I agree, considering their D was on the field 80% of the game they didn't look half bad.I thought Oaklands run d looked pretty good
Turner still had 10 fantasy points, this could be like an LJ/Priest situation where you start bothI agree, considering their D was on the field 80% of the game they didn't look half bad.I thought Oaklands run d looked pretty good
It was a kickoff (the only Oakland kickoff of the game). Eric Parker handled all punt return duties.Turner returned a kick last night too. A punt I believe.
No but you'll probably need to adjust your lineup.Got Jordanand considering Turner or Norwood. Do I need to adjust my meds?
They are still better options. You are betting on a blowout which even against bad NFL teams is not as predictable as it seems. then you are betting that the game falls in a similiar manner as Oakland where the Chargers can run 50 times in game. Even with that Turner is what going to get 15 touches, and now you have to figure out if he is going to do something with the 15 touches,While Droughns and Lundy had poor week 1s, 15 touches is the low end for both especially Droughns. They are easily better options than trying guess a clear back-ups production.i have ruben droughns and king kong lundy as the other options. turner seems viable to me.
This could be the game where you see them let Rivers pass a little more. Did anyone see what Pennington did against Tenn? Plus, it's the second game of the year and you're going to give LT back-to-back 30 carry games?Im thinking there should be about 45-50 carries against the TitansTurner gets 15-20 carries 80/1tdLT Gets 30 carries![]()
So, let me get this straight. You have an RB who is basically guaranteed about 15 touches, and another RB who is basically guaranteed about 20 touches, and you are considering benching them both for an RB who has an absolute CEILING of 10 touches against ridiculously overstacked defenses, but who in all likelihood will get no more than 2 or 3 touches? That about sum it up?i have ruben droughns and king kong lundy as the other options. turner seems viable to me.
That would be something new, no one has tried to put 8 or 9 guys in the box against LT before.Fisher is no ####### Art Shell.They know what is going to happen. Run, Run, Run.8-9 men in the box and make 5 passes a game Rivers beat them.LT isnt getting by Thornton, Bullock, and Hope.
Not many teams has as good of LBs as TEN has either.That would be something new, no one has tried to put 8 or 9 guys in the box against LT before.Fisher is no ####### Art Shell.They know what is going to happen. Run, Run, Run.8-9 men in the box and make 5 passes a game Rivers beat them.LT isnt getting by Thornton, Bullock, and Hope.
In that case, Turner would get more carries no?This could be the game where you see them let Rivers pass a little more. Did anyone see what Pennington did against Tenn? Plus, it's the second game of the year and you're going to give LT back-to-back 30 carry games?Im thinking there should be about 45-50 carries against the TitansTurner gets 15-20 carries 80/1tdLT Gets 30 carries![]()
Man I wont even answer this, it's been discussed so many times you should know it by heart nowBeg pardon for the hijack but what is Turner's contract status?
Of course it's going to be a blowout, thats the whole point of the threadRunnings the ball isnt going to win them games against other teams folks. Running Turner instead of LT is going to be even worse, if they plan on running LT will be running unless its a BLOWOUT.
Runnings the ball isnt going to win them games against other teams folks.
We have a slow one.Runnings the ball isnt going to win them games against other teams folks.![]()
We have a slow one.Runnings the ball isnt going to win them games against other teams folks.![]()
How many points will you give me? Titans plus?I think it's pretty dumb to predict a blowout in any given NFL game. Predict the winner, sure, but predicting an NFL team to lay an egg is a crapshoot. Tennessee could win this game 24-21 and no one would be shocked.Of course it's going to be a blowout, thats the whole point of the threadRunnings the ball isnt going to win them games against other teams folks. Running Turner instead of LT is going to be even worse, if they plan on running LT will be running unless its a BLOWOUT.
Good point, you people are saying your going to start a backup because of a blowout? Who the hell are you starting him over Bo Jackson? I Guess i should have started Morris last week because the Seahawks sure blewout Detroit.How many points will you give me? Titans plus?I think it's pretty dumb to predict a blowout in any given NFL game. Predict the winner, sure, but predicting an NFL team to lay an egg is a crapshoot. Tennessee could win this game 24-21 and no one would be shocked.Of course it's going to be a blowout, thats the whole point of the threadRunnings the ball isnt going to win them games against other teams folks. Running Turner instead of LT is going to be even worse, if they plan on running LT will be running unless its a BLOWOUT.
We sure do, although I don't think it's Gr00vusWe have a slow one.Runnings the ball isnt going to win them games against other teams folks.![]()
I would sure be shocked. Pleasantly shocked.How many points will you give me? Titans plus?I think it's pretty dumb to predict a blowout in any given NFL game. Predict the winner, sure, but predicting an NFL team to lay an egg is a crapshoot. Tennessee could win this game 24-21 and no one would be shocked.Of course it's going to be a blowout, thats the whole point of the threadRunnings the ball isnt going to win them games against other teams folks. Running Turner instead of LT is going to be even worse, if they plan on running LT will be running unless its a BLOWOUT.
AhrnCityPahnder said:We sure do, although I don't think it's Gr00vusMeVsMaradona said:We have a slow one.Gr00vus said:MeVsMaradona said:Runnings the ball isnt going to win them games against other teams folks.![]()
Vince Young should start. He can't do much worse. Trial by fire certainly kills QBs in their first year, but they are super good in Year 2.I'll be surprised if Collins has another week as bad or worse than last. At least this week he won't be playing in front of such a hostile crowd.
