What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.

With Chad and Patrick, why are the Jets taking (1 Viewer)

Is this a serious question?

A weak armed quarterback with two shoulder surgeries and a quarterback that couldn't beat out a 487 year old Mark Brunnell are your two available options at starting QB and you're wondering why they would draft someone to replace them?
These are viable opinions, but we are judging the Jets actions in regards to these quarterbacks. It's not like Pennington, Ramsey and Bollinger happen to be on the roster, the current regime's action indicate they wanted these three guys. They negotiated a new contract with Pennington (instead of cutting him), so he will have to be on the roster. They traded for Ramsey so he has to be on the roster. Certainly Bollinger can be considered disposable, but he is penciled in as the third string guy with a very cap friendly number.
I think you're reading too hard into all this. Pennington was owed a lot of money and cutting him was going to be hard on the cap and hard on the wallet. Bollinger showed he was a better backup than anyone thought last year - what were they going to d, cut him? The only guy they went out and got was Ramsey, and he cost all of a 6th round pick.I think the Jets draft board looks something like this:

Leinert

Mario

Ferguson

Hawk

Davis

Trade down for Young, Cutler, or Justice
I keep reading the local papers and everything I am hearing is that they are not interested in a quarterback; and it makes a lot of sense. Here is what I think they want to do:1) Trade down for more picks

2) Mario Williams

3) D'Brickshaw Ferguson

....[gap]

4) AJ Hawk
I agree. THe Jets would trade down for the right offer; but if not, they prefer Williams and then Ferguson. Hawk runs a far third. If they trade down I could see Davis, Justice or Ngata getting consideration (depending on how far down they moved).
Considering they reportedly have turned down the Broncos' offer of #15 and #22 it would seem they want a top ten-twelve trading partner
I think the likeliest trade scenario is with Oakland. If they are truly interested in VY, they will move to #4 to get him. The way it works out, the Jets would end up with either Ferguson or Davis at #7 (or Cutler, if they decide to go QB).I don't trust the local papers on any of this. They had the Jets interested in trading up for Bush, then interested in trading up for Leinert, then interested in staying put and grabbing VY, then interested in staying put for Cutler, then interested in trading down and grabbing Cutler, then interested in staying in place for D'Brickshaw, then interested in staying in place for Mario Williams, then interested in staying in place for Davis.

 
I still say it makes no sense to pay Mario Williams (out of position in a 3-4) John Abe money when you refused to give it to a proven 10 sack guy (even though he has warts).
John Abraham and Mario Williams barely even play the same position.In a 3-4 Defense, a 1 dimensional pass rusher like Abe would play what? OLB?

Mario Williams is possibly a Carbon Copy of the highest paid defensive player in the league and the Key to one of the best teams in the league's defense...

Mario potentially makes you defense deceptive and allows you to mix up DL fronts in and out of 3-4 to 4-3...

Abe DOES NOT have that potential.....There is no comparison to John Abraham here.... PLUS Abe is a bonafide Injury concern.

What I have found with Jet fans I know and talk to is, there is a contingent that Loved Abraham and they have this hatred for Mario thinking the guy is taking his $$$$ - But, honetly they don't fill the same roles.
:goodposting:
Thanks - I'm getting this speech down.. It's driving me BATTY.... Between the people who want to compare Mario to Abraham and the people who think Mario can't play the 3-4....

Someone, long ago wrote an article that said Mario would have better numbers (Stats) in the 4-3 and that has led to a lot of people saying he can't play the 3-4!!! Sheesh, That's NOT what they said or meant.

- AS IF, there is a better physical specimen around to play a 3-4 DE ....

What do they think he's TOO BIG? TOO FAST???

I'm praying we (Jets) get SUPER MARIO - I want that Jersey!!!!
Call me Charley Casserly, but if I was an NFL GM I would have Mario and Reggie neck-and-neck on my draft board.
 
I still say it makes no sense to pay Mario Williams (out of position in a 3-4) John Abe money when you refused to give it to a proven 10 sack guy (even though he has warts).
John Abraham and Mario Williams barely even play the same position.In a 3-4 Defense, a 1 dimensional pass rusher like Abe would play what? OLB?

Mario Williams is possibly a Carbon Copy of the highest paid defensive player in the league and the Key to one of the best teams in the league's defense...

