Nattily_Attired
Footballguy
He hasn’t done much of anything and he looked really ****ty last week. Check my dominator this morning, again “start D. Jones”.
Idiots.
Idiots.
Te question really is who is on the other end of this equation? IOW who are they recommending him over? And if you have Jones what are your other options?
One of the few QBs that can rush for 100 yards 1 TD in any given week. However the odds are it's not likely to happen lolHe hasn’t done much of anything and he looked really ****ty last week. Check my dominator this morning, again “start D. Jones”.
Idiots.
finished ahead of both in week 2…..by a lot.Te question really is who is on the other end of this equation? IOW who are they recommending him over? And if you have Jones what are your other options?
In my case in the two leagues I have him, I've seen him recommended to start over Fields and Tua.
His rushing adds to his projected totals. His opponent this week (Buffalo) is also ranked #30 in FF points allowed to QBs. I get that he has had one good FF game this year and 3 stinkers but as soon as you give up on him he will hit a monster game. I have him as my QB2 and I feel the pain but it also wouldn't surprise my if he put up 30 points this week if they are playing from behind against Buffalo and he is running and throwing every down trying to keep up. Of course his OL better figure out how to protect a little.
I thought he’d be better too. Planned on him being my starter, that didn’t work out. Because of where I drafted, I didn’t have a lot of options, at QB and ended up with G. Smith, M. Stafford, D. Jones, and R. Tannehill. since the start of the season, M. Jones was briefly on my’ team, and now I’ve added Stroud. Every week, every single week, they projected +20 points for D. Jones. We know how that’s gone. I really thought I had a viable choice between Smith and D. Jones this year.We all fall prey to this mindset. Being an "expert" doesn't mean someone isn't susceptible to bias. I think it's fair to say that most people thought Daniel Jones would be a whole lot better than what he has been so far.
The question really is who is on the other end of this equation? IOW who are they recommending him over? And if you have Jones what are your other options?
That’s why I can’t figure out why they ranked him so high, I watched that last game, and it was pretty clear that the O line stinks. The experts should have figured that out by week 3.His rushing adds to his projected totals. His opponent this week (Buffalo) is also ranked #30 in FF points allowed to QBs. I get that he has had one good FF game this year and 3 stinkers but as soon as you give up on him he will hit a monster game. I have him as my QB2 and I feel the pain but it also wouldn't surprise my if he put up 30 points this week if they are playing from behind against Buffalo and he is running and throwing every down trying to keep up. Of course his OL better figure out how to protect a little.
We all fall prey to this mindset. Being an "expert" doesn't mean someone isn't susceptible to bias. I think it's fair to say that most people thought Daniel Jones would be a whole lot better than what he has been so far.
The question really is who is on the other end of this equation? IOW who are they recommending him over? And if you have Jones what are your other options?
Do they also paint over the windshield with black paint?First thing fantasy "experts" do when they buy a new car is remove the rear-view mirrors.
Do they also paint over the windshield with black paint?First thing fantasy "experts" do when they buy a new car is remove the rear-view mirrors.