its hard for me to reconcile that every preseason projection had pierre much higher, and his adp was 30 spots higher. yet somehow bush is the better start this week. i just dont understand it.I have both Thomas and Bush in a PPR and started Bush and then switched to Thomas. My first instinct said Bush due to the PPR and I can see a lot of passes to him out of the backfield. I'm more or less guessing. I think Thomas is a safe play and Bush is a serious homerun or dud. I'm playing safe for now, however I'm still debating.I just switched back to Reggie which is risky I know, howver I have Peterson and Harrison as my other 2 backs. I'm going to swing for the fences I guess. I know it's risky.
I would say it is a combination of the situational game tonight and how Bush has been looking in the preseason. As far as the game tonight Minny is real strong against the run. So the thought is to throw it outside to Bush. I think it is a toss up on who to play. In PPR I would definitely lean towards Reggie.its hard for me to reconcile that every preseason projection had pierre much higher, and his adp was 30 spots higher. yet somehow bush is the better start this week. i just dont understand it.
Thomas catches balls as well, and will most certainly get more of the carries..Good Post and exactly my thought process. I know there is a chance I'll be upset with taking Bush over Thomas, but I agree with Reggie being used a lot tonight in the passing game. I think Minny brings the heat tonight too, so dump offs and hot reads to Bush could be happening a lot tonight.skinsrule05 said:I would say it is a combination of the situational game tonight and how Bush has been looking in the preseason. As far as the game tonight Minny is real strong against the run. So the thought is to throw it outside to Bush. I think it is a toss up on who to play. In PPR I would definitely lean towards Reggie.cvnpoka said:its hard for me to reconcile that every preseason projection had pierre much higher, and his adp was 30 spots higher. yet somehow bush is the better start this week. i just dont understand it.
I am starting him over Moreno in a .5 ppr league. Although I still have reservations... this is the Minny D he's going against and not Chicagoredrum42 said:I don't think it's even close in ppr scoring. Minn is tough against the run, Brees will be passing lots. Reggie will probably line up wr lots.Tacos al Carboner said:Him or Pierre in a PPR league.
I got him for $3 in a $100 auction leagueIs this the Reggie Bush owners meeting? If so, what type of league and what round did you steal him this year? I got him in the 6th round of 12 team PPR.
6th or 7th in non PPR. Would anyone take a chance on him over Barber/Bradshaw?Is this the Reggie Bush owners meeting? If so, what type of league and what round did you steal him this year? I got him in the 6th round of 12 team PPR.
Bradshaw - NoMarion Barber - YesTiki Barber - Yes6th or 7th in non PPR. Would anyone take a chance on him over Barber/Bradshaw?Is this the Reggie Bush owners meeting? If so, what type of league and what round did you steal him this year? I got him in the 6th round of 12 team PPR.
looks like one of their strategies is to use up all of minnesota's cbs.bush was in the first play. had a target/drop and a carry. not sure if pierre played on that drive.
Can someone please translateLet retire "rolling" for 2010..OK?
8th round .5 ppr, 10 team league.Is this the Reggie Bush owners meeting? If so, what type of league and what round did you steal him this year? I got him in the 6th round of 12 team PPR.
Let's retire "rolling" for 2010..OK?Can someone please translateLet retire "rolling" for 2010..OK?
I meant 65looks like another 7 Rec for 35 yd night
Who is Rolling? or is it a word we're retiring?Let's retire "rolling" for 2010..OK?Can someone please translateLet retire "rolling" for 2010..OK?
He wants the word rolling to retire (i.e. not be used)Who is Rolling? or is it a word we're retiring?Let's retire "rolling" for 2010..OK?Can someone please translateLet retire "rolling" for 2010..OK?
this may have been a bit premature...REGGIE REGGIE REGGIE.
There is a reason NO kept Reggie at a high salary and laughed at pt's request for more.