Mario potentially makes your defense deceptive and allows you to mix up DL fronts in and out of 3-4 to 4-3...

Abe DOES NOT have that potential.....There is no comparison to John Abraham here.... PLUS Abe is a bonafide Injury concern.

What I have found with Jet fans I know and talk to is, there is a contingent that Loved Abraham and they have this hatred for Mario thinking the guy is taking his $$$$ - But, honestly they don't fill the same roles.
bingo. williams does not equal Abe
 
I still say it makes no sense to pay Mario Williams (out of position in a 3-4) John Abe money when you refused to give it to a proven 10 sack guy (even though he has warts).
John Abraham and Mario Williams barely even play the same position.In a 3-4 Defense, a 1 dimensional pass rusher like Abe would play what? OLB?

Mario Williams is possibly a Carbon Copy of the highest paid defensive player in the league and the Key to one of the best teams in the league's defense...

Mario potentially makes your defense deceptive and allows you to mix up DL fronts in and out of 3-4 to 4-3...

Abe DOES NOT have that potential.....There is no comparison to John Abraham here.... PLUS Abe is a bonafide Injury concern.

What I have found with Jet fans I know and talk to is, there is a contingent that Loved Abraham and they have this hatred for Mario thinking the guy is taking his $$$$ - But, honestly they don't fill the same roles.
:goodposting: Exactly. Compairng Abraham and Mario is apples and oranges. In no way shape or form could Abraham have played 3-4 end. Too small.

 
I still say it makes no sense to pay Mario Williams (out of position in a 3-4) John Abe money when you refused to give it to a proven 10 sack guy (even though he has warts).
John Abraham and Mario Williams barely even play the same position.In a 3-4 Defense, a 1 dimensional pass rusher like Abe would play what? OLB?

Mario Williams is possibly a Carbon Copy of the highest paid defensive player in the league and the Key to one of the best teams in the league's defense...

Mario potentially makes you defense deceptive and allows you to mix up DL fronts in and out of 3-4 to 4-3...

Abe DOES NOT have that potential.....There is no comparison to John Abraham here.... PLUS Abe is a bonafide Injury concern.

What I have found with Jet fans I know and talk to is, there is a contingent that Loved Abraham and they have this hatred for Mario thinking the guy is taking his $$$$ - But, honetly they don't fill the same roles.
:goodposting:
Thanks - I'm getting this speech down.. It's driving me BATTY.... Between the people who want to compare Mario to Abraham and the people who think Mario can't play the 3-4....

Someone, long ago wrote an article that said Mario would have better numbers (Stats) in the 4-3 and that has led to a lot of people saying he can't play the 3-4!!! Sheesh, That's NOT what they said or meant.

- AS IF, there is a better physical specimen around to play a 3-4 DE ....

What do they think he's TOO BIG? TOO FAST???

I'm praying we (Jets) get SUPER MARIO - I want that Jersey!!!!
Call me Charley Casserly, but if I was an NFL GM I would have Mario and Reggie neck-and-neck on my draft board.
Definitely.... For me the Jets options are MARIO or Trade down.If they could move into the 11 spot or so, then they could fill any number of holes with pretty equal players..... Depending on how they feel with these QB's - But, it's much easier to take a Cutler at 11 along with another pick... And that goes for:

Mario

Bush

Ferguson

Davis

Hawk

Ngata

Huff

Justice

Leinert

Young

Cutler

At 11 the Jets would get a great player to fill a huge hole and get another pick...

MARIO OR TRADE DOWN!!!!

VALUE DRAFTING!!!

 
I still say it makes no sense to pay Mario Williams (out of position in a 3-4) John Abe money when you refused to give it to a proven 10 sack guy (even though he has warts).
John Abraham and Mario Williams barely even play the same position.In a 3-4 Defense, a 1 dimensional pass rusher like Abe would play what? OLB?

Mario Williams is possibly a Carbon Copy of the highest paid defensive player in the league and the Key to one of the best teams in the league's defense...

Mario potentially makes your defense deceptive and allows you to mix up DL fronts in and out of 3-4 to 4-3...

Abe DOES NOT have that potential.....There is no comparison to John Abraham here.... PLUS Abe is a bonafide Injury concern.

