FUBAR
Footballguy
Mickey Mouse?I will. But with throwing around "Plato's teacher" I'm pretty sure we all know who we're talking about.Andy, your spotlight probably doesn't hurt anything but please be careful. Thanks.
Mickey Mouse?I will. But with throwing around "Plato's teacher" I'm pretty sure we all know who we're talking about.Andy, your spotlight probably doesn't hurt anything but please be careful. Thanks.
I knew it was going to be a long shot, but I would have liked to get Confucius or Darwin at the end of round 2. Great picks in my mind.Just in case it does get to my picks... I won't be around until ~10:00 pm central time tonight. Leaving shortly.Guess I'll just have to live with whoever gets taken in the next 38 picks.
2.1 Confucius (Philosopher/Intellectual)
Confucius say "Man with hole in pocket feel cocky."Guess I'll just have to live with whoever gets taken in the next 38 picks.
2.1 Confucius (Philosopher/Intellectual)

This is who I thought was a #1 before the Greeks started going off the board. Someone else pointed out about the number of people living under his philosophies. But like I said, wrong hemisphere.Guess I'll just have to live with whoever gets taken in the next 38 picks.
2.1 Confucius (Philosopher/Intellectual)
Almost didn't take him due to the blurred line separating philosophers and intellectuals, but decided to worry about that later. I'll toss in a writeup later to stop holding the draft up any longer.
Leader - Mohandas GandhiMilitaryConfucius (Chinese: 孔夫子; pinyin: Kǒng Fūzǐ; Wade-Giles: K'ung-fu-tzu), lit. "Master Kong,"[1] (September 28, 551 BC – 479 BC) was a Chinese thinker and social philosopher, whose teachings and philosophy have deeply influenced Chinese, Korean, Japanese, Taiwanese and Vietnamese thought and life.
His philosophy emphasized personal and governmental morality, correctness of social relationships, justice and sincerity. These values gained prominence in China over other doctrines, such as Legalism (法家) or Taoism (道家) during the Han Dynasty[2][3][4] (206 BC – 220 AD). Confucius' thoughts have been developed into a system of philosophy known as Confucianism (儒家). It was introduced to Europe by the Jesuit Matteo Ricci, who was the first to Latinise the name as "Confucius."
In the Analects 論語, Confucius presents himself as a "transmitter who invented nothing".[7] He put the greatest emphasis on the importance of study,[21][22] and it is the Chinese character for study (or learning) that opens the text. In this respect, he is seen by Chinese people as the Greatest Master.[23] Far from trying to build a systematic theory of life and society or establish a formalism of rites, he wanted his disciples to think deeply for themselves and relentlessly study the outside world,[24] mostly through the old scriptures and by relating the moral problems of the present to past political events (like the Annals) or past expressions of feelings by common people and reflective members of the elite (preserved in the poems of the Book of Odes[25]).[26]
In times of division, chaos, and endless wars between feudal states, he wanted to restore the Mandate of Heaven “天命” that could unify the "world" (i.e. China) and bestow peace and prosperity on the people.[27] Because his vision of personal and social perfections was framed as a revival of the ordered society of earlier times, Confucius is often considered a great proponent of conservatism, but a closer look at what he proposes often shows that he used (and perhaps twisted) past institutions and rites to push a new political agenda of his own: a revival of a unified royal state, whose rulers would succeed to power on the basis of their moral merit, not their parentage;[28][29] these would be rulers devoted to their people, reaching for personal and social perfection.[30] Such a ruler would spread his own virtues to the people instead of imposing proper behavior with laws and rules.[31]
One of the deepest teachings of Confucius may have been the superiority of personal exemplification over explicit rules of behavior. Because his moral teachings emphasise self-cultivation, emulation of moral exemplars, and the attainment of skilled judgment rather than knowledge of rules, Confucius's ethics may be considered a type of virtue ethics. His teachings rarely rely on reasoned argument, and ethical ideals and methods are conveyed more indirectly, through allusions, innuendo, and even tautology. This is why his teachings need to be examined and put into proper context in order to be understood.[32][33] A good example is found in this famous anecdote:
廄焚。子退朝,曰:“傷人乎?”不問馬。
When the stables were burnt down, on returning from court, Confucius said, "Was anyone hurt?" He did not ask about the horses.
