They are boycotting playing in their own league NWHL until they can be paid a living wage and get insurance. It only says that they would like for the NHL to step in and support the league financially.LINK
Am I missing something? Why should the NHL pay for a failing league to exist? Isn't this like the AAF players boycotting the NFL until the NFL decided to pay for that league to exist?
Again, maybe I'm missing something big here.
I’m sure if they embraced fighting in the league, it would gain more traction.i appreciate equality and everything, but not enough people care about women’s sports. seems like a simple truth, unless i am uninformed. it’s not anything i care remotely about.
there are no financials that can support a full time league where all players have salaries that can sustain them and have health insurance, in the short term.Northern Voice said:I want them to be a viable league and some NHL support is probably needed, just trying to wrap my head around the financials.
Equality of opportunity or equality of outcome?Chemical X said:i appreciate equality and everything, but not enough people care about women’s sports. seems like a simple truth, unless i am uninformed. it’s not anything i care remotely about.
Kind of irrelevant. There is a direct result for the league if all teams survive. That is not the case when talking about financially supporting the NWHL.Even NHL teams have revenue sharing.
Apparently the 100,000 they are already given from the NHL is not enough of a hand out. How much more money are they supposed to waste on the sinkhole?If you want to grow the sport, the NHL would be negligent not to support their league.
From everything I've read (and I didn't know this before reading these articles pertaining to the AAF), minor league sports don't make money. They are actually subsidized by the pro teams that use them as farm teams. But they do that because there is a need for minor league baseball. It benefits MLB. But if MLB did not have a need for the minors, they would not survive on their own.are there minor league women's hockey teams? not sub-organizations to a parent pro league.. but.. like independent baseball sort of with small community supported teams teamed by mostly college-aged girls?
like here in GB we have an independent league baseball team & people enjoy it. it's not huge & the guys don't make much at all but it has community support and the league is building out to other small cities in Wisconsin.. some more successful than others.
seems like that's the way to go. start small, build a community base of support, grow the business. men's or women's. there are both men's and women's independent league soccer teams starting up here this summer... they'll share the baseball park space. crowds will be in the 1000 range, i'd bet, top end. but it will be kid friendly and their mascot & players will pop up at community events all over town to build that bond with the city. might not last but who knows.. we've had independent baseball here since i can remember.
these sports leagues try to plant a flag in.... New York and LA and Chicago with a splashy marketing campaign, loads of borrowed money, etc. and act as though they've been around for decades and people are invested before the thing even gets off the ground. it's a recipe for disaster yet sports leagues keep trying to launch this way.
these football leagues are just doomed before the idea even takes off but every few years someone gets a hair up their ### and thinks "if i can just convince enough people to raise a couple hundred million dollars, i could have a failed business 3 weeks after the season starts!"
I am always amazed by England's pro soccer setup. They have 92 pro teams, broken up into 4 tiers and all the teams are individual financial entities that have to live or die on their own. There is no "minor" league as we think of it since lower divisions teams have the ability to climb through the divisions but the idea of having to make enough money to survive is very similar to what we are talking about.From everything I've read (and I didn't know this before reading these articles pertaining to the AAF), minor league sports don't make money. They are actually subsidized by the pro teams that use them as farm teams. But they do that because there is a need for minor league baseball. It benefits MLB. But if MLB did not have a need for the minors, they would not survive on their own.
I don't think they have any notion of getting "equal" pay. They want a sustainable league and opportunity to continue playing the game.That being said, I don't think women should be paid "equal" if they can't draw the same numbers. I'm not saying they should be treated like crap or purposely get bad pay/accommodations etc
So one of the article I read mentioned European soccer. And it said the main reason it is able to thrive is because there is a chance these teams can move up to bigger leagues. So even though they are technically lower levels, the chance of being promoted makes them viable. The fact that the Reading Fightin' Phils will always be a Double A ball team means they have no chance of ever competing against the Yankees. And therefore, their revenue suffers.I am always amazed by England's pro soccer setup. They have 92 pro teams, broken up into 4 tiers and all the teams are individual financial entities that have to live or die on their own. There is no "minor" league as we think of it since lower divisions teams have the ability to climb through the divisions but the idea of having to make enough money to survive is very similar to what we are talking about.
Two things here: 1) The WNBA players have been complaining about the difference between NBA contracts and WNBA contracts for a couple of years. 2) The league can't pay more than they are pulling in. I didn't even realize women had a pro hockey league. I'm guessing attendance to these games averages way into the high dozens. And that's being generous.I don't think they have any notion of getting "equal" pay. They want a sustainable league and opportunity to continue playing the game.
Also want a league that won't slash their already agreed-to contracted salaries in half on a whim, with no financial information/evidence to back it up.
the most recent article I read is that they are looking for around $50k a year and some health insurance, which seems reasonable on the surface but they have to understand whom ever funds this level of pay is going to lose a lot of money in the short term. They need to convince whom ever the owners will be that they will be able to substantially raise revenue in the coming years.I don't think they have any notion of getting "equal" pay. They want a sustainable league and opportunity to continue playing the game.
Also want a league that won't slash their already agreed-to contracted salaries in half on a whim, with no financial information/evidence to back it up.