What I have found with Jet fans I know and talk to is, there is a contingent that Loved Abraham and they have this hatred for Mario thinking the guy is taking his $$$$ - But, honestly they don't fill the same roles.
:goodposting: Exactly. Compairng Abraham and Mario is apples and oranges. In no way shape or form could Abraham have played 3-4 end. Too small.
I understand that they are different types of players but the bottom line is the Jets didn't want to pay big money to a proven DE who gave you double digit sacks every year. Why would you want to give that same money to a rookie? There is no guarantee that the team will run an exclusive 3-4 - Tangini have said that they will run both all year depending on the situation. I am fine with the DL that we have - aren't there 3 1st rd picks on the DL already? Plus the signing of KVO? The JEts problem is there is not one offensive player that strikes fear into the heart of DCs. That needs to change to be competitve. I have full confidence in Mangini running the defense with what they have and being successful. Get that offense some weapons - starting with a QB and RB in the 1st rd IMO.

 
I understand that they are different types of players but the bottom line is the Jets didn't want to pay big money to a proven DE who gave you double digit sacks every year. Why would you want to give that same money to a rookie? There is no guarantee that the team will run an exclusive 3-4 - Tangini have said that they will run both all year depending on the situation. I am fine with the DL that we have - aren't there 3 1st rd picks on the DL already? Plus the signing of KVO?
I don't think Abraham could play defensive end in a 3-4, Mario certainly can. Mario has the potential to be very disruptive for opposing rushing attacks; Abraham can not. Mario is far more physically gifted than Abraham. Abraham to me was a one trick pony; he could rush the quarterback. Mario is a potential defensive cornerstone.And I don't think Mario's rookie contract will be close to what Abraham wanted.

 
I understand that they are different types of players but the bottom line is the Jets didn't want to pay big money to a proven DE who gave you double digit sacks every year.  Why would you want to give that same money to a rookie?  There is no guarantee that the team will run an exclusive 3-4 - Tangini have said that they will run both all year depending on the situation.  I am fine with the DL that we have - aren't there 3 1st rd picks on the DL already?    Plus the signing of KVO? 
I don't think Abraham could play defensive end in a 3-4, Mario certainly can. Mario has the potential to be very disruptive for opposing rushing attacks; Abraham can not. Mario is far more physically gifted than Abraham. Abraham to me was a one trick pony; he could rush the quarterback. Mario is a potential defensive cornerstone.And I don't think Mario's rookie contract will be close to what Abraham wanted.
The money for the #4 overall pick will be very close to the contract Abe got - understand Mario is more complete and could be Peppers but...how many 1st rders do they take for the DL in the past 6 years? This would be 4! Shouldn't other positions be addressed - especially a pathetic and predictable offense without any gambreakers?

 
I understand that they are different types of players but the bottom line is the Jets didn't want to pay big money to a proven DE who gave you double digit sacks every year.  Why would you want to give that same money to a rookie?  There is no guarantee that the team will run an exclusive 3-4 - Tangini have said that they will run both all year depending on the situation.  I am fine with the DL that we have - aren't there 3 1st rd picks on the DL already?    Plus the signing of KVO? 
I don't think Abraham could play defensive end in a 3-4, Mario certainly can. Mario has the potential to be very disruptive for opposing rushing attacks; Abraham can not. Mario is far more physically gifted than Abraham. Abraham to me was a one trick pony; he could rush the quarterback. Mario is a potential defensive cornerstone.And I don't think Mario's rookie contract will be close to what Abraham wanted.
The money for the #4 overall pick will be very close to the contract Abe got - understand Mario is more complete and could be Peppers but...how many 1st rders do they take for the DL in the past 6 years? This would be 4! Shouldn't other positions be addressed - especially a pathetic and predictable offense without any gambreakers?
What Abraham got from Atlanta is not what he would have taken from the Jets. I would be interested in seeing the actual numbers.
 
