What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

WIS MMXI: Back to the Future Edition- Draft & Season Thread (2 Viewers)

Honestly, I am just constantly looking at my OBP and SLG for my hitters, as well as PA's.

WIth my pitchers, I am looking at WHIP, HR/9 and K/9. As long as those stay in the good range, I should have a decent SIM.

Currently, I have 4 relievers with solid WHIPS: Frieri at 0.90, Mujica at 0.857, Sanches at 0.366 and Qualls at 1.29. Webb and Kuo should also finish up strongly, and I definitely expect Evan Meek to be solid.

Starters are doing alright, Hamels with a 1.21 WHIP, Cliff Lee at 1.02, Chris Young at 1.05 and Mat Latos at 1.26. I expect Hamels and Latos to get better and hope Young will stay relatively healthy and not end up with a WHIP over 1.20.

Hitting-wise, I am solid at C (Ianetta), 1B (Konerko), 3B (Chipper), SS (Escobar), and OF (Bay, Coghlan and Drew). 2B and back-up C are holes right now. Outside of those starters I still have Ryan Roberts and Callaspo putting up solid numbers. Brett Gardner has been horrible. Hoping Ackley will get called up by Seattle and put in some meaningful time at 2B as Blake Dewitt is my only other option there. Maybe Roberts will get eligibility there and I can platoon him with someone else...

If anyone has an extra 2B, I have pitching and a little bit of hitting to trade.

 
'Doug B said:
'Notorious T.R.E. said:
Some interesting numbers in there. DougB's league worst 4.86 ERA is a 4.44 DICE, for example.
:shrug: ¿Que?
DICE is intended to show a pitcher's effectiveness independent of defense. The stats taken account here are HR, BB, HBP, K and IP; which are supposed to be the stats that a pitcher can control. So, your ERA is 4.86, but your defense-independent ERA is 4.44. Meaning, your pitching is better than the ERA shows. (i.e. you've had some bad luck/defense)

On the flip side, Boubacarow has the opposite going on with an ERA of 3.52 and a DICE of 4.13. So, he maybe should be a little more considered about his pitching than ERA might tell him.

I'm kind of surprised that we can see such a high fluctuation on some of these...more than half a run a game is quite a bit!

 
'Doug B said:
'Notorious T.R.E. said:
Some interesting numbers in there. DougB's league worst 4.86 ERA is a 4.44 DICE, for example.
:shrug: ¿Que?
DICE is intended to show a pitcher's effectiveness independent of defense. The stats taken account here are HR, BB, HBP, K and IP; which are supposed to be the stats that a pitcher can control. So, your ERA is 4.86, but your defense-independent ERA is 4.44. Meaning, your pitching is better than the ERA shows. (i.e. you've had some bad luck/defense)

On the flip side, Boubacarow has the opposite going on with an ERA of 3.52 and a DICE of 4.13. So, he maybe should be a little more considered about his pitching than ERA might tell him.

I'm kind of surprised that we can see such a high fluctuation on some of these...more than half a run a game is quite a bit!
Ok I'm a little slow so le me see if Iunderstand.Jon Garland has a 3.60 ERA but a 5.05 DICE - did you mean concerned above (not considered ?) So this means that a couple errors is causing his ERA to be lower but its "true measure" is a 5.05 so he's technically worse than his ERA is showing.

Where as Mike Leake has a 4.40 ERA but a 4.08 means I'm actually pitching better than my ERA shows ?

 
'Doug B said:
'Notorious T.R.E. said:
Some interesting numbers in there. DougB's league worst 4.86 ERA is a 4.44 DICE, for example.
:shrug: ¿Que?
DICE is intended to show a pitcher's effectiveness independent of defense. The stats taken account here are HR, BB, HBP, K and IP; which are supposed to be the stats that a pitcher can control. So, your ERA is 4.86, but your defense-independent ERA is 4.44. Meaning, your pitching is better than the ERA shows. (i.e. you've had some bad luck/defense)

On the flip side, Boubacarow has the opposite going on with an ERA of 3.52 and a DICE of 4.13. So, he maybe should be a little more considered about his pitching than ERA might tell him.