Analects X.11, tr. A. Waley
The passage conveys the lesson that by not asking about the horses, Confucius demonstrated that a sage values human beings over property; readers of this lesson are led to reflect on whether their response would follow Confucius's, and to pursue ethical self-improvement if it would not. Confucius, an exemplar of human excellence, serves as the ultimate model, rather than a deity or a universally true set of abstract principles. For these reasons, according to many Eastern and Western commentators, Confucius's teaching may be considered a Chinese example of humanism.[34]
Perhaps his most famous teaching was the Golden Rule stated in the negative form, often called the silver rule:
子貢問曰、有一言、而可以終身行之者乎。子曰、其恕乎、己所 不欲、勿施於人。
Adept Kung asked: "Is there any one word that could guide a person throughout life?"
The Master replied: "How about 'shu' [reciprocity]: never impose on others what you would not choose for yourself?"
Analects XV.24, tr. David Hinton
Scientist
Inventor
Discoverer/Explorer
Humanitarian/Saint/Martyr
Novelist/short story
Playwright/Poet
Villain
Athlete
Composer
Muscian/ Performer
Painter
Artist/ Non Painter
Philosopher - Confucius
Religious Figure
Celebrity
Intellectual
Rebel
Wildcard
Wildcard
Wildcard
No. Questioning the faith makes one's faith stronger. At least it does for me. As a kid, when your parents told you to brush your teeth, did you ever question why? After learning the reason, didn't it make you want to brush? Instead of blind faith, IMO God wants us to look at everything and choose to follow, it's why he gave us freedom of choice. I don't mean doubting in the end and never choosing to follow, but questions are a good thing.This seems reasonable to me, except I'm not quite sure why God would want us to "question the faith". As a believer, isn't it your view that those who "question the faith" do not end up in Heaven, but in the other place? Why would God want this?As a Christian who believes the Bible is right but humans have misinterpreted and things were explained in a way they could be understood at the time, I believe God put Darwin on this planet to make us question the faith and to help explain his methods.Darwin is probably the most controversial scientist in history, mainly because his ideas, if carried to their logical conclusion, challenge the more literal minded religionists among us. For a guy like CrossEyed here, for example, who believes that the Bible is the word of God and should be taken literally- macroevolution cannot occur or have occurred. It must be challenged or God's word is incorrect. Other religious people who take parts of the Bible to be metaphors rather than literal (especially the Book of Genesis) have no problem accepting Darwin's teachings. According to them, Darwin just discovered the way God does things. But there is no doubt that even for someone in this latter case, one cannot accept Darwin without at least altering the way one thinks about God, faith, and the Bible.
He tempted Christ. He puts hot women out here to make us question our wedding vows. He put the snake in the garden to tempt XXX.I don't know if I think He does, but at the same time looking at the Scriptures (especially Job), I don't think its outside of Scriptural possibility...OK, Larry, but do you accept the idea that God might put someone here (like Darwin) in order to CAUSE you to question your faith (and in many cases, have people abandon their faith)?everyone questions...heck, I've spent most of the last 2 years not at all living "for God" because of various doubts and issues with the church and other things...I'm past it now (mostly), and my faith in God is stronger than ever because of it...but everyone questions their faith... and if someone doesn't, I would argue they might not have as much of a faith as they think they do...
I thought we eliminated the myths/legends category.He tempted Christ. He puts hot women out here to make us question our wedding vows. He put the snake in the garden to tempt XXX.I don't know if I think He does, but at the same time looking at the Scriptures (especially Job), I don't think its outside of Scriptural possibility...OK, Larry, but do you accept the idea that God might put someone here (like Darwin) in order to CAUSE you to question your faith (and in many cases, have people abandon their faith)?everyone questions...
heck, I've spent most of the last 2 years not at all living "for God" because of various doubts and issues with the church and other things...
I'm past it now (mostly), and my faith in God is stronger than ever because of it...
but everyone questions their faith... and if someone doesn't, I would argue they might not have as much of a faith as they think they do...
