timschochet
Footballguy
What? I’m using the same data you are. I think your interpretation of it is skewed and wrong.The difference between our positions is that one is using data, the other isn't.
What? I’m using the same data you are. I think your interpretation of it is skewed and wrong.The difference between our positions is that one is using data, the other isn't.
I don't know either, but I'd be willing to bet it varies greatly by location.
I read this and wasn't sure what party you were referring to. It seems applicable to all of them.These last 2 years has shown a bright light on just how dysfunctional the party is. They need to spend the next couple years on a complete tear down and rebuilt if they have any hope for a run at ‘24.
I disagree. 22 is likely to be bad for Democrats but I don’t think it’s because of any fundamental problem with the party. I think it’s because despite good efforts by Biden, the pandemic still hasn’t gone away and now we have inflation. I don’t think the party as it currently stands needs to rethink much of anything; it’s simply bad happenstance.Dems are F’d in 2022 and I’d bet 2024 (unless Trump runs and energizes the normally apathetic to come out again). And they deserve it. The abundance of self infected wounds starting all the way back with throwing Biden into the POTUS running and ending with there inability to work together within there own party will catch up to them come election time.
These last 2 years has shown a bright light on just how dysfunctional the party is. They need to spend the next couple years on a complete tear down and rebuilt if they have any hope for a run at ‘24.
100% does unfortunately and exactly why jo jorgensen ( who ever she is or stands for) got my vote in 2020I read this and wasn't sure what party you were referring to. It seems applicable to all of them.
2022 will likely be a R wave. The Democratic party will win 55%+ of all House votes nationwide, yet garner fewer than 50% of House seats. This won't be due to policy choices, inflation, or COVID. It will be due almost entirely to redistricting (D poor performance in 2020 local elections will bite them badly) and changes in election rules.I disagree. 22 is likely to be bad for Democrats but I don’t think it’s because of any fundamental problem with the party. I think it’s because despite good efforts by Biden, the pandemic still hasn’t gone away and now we have inflation. I don’t think the party as it currently stands needs to rethink much of anything; it’s simply bad happenstance.
I voted for Gary Johnson in 2012 and 2016, but wasn’t impressed with Jo. And although KS was a strong Trump state, I thought it was more important to vote for Biden.100% does unfortunately and exactly why jo jorgensen ( who ever she is or stands for) got my vote in 2020
These last 2 years has shown a bright light on just how dysfunctional the party is. They need to spend the next couple years on a complete tear down and rebuilt if they have any hope for a run at ‘24.
Up until the 9th month?Personally I believe in abortion rights up until the date of delivery. A 15 week limitation is very severe and makes no sense. Late term abortion can be very necessary when there is hydrocephalus or other issues or simply as a decision between a woman and her doctor. The state should not play any role at all IMO.
Yes.
Let me give you an example of a late term abortion: let’s suppose that at 8 and a half months, the doctor tells the mother that the baby has hydrocephalus (water in the brain) and will be born brain dead. Furthermore because the brain is enlarged, there is a 5% risk that the mother will be harmed in childbirth and either be unable to have further children, or her life might even be threatened. In such a case, would you be OK with an abortion?What if like only one foot is out and the rest is still in the womb? Technically 99% of the baby is still in the womb. We still talking that you're okay with abortion?
15 weeks - IF WE HAVE TO HAVE ABORTION - seems about right - 9 months is straight up murder. If that were the case, I would advocate that the mother and father (if was involved) and provider be charged with 1st degree intentional homicide and the provider's business shut down.
Man. Im telling you. Once we can finally get rid of dem dern Republicans! I mean obviously no one likes them. They only win stuff by cheating.2022 will likely be a R wave. The Democratic party will win 55%+ of all House votes nationwide, yet garner fewer than 50% of House seats. This won't be due to policy choices, inflation, or COVID. It will be due almost entirely to redistricting (D poor performance in 2020 local elections will bite them badly) and changes in election rules.
NorvilleBarnes said:Sometimes it seems more like four parties, than two. A light blue and a dark blue, and a light and dark red. And when the two shades get together the party is pretty strong and when they fight themselves, they lose. 2024 could see both parties in internal disarray.
timschochet said:Let me give you an example of a late term abortion: let’s suppose that at 8 and a half months, the doctor tells the mother that the baby has hydrocephalus (water in the brain) and will be born brain dead. Furthermore because the brain is enlarged, there is a 5% risk that the mother will be harmed in childbirth and either be unable to have further children, or her life might even be threatened. In such a case, would you be OK with an abortion?