I'm kind of surprised that we can see such a high fluctuation on some of these...more than half a run a game is quite a bit!
Ok I'm a little slow so le me see if Iunderstand.Jon Garland has a 3.60 ERA but a 5.05 DICE - did you mean concerned above (not considered ?) So this means that a couple errors is causing his ERA to be lower but its "true measure" is a 5.05 so he's technically worse than his ERA is showing.

Where as Mike Leake has a 4.40 ERA but a 4.08 means I'm actually pitching better than my ERA shows ?
Yes, but its a little simpler than that normally. Usually, pitchers with high BABIP are the guys that show up here as being unlucky because either balls are finding holes for hits or guys just aren't getting to them defensively. A bad play that is actually ruled an error is essentially excluded from both DICE and ERA so it shouldn't be a big factor. Also, strand rate will play a role here. Without looking it up, I'm guessing that Garland has managed to strand a lot of runners.

 
'Doug B said:
'Notorious T.R.E. said:
Some interesting numbers in there. DougB's league worst 4.86 ERA is a 4.44 DICE, for example.
:shrug: ¿Que?
DICE is intended to show a pitcher's effectiveness independent of defense. The stats taken account here are HR, BB, HBP, K and IP; which are supposed to be the stats that a pitcher can control. So, your ERA is 4.86, but your defense-independent ERA is 4.44. Meaning, your pitching is better than the ERA shows. (i.e. you've had some bad luck/defense)

On the flip side, Boubacarow has the opposite going on with an ERA of 3.52 and a DICE of 4.13. So, he maybe should be a little more considered about his pitching than ERA might tell him.

I'm kind of surprised that we can see such a high fluctuation on some of these...more than half a run a game is quite a bit!
Ok I'm a little slow so le me see if Iunderstand.Jon Garland has a 3.60 ERA but a 5.05 DICE - did you mean concerned above (not considered ?) So this means that a couple errors is causing his ERA to be lower but its "true measure" is a 5.05 so he's technically worse than his ERA is showing.

Where as Mike Leake has a 4.40 ERA but a 4.08 means I'm actually pitching better than my ERA shows ?
Yes, but its a little simpler than that normally. Usually, pitchers with high BABIP are the guys that show up here as being unlucky because either balls are finding holes for hits or guys just aren't getting to them defensively. A bad play that is actually ruled an error is essentially excluded from both DICE and ERA so it shouldn't be a big factor. Also, strand rate will play a role here. Without looking it up, I'm guessing that Garland has managed to strand a lot of runners.
Yes, but keep in mind hits aren't even used unless the hit is a homerun. Garland likely walks too many and gives up a lot of homeruns without striking out many. That's a recipe for a bad DICE.
 
How does DICE compare to ERC? I've used ERC in the past for ranking RPs but only as a single metric that encompasses Ks and HRs.

I've never seen the devs acknowledge that the sim uses advanced pitching stats directly. As I understand it, it processes the K and BB probabilities first and HRs that aren't HRs because of park effects end up as doubles and triples. I suspect they're limited by the lack of data for historical players so XBH% are normalized for pitchers. Maybe jfranco can add something extra.

 
'Doug B said:
'Notorious T.R.E. said:
Some interesting numbers in there. DougB's league worst 4.86 ERA is a 4.44 DICE, for example.
:shrug: ¿Que?
DICE is intended to show a pitcher's effectiveness independent of defense. The stats taken account here are HR, BB, HBP, K and IP; which are supposed to be the stats that a pitcher can control. So, your ERA is 4.86, but your defense-independent ERA is 4.44. Meaning, your pitching is better than the ERA shows. (i.e. you've had some bad luck/defense)

On the flip side, Boubacarow has the opposite going on with an ERA of 3.52 and a DICE of 4.13. So, he maybe should be a little more considered about his pitching than ERA might tell him.

I'm kind of surprised that we can see such a high fluctuation on some of these...more than half a run a game is quite a bit!
Ok I'm a little slow so le me see if Iunderstand.Jon Garland has a 3.60 ERA but a 5.05 DICE - did you mean concerned above (not considered ?) So this means that a couple errors is causing his ERA to be lower but its "true measure" is a 5.05 so he's technically worse than his ERA is showing.