I understand that they are different types of players but the bottom line is the Jets didn't want to pay big money to a proven DE who gave you double digit sacks every year.  Why would you want to give that same money to a rookie?  There is no guarantee that the team will run an exclusive 3-4 - Tangini have said that they will run both all year depending on the situation.  I am fine with the DL that we have - aren't there 3 1st rd picks on the DL already?    Plus the signing of KVO? 
I don't think Abraham could play defensive end in a 3-4, Mario certainly can. Mario has the potential to be very disruptive for opposing rushing attacks; Abraham can not. Mario is far more physically gifted than Abraham. Abraham to me was a one trick pony; he could rush the quarterback. Mario is a potential defensive cornerstone.And I don't think Mario's rookie contract will be close to what Abraham wanted.
The money for the #4 overall pick will be very close to the contract Abe got - understand Mario is more complete and could be Peppers but...how many 1st rders do they take for the DL in the past 6 years? This would be 4! Shouldn't other positions be addressed - especially a pathetic and predictable offense without any gambreakers?
That's true, but RB and OL have depth this year. The Jets have picks in the later rounds to get a good OL instead of Ferguson, to get a Center, and to get RB's. But To get a defensive lineman that is big enough to be the run stopper in a 3-4 and fast enough to be a pass rusher in a 4-3 is not something the draft has a lot of. Abe could not pull off both, and when the team played a 3-4 he would be off the field. Williams supposedly can do that.Abe was a known commodity and a good one at what he did - rush the passer.

Williams is still an unknown. He did not play a football factory. He may bust. He is a risk, but the reward is significant for the Jets.

The real problem is he won't be there at 4.

 
I think Abraham got a contract with 18 million in guaranteed upfront year 1 money. Personally, I don't even think Reggie Bush is going to get 18 million in upfront 1st year guarantees.

 
I understand that they are different types of players but the bottom line is the Jets didn't want to pay big money to a proven DE who gave you double digit sacks every year.  Why would you want to give that same money to a rookie?  There is no guarantee that the team will run an exclusive 3-4 - Tangini have said that they will run both all year depending on the situation.  I am fine with the DL that we have - aren't there 3 1st rd picks on the DL already?    Plus the signing of KVO? 
I don't think Abraham could play defensive end in a 3-4, Mario certainly can. Mario has the potential to be very disruptive for opposing rushing attacks; Abraham can not. Mario is far more physically gifted than Abraham. Abraham to me was a one trick pony; he could rush the quarterback. Mario is a potential defensive cornerstone.And I don't think Mario's rookie contract will be close to what Abraham wanted.
The money for the #4 overall pick will be very close to the contract Abe got - understand Mario is more complete and could be Peppers but...how many 1st rders do they take for the DL in the past 6 years? This would be 4! Shouldn't other positions be addressed - especially a pathetic and predictable offense without any gambreakers?
Why would this have ANY influence on a new Regime????Their job is to analyze the talent and add where they see fit...

And as I see it Bryan Thomas is NOT a 1st round talent - Who cares where Bradway picked him... Heck, DROB may not even be here too long... And don't penalize these guys for Bradway being a complete imbecile and using 2 1st round picks for DROB... We have 1 possibly 2 FIRST ROUND TALENTS (BARELY) on the DL and that's all that counts.

I agree the Offense needs help - But with a Top pick in the draft, you need to take the BEST PLAYER AVAILABLE......

it starts with the QB's.. if they don't rate any of those guys worthy then it goes to position players and Mario is just a perfect fit....

Build the OL and the defense and NEXT YEAR we can add playmakers and gamebreakers...

There isn't going to be a lot of game breaking this year anyway with the OL being rebuilt.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
In another thread here, people used "selling jersey's" and "selling seats" as reasons to draft Bush. We all know NY is one of, if not, the largest NFL markets.

As a NY fan, would you be upset if they traded up for Bush?

Would you buy a Bush jersey?

Would you buy into the hype?

What sort of impact would this move had on you if the FO had Bush that much higher on their draft boards with respect to grading out NFL talents?

 
I understand that they are different types of players but the bottom line is the Jets didn't want to pay big money to a proven DE who gave you double digit sacks every year.  Why would you want to give that same money to a rookie?  There is no guarantee that the team will run an exclusive 3-4 - Tangini have said that they will run both all year depending on the situation.  I am fine with the DL that we have - aren't there 3 1st rd picks on the DL already?    Plus the signing of KVO? 
I don't think Abraham could play defensive end in a 3-4, Mario certainly can. Mario has the potential to be very disruptive for opposing rushing attacks; Abraham can not. Mario is far more physically gifted than Abraham. Abraham to me was a one trick pony; he could rush the quarterback. Mario is a potential defensive cornerstone.And I don't think Mario's rookie contract will be close to what Abraham wanted.
The money for the #4 overall pick will be very close to the contract Abe got - understand Mario is more complete and could be Peppers but...how many 1st rders do they take for the DL in the past 6 years? This would be 4! Shouldn't other positions be addressed - especially a pathetic and predictable offense without any gambreakers?
Why would this have ANY influence on a new Regime????Their job is to analyze the talent and add where they see fit...

