SoCalBroncoFan
Footballguy
Great minds think alike.same sameThis was the other guy I almost took at the Hamels spot.My list was:3.11 David Price, SP
Cain
Carpenter
Hamels
Price

Great minds think alike.same sameThis was the other guy I almost took at the Hamels spot.My list was:3.11 David Price, SP
Cain
Carpenter
Hamels
Price

I dont know much about how WIS decides defensive ratings, but he is ridiculously good on defense.Yeah, his defensive rating was kind of a shocker for me. I'll be interested to see if that holds up in 2011.SOD. I almost took him back at 2.5.He'll be good value here if all he does is duplicate last year, and he's got a good chance to take the next step up.Hamels was the other guy I was considering so for the 3rd round in a row I will take the hitter instead.3.10 Jay BruceNot sure how I'm going to make the lineup work, but getting probable A defense out of a guy with his offensive upside is worth it for me. Plus, the homer factor of course.
As far as I know:The Glove grade is based on FLD%I dont know much about how WIS decides defensive ratings, but he is ridiculously good on defense.
The Reds rotation had a number of extreme fly ball pitchers last year.As far as I know:The Glove grade is based on FLD%I dont know much about how WIS decides defensive ratings, but he is ridiculously good on defense.
The Range grade, I think, is based on Range Factor. It's better than nothing, but it can lead to some counter-intuitive results. A lot of times, really fast-running CFs come up with surprisingly poor Range Factors just from sharing an outfield with other fast RFs/LFs. Whereas a mediocre CF can get a boost from playing between two stiffs.
For instance -- just by reputation, you'd think Ozzie Smith would always have A/A+ defensive grades in the WIS sim engine. His WIS defensive grades are good, but nowhere near as eye-popping as his rep would lead you to think. I can only surmise that his Range Factor took a hit in years where he played with other "rangey" IFs like Tommy Herr and Terry Pendleton. Or maybe there were years where Smith played with more fly-ball pitchers (not a bad strategy in Busch in the 1980s), and his number of chances dropped. Not really sure.
Fully intended on going P/P around this next turn, but oso has unwittingly ruined my master plan.11 out of the last 14 picks have been pitchers
Brian Leetch's birthdayAnyone know if there's a significant NHL milestone today? Could be hammered already.
GB LeetchBrian Leetch's birthdayAnyone know if there's a significant NHL milestone today? Could be hammered already.
PM sent bobucarow.3 . 13 ChemX…. Jason Heyward OF3 . 14 Arsenal.. Justin Upton OF3 . 15 DougB…. Brandon Phillips 2B3 . 16 SNC…… Jayson Werth OF3 . 17 NV……. Brian McCann C3 . 18 Bogart… Ichiro OF3 . 19 bobucarow OTC until xx:46 3 . 20 sparty…3 . 21 RnR…
Bad defense hurts more than good defense helps. Errors are directly related to fielding percentage. Since this is a single season sim, fielding normalization won't come into play which is a good thing. Range affects the number of +/- plays. A+ range guys will get to balls (+ plays) that normal fielders won't. A WIS update a few years ago dramatically reduced the number of +/- plays. I've never seen a conclusive answer how IF range impacts double plays.Playing guys out of position is almost always a bad idea. You can probably get away with playing an out of position guy at 1B but it won't be pretty.1) Just how much do the defensive ratings impact play?
Petco will definitely produce lower scoring games than Coors. All hitters will be affected when playing in a pitcher's park. Constructing a team specifically for a home park is a lot harder than it sounds, especially when you're drafting in advance of the season.2) Just how much do the ballpark rating impact play?
No, raw numbers aren't adjusted.3) Does WIS adjust players raw numbers from the season to take into account the park that they play in? (i.e. bumping down HRs for a player in Coors while adjusting the pitchers numbers conversly)
:(An MRI on Cain's injured right elbow showed inflammation, the San Francisco Chronicle reports. He was scratched from Thursday's scheduled start with a sore elbow. "Obviously we hope it doesn't have to take missing more than one start," Manager Bruce Bochy said. "We'll see where he's at in a couple of days. Now's the time to back him off and calm this down a little bit."
####er:(An MRI on Cain's injured right elbow showed inflammation, the San Francisco Chronicle reports. He was scratched from Thursday's scheduled start with a sore elbow. "Obviously we hope it doesn't have to take missing more than one start," Manager Bruce Bochy said. "We'll see where he's at in a couple of days. Now's the time to back him off and calm this down a little bit."
He'll be fine by the time they hand out the championship rings...hopefully####erAn MRI on Cain's injured right elbow showed inflammation, the San Francisco Chronicle reports. He was scratched from Thursday's scheduled start with a sore elbow. "Obviously we hope it doesn't have to take missing more than one start," Manager Bruce Bochy said. "We'll see where he's at in a couple of days. Now's the time to back him off and calm this down a little bit."![]()
I don't know why we had to rush into this draft anyhow.
We have plenty of time. Probably should've worked in some supplemental drafts along the way too.isn't this somewhat misleading? while raw numbers may not be park-adjusted, don't the important stats get park-adjusted? For example, OBP# and/or OBP+.No, raw numbers aren't adjusted.3) Does WIS adjust players raw numbers from the season to take into account the park that they play in? (i.e. bumping down HRs for a player in Coors while adjusting the pitchers numbers conversly)
Pretty sure there is no park adjustment. In the Oct 14 2009 where they started fielding normalization, they neve mention park effects.On thing to keep in mind for rdog is that the salaries you see in the WIS draft center include defense which may or may not be the same for next year.isn't this somewhat misleading? while raw numbers may not be park-adjusted, don't the important stats get park-adjusted? For example, OBP# and/or OBP+.No, raw numbers aren't adjusted.3) Does WIS adjust players raw numbers from the season to take into account the park that they play in? (i.e. bumping down HRs for a player in Coors while adjusting the pitchers numbers conversly)
Era normalized + and #(log5) numbers won't come into play because this is a single season sim (unless someone tries to sneak Mordecai Brown onto their pitching staff).Pretty sure there is no park adjustment. In the Oct 14 2009 where they started fielding normalization, they neve mention park effects.On thing to keep in mind for rdog is that the salaries you see in the WIS draft center include defense which may or may not be the same for next year.isn't this somewhat misleading? while raw numbers may not be park-adjusted, don't the important stats get park-adjusted? For example, OBP# and/or OBP+.No, raw numbers aren't adjusted.3) Does WIS adjust players raw numbers from the season to take into account the park that they play in? (i.e. bumping down HRs for a player in Coors while adjusting the pitchers numbers conversly)
WIS salaries are also heavily dependent on PAs and IPs.Pretty sure there is no park adjustment. In the Oct 14 2009 where they started fielding normalization, they neve mention park effects.On thing to keep in mind for rdog is that the salaries you see in the WIS draft center include defense which may or may not be the same for next year.isn't this somewhat misleading? while raw numbers may not be park-adjusted, don't the important stats get park-adjusted? For example, OBP# and/or OBP+.No, raw numbers aren't adjusted.3) Does WIS adjust players raw numbers from the season to take into account the park that they play in? (i.e. bumping down HRs for a player in Coors while adjusting the pitchers numbers conversly)
I'll be around all day.who can take a list? Tired of waiting
surewho can take a list? Tired of waiting
SentI'll be around all day.who can take a list? Tired of waiting