And before I had a chance to use it.. I'm behind on the trends.. :sigh:..He wants the word rolling to retire (i.e. not be used)Who is Rolling? or is it a word we're retiring?Let's retire "rolling" for 2010..OK?Can someone please translateLet retire "rolling" for 2010..OK?
PT:19 carries, 3 rec, 86 yards 1 TDthis may have been a bit premature...REGGIE REGGIE REGGIE.
There is a reason NO kept Reggie at a high salary and laughed at pt's request for more.
PT:
8 carries, 2 rec, 42 yards 1 TD
10 touches
Bush
2 carries, 4 rec, 46 yards 0 TD
6 touches
12 team redraft, .5 PPR, start 2 RB, no flex. He fell all the way to me @ 8.08. I thought about taking him as soon as Rd 6, but needed WRs; was very surprised he fell that far.Is this the Reggie Bush owners meeting? If so, what type of league and what round did you steal him this year? I got him in the 6th round of 12 team PPR.
I owe you a beer dude! Swear to God I was about to switch when I read your post and I said to myself, "Groin Pains is right. I'm gonna keep Pierre in."Week one is too early to start yanking guys you took in round three or four.Sweating that first half was tough though...Every time I do that, it always bites me in the ###!I have Reggie and Pierre in a non-PPR. Receiving TDs for RBs are worth an extra 3 points in my league.Pierre did score a receiving TD last year however.Right now I have Pierre in but may switch.
Problem is there are so many people on that team that will get touches. Who do you take them from. There didn't look to be a weak link last night. Every WR and RB on the field for NO was solid... They can get more touches as a team by sustaining more drives but I don't think all those touches go to Bush. Bush did well and could certainly handle more touches, his touches will likely be around 7-13 touches a game. 13 would be a really good game for him. Unless PT goes down...Bush will have some stinkers for sure and in non-ppr leagues is a total gamble.But in a ppr league, Bush had a decent night, despite having 7 touches.The good news is that he looked really good tonight. I expect his touches to only go up from here.
Bush had 6 targets catching 5 Thomas 3 targets catching all 3.PT:19 carries, 3 rec, 86 yards 1 TDthis may have been a bit premature...REGGIE REGGIE REGGIE.
There is a reason NO kept Reggie at a high salary and laughed at pt's request for more.
PT:
8 carries, 2 rec, 42 yards 1 TD
10 touches
Bush
2 carries, 4 rec, 46 yards 0 TD
6 touches
22 touches - 17.6 fantasy points
Bush:
2 carries, 5 rec, 47 yards 0 TD
7 touches - 9.7 fantasy points
To lazy to figure out the targets...
Sedrick Ellis tied or came close to Colston and other defenders did better than him. When a DT equals a WR it's news.The good news is Bush barely touched the ball and still had almost 10 points in PPR format. No one except Thomas really had good stats for the Saints be it a WR/TE/QB...no one was explosive. Thomas ends up with possible top12 numbers this week.
Both pretty efficient then. Like most of the NO WR's...Bush had 6 targets catching 5 Thomas 3 targets catching all 3.PT:19 carries, 3 rec, 86 yards 1 TDthis may have been a bit premature...REGGIE REGGIE REGGIE.
There is a reason NO kept Reggie at a high salary and laughed at pt's request for more.
PT:
8 carries, 2 rec, 42 yards 1 TD
10 touches
Bush
2 carries, 4 rec, 46 yards 0 TD
6 touches
22 touches - 17.6 fantasy points
Bush:
2 carries, 5 rec, 47 yards 0 TD
7 touches - 9.7 fantasy points
To lazy to figure out the targets...
Well you're not very patriotic. "Let's Roll"Let retire "rolling" for 2010..OK?
Nvm...missed the Saints part...Sedrick Ellis tied or came close to Colston and other defenders did better than him. When a DT equals a WR it's news.The good news is Bush barely touched the ball and still had almost 10 points in PPR format. No one except Thomas really had good stats for the Saints be it a WR/TE/QB...no one was explosive. Thomas ends up with possible top12 numbers this week.