And as I see it Bryan Thomas is NOT a 1st round talent - Who cares where Bradway picked him... Heck, DROB may not even be here too long... And don't penalize these guys for Bradway being a complete imbecile and using 2 1st round picks for DROB... We have 1 possibly 2 FIRST ROUND TALENTS (BARELY) on the DL and that's all that counts.

I agree the Offense needs help - But with a Top pick in the draft, you need to take the BEST PLAYER AVAILABLE......

it starts with the QB's.. if they don't rate any of those guys worthy then it goes to position players and Mario is just a perfect fit....

Build the OL and the defense and NEXT YEAR we can add playmakers and gamebreakers...

There isn't going to be a lot of game breaking this year anyway with the OL being rebuilt.
I agree you can't penalize Tangini for TB's incompetence but my point is there is enough talent on the DL for Mangini to work with - there is almost none on the offensive side of the ball. Go for the offense - prefer a QB but could live with Brick. As for the contracts - you have to look at all the guaranteed money not just the 1st year - I think the #4 pick will not be too far off from what Abe got. D Rob was the #4 a few years ago and that bum is one of if not the highest paid players on the team!

 
I understand that they are different types of players but the bottom line is the Jets didn't want to pay big money to a proven DE who gave you double digit sacks every year. Why would you want to give that same money to a rookie? There is no guarantee that the team will run an exclusive 3-4 - Tangini have said that they will run both all year depending on the situation. I am fine with the DL that we have - aren't there 3 1st rd picks on the DL already? Plus the signing of KVO?
I don't think Abraham could play defensive end in a 3-4, Mario certainly can. Mario has the potential to be very disruptive for opposing rushing attacks; Abraham can not. Mario is far more physically gifted than Abraham. Abraham to me was a one trick pony; he could rush the quarterback. Mario is a potential defensive cornerstone.And I don't think Mario's rookie contract will be close to what Abraham wanted.
The money for the #4 overall pick will be very close to the contract Abe got - understand Mario is more complete and could be Peppers but...how many 1st rders do they take for the DL in the past 6 years? This would be 4! Shouldn't other positions be addressed - especially a pathetic and predictable offense without any gambreakers?
Why would this have ANY influence on a new Regime????Their job is to analyze the talent and add where they see fit...

And as I see it Bryan Thomas is NOT a 1st round talent - Who cares where Bradway picked him... Heck, DROB may not even be here too long... And don't penalize these guys for Bradway being a complete imbecile and using 2 1st round picks for DROB... We have 1 possibly 2 FIRST ROUND TALENTS (BARELY) on the DL and that's all that counts.

I agree the Offense needs help - But with a Top pick in the draft, you need to take the BEST PLAYER AVAILABLE......

it starts with the QB's.. if they don't rate any of those guys worthy then it goes to position players and Mario is just a perfect fit....

Build the OL and the defense and NEXT YEAR we can add playmakers and gamebreakers...

There isn't going to be a lot of game breaking this year anyway with the OL being rebuilt.
I agree you can't penalize Tangini for TB's incompetence but my point is there is enough talent on the DL for Mangini to work with - there is almost none on the offensive side of the ball. Go for the offense - prefer a QB but could live with Brick. As for the contracts - you have to look at all the guaranteed money not just the 1st year - I think the #4 pick will not be too far off from what Abe got. D Rob was the #4 a few years ago and that bum is one of if not the highest paid players on the team!
Look, the Jets didn't want to pay Abe for the following reasons:1) In a 3-4, he plays WLB - a position he'd be great at, but one that's not worth the money he's demanding. You can get pass-rush specialst tweener LBs for cheap.

2) He has injury issues

3) He didn't want to be in NY anymore

The Jets would pay Mario a simliar amount b/c

1) He's rated much higher than Abraham was when he came out

2) He can play in any alignment that Mangini can cook up

3) He's only 21

The question of what happened in past years with other picks like BT or DRob is irrelevant - it's what an economist would call a sunk cost.

