Notorious T.R.E.
Showdown!™ Administrator
I am dead last in hitting. :dead:
Some interesting numbers in there. DougB's league worst 4.86 ERA is a 4.44 DICE, for example.
DICE is intended to show a pitcher's effectiveness independent of defense. The stats taken account here are HR, BB, HBP, K and IP; which are supposed to be the stats that a pitcher can control. So, your ERA is 4.86, but your defense-independent ERA is 4.44. Meaning, your pitching is better than the ERA shows. (i.e. you've had some bad luck/defense)'Doug B said:'Notorious T.R.E. said:Some interesting numbers in there. DougB's league worst 4.86 ERA is a 4.44 DICE, for example.¿Que?
Ok I'm a little slow so le me see if Iunderstand.Jon Garland has a 3.60 ERA but a 5.05 DICE - did you mean concerned above (not considered ?) So this means that a couple errors is causing his ERA to be lower but its "true measure" is a 5.05 so he's technically worse than his ERA is showing.DICE is intended to show a pitcher's effectiveness independent of defense. The stats taken account here are HR, BB, HBP, K and IP; which are supposed to be the stats that a pitcher can control. So, your ERA is 4.86, but your defense-independent ERA is 4.44. Meaning, your pitching is better than the ERA shows. (i.e. you've had some bad luck/defense)'Doug B said:'Notorious T.R.E. said:Some interesting numbers in there. DougB's league worst 4.86 ERA is a 4.44 DICE, for example.¿Que?
On the flip side, Boubacarow has the opposite going on with an ERA of 3.52 and a DICE of 4.13. So, he maybe should be a little more considered about his pitching than ERA might tell him.
I'm kind of surprised that we can see such a high fluctuation on some of these...more than half a run a game is quite a bit!
Yes, but its a little simpler than that normally. Usually, pitchers with high BABIP are the guys that show up here as being unlucky because either balls are finding holes for hits or guys just aren't getting to them defensively. A bad play that is actually ruled an error is essentially excluded from both DICE and ERA so it shouldn't be a big factor. Also, strand rate will play a role here. Without looking it up, I'm guessing that Garland has managed to strand a lot of runners.Ok I'm a little slow so le me see if Iunderstand.Jon Garland has a 3.60 ERA but a 5.05 DICE - did you mean concerned above (not considered ?) So this means that a couple errors is causing his ERA to be lower but its "true measure" is a 5.05 so he's technically worse than his ERA is showing.DICE is intended to show a pitcher's effectiveness independent of defense. The stats taken account here are HR, BB, HBP, K and IP; which are supposed to be the stats that a pitcher can control. So, your ERA is 4.86, but your defense-independent ERA is 4.44. Meaning, your pitching is better than the ERA shows. (i.e. you've had some bad luck/defense)'Doug B said:'Notorious T.R.E. said:Some interesting numbers in there. DougB's league worst 4.86 ERA is a 4.44 DICE, for example.¿Que?
On the flip side, Boubacarow has the opposite going on with an ERA of 3.52 and a DICE of 4.13. So, he maybe should be a little more considered about his pitching than ERA might tell him.
I'm kind of surprised that we can see such a high fluctuation on some of these...more than half a run a game is quite a bit!
Where as Mike Leake has a 4.40 ERA but a 4.08 means I'm actually pitching better than my ERA shows ?
Yes, but keep in mind hits aren't even used unless the hit is a homerun. Garland likely walks too many and gives up a lot of homeruns without striking out many. That's a recipe for a bad DICE.Yes, but its a little simpler than that normally. Usually, pitchers with high BABIP are the guys that show up here as being unlucky because either balls are finding holes for hits or guys just aren't getting to them defensively. A bad play that is actually ruled an error is essentially excluded from both DICE and ERA so it shouldn't be a big factor. Also, strand rate will play a role here. Without looking it up, I'm guessing that Garland has managed to strand a lot of runners.Ok I'm a little slow so le me see if Iunderstand.Jon Garland has a 3.60 ERA but a 5.05 DICE - did you mean concerned above (not considered ?) So this means that a couple errors is causing his ERA to be lower but its "true measure" is a 5.05 so he's technically worse than his ERA is showing.DICE is intended to show a pitcher's effectiveness independent of defense. The stats taken account here are HR, BB, HBP, K and IP; which are supposed to be the stats that a pitcher can control. So, your ERA is 4.86, but your defense-independent ERA is 4.44. Meaning, your pitching is better than the ERA shows. (i.e. you've had some bad luck/defense)'Doug B said:'Notorious T.R.E. said:Some interesting numbers in there. DougB's league worst 4.86 ERA is a 4.44 DICE, for example.¿Que?