Where as Mike Leake has a 4.40 ERA but a 4.08 means I'm actually pitching better than my ERA shows ?
Yes, but its a little simpler than that normally. Usually, pitchers with high BABIP are the guys that show up here as being unlucky because either balls are finding holes for hits or guys just aren't getting to them defensively. A bad play that is actually ruled an error is essentially excluded from both DICE and ERA so it shouldn't be a big factor. Also, strand rate will play a role here. Without looking it up, I'm guessing that Garland has managed to strand a lot of runners.
Yes, but keep in mind hits aren't even used unless the hit is a homerun. Garland likely walks too many and gives up a lot of homeruns without striking out many. That's a recipe for a bad DICE.
4 dingers is not helping him.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
DICE = 3 + (13HR +3(BB+HBP)-2K)/IP

ERC = (((H + BB + HBP)×PTB)/(BFP×IP))×9 − 0.56

BFP is batters faced and PTB = 0.89×(1.255×(H − HR) + 4×HR) + 0.56×(BB + HBP − IBB)

So, ERC has a lot more variables involved and as I undestand it some of those weights can vary based on people's own preferences. Most notable difference besides the plug numbers is that ERC uses hits allowed. DICE considered a batted ball being a hit or an as a product of luck more or less.

DIPS is a variation of DICE that involves calculators that include ground ball and fly ball percentage.

 
DICE = 3 + (13HR +3(BB+HBP)-2K)/IPERC = (((H + BB + HBP)×PTB)/(BFP×IP))×9 − 0.56 BFP is batters faced and PTB = 0.89×(1.255×(H − HR) + 4×HR) + 0.56×(BB + HBP − IBB)So, ERC has a lot more variables involved and as I undestand it some of those weights can vary based on people's own preferences. Most notable difference besides the plug numbers is that ERC uses hits allowed. DICE considered a batted ball being a hit or an as a product of luck more or less. DIPS is a variation of DICE that involves calculators that include ground ball and fly ball percentage.
:nerd:
 
Do we know our divisions yet?
One approach I've been mulling over is to use the mid-season Fantrax standings like Harrrrankings. The top six teams at the All-Star break would be placed into pool A, numbers 7-12 in pool B, etc.The divisions would consist of one team from each of the four pools.
 
Do we know our divisions yet?
One approach I've been mulling over is to use the mid-season Fantrax standings like Harrrrankings. The top six teams at the All-Star break would be placed into pool A, numbers 7-12 in pool B, etc.The divisions would consist of one team from each of the four pools.
we could let the top 6 teams at the end draft their divisions 1 team at a team (non-serpentine)...makes there be a small advantage to doing well in this thing... or is that too much?
 
I hate Houston's stadium...

Braun's hit two shots that would have been homeruns in every other park in baseball (except Boston and Houston's)...

:rant:

 
How does DICE compare to ERC? I've used ERC in the past for ranking RPs but only as a single metric that encompasses Ks and HRs.I've never seen the devs acknowledge that the sim uses advanced pitching stats directly. As I understand it, it processes the K and BB probabilities first and HRs that aren't HRs because of park effects end up as doubles and triples. I suspect they're limited by the lack of data for historical players so XBH% are normalized for pitchers. Maybe jfranco can add something extra.
I don't understand 100% how it works. But there are other people who do. Check out this thread:http://whatifsports.com/forums/Posts.aspx?TopicID=431232&ThreadID=9280955#l_9280955K's don't actually matter as much as you think It basically goes walk -> hit/out ... and then if it's an out, it could be a K or an error or a regular out. Once it's a hit, it goes hit -> HR/notHR ... and then there are multipliers based on the pitcher's era and ERA (earned run average and the time frame he played in) as well as park factors, the hitter's speed, etc.
 
My team is certainly interesting so far.

Jose Bautista is the best hitter in the AL. Matt Joyce is actually killing the ball. Gaby Sanchez has been great too - 294/381/461.

Alfonso Soriano has 11 HRs in 101 AB and his line is 267/286/634. Zorilla has a Soriano-like slash line of 260/316/587 and Lind is at 282/314/464. Billy Beane hates my team but Ruben Amaro loves it.

On the flip side, Carlos Santana is hitting .191. Alexi Casilla is hitting .190. Brignac is hitting .212 with a .212 SLG.