The offense lacks playmakers, that's true, but this draft doesn't have any high-end offensive playmakers at any position other than QB. There aren't any top WRs, the highest graded RB is only a mid-round pick, and so all you're left looking at is a top TE and OT in a draft that's deep at both positions. Assuming you're not interested in the QBs, Mario is as no-brainer a choice at #4 is you'll ever have in a draft - which is why he likely won't be available.

 
The simple reason I think the Jets SHOULD draft a QB this year is that they don't have a playoff caliber QB on the roster now. If a rookie drafted this year is ready for a playoff run by 2008, that would be tremendous progress. Put off getting a QB to develop now, and you're looking at 2009 for a playoff run. It would take time for any rookie to become a solid NFL QB, even Leinart, who is the closest to being ready to start.

This is a clear rebuilding year, and besides the QB spot, the O line HAS to get fixed. Rookie RB's don't need the sort of time that rookie QB's need to develop. The Jets will likely have a high draft slot next year, and that would be the time to take an RB. I think the Jets should have their eye on 2008.

Having said that, I think they will pass on a QB in round one. I don't agree with that, but it's what I think they will do. They seem to think highly of Ramsey. That scares last night's dinner right out of me.

 
In another thread here, people used "selling jersey's" and "selling seats" as reasons to draft Bush. We all know NY is one of, if not, the largest NFL markets.

As a NY fan, would you be upset if they traded up for Bush?

Would you buy a Bush jersey?

Would you buy into the hype?

What sort of impact would this move had on you if the FO had Bush that much higher on their draft boards with respect to grading out NFL talents?
How upset could you be with getting Bush :lmao: Isn't there an old saying in Texas about Getting Bush?

But, I think he would be WAY too expensive for the Jets...

And I think SUPER MARIO jersey's would sell like hot cakes.

 
The simple reason I think the Jets SHOULD draft a QB this year is that they don't have a playoff caliber QB on the roster now. If a rookie drafted this year is ready for a playoff run by 2008, that would be tremendous progress. Put off getting a QB to develop now, and you're looking at 2009 for a playoff run. It would take time for any rookie to become a solid NFL QB, even Leinart, who is the closest to being ready to start.
That's if you feel we need to groom a QB... AND you feel one of these guys is a franchise QB.I feel that if we go full bore at building an OL - As well as building a championship defense, You're well on your way and can find a QB - wether it's Ramsey, or another FA this year or next.

To me, Mario will go a long way towards building a real good defense - Then attack the OL a bunch - Add your Playmakers next year with your high pick and away we go...

Trade down, Even better - Maybe get your Cutler or any one of the top 11 guys PLUS more picks.

 
The simple reason I think the Jets SHOULD draft a QB this year is that they don't have a playoff caliber QB on the roster now. If a rookie drafted this year is ready for a playoff run by 2008, that would be tremendous progress. Put off getting a QB to develop now, and you're looking at 2009 for a playoff run. It would take time for any rookie to become a solid NFL QB, even Leinart, who is the closest to being ready to start.

This is a clear rebuilding year, and besides the QB spot, the O line HAS to get fixed. Rookie RB's don't need the sort of time that rookie QB's need to develop. The Jets will likely have a high draft slot next year, and that would be the time to take an RB. I think the Jets should have their eye on 2008.

Having said that, I think they will pass on a QB in round one. I don't agree with that, but it's what I think they will do. They seem to think highly of Ramsey. That scares last night's dinner right out of me.
Agree 100%! Jets will be a medicore team next year anyway - why not develop a young QB so two seasons are not sunk! Trade down to #7 with Oak - take Cutler and pick up another early 2nd rder - that would be 2 picks in each of the 1st 3 rds - Go, cutler, RB, OL, OL, best avail, best avail

Anyone know what UFA QBs would be available in 2007? That may have an impact on if the Jets go QB.

 
Is this a serious question?

A weak armed quarterback with two shoulder surgeries and a quarterback that couldn't beat out a 487 year old Mark Brunnell are your two available options at starting QB and you're wondering why they would draft someone to replace them?
:goodposting: Whew, I was getting scared there for a second. Pennington is done folks. For those of you who wouldnt listen to that last offseason, nows the time to buy in to it. The only reason he still is on the roster is in case the Jets can't get a QB in the draft.

Ramsey is a very marginal starter and a decent backup.

