I think there's still quite a bit of sniping going on. All the guys who I shortlisted last night for my 10/11 picks are gone.If the current pace is sustainable, we'll be done before opening day. If interest drops off in the later rounds and we get overrun with skips, we'll move to two-a-days or three-a-days.Would there ever be a point where we'd want to start picking two players at each draft turn ... or is that too much?
each even numbered roundWould there ever be a point where we'd want to start picking two players at each draft turn ... or is that too much?
Nope I'll email himBogart PMed.
Eephus, you still have picks for Northern Voice?
so wanted to pull the trigger on him at the turn, but still scarred from last two years of this guy killing me in my NL roto league.12.07 - Bogart - Brandon Webb - SP
All signs are positive early in ST, the Rangers are going to treat him with kid gloves, guy on a one year deal to prove himself = a great 3/4 of a season
No. Tradition has it that going off daytime clock stops multiple skips from happening. This may be another rule worth suspending when we enter the irrelevant roundsDoes ChemX get autoskipped after AOD makes his pick?ETA: Since he missed his last pick...
that's your wish? mine is jessica biel for eternity.i wish there was some feasible way to do a "chess clock" in these drafts. you get some amount of accumulated wait time for the whole draft, still with the normal 1-hour limit per pick. But once you reach that accumulated limit, you are on autoskip for the rest of the draft.
With waiting so long on pitching, I am going to have to go high risk/high reward on occasion. Webb fits that perfectly.so wanted to pull the trigger on him at the turn, but still scarred from last two years of this guy killing me in my NL roto league.12.07 - Bogart - Brandon Webb - SP
All signs are positive early in ST, the Rangers are going to treat him with kid gloves, guy on a one year deal to prove himself = a great 3/4 of a season
I'm OK having 4 right now, I figure that if I can get 5 (or even if I can't) and then get one of the guys who emerges from nowhere like Garcia, Romero, etc last year I'll be OK.Exactly, which is why I feel bad for the guys that are only 2 or 3 SP deep. Yikes.I think everybody has at least one rotation spot to fill, even the people who've drafted five SPs.WIS rule of thumb is you need to draft a minimum of 900 IP from your SPs. That's 180 IP per arm. Chances are one of the five will either get hurt or underperform.I have five SPs and I'm still looking for more.Feeling the pain for some of you guys that have more than one rotation spot left to fill.
sounds like a good plan for the supplemental draftI'm OK having 4 right now, I figure that if I can get 5 (or even if I can't) and then get one of the guys who emerges from nowhere like Garcia, Romero, etc last year I'll be OK.Exactly, which is why I feel bad for the guys that are only 2 or 3 SP deep. Yikes.I think everybody has at least one rotation spot to fill, even the people who've drafted five SPs.WIS rule of thumb is you need to draft a minimum of 900 IP from your SPs. That's 180 IP per arm. Chances are one of the five will either get hurt or underperform.I have five SPs and I'm still looking for more.Feeling the pain for some of you guys that have more than one rotation spot left to fill.
ship it.I'm gunna be on the road all day, can I PM someone my number and have them text me when I'm up?
Not sure I follow that line of thinking. When you draft a guy that has thrown 200 MLB innings in a season, it will be the first on your staff. Everyone, pitching rich included, will be gunning for the next Garcia or Romero with upcoming draft picks. It's a bit of a crap shoot, and there's certainly no guarantee anyone lands that caliber of a season. And exactly how successful is a 2010 Garcia/Romero? Those are probably middle of the rotation options. Rarely will a true #1 emerge from the scrap heap.I'm OK having 4 right now, I figure that if I can get 5 (or even if I can't) and then get one of the guys who emerges from nowhere like Garcia, Romero, etc last year I'll be OK.
I agree completely. I have Felix/Floyd/Anderson as my top 3. I'm very happy if I have 150 innings of mid-level starter innings from my 20th round pick. But I wouldn't want to be planning to build a whole rotation of those guys.Not sure I follow that line of thinking. When you draft a guy that has thrown 200 MLB innings in a season, it will be the first on your staff. Everyone, pitching rich included, will be gunning for the next Garcia or Romero with upcoming draft picks. It's a bit of a crap shoot, and there's certainly no guarantee anyone lands that caliber of a season. And exactly how successful is a 2010 Garcia/Romero? Those are probably middle of the rotation options. Rarely will a true #1 emerge from the scrap heap.I'm OK having 4 right now, I figure that if I can get 5 (or even if I can't) and then get one of the guys who emerges from nowhere like Garcia, Romero, etc last year I'll be OK.