Just Win Baby said:
In 2017, here was the
breakdown on NHE:
So this is already part of the "general revenue". Already paid by taxes.
Just Win Baby said:
- 17.1% State and Local Government
While not federal, so is the above. And while all states aren't equal and the types of taxes aren't the same so there will be some winners and some losers here in shifting meaning the politics are hard, this is still already paid for in taxes.
Just Win Baby said:
- 28.0% Household - includes employee contributions to employer-sponsored private health insurance premiums, directly purchased health insurance, the medical portion of property and casualty insurance premiums, employee and self-employment payroll taxes and premiums paid to the Medicare HI Trust Fund, premiums paid by individuals to the Medicare Supplementary Medical Insurance (SMI) Trust Fund, premiums paid for the Pre-existing Condition Insurance Program (PCIP) for 2010-2014, and out-of-pocket health spending
This list includes lots of things. Some of which ("employee and self-employment payroll taxes") are already taxes (ignoring the self employed and the .9% bump complication about
128 billion in 2017 or about 13% of this total - 28% of 3.5T is just under 1T.)
But the rest fall under
@The Commish's need for it to be really laid out. And even once that is done and it is shown (presumably) that most people make out in taxes replacing existing premiums and out of pocket spending as well as find hidden savings on other forms of insurance it is a tough sell to a change averse electorate. Especially since lots of the benefits will need be over one's lifetime rather than necessarily in the here and now.
Just Win Baby said:
- 19.9% Private Business - includes employer contributions to employer-sponsored private health insurance premiums, employer Medicare Hospital Insurance (HI) Trust Fund payroll taxes, workers' compensation, temporary disability insurance, and worksite health care
This is where implementation rather than "selling politically" it might start getting hard. I say that because this is all really employee compensation that isn't included in the gross pay value for employees. And it is where employees doing the same job for the same "base pay" are compensated differently based on the employer shares of things. Ideally I would think we wouldn't have any of this "paid by employers" but would all roll into the employees compensation and then be taxed from there. But that is a tough transition in a short window of time.
Now most of the individual items are easy as payroll taxes, workers' comp, etc. are already pretty much taxes. But untangling employer shares of single, single with children, couple, family seems difficult to do and explain. But all of this in aggregate is just changing where the check is mailed - except maybe worksite health.
Just Win Baby said:
- 6.8% Other Private Revenues - includes health-related philanthropic support, non-operating revenue, investment income, and privately-funded structures and equipment
With the possible exception of charity care I don't think any of this is a concern. I'd guess that the vast majority of philanthropic support is supporting research for diseases and conditions that individuals are concerned about curing or eliminating.
I'm guessing we don't disagree too much here. We just disagree on whether saying 25% increase in federal income taxes without subtracting out what goes away really represents the costs.
Oh to run the 2017 numbers to get the ratios.
We have 3.5 Trillion in total. We can subtract the 28.1% or 983 billion already in federal. We can also subtract 255 billion in payroll taxes. That leaves about 2.3 trillion shifting to the fed. 255 is conveniently about 1/9 of 2.3 trillion. A payroll tax of about 3% pulled in the 255 so I can see how payroll taxes might go up 27% or a even a bit more. Maybe even the 32% if there are enough surcharge dollars that its really 3.5% But that is without a single offset for lower state and local taxes, the elimination of all premiums, reduction in other insurances, etc. We have this big scary exaggerated "new taxes" number as if it is new cost -"what would it cost" with barely a foot note that this all cost we already pay. The issue isn't how much we will be taxed as we already are, but how we are taxed (and thus who is taxed what).
Of course now that I think about it, moving all of those senior's Medicare premiums and out of pocket to payroll taxes they largely don't pay might just be the winning selling point.