For a rebuilding team, it is infinitely important to get the QB position on the right track, especially when you already have a high pick in a top heavy QB draft.
Ramsey really got shafted in Wash. First, he had to deal with two years under Spurrier who ran one of the worst offenses in the NFL. Then he had one bad game week 2 2004 against the Giants in which they only lose by 6 points and got benched for Brunell, who went on to suck until he was replaced again by Ramsey. After taking over week 10, Ramsey passed for over 62% with 9 TD's and 8 INT's. Finally, in 2005 he starts week 1 against the Bears and throws an INT and fumbles twice, losing one and gets injured. Brunell takes over and leads the team to 3 FG's and a win. Brunell keeps the job the rest of the season with the team looking to first round pick Jason Campbell as the future QB.

So basically because he started poorly against what turned out to be the #1 defense in the league, Ramsey got benched and essentially written off. I think he's much better than people give him credit for and has a good chance of being the starting QB for the Jets by next year.

 
I understand that they are different types of players but the bottom line is the Jets didn't want to pay big money to a proven DE who gave you double digit sacks every year. Why would you want to give that same money to a rookie? There is no guarantee that the team will run an exclusive 3-4 - Tangini have said that they will run both all year depending on the situation. I am fine with the DL that we have - aren't there 3 1st rd picks on the DL already? Plus the signing of KVO?
I don't think Abraham could play defensive end in a 3-4, Mario certainly can. Mario has the potential to be very disruptive for opposing rushing attacks; Abraham can not. Mario is far more physically gifted than Abraham. Abraham to me was a one trick pony; he could rush the quarterback. Mario is a potential defensive cornerstone.And I don't think Mario's rookie contract will be close to what Abraham wanted.
The money for the #4 overall pick will be very close to the contract Abe got - understand Mario is more complete and could be Peppers but...how many 1st rders do they take for the DL in the past 6 years? This would be 4! Shouldn't other positions be addressed - especially a pathetic and predictable offense without any gambreakers?
Why would this have ANY influence on a new Regime????Their job is to analyze the talent and add where they see fit...

And as I see it Bryan Thomas is NOT a 1st round talent - Who cares where Bradway picked him... Heck, DROB may not even be here too long... And don't penalize these guys for Bradway being a complete imbecile and using 2 1st round picks for DROB... We have 1 possibly 2 FIRST ROUND TALENTS (BARELY) on the DL and that's all that counts.

I agree the Offense needs help - But with a Top pick in the draft, you need to take the BEST PLAYER AVAILABLE......

it starts with the QB's.. if they don't rate any of those guys worthy then it goes to position players and Mario is just a perfect fit....

Build the OL and the defense and NEXT YEAR we can add playmakers and gamebreakers...

There isn't going to be a lot of game breaking this year anyway with the OL being rebuilt.
I agree you can't penalize Tangini for TB's incompetence but my point is there is enough talent on the DL for Mangini to work with - there is almost none on the offensive side of the ball. Go for the offense - prefer a QB but could live with Brick. As for the contracts - you have to look at all the guaranteed money not just the 1st year - I think the #4 pick will not be too far off from what Abe got. D Rob was the #4 a few years ago and that bum is one of if not the highest paid players on the team!
Look, the Jets didn't want to pay Abe for the following reasons:1) In a 3-4, he plays WLB - a position he'd be great at, but one that's not worth the money he's demanding. You can get pass-rush specialst tweener LBs for cheap.

2) He has injury issues

3) He didn't want to be in NY anymore

The Jets would pay Mario a simliar amount b/c

1) He's rated much higher than Abraham was when he came out

2) He can play in any alignment that Mangini can cook up

3) He's only 21

The question of what happened in past years with other picks like BT or DRob is irrelevant - it's what an economist would call a sunk cost.