God didn't tempt Christ personally...but, yes, those are other examples of God allowing us to be tempted/allowing things to happen to cause us to doubt...He tempted Christ. He puts hot women out here to make us question our wedding vows. He put the snake in the garden to tempt XXX.I don't know if I think He does, but at the same time looking at the Scriptures (especially Job), I don't think its outside of Scriptural possibility...OK, Larry, but do you accept the idea that God might put someone here (like Darwin) in order to CAUSE you to question your faith (and in many cases, have people abandon their faith)?everyone questions...heck, I've spent most of the last 2 years not at all living "for God" because of various doubts and issues with the church and other things...I'm past it now (mostly), and my faith in God is stronger than ever because of it...but everyone questions their faith... and if someone doesn't, I would argue they might not have as much of a faith as they think they do...
Do you think she'll last to #22?Crap. I have my cheat sheet on Google Docs spreadsheet and I neglected to scroll far enough to the right to see the person I really wanted at 1.19.:crossesfingers:

the story is a myth, but there is no evidence that there was no person by that name that the story is about...I thought we eliminated the myths/legends category.He tempted Christ. He puts hot women out here to make us question our wedding vows. He put the snake in the garden to tempt XXX.I don't know if I think He does, but at the same time looking at the Scriptures (especially Job), I don't think its outside of Scriptural possibility...OK, Larry, but do you accept the idea that God might put someone here (like Darwin) in order to CAUSE you to question your faith (and in many cases, have people abandon their faith)?everyone questions...
heck, I've spent most of the last 2 years not at all living "for God" because of various doubts and issues with the church and other things...
I'm past it now (mostly), and my faith in God is stronger than ever because of it...
but everyone questions their faith... and if someone doesn't, I would argue they might not have as much of a faith as they think they do...
Vin Diesel, maybe?I thought we eliminated the myths/legends category.He tempted Christ. He puts hot women out here to make us question our wedding vows.
He put the snake in the garden to tempt XXX.
No Spotlighting!!Vin Diesel, maybe?I thought we eliminated the myths/legends category.He tempted Christ. He puts hot women out here to make us question our wedding vows.
He put the snake in the garden to tempt XXX.
FixxxedNo Spotlighting!!Vxx Dxxxxx, maybe?I thought we eliminated the myths/legends category.He tempted Christ. He puts hot women out here to make us question our wedding vows.
He put the snake in the garden to tempt XXX.
Sun Tzu? There's someone I'd like you to meet. Mr. Sun, this is Mr. Tesla. Mr. Tesla, Mr. Sun. Now the two of you are going to wait in this room over here. That's right, the room for those who were drafted about 4-5 rounds too early. Yes, this is the "Major Reach" room! Enjoy yourselves, gentlemen...

It's a long wait for the 3.18. Hopefully my personal 1.01 is still available.Siddhārtha Gautama (Sanskrit; Pali: Siddhattha Gotama) was a spiritual teacher in the northern region of the Indian subcontinent who founded Buddhism. He is generally seen by Buddhists as the Supreme Buddha (Sammāsambuddha) of our age. The time of his birth and death are uncertain: most early 20th-century historians date his lifetime from c. 563 BCE to 483 BCE; more recently, however, at a specialist symposium on this question, the majority of those scholars who presented definite opinions gave dates within 20 years either side of 400 BCE for the Buddha's death, with others supporting earlier or later dates.
Gautama, also known as Śākyamuni or Shakyamuni ("sage of the Shakyas"), is the key figure in Buddhism, and accounts of his life, discourses, and monastic rules are believed by Buddhists to have been summarized after his death and memorized by his followers. Various collections of teachings attributed to Gautama were passed down by oral tradition, and first committed to writing about 400 years later. Early Western scholarship tended to accept the biography of the Buddha presented in the Buddhist scriptures as largely historical, but currently "scholars are increasingly reluctant to make unqualified claims about the historical facts of the Buddha's life and teachings."
timschochet said:Fraid not. But I'll be highly partial as a wildcard judge to whoever you want to include for this reason- so long as pictures are included.higgins said:Timmy, can we just jettison the intellectuals slot, and replace it "best racks of the world"? I'm dead serious...