I think the promotion relegation system is wonderful, but in our American model of closed leagues with franchises, we will never see it since the owners have monopolies.So one of the article I read mentioned European soccer. And it said the main reason it is able to thrive is because there is a chance these teams can move up to bigger leagues. So even though they are technically lower levels, the chance of being promoted makes them viable. The fact that the Reading Fightin' Phils will always be a Double A ball team means they have no chance of ever competing against the Yankees. And therefore, their revenue suffers.
that seems very likely at those levels. they aren't really separate entities but parts of the larger parent company.From everything I've read (and I didn't know this before reading these articles pertaining to the AAF), minor league sports don't make money. They are actually subsidized by the pro teams that use them as farm teams. But they do that because there is a need for minor league baseball. It benefits MLB. But if MLB did not have a need for the minors, they would not survive on their own.
check out Losers on Netflix.I am always amazed by England's pro soccer setup. They have 92 pro teams, broken up into 4 tiers and all the teams are individual financial entities that have to live or die on their own. There is no "minor" league as we think of it since lower divisions teams have the ability to climb through the divisions but the idea of having to make enough money to survive is very similar to what we are talking about.
To be fair, this player was not asking for over 6 figures. She mentioned $50k as a livable wage.i get what she's saying.. but she's coming at it form the angle of "well, i played D1 and professionally at the international level so this is what i expect.. anything below 6 figures, catered meals, personal trainers, etc. is insufficient. we need to be treated at least that well if this league is going to work and the other professional hockey leagues should help us get there."
I'd also like $50k to play hockey and just like them, I couldn't make an NHL or minor league team. Where do I sign up?To be fair, this player was not asking for over 6 figures. She mentioned $50k as a livable wage.
Serious question...Can men who identify as women play in the women's hockey league?I'd also like $50k to play hockey and just like them, I couldn't make an NHL or minor league team. Where do I sign up?
Why wouldn't they? Are you homophobic?Serious question...Can men who identify as women play in the women's hockey league?
Hopefully they can settle on something like $25k a year with a modicum of health insurance and see if they can even justify those numbers three years from now revenue wise. But to support that cost, they will need significant buy in from the NHL. I can't see the NWHL owners wanting to sustain that level of losses.I'd also like $50k to play hockey and just like them, I couldn't make an NHL or minor league team. Where do I sign up?
Not at all....just wondering how they would handle it.Why wouldn't they? Are you homophobic?
here are the policies. From a quick read, transgender = yes, but just identify as woman = noSerious question...Can men who identify as women play in the women's hockey league?
yeah, i see that. in Toronto. i don't know Toronto that well but it's a major world city. i can't believe the women's hockey pro league needs to launch with teams in Toronto, Montreal, Buffalo, etc. with players expecting to make 50k and have a pro infrastructure surrounding them immediately.To be fair, this player was not asking for over 6 figures. She mentioned $50k as a livable wage.
I was just joking, GB.Not at all....just wondering how they would handle it.
It's like they think NBA players were making millions of dollars a year shooting balls into peach baskets. The first NBA players weren't playing so they could get nationwide endorsement deals and retire off a few years salary and never have to worry about money again. The major leagues that exist today took a long time to build a following by creating a product people cared about and wanted to pay more and more money to be able to see. You can't really short cut that long process and throwing money at it in the hopes of creating a long term viable product isn't going to work.yeah, i see that. in Toronto. i don't know Toronto that well but it's a major world city. i can't believe the women's hockey pro league needs to launch with teams in Toronto, Montreal, Buffalo, etc. with players expecting to make 50k and have a pro infrastructure surrounding them immediately.
50k goes... not as far in Toronto as maybe it does in Schenectady? people in Toronto may love hockey but enough to support a women's pro team where the players salaries run in to the millions total + all that supporting a pro team entails?
if there were a women's pro hockey team in GB, i'd go watch that #### tonight and probably buy my daughters all the souvenirs they wanted. we'd load up on food & drinks and hopefully do something like skate with the team afterwards, maybe kick in to the 50/50 raffle. and i bet lots of other people in this town would go watch, too.
there's not much else to do here, sure, but people also love hockey, love their local teams and turn out to support. 50k here for a single person would be just fine. 50k with another salary as a couple... you'd have no problems.
is it wrong of them to ask? no. but & this is a complaint of mine for all these sorts of leagues... start small with reasonable expectations. the football minor leagues that keep launching & trying to splash in major American cities are just a bloodbath. they don't freaking work. but arena/indoor football is working well in small towns everywhere. those guys don't make a lot of money but the games are fun and fans turn out
all those guys played college ball. some at higher levels. they're living the dream, making some side money and working full time jobs.
maybe the difference would be that these ladies played hockey at a pro level elsewhere so they have pro skill... but if that's the case & the American league isn't sufficient then keep playing in Russia or wherever and let other players grind and suffer here to build the league then come over when the US league is up to snuff?
This is very true.It's like they think NBA players were making millions of dollars a year shooting balls into peach baskets. The first NBA players weren't playing so they could get nationwide endorsement deals and retire off a few years salary and never have to worry about money again. The major leagues that exist today took a long time to build a following by creating a product people cared about and wanted to pay more and more money to be able to see. You can't really short cut that long process and throwing money at it in the hopes of creating a long term viable product isn't going to work.
I get that people would like to have equal opportunities for women to play professional sports, but if the product they put out doesn't garner enough attention on its own, it doesn't worry.
Can you skate?I'd also like $50k to play hockey and just like them, I couldn't make an NHL or minor league team. Where do I sign up?
Yeah, but thats because nobody wants to watch disc golf. Oh wait...I can't make a living wage playing disc golf and I want someone to make up the difference.