What I’ve just described is not atypical of late term abortions. They aren’t performed out of convenience; there’s usually something quite serious going on.
There is nothing the Republicans can do to change the date.It's looking like 2022 will not be good for Dems. The only thing that might save them is Roe vs. Wade. I think Republicans should do everything in their power to have the SC decision pushed past the summer of 2022. This date is almost lining up perfect for the Dems.
There is nothing the Republicans can do to change the date.
But I think, from what I’ve read, that it’s now likely that the SC will uphold the Mississippi law but not overturn Roe. If that happens, it won’t be enough to alter the election IMO.
Isn't this pretty much overturning Roe (without overturning it).There is nothing the Republicans can do to change the date.
But I think, from what I’ve read, that it’s now likely that the SC will uphold the Mississippi law but not overturn Roe. If that happens, it won’t be enough to alter the election IMO.
I don’t disagree. But politics is about messaging and symbolism. To truly energize suburban women to vote Democrat, you have to actually overturn Roe. (Not Casey; I suspect most people couldn’t tell you what Casey is. Everybody knows Roe vs Wade.)Once you remove viability from the abortion equation, you might as well overturn Roe/Casey.
See my last post. Messaging.Isn't this pretty much overturning Roe (without overturning it).
You really think the young voter is going to ask “Pretty much? Wait did they overturn it or not?”See my last post. Messaging.
The pro-choice activists will say to the voter, “They’ve pretty much overturned Roe!”. The voter will ask, “Pretty much? Wait did they overturn it or not?” The activists will say “well, technically no, but…” and the voter will go back to sleep.
Isn't this pretty much overturning Roe (without overturning it).
These are all good points and I agree with your overall analysis. That being said:Five reasons the Dems are in trouble
1. Runaway inflation, even the Fed admits it is not temporary. To those who say it wii subside, I use the example of my favorite restaurant they raised their prices significantly, I asked the owner why, he said he went from paying 12 an hour to 18 an hour for help. I asked if they would ever lower the prices, he just laughed.
2. The virus situation is not getting better, not Joe’s fault, but he should not of taken a victory lap in July saying we had defeated/turned the corner. He’s in charge so the buck stops with the Dems, again maybe not his fault, but people are in a bad mood about it.
3. Two democratic senators control the party, and will not agree to any agenda except their own. They seem to enjoy telling Biden it’s their way or the highway.
4. Foreign relations are at a critical point with Russia and China. The threat of hostile action against other countries is real for both of these countries. We seem to be doing nothing about the threat.
5. immigration what a mess, I have a second home in AZ, my friends an neighbors their are so upset about the lack of control, they can’t wait to vote. Senator Kelly is in trouble, and AZ is looking awful red IMO.
2022 will likely be a R wave. The Democratic party will win 55%+ of all House votes nationwide, yet garner fewer than 50% of House seats. This won't be due to policy choices, inflation, or COVID. It will be due almost entirely to redistricting (D poor performance in 2020 local elections will bite them badly) and changes in election rules.
Is your favorite restaurant Chipotle?Five reasons the Dems are in trouble
1. Runaway inflation, even the Fed admits it is not temporary. To those who say it wii subside, I use the example of my favorite restaurant they raised their prices significantly, I asked the owner why, he said he went from paying 12 an hour to 18 an hour for help. I asked if they would ever lower the prices, he just laughed.
I stopped reading here. You must be the only person in America, conservative or liberal, who believes this.Zero to do with redistricting.
Agree on a fair wage, but we all will be paying more for a long time. He has a good number of part time teenage help, so they should be spending more on x box’s, etc.Is your favorite restaurant Chipotle?
Sort of kidding, but I don't think paying 18 dollars an hour for help is outrageous. Paying 12 an hour certainly is though.
Good post, GS.Five reasons the Dems are in trouble
1. Runaway inflation, even the Fed admits it is not temporary. To those who say it wii subside, I use the example of my favorite restaurant they raised their prices significantly, I asked the owner why, he said he went from paying 12 an hour to 18 an hour for help. I asked if they would ever lower the prices, he just laughed.
2. The virus situation is not getting better, not Joe’s fault, but he should not of taken a victory lap in July saying we had defeated/turned the corner. He’s in charge so the buck stops with the Dems, again maybe not his fault, but people are in a bad mood about it.
3. Two democratic senators control the party, and will not agree to any agenda except their own. They seem to enjoy telling Biden it’s their way or the highway.
4. Foreign relations are at a critical point with Russia and China. The threat of hostile action against other countries is real for both of these countries. We seem to be doing nothing about the threat.