On the flip side, Boubacarow has the opposite going on with an ERA of 3.52 and a DICE of 4.13. So, he maybe should be a little more considered about his pitching than ERA might tell him.
I'm kind of surprised that we can see such a high fluctuation on some of these...more than half a run a game is quite a bit!
Where as Mike Leake has a 4.40 ERA but a 4.08 means I'm actually pitching better than my ERA shows ?
4 dingers is not helping him.Yes, but keep in mind hits aren't even used unless the hit is a homerun. Garland likely walks too many and gives up a lot of homeruns without striking out many. That's a recipe for a bad DICE.Yes, but its a little simpler than that normally. Usually, pitchers with high BABIP are the guys that show up here as being unlucky because either balls are finding holes for hits or guys just aren't getting to them defensively. A bad play that is actually ruled an error is essentially excluded from both DICE and ERA so it shouldn't be a big factor. Also, strand rate will play a role here. Without looking it up, I'm guessing that Garland has managed to strand a lot of runners.Ok I'm a little slow so le me see if Iunderstand.Jon Garland has a 3.60 ERA but a 5.05 DICE - did you mean concerned above (not considered ?) So this means that a couple errors is causing his ERA to be lower but its "true measure" is a 5.05 so he's technically worse than his ERA is showing.DICE is intended to show a pitcher's effectiveness independent of defense. The stats taken account here are HR, BB, HBP, K and IP; which are supposed to be the stats that a pitcher can control. So, your ERA is 4.86, but your defense-independent ERA is 4.44. Meaning, your pitching is better than the ERA shows. (i.e. you've had some bad luck/defense)'Doug B said:'Notorious T.R.E. said:Some interesting numbers in there. DougB's league worst 4.86 ERA is a 4.44 DICE, for example.¿Que?
On the flip side, Boubacarow has the opposite going on with an ERA of 3.52 and a DICE of 4.13. So, he maybe should be a little more considered about his pitching than ERA might tell him.
I'm kind of surprised that we can see such a high fluctuation on some of these...more than half a run a game is quite a bit!
Where as Mike Leake has a 4.40 ERA but a 4.08 means I'm actually pitching better than my ERA shows ?
DICE = 3 + (13HR +3(BB+HBP)-2K)/IPERC = (((H + BB + HBP)×PTB)/(BFP×IP))×9 − 0.56 BFP is batters faced and PTB = 0.89×(1.255×(H − HR) + 4×HR) + 0.56×(BB + HBP − IBB)So, ERC has a lot more variables involved and as I undestand it some of those weights can vary based on people's own preferences. Most notable difference besides the plug numbers is that ERC uses hits allowed. DICE considered a batted ball being a hit or an as a product of luck more or less. DIPS is a variation of DICE that involves calculators that include ground ball and fly ball percentage.
One approach I've been mulling over is to use the mid-season Fantrax standings like Harrrrankings. The top six teams at the All-Star break would be placed into pool A, numbers 7-12 in pool B, etc.The divisions would consist of one team from each of the four pools.Do we know our divisions yet?
we could let the top 6 teams at the end draft their divisions 1 team at a team (non-serpentine)...makes there be a small advantage to doing well in this thing... or is that too much?One approach I've been mulling over is to use the mid-season Fantrax standings like Harrrrankings. The top six teams at the All-Star break would be placed into pool A, numbers 7-12 in pool B, etc.The divisions would consist of one team from each of the four pools.Do we know our divisions yet?
I saw that. Forgot about it though.Not sure I want to do that. Decent offer though, but I suppose I gotta hold on to Hanley for now.Moops check your messages
Well if you have any counter-offers I'm all ears.And that goes for everybody, start offering me some trades!I saw that. Forgot about it though.Not sure I want to do that. Decent offer though, but I suppose I gotta hold on to Hanley for now.Moops check your messages
I don't understand 100% how it works. But there are other people who do. Check out this thread:http://whatifsports.com/forums/Posts.aspx?TopicID=431232&ThreadID=9280955#l_9280955K's don't actually matter as much as you think It basically goes walk -> hit/out ... and then if it's an out, it could be a K or an error or a regular out. Once it's a hit, it goes hit -> HR/notHR ... and then there are multipliers based on the pitcher's era and ERA (earned run average and the time frame he played in) as well as park factors, the hitter's speed, etc.How does DICE compare to ERC? I've used ERC in the past for ranking RPs but only as a single metric that encompasses Ks and HRs.I've never seen the devs acknowledge that the sim uses advanced pitching stats directly. As I understand it, it processes the K and BB probabilities first and HRs that aren't HRs because of park effects end up as doubles and triples. I suspect they're limited by the lack of data for historical players so XBH% are normalized for pitchers. Maybe jfranco can add something extra.