Trumbo is getting a lot more PT than expected with Morales out forever. Span and Fowler are about what I expected they would be. So I basically have a bunch of great outfielders and first basemen but my 3B/SS situation is a disaster and my catcher situation is bad too (but hopefully will get better)

Too early to tell on the pitching side, but Humber has been a pleasant surprise and my bullpen "aces" have been horrible (Sale, Jansen, Parnell)

 
24 teams, 40 round draft, nobody took Jason Bourgeios (.417/.451/.521 12 SB)

I know it's early, but anybody else undrafted that's lighting it up?

 
24 teams, 40 round draft, nobody took Jason Bourgeios (.417/.451/.521 12 SB)I know it's early, but anybody else undrafted that's lighting it up?
Lillibridge doing pretty well in a part time role.Jason Pridie too.Rich Thompson and Al ALburquerque are among the pitching highlights I guess. Also, no one grabbed Matt Lindstrom?
 
24 teams, 40 round draft, nobody took Jason Bourgeios (.417/.451/.521 12 SB)I know it's early, but anybody else undrafted that's lighting it up?
Lillibridge doing pretty well in a part time role.Jason Pridie too.Rich Thompson and Al ALburquerque are among the pitching highlights I guess. Also, no one grabbed Matt Lindstrom?
34 . 03 ( 795 ) HoosFirst Matt Lindstrom P PROXY eephus
 
24 teams, 40 round draft, nobody took Jason Bourgeios (.417/.451/.521 12 SB)I know it's early, but anybody else undrafted that's lighting it up?
Lillibridge doing pretty well in a part time role.Jason Pridie too.Rich Thompson and Al ALburquerque are among the pitching highlights I guess. Also, no one grabbed Matt Lindstrom?
34 . 03 ( 795 ) HoosFirst Matt Lindstrom P PROXY eephus
I guess I (TRE) will have to fix that when I'm (TRE is) sober.
 
24 teams, 40 round draft, nobody took Jason Bourgeios (.417/.451/.521 12 SB)I know it's early, but anybody else undrafted that's lighting it up?
Lillibridge doing pretty well in a part time role.Jason Pridie too.Rich Thompson and Al ALburquerque are among the pitching highlights I guess. Also, no one grabbed Matt Lindstrom?
34 . 03 ( 795 ) HoosFirst Matt Lindstrom P PROXY eephus
I guess I (TRE) will have to fix that when I'm (TRE is) sober.
What did you (TRE) do to have to break out TRE's favorite mustached username?
 
'RnR said:
24 teams, 40 round draft, nobody took Jason Bourgeios (.417/.451/.521 12 SB)I know it's early, but anybody else undrafted that's lighting it up?
Lillibridge doing pretty well in a part time role.Jason Pridie too.Rich Thompson and Al ALburquerque are among the pitching highlights I guess. Also, no one grabbed Matt Lindstrom?
34 . 03 ( 795 ) HoosFirst Matt Lindstrom P PROXY eephus
I guess I (TRE) will have to fix that when I'm (TRE is) sober.
What did you (TRE) do to have to break out TRE's favorite mustached username?
Circumvented the language filter and alluded to having relations with dead, BBQ'd animals.
 
Well, by now you should know that JB takes his BBQ very seriously. That's someone's BBQ, guy.

Also, love the throwback sig. :thumbup:

 
Lindstrom added to HOOS roster. His pitching is looking pretty solid actually. Looks like HOOS and RNR haven't signed up to the WIS league yet. You're missing out on all of the fun guys.

 
.179 is

A. The combined isolated power of my two first offensive picks (Pedroia & Morneau)

B. My expected winning percentage in this thing

C. Both

 
Chapman went from being an absolute steal to a potential cut in a 2 week span. Gotta love relief pitchers in this thing.

 
'the moops said:
'oso diablo said:
I'll take Vin Mazzaro - SP (28.21)
ouch!worst outing ever?
At least we know he will take one for the team. The guy's got heart. :unsure:
Already shipped him to AAA. I'd be pissed if I were Mazzaro. He stays in there to take one for the team, and they reward it by putting him on the next bus out of town. You know that ERA/WHIP are going to hurt him in his future attempts to land a spot on a big league club.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top