. Then he turned it on and didn't look back. And the 2013 season when he retook the td record and a bunch of others, manning was the decisive leader again. And the first half of this season looked no different.
But another one and done for manning, and another afccg or more for brady, after an elite playoff performance, he's taken almost every vote cast since this most recent bump.
To me that's what makes this rivalry so compelling. I've always backed brady, but the swings back and forth year after year were just incredible, with each setting the bar higher for the other, then watching the other leap over it. It's been awesome watching them both. I think manning comes back and I think he wants to be the definitive goat, but if he's done, I'll be as sad as anyone to see him gone. This has just been too good.
Do you realize how ridiculous that sounds?Thumbs up to the guy who suggested Manning/Bill would have 8 rangs.
If Brady was on the Colts and then Denver he would be pushing 1000 career touchdown passes and have at least 3 rings.Do you realize how ridiculous that sounds?Thumbs up to the guy who suggested Manning/Bill would have 8 rangs.
lot of southern accents sound like thatDo you realize how ridiculous that sounds?Thumbs up to the guy who suggested Manning/Bill would have 8 rangs.
Yeah, Manning is pretty awesome.We literally might never see another QB have a career like this.
Those are some sour grapes.Maybe I will never understand this but all of Brady's superbowl wins came in an era that his team was caught cheating. Why does he get credit as the best ever when the team was caught cheating???
Sure sure, say "all teams did it". Fine, but everyone was juicing in baseball but Bonds gets caught. Do you look at him like less of a cheater because "other players did it too"?
People are celebrating this legacy Craft, BB and Brady all have together and it was built off of SB rings that they cheated to achieve.
I guess when the commissioner of the league is the same guy who burns the evidence its tough to draw much attention to this.
I put Brady in the same category as Bonds.
Did he start doing state farm ads with Cliff Paul?Tim Brady without a doubt.
Those are some sour grapes.Maybe I will never understand this but all of Brady's superbowl wins came in an era that his team was caught cheating. Why does he get credit as the best ever when the team was caught cheating???
Sure sure, say "all teams did it". Fine, but everyone was juicing in baseball but Bonds gets caught. Do you look at him like less of a cheater because "other players did it too"?
People are celebrating this legacy Craft, BB and Brady all have together and it was built off of SB rings that they cheated to achieve.
I guess when the commissioner of the league is the same guy who burns the evidence its tough to draw much attention to this.
I put Brady in the same category as Bonds.
dumbest post in a whileMaybe I will never understand this but all of Brady's superbowl wins came in an era that his team was caught cheating. Why does he get credit as the best ever when the team was caught cheating???
Sure sure, say "all teams did it". Fine, but everyone was juicing in baseball but Bonds gets caught. Do you look at him like less of a cheater because "other players did it too"?
People are celebrating this legacy Craft, BB and Brady all have together and it was built off of SB rings that they cheated to achieve.
I guess when the commissioner of the league is the same guy who burns the evidence its tough to draw much attention to this.
I put Brady in the same category as Bonds.