Lillibridge doing pretty well in a part time role.Jason Pridie too.Rich Thompson and Al ALburquerque are among the pitching highlights I guess. Also, no one grabbed Matt Lindstrom?24 teams, 40 round draft, nobody took Jason Bourgeios (.417/.451/.521 12 SB)I know it's early, but anybody else undrafted that's lighting it up?
34 . 03 ( 795 ) HoosFirst Matt Lindstrom P PROXY eephusLillibridge doing pretty well in a part time role.Jason Pridie too.Rich Thompson and Al ALburquerque are among the pitching highlights I guess. Also, no one grabbed Matt Lindstrom?24 teams, 40 round draft, nobody took Jason Bourgeios (.417/.451/.521 12 SB)I know it's early, but anybody else undrafted that's lighting it up?
I guess I (TRE) will have to fix that when I'm (TRE is) sober.34 . 03 ( 795 ) HoosFirst Matt Lindstrom P PROXY eephusLillibridge doing pretty well in a part time role.Jason Pridie too.Rich Thompson and Al ALburquerque are among the pitching highlights I guess. Also, no one grabbed Matt Lindstrom?24 teams, 40 round draft, nobody took Jason Bourgeios (.417/.451/.521 12 SB)I know it's early, but anybody else undrafted that's lighting it up?
What did you (TRE) do to have to break out TRE's favorite mustached username?I guess I (TRE) will have to fix that when I'm (TRE is) sober.34 . 03 ( 795 ) HoosFirst Matt Lindstrom P PROXY eephusLillibridge doing pretty well in a part time role.Jason Pridie too.Rich Thompson and Al ALburquerque are among the pitching highlights I guess. Also, no one grabbed Matt Lindstrom?24 teams, 40 round draft, nobody took Jason Bourgeios (.417/.451/.521 12 SB)I know it's early, but anybody else undrafted that's lighting it up?
Circumvented the language filter and alluded to having relations with dead, BBQ'd animals.'RnR said:What did you (TRE) do to have to break out TRE's favorite mustached username?I guess I (TRE) will have to fix that when I'm (TRE is) sober.34 . 03 ( 795 ) HoosFirst Matt Lindstrom P PROXY eephusLillibridge doing pretty well in a part time role.Jason Pridie too.Rich Thompson and Al ALburquerque are among the pitching highlights I guess. Also, no one grabbed Matt Lindstrom?24 teams, 40 round draft, nobody took Jason Bourgeios (.417/.451/.521 12 SB)I know it's early, but anybody else undrafted that's lighting it up?
I like to think I was nipped for being unfunny.Classic sig there...forgot about it.Well, by now you should know that JB takes his BBQ very seriously. That's someone's BBQ, guy.Also, love the throwback sig.![]()
Better start working the phones.When do we supplemental in this thing? I have zero (0) ABs from my 2Bmen spot.
When do we supplemental in this thing? I have zero (0) ABs from my 2Bmen spot.
Don't think one of them is at 2B this year. I stand corrected. According to baseball reference they're all at 2B. I swear I looked it up on yahoo and he hadn't had one AB at 2B. Guess not.When do we supplemental in this thing? I have zero (0) ABs from my 2Bmen spot.Bill Hall has 111
true. unfortunately, the WIS sim algorithm has no heart.'the moops said:At least we know he will take one for the team. The guy's got heart.![]()
true. unfortunately, the WIS sim algorithm has no heart.'the moops said:At least we know he will take one for the team. The guy's got heart.![]()
Already shipped him to AAA. I'd be pissed if I were Mazzaro. He stays in there to take one for the team, and they reward it by putting him on the next bus out of town. You know that ERA/WHIP are going to hurt him in his future attempts to land a spot on a big league club.'the moops said:At least we know he will take one for the team. The guy's got heart.'oso diablo said:ouch!worst outing ever?I'll take Vin Mazzaro - SP (28.21)![]()