Give the man a break. He is a RFA next year and will be a UFA in 2008.gocats said:Man I wont even answer this, it's been discussed so many times you should know it by heart nowMy Hope Street Alias said:Beg pardon for the hijack but what is Turner's contract status?
If LT gets 30 carries a game, then he won't last the season. Look, I posted a bunch of articles on the Bandwagon thread about how the coaching staff has been dreaming up ways to utilize MT (even in the same backfield with LT). This situation will continue even in non-blowout situations. Turner IS a viable flex starter this year. Like SSOG, I wouldn't recommend starting him ahead of someone like Droughns. But, against another backup, goal line specialist, or second tier WR, I would start him in a heartbeat.This is nothing like the Priest/LJ situation last year. The coach announced last year that LJ would get every third series. You knew he was going to get 1/3 of the work. Even then, he was hit or miss as a starter until Priest went down for the count.You might as well give up on your season if you are choosing to start a true backup RB over starting running backs. Turner is a great backup, but how many games can you recall where a team gets 45-50 carries? There are very few. Even if the Titans offense can't get anything going, all the Titans need is a big play or two on special teams or a couple of turnovers by SD in SD territory to stay in the game. And that pretty much means Turner likely will give you a goose-egg. Also, what kind of upside would you be looking for from Turner? If LT gets his 30 carries, you will be lucky if Turner gets fifty total yards. A TD would be flukey at best.
Even if it is another blowout (which you can't anticipate), and even if San Diego goes with 48 runs compared to 11 passes again this week (which is a GIGANTIC fluke that nobody should bet on repeating)... Turner averaged 3.7 yards per carry (because the D was stacking against the run because it was a blowout), and would have had no fantasy value if it weren't for a late TD (which could have just as easily gone to Gates, or McCardell, or Lorenzo Neal).No way should Turner see anyone's starting lineup except in the most extreme of desperation situations.
Why throw the ball when you have the lead? This isn't college football where you run up the score, it's the NFL. Most teams with a nice lead burn the clock out by running the ball, especially when the running game was working as well as it was against the Raiders. I also would think the Chargers staff know when to balance their offensive scheme up. Did you know that last year against Oakland Brees passed for 164 yards and 1 touchdown in the first meeting? The second meeting he passed for 160 yards and 2 touchdowns. That isn't a lot more yards compared to what Rivers did against Oakland, in his very first NFL start. As for Tennessee, never underestimate your opponent. Even though the Jets don't have LT, they didn't have an easy time running on TN. They got their yards through the air. I doubt TN will use the same formation the Raiders used on the Chargers, which didn't work.Ministry of Pain said:1 thing that bothered me alst night as I was pissing off Raiders fans in the Santa Monica Hooters(Let's go Chargers Let's Go!...was beautiful)...was the fact marty did not throw more when they ahd the lead. let Rivers attack an awful secondary. They won't win a ton of ball games if the gameplan is to hide Rivers. I understnd they didn't need much from him...and he did deliver when he was asked to...but still what happens whent hey face someone actually worth a crap?martyball at its finest last night.
Sure seems to debunk the theory of coaches not changing thier stripes midseason that you spewed in the A Green thread.Contradict seems to be the term I'm looking for to complete this post.Yes, contradict.Even if it is another blowout (which you can't anticipate), and even if San Diego goes with 48 runs compared to 11 passes again this week (which is a GIGANTIC fluke that nobody should bet on repeating)... Turner averaged 3.7 yards per carry (because the D was stacking against the run because it was a blowout), and would have had no fantasy value if it weren't for a late TD (which could have just as easily gone to Gates, or McCardell, or Lorenzo Neal).No way should Turner see anyone's starting lineup except in the most extreme of desperation situations.
I'm not predicting Schottenheimer to change his stripes. I'm saying that you can't predict a 27-0 blowout, and even if you COULD predict a 27-0 blowout and even if Schotty DID run the ball about 84% of the time and even if there WERE 48 carries to go around... even then, Turner's a poor play because he's still looking at only 10 carries against overstacked defenses.If Schottenheimer has as much of a lead and as solid of a command of the game and his defense is as dominating, I would expect Schotty to call plays exactly the same way. My point is that that situation is so unbelievably rare in the NFL that trying to predict it is absolute lunacy. We might as well project 6 TDs for Peyton Manning this week while we're at it.Right now you're just trying to pick a fight, and you're doing a pretty poor job of it at that. You can keep trying if it makes you feel better, but hopefully you won't mind if I just ignore you from now on.Sure seems to debunk the theory of coaches not changing thier stripes midseason that you spewed in the A Green thread.Contradict seems to be the term I'm looking for to complete this post.Yes, contradict.Even if it is another blowout (which you can't anticipate), and even if San Diego goes with 48 runs compared to 11 passes again this week (which is a GIGANTIC fluke that nobody should bet on repeating)... Turner averaged 3.7 yards per carry (because the D was stacking against the run because it was a blowout), and would have had no fantasy value if it weren't for a late TD (which could have just as easily gone to Gates, or McCardell, or Lorenzo Neal).No way should Turner see anyone's starting lineup except in the most extreme of desperation situations.
Apparently it isn't.This would have been a dynamite 1-2 punch at RB this week...Even if it is another blowout (which you can't anticipate), and even if San Diego goes with 48 runs compared to 11 passes again this week (which is a GIGANTIC fluke that nobody should bet on repeating)... Turner averaged 3.7 yards per carry (because the D was stacking against the run because it was a blowout), and would have had no fantasy value if it weren't for a late TD (which could have just as easily gone to Gates, or McCardell, or Lorenzo Neal).No way should Turner see anyone's starting lineup except in the most extreme of desperation situations.![]()