Bonus link for Stalin -- Stalin, the animal loverWill you all settle for man boobs?Do you think she'll last to #22?Crap. I have my cheat sheet on Google Docs spreadsheet and I neglected to scroll far enough to the right to see the person I really wanted at 1.19.:crossesfingers:![]()
oh, she's realthe story is a myth, but there is no evidence that there was no person by that name that the story is about...I thought we eliminated the myths/legends category.
Coming.......my pick I mean.Will you all settle for man boobs?Do you think she'll last to #22?Crap. I have my cheat sheet on Google Docs spreadsheet and I neglected to scroll far enough to the right to see the person I really wanted at 1.19.:crossesfingers:![]()
Darwin and Buddha? Very nice haul.I was kicking myself for missing out on this pick at 1.18.
Again, the write-up is weak here - what value can my commentary possibly add to his man's legacy?. I'm just here to drop names for now.
2.02 - Siddhartha Gautama -or is it Gautama Buddha? I hope I'm not drafting the wrong Ricky Williams .... Religious Figure
WIKI
It's a long wait for the 3.18. Hopefully my personal 1.01 is still available.Siddhārtha Gautama (Sanskrit; Pali: Siddhattha Gotama) was a spiritual teacher in the northern region of the Indian subcontinent who founded Buddhism. He is generally seen by Buddhists as the Supreme Buddha (Sammāsambuddha) of our age. The time of his birth and death are uncertain: most early 20th-century historians date his lifetime from c. 563 BCE to 483 BCE; more recently, however, at a specialist symposium on this question, the majority of those scholars who presented definite opinions gave dates within 20 years either side of 400 BCE for the Buddha's death, with others supporting earlier or later dates.
Gautama, also known as Śākyamuni or Shakyamuni ("sage of the Shakyas"), is the key figure in Buddhism, and accounts of his life, discourses, and monastic rules are believed by Buddhists to have been summarized after his death and memorized by his followers. Various collections of teachings attributed to Gautama were passed down by oral tradition, and first committed to writing about 400 years later. Early Western scholarship tended to accept the biography of the Buddha presented in the Buddhist scriptures as largely historical, but currently "scholars are increasingly reluctant to make unqualified claims about the historical facts of the Buddha's life and teachings."
Great pick. Dodged a bullet, as this was my other consideration for the previous pick.I was kicking myself for missing out on this pick at 1.18.
Again, the write-up is weak here - what value can my commentary possibly add to his man's legacy?. I'm just here to drop names for now.
2.02 - Siddhartha Gautama -or is it Gautama Buddha? I hope I'm not drafting the wrong Ricky Williams .... Religious Figure
WIKI
It's a long wait for the 3.18. Hopefully my personal 1.01 is still available.Siddhārtha Gautama (Sanskrit; Pali: Siddhattha Gotama) was a spiritual teacher in the northern region of the Indian subcontinent who founded Buddhism. He is generally seen by Buddhists as the Supreme Buddha (Sammāsambuddha) of our age. The time of his birth and death are uncertain: most early 20th-century historians date his lifetime from c. 563 BCE to 483 BCE; more recently, however, at a specialist symposium on this question, the majority of those scholars who presented definite opinions gave dates within 20 years either side of 400 BCE for the Buddha's death, with others supporting earlier or later dates.
Gautama, also known as Śākyamuni or Shakyamuni ("sage of the Shakyas"), is the key figure in Buddhism, and accounts of his life, discourses, and monastic rules are believed by Buddhists to have been summarized after his death and memorized by his followers. Various collections of teachings attributed to Gautama were passed down by oral tradition, and first committed to writing about 400 years later. Early Western scholarship tended to accept the biography of the Buddha presented in the Buddhist scriptures as largely historical, but currently "scholars are increasingly reluctant to make unqualified claims about the historical facts of the Buddha's life and teachings."

Another pick I was looking at for 1.10. I really wanted to go East, but in a category with Muhammed and Jesus, he's almost a lock for 3rd. Unless LB wants to put Jesus in the martyr category so he doesn't chance losing out to Muhammed.This is probably the first instance of categories affecting overall value, or at least the biggest.I was kicking myself for missing out on this pick at 1.18.
Again, the write-up is weak here - what value can my commentary possibly add to his man's legacy?. I'm just here to drop names for now.
