I'm sure that today's best female basketball players could have competed and done very well in the NBA of the 1940s. And the best women from 2050 may be able compete and do well in the NBA of today. But the NBA of 2050 will be far ahead of that.
You apparently haven't been watching the decline in the fundamental skills in NBA players over the past couple of decades. Hell, a shot from the elbow that used to be money is now a ridiculously outrageous adventure. NBA players have no problem with shooting 60% or worse from the free throw line. The only pick that current NBA players know is that which relieves their nose of a booger.They ought to play the NBA the way Iowa girls' basketball used to play - put 3 players on the O end & 3 players on the D end and not let them cross midcourt of their respectives zones - at least we some some guys attempting to play D then.
I agree with you. I'm one of the very few people I know who often prefers watching women's basketball to men's basketball because, as an overgeneralization, the women often seem more sound in their fundamentals and teamwork. (I've also coached both guys and girls basketball, and generally found that the girls responded a lot better to coaching since they didn't already think they knew everything.)But still, any mens' NCAA team would crush any women's team in a head-to-head contest. They're just much better athletes.
I went to a Big East school and played pickup ball with the members of the womens' basketball team quite often. If I had been a woman, I would have been the best player on the team. But I was barely recruited by any D-III schools.
(I've also played a lot of ball with an NCAA All-American woman who played on the national team in the Goodwill Games before embarking on her WNBA career -- which was interrupted for three years while she attended Duke law school. So I know exactly how good the top women's players are; I'm not speaking from ignorance. They are nowhere near as good as men.)