The offense lacks playmakers, that's true, but this draft doesn't have any high-end offensive playmakers at any position other than QB. There aren't any top WRs, the highest graded RB is only a mid-round pick, and so all you're left looking at is a top TE and OT in a draft that's deep at both positions. Assuming you're not interested in the QBs, Mario is as no-brainer a choice at #4 is you'll ever have in a draft - which is why he likely won't be available.
That's what I love about Mario for the Jets. I don't think there's another guy in the NFL with his ability to play equally well in the 3-4 or 4-3. Usually the 300lb guys you need at 3-4 DE don't have the speed to also play 4-3 DE. I think he's going to give offense nightmares since they'll have to be prepared for him in either formation.
 
unless the Jets feel the need to get a QB to counteract the "Manning" factor -- which only Leinart and Young do (CUtler may be the best of the bunch, but I don't think he brings the same recognition as the others). In any event, I think they stand pat on QBs.
The Jets do not need to counteract the Manning factor as the season ticket waiting list is at plus 8 years and they have a strong fan base as is.Supposedly Cutler is the QB they rate the highest, but all indications are that they will not draft a QB and are creating a smokescreen by working out and interviewing all three QBs hoping some one wants to move up.Mario Williams and D'Brickashaw Ferguson are beleived to be 1 and 2 on their wish list (assuming Bush is gone of course).
 
Agree 100%! Jets will be a medicore team next year anyway - why not develop a young QB so two seasons are not sunk!

Trade down to #7 with Oak - take Cutler and pick up another early 2nd rder - that would be 2 picks in each of the 1st 3 rds - Go, cutler, RB, OL, OL, best avail, best avail

Anyone know what UFA QBs would be available in 2007? That may have an impact on if the Jets go QB.
By way of pick value, a trade with Oakland would bring in a 3rd and a 4th, and the Jets trade back a 7th rounder.
 
Agree 100%! Jets will be a medicore team next year anyway - why not develop a young QB so two seasons are not sunk!

Trade down to #7 with Oak - take Cutler and pick up another early 2nd rder - that would be 2 picks in each of the 1st 3 rds - Go, cutler, RB, OL, OL, best avail, best avail

Anyone know what UFA QBs would be available in 2007? That may have an impact on if the Jets go QB.
By way of pick value, a trade with Oakland would bring in a 3rd and a 4th, and the Jets trade back a 7th rounder.
Jets | Rumor alert: NFL Draft tradeTue, 25 Apr 2006 08:46:30 -0700

Rich Cimini, of the New York Daily News, reports one rumor making the rounds has the New York Jets (No. 4) swapping their first-round pick with the Oakland Raiders (No. 7), who want a quarterback. The Jets then select Oregon DT Haloti Ngata with the seventh pick. The Jets don't have a pure nose tackle for their new 3-4 scheme.

 
Agree 100%! Jets will be a medicore team next year anyway - why not develop a young QB so two seasons are not sunk!

Trade down to #7 with Oak - take Cutler and pick up another early 2nd rder - that would be 2 picks in each of the 1st 3 rds - Go, cutler, RB, OL, OL, best avail, best avail

Anyone know what UFA QBs would be available in 2007? That may have an impact on if the Jets go QB.
By way of pick value, a trade with Oakland would bring in a 3rd and a 4th, and the Jets trade back a 7th rounder.
Jets | Rumor alert: NFL Draft tradeTue, 25 Apr 2006 08:46:30 -0700

Rich Cimini, of the New York Daily News, reports one rumor making the rounds has the New York Jets (No. 4) swapping their first-round pick with the Oakland Raiders (No. 7), who want a quarterback. The Jets then select Oregon DT Haloti Ngata with the seventh pick. The Jets don't have a pure nose tackle for their new 3-4 scheme.
So D'Brick or Mario falls to the Packers? Interesting.
 
Agree 100%! Jets will be a medicore team next year anyway - why not develop a young QB so two seasons are not sunk!

Trade down to #7 with Oak - take Cutler and pick up another early 2nd rder - that would be 2 picks in each of the 1st 3 rds - Go, cutler, RB, OL, OL, best avail, best avail

Anyone know what UFA QBs would be available in 2007? That may have an impact on if the Jets go QB.
By way of pick value, a trade with Oakland would bring in a 3rd and a 4th, and the Jets trade back a 7th rounder.
Jets | Rumor alert: NFL Draft tradeTue, 25 Apr 2006 08:46:30 -0700

Rich Cimini, of the New York Daily News, reports one rumor making the rounds has the New York Jets (No. 4) swapping their first-round pick with the Oakland Raiders (No. 7), who want a quarterback. The Jets then select Oregon DT Haloti Ngata with the seventh pick. The Jets don't have a pure nose tackle for their new 3-4 scheme.
Cool - I'll take credit for starting that one :ph34r:

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top