Ah, that's probably the difference.
For me, I needed to get out of the mindset I developed in college where I believed that there was always one right answer that could be derived through reason and critical thinking. I needed law school to teach me that being a lawyer often entails dealing with situations where there is no firm right answer or multiple "right" answers for varying reasons and the skill is to identify them all so you can advance your side's argument while simultaneously anticipating the other side's.
I get that. But just thinking back on my law school classes (I actually have my transcript handy)
Civil Procedure was a waste because it focused on federal procedure, nothing New Jersey specific at all (there was another class for that) and in my years of practicing I don't recall more than 2 or 3 times where I ever had to worry about something I was taught being more important that the briefs already on file at the firm I worked at.
Legal writing was absolutely necessary. No argument there.
Contracts was a waste of time. So was Property. In fact the property class was such a waste of time I should get my money back for that class. It had literally nothing to do with on the ground actual property litigation or transactions at all. I've written thousands of deeds and litigated hundreds of property cases. Know how many times the rule of perpetuities has come up....... zero.
Constitutional Law was fun, but nothing that required law school.
Moot court was of course necessary but again, I didn't need law school for that.
My real estate transactions class was a joke. Nothing they taught is anything close to what actually happens in a real real estate transaction.
Criminal law was all theoretical as to why we have it. Which..... ok?
Income Tax was interesting but I was never going into tax law so it was a waste of my time - I have an accountant to talk to if I need to know anything and beyond that, I will hire them as an expert if I need them.
My New Jersey Practice and Rules class was worth every penny. I still use those notes. I could have taken that as a weekend long CLE though.
My election law class was nothing more than a few cases mixed into my knowledge from my B.A. and Masters.
There are more..... overall, there were maybe 4 classes that I actually learned something in. And I will hurt my own argument with this last class - my evidence class was simply amazing in every way. I still use my notes and memory from that class often - but I credit the professor - one of my judges - and not the class itself. He was just amazing and able to make it something that anyone could understand. I was in his courtroom once where he lectured 2 attorneys on contract law and evidence for the case they were arguing and I still kick myself to this day for not taking notes once he started talking. His 15 minute lecture to them was everything law school needed to be.
And all of this I can and could have gotten with maybe 1 year of school training, Bar/bri and an apprenticeship in a court or firm. Yeah, law school was a waste of time for the most part and absolutely a waste of money.