5. immigration what a mess, I have a second home in AZ, my friends an neighbors their are so upset about the lack of control, they can’t wait to vote. Senator Kelly is in trouble, and AZ is looking awful red IMO.
Good post, GS.
Specifically on #1, a few questions:
1. you say "significantly", but how much did prices go up for him? He didn’t say on food costs, only labor, but sure he had a good increase in overall costs.
2. Has that bump in price negatively effected his business?
nope he is very busy, people are flush with cash, and want to get out
3. When we are talking about voting and Dems being in trouble, do think those big raises for people and whatever might come from BBB offset the inflation concerns as people vote? Good thoughts here. But IMO people are pissed about higher costs, the BBB will not lower the 4.00 a gallon I have to pay for gas for my truck. I also don’t see food costs going down, parts of the Midwest had a drought last year so their is not as much feed grains and cattle to process. Plus states like AZ are starting to cut off water for farming from the CO river, will effect everything from cotton to produce. I don’t see how the BBB will help lower vehicle prices (gas powered). I went to replace a pickup for my operation this year, the dealer wanted 10k over sticker, last year I purchased about the same vehicle for 14k UNDER sticker last year. Unable to get new farm equipment as well. The dealer claims they don’t plan to discount any trucks until 2023 due to chip shortage.
llthe BBB is not going to lower gas from the 4.00 a gallon I am paying for my truck. I don’t see how the BBB
I stopped reading here. You must be the only person in America, conservative or liberal, who believes this.
It would be ridiculous to blame it all on redistricting. It would be even more ridiculous to blame none of it on redistricting, as you just did. Of course redistricting plays a big part, not the only part but a big one. Everyone on all sides seems to get that except you.Of course, that is how you roll. For the Senate portion, it is a joke to even mention jerrymandering as it has no impact.
For house seats Democrats completely control the redistricting process in states like New York and Illinois and have the upper hand in many other states like California, New Jersey and Michigan. Maybe the GOP nets a handful of seats overall, but we are going to see a bloodbath swing of 25 plus seats in the house and to blame that on redistricting is ridiculous.
It would be ridiculous to blame it all on redistricting. It would be even more ridiculous to blame none of it on redistricting, as you just did. Of course redistricting plays a big part, not the only part but a big one. Everyone on all sides seems to get that except you.
But I disagreed with Rich as well. You’ll notice that redistricting was not mentioned in my OP on this subject. But it’s silly to dismiss it.Lol...of course Rich's hyperbole was 'almost entirely'.. I answered hyperbole with hyperbole, but you wish to dismiss me. You are so blindly one-sided in your analysis and how easily you dismiss people you disagree with. I went on and pointed out five factors, and you completely ignored. Fine, that is how you roll and why you love mainstream media.
But I disagreed with Rich as well. You’ll notice that redistricting was not mentioned in my OP on this subject. But it’s silly to dismiss it.
I didn’t respond to your other 5 points because I’ve already addressed many of them. Some of them, particularly point #3, I suspect are more representative of your own personal passions than of voters in general.
Is your favorite restaurant Chipotle?
Sort of kidding, but I don't think paying 18 dollars an hour for help is outrageous. Paying 12 an hour certainly is though.
Good post, GS.
Specifically on #1, a few questions:
1. you say "significantly", but how much did prices go up for him?
2. Has that bump in price negatively effected his business?
3. When we are talking about voting and Dems being in trouble, do think those big raises for people and whatever might come from BBB offset the inflation concerns as people vote?
Ok...stay in denial. Biden's approval numbers continue to drop. I am not seeing anything on the horizon to change that. He is pretty much holding course and dividing the country more and digging deeper. The answer is to reach out to the other side more, but instead he is dug in for battle. It is going to be complete gridlock after midterms, and that will largely be Biden's own doing.
I don't think he is talking about wait staff getting 18 an hour plus tipsHere in PA, wait staff get like $3 an hour plus tips. When I used to bar-back at a local night club I made $2.85 an hour plus tips. I would get bi-weekly checks for like $125 after taxes. If I made $18 and hour plus tips I would be retired by now.
If it’s beyond easy to see, why do I have so much trouble seeing it?Here is the 1,000,000-pound gorilla in the room...Biden is declining mentally and physically; it is beyond easy to see…
If it’s beyond easy to see, why do I have so much trouble seeing it?
If it’s beyond easy to see, why do I have so much trouble seeing it?
So I’ve lost all powers of perception? Lol, don’t answer.You said so in another thread, you've become an "Establishment Democrat".