2.02 - Siddhartha Gautama -or is it Gautama Buddha? I hope I'm not drafting the wrong Ricky Williams .... Religious Figure
WIKI
It's a long wait for the 3.18. Hopefully my personal 1.01 is still available.Siddhārtha Gautama (Sanskrit; Pali: Siddhattha Gotama) was a spiritual teacher in the northern region of the Indian subcontinent who founded Buddhism. He is generally seen by Buddhists as the Supreme Buddha (Sammāsambuddha) of our age. The time of his birth and death are uncertain: most early 20th-century historians date his lifetime from c. 563 BCE to 483 BCE; more recently, however, at a specialist symposium on this question, the majority of those scholars who presented definite opinions gave dates within 20 years either side of 400 BCE for the Buddha's death, with others supporting earlier or later dates.
Gautama, also known as Śākyamuni or Shakyamuni ("sage of the Shakyas"), is the key figure in Buddhism, and accounts of his life, discourses, and monastic rules are believed by Buddhists to have been summarized after his death and memorized by his followers. Various collections of teachings attributed to Gautama were passed down by oral tradition, and first committed to writing about 400 years later. Early Western scholarship tended to accept the biography of the Buddha presented in the Buddhist scriptures as largely historical, but currently "scholars are increasingly reluctant to make unqualified claims about the historical facts of the Buddha's life and teachings."
Agreed. Religious figure with these 3 and leaders with a slew of people are examples of where judging this by categories can lead to a weird draft.Another pick I was looking at for 1.10. I really wanted to go East, but in a category with Muhammed and Jesus, he's almost a lock for 3rd. Unless LB wants to put Jesus in the martyr category so he doesn't chance losing out to Muhammed.This is probably the first instance of categories affecting overall value, or at least the biggest.
I'm pleased, with the caveat that neither one will likely be voted top-2 in either category.Darwin and Buddha? Very nice haul.I was kicking myself for missing out on this pick at 1.18.
Again, the write-up is weak here - what value can my commentary possibly add to his man's legacy?. I'm just here to drop names for now.
2.02 - Siddhartha Gautama -or is it Gautama Buddha? I hope I'm not drafting the wrong Ricky Williams .... Religious Figure
WIKI
It's a long wait for the 3.18. Hopefully my personal 1.01 is still available.Siddhārtha Gautama (Sanskrit; Pali: Siddhattha Gotama) was a spiritual teacher in the northern region of the Indian subcontinent who founded Buddhism. He is generally seen by Buddhists as the Supreme Buddha (Sammāsambuddha) of our age. The time of his birth and death are uncertain: most early 20th-century historians date his lifetime from c. 563 BCE to 483 BCE; more recently, however, at a specialist symposium on this question, the majority of those scholars who presented definite opinions gave dates within 20 years either side of 400 BCE for the Buddha's death, with others supporting earlier or later dates.
Gautama, also known as Śākyamuni or Shakyamuni ("sage of the Shakyas"), is the key figure in Buddhism, and accounts of his life, discourses, and monastic rules are believed by Buddhists to have been summarized after his death and memorized by his followers. Various collections of teachings attributed to Gautama were passed down by oral tradition, and first committed to writing about 400 years later. Early Western scholarship tended to accept the biography of the Buddha presented in the Buddhist scriptures as largely historical, but currently "scholars are increasingly reluctant to make unqualified claims about the historical facts of the Buddha's life and teachings."
Going by this rule of thumb on my spreadsheet, as well.If you post two or more categories for your pick, I will always place them in the first category. It's up to you to instruct me to switch later, if you want.
I had Confucius and one other Easterner queued for consolation.Great pick. Dodged a bullet, as this was my other consideration for the previous pick.I was kicking myself for missing out on this pick at 1.18.
Again, the write-up is weak here - what value can my commentary possibly add to his man's legacy?. I'm just here to drop names for now.
2.02 - Siddhartha Gautama -or is it Gautama Buddha? I hope I'm not drafting the wrong Ricky Williams .... Religious Figure
WIKI
It's a long wait for the 3.18. Hopefully my personal 1.01 is still available.Siddhārtha Gautama (Sanskrit; Pali: Siddhattha Gotama) was a spiritual teacher in the northern region of the Indian subcontinent who founded Buddhism. He is generally seen by Buddhists as the Supreme Buddha (Sammāsambuddha) of our age. The time of his birth and death are uncertain: most early 20th-century historians date his lifetime from c. 563 BCE to 483 BCE; more recently, however, at a specialist symposium on this question, the majority of those scholars who presented definite opinions gave dates within 20 years either side of 400 BCE for the Buddha's death, with others supporting earlier or later dates.
Gautama, also known as Śākyamuni or Shakyamuni ("sage of the Shakyas"), is the key figure in Buddhism, and accounts of his life, discourses, and monastic rules are believed by Buddhists to have been summarized after his death and memorized by his followers. Various collections of teachings attributed to Gautama were passed down by oral tradition, and first committed to writing about 400 years later. Early Western scholarship tended to accept the biography of the Buddha presented in the Buddhist scriptures as largely historical, but currently "scholars are increasingly reluctant to make unqualified claims about the historical facts of the Buddha's life and teachings."![]()
Another pick I was looking at for 1.10. I really wanted to go East, but in a category with Muhammed and Jesus, he's almost a lock for 3rd. Unless LB wants to put Jesus in the martyr category so he doesn't chance losing out to Muhammed.
This is probably the first instance of categories affecting overall value, or at least the biggest.
The Buddha is an easy top-5 in a draft without categories. Still in all, Mr. CIA does have a lock on a high score in the Religious Figures category.Collecting top-5s ain't a bad strategy for someone drafting from the bottom of the first round.I'm pleased, with the caveat that neither one will likely be voted top-2 in either category.
He was one of the 4 I was deciding between when I chose Alexander. The other 2 are still available.I had another category in mind for Darwin. Just wish I could say what it wasSolid pick within the category to be sure. I think you trepidation is well founded though; this is a category that gets pretty messy after the first few, so it depends on how the judge weighs out historical vs. more recent advances in scientific thought. Should be solidly in the second teir though.1.19 - Charles Darwin - Scientist
he wasn't Chinese?What do Jesus and Buddha have in common? One answer is, the religions that were eventually formed around both of them have always been more popular among other peoples than the original people it was preached to.Another similarity is that the portrayal of Jesus and Buddha is usually based on the ethnicity of the people worshipping him. Just as Americans of English and German descent have generally worshipped a blue-eyed fair skinned Jesus, Buddha in China is always Chinese.
He was an Indian prince.he wasn't Chinese?What do Jesus and Buddha have in common? One answer is, the religions that were eventually formed around both of them have always been more popular among other peoples than the original people it was preached to.Another similarity is that the portrayal of Jesus and Buddha is usually based on the ethnicity of the people worshipping him. Just as Americans of English and German descent have generally worshipped a blue-eyed fair skinned Jesus, Buddha in China is always Chinese.
For those of you who may be interested, there were two options at #1 when I picked. The first was Sun Tzu and the other option was Alexander the Great.Sun Tzu because of his philosophy towards war and the fact many war time participants have followed his writing (plus many other applications of said writing such as business wise) and the fact that those writings are still being used today in many more applicable ways.Alexander the Great because he spawned an empire that had not been seen before and has not been seen since. He practically ruled the known world... not a part of it but all of it... at that time. He stands above and beyond any General, King, President or any other high government official because nobody has duplicated what he had.

I had another category in mind for Darwin. Just wish I could say what it was.
Not sure why you can't?Have you got a link for that?Also I think you are either #### stirring or making Gandhi out to be something he isn't responsible for.I've never been a huge fan of Gandhi. I've always been skeptical of the fact that he found the British to be so abhorrent that he was willing to work with the Nazis and Japanese during WWII. This soured him for me.
Plus, he was the instigator of a wave of anti-colonialism and liberation for the Third World. Has this been a good thing? My honest answer is no, not for us in the west, and not for the Third World either. Mostly it's resulted in a lot of bloody dictatorships in whose politics the United States has often been forced to intervene. In the land of Gandhi, his "liberation" of that land may eventually result in the world's first nuclear exchange.
I'm curious about the category.I had another category in mind for Darwin. Just wish I could say what it was.Not sure why you can't?
Because I think he scores higher in this other categoryI had another category in mind for Darwin. Just wish I could say what it was.Not sure why you can't?
Its pretty provincial that consensus on Budda and Confucius is that they're good picks, but not in the running for the top spot.
And Sun Tzu is far and away the most influential military thinker of all time (and there's really only 1 other with broad influence) Its somewhat like the issue in the American draft where we had musical performers and songwriters lumped together.
BTW Tim, I have no idea why you're so down on Tesla, but he's a giant and his inventions are as responsible for modern life as anyone. Oh yeah, and unlike the guy ahead of him in the cat, he actually invented the stuff he's credited with.
And I wouldnt put Einstein or Newton first in the scientist category.

So in other words, he got involved in a land war in Asia...AND WON. Beat that!!!2.05 - Genghis Khan was the founder, Khan (ruler) and Khagan (emperor) of the Mongol Empire, the largest contiguous empire in history.
He came to power by uniting many of the nomadic tribes of northeast Asia. After founding the Mongol Empire and being proclaimed "Genghis Khan", he started the Mongol invasions and raids of the Kara-Khitan Khanate, Caucasus, Khwarezmid Empire, Western Xia and Jin dynasties. During his life, the Mongol Empire eventually occupied a substantial portion of Central Asia.
Before Genghis Khan died, he assigned {someone else} as his successor and split his empire into khanates among his sons and grandsons. He died in 1227 after defeating the Tanguts. He was buried in an unmarked grave somewhere in Mongolia at a location unknown. His descendants went on to stretch the Mongol Empire across most of Eurasia by conquering and/or creating vassal states out of all of modern-day China, Korea, the Caucasus, Central Asian countries, and substantial portions of modern Eastern Europe and the Middle East.
There were probably some other picks that might be "bigger" but I expect this draft to be Euro/American centric in its selections and I wanted to get one of the top Asian selections in my bag. I'm not sure what category I'm going to put him in yet. For now we'll say "leader".Yes.Am I up?
Well, Khan was my likely pick, so nice snipe. Pick coming shortly, a lot of ways I could go here.Yes.Am I up?
And flush goes my dream of stealing the top spot in two categories...So in other words, he got involved in a land war in Asia...AND WON. Beat that!!!2.05 - Genghis Khan was the founder, Khan (ruler) and Khagan (emperor) of the Mongol Empire, the largest contiguous empire in history.
He came to power by uniting many of the nomadic tribes of northeast Asia. After founding the Mongol Empire and being proclaimed "Genghis Khan", he started the Mongol invasions and raids of the Kara-Khitan Khanate, Caucasus, Khwarezmid Empire, Western Xia and Jin dynasties. During his life, the Mongol Empire eventually occupied a substantial portion of Central Asia.
Before Genghis Khan died, he assigned {someone else} as his successor and split his empire into khanates among his sons and grandsons. He died in 1227 after defeating the Tanguts. He was buried in an unmarked grave somewhere in Mongolia at a location unknown. His descendants went on to stretch the Mongol Empire across most of Eurasia by conquering and/or creating vassal states out of all of modern-day China, Korea, the Caucasus, Central Asian countries, and substantial portions of modern Eastern Europe and the Middle East.There were probably some other picks that might be "bigger" but I expect this draft to be Euro/American centric in its selections and I wanted to get one of the top Asian selections in my bag.
Again, the category isn't military thinker or theorist. It's military. It's hard to compare and contrast thinkers and doers, but Tzu isn't the #1 guy when they're all lumped together. As long as you're not judging science, I'm ok with that though I disagree. Unfortunately the guy I sniped for Newton is...Its pretty provincial that consensus on Budda and Confucius is that they're good picks, but not in the running for the top spot.
And Sun Tzu is far and away the most influential military thinker of all time (and there's really only 1 other with broad influence) Its somewhat like the issue in the American draft where we had musical performers and songwriters lumped together.
BTW Tim, I have no idea why you're so down on Tesla, but he's a giant and his inventions are as responsible for modern life as anyone. Oh yeah, and unlike the guy ahead of him in the cat, he actually invented the stuff he's credited with.
And I wouldnt put Einstein or Newton first in the scientist category.