What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

World's Greatest Draft (1 Viewer)

Guess I'll just have to live with whoever gets taken in the next 38 picks.

2.1 Confucius (Philosopher/Intellectual)
I knew it was going to be a long shot, but I would have liked to get Confucius or Darwin at the end of round 2. Great picks in my mind.Just in case it does get to my picks... I won't be around until ~10:00 pm central time tonight. Leaving shortly.

 
Guess I'll just have to live with whoever gets taken in the next 38 picks.

2.1 Confucius (Philosopher/Intellectual)

Almost didn't take him due to the blurred line separating philosophers and intellectuals, but decided to worry about that later. I'll toss in a writeup later to stop holding the draft up any longer.

Confucius (Chinese: 孔夫子; pinyin: Kǒng Fūzǐ; Wade-Giles: K'ung-fu-tzu), lit. "Master Kong,"[1] (September 28, 551 BC – 479 BC) was a Chinese thinker and social philosopher, whose teachings and philosophy have deeply influenced Chinese, Korean, Japanese, Taiwanese and Vietnamese thought and life.

His philosophy emphasized personal and governmental morality, correctness of social relationships, justice and sincerity. These values gained prominence in China over other doctrines, such as Legalism (法家) or Taoism (道家) during the Han Dynasty[2][3][4] (206 BC – 220 AD). Confucius' thoughts have been developed into a system of philosophy known as Confucianism (儒家). It was introduced to Europe by the Jesuit Matteo Ricci, who was the first to Latinise the name as "Confucius."

In the Analects 論語, Confucius presents himself as a "transmitter who invented nothing".[7] He put the greatest emphasis on the importance of study,[21][22] and it is the Chinese character for study (or learning) that opens the text. In this respect, he is seen by Chinese people as the Greatest Master.[23] Far from trying to build a systematic theory of life and society or establish a formalism of rites, he wanted his disciples to think deeply for themselves and relentlessly study the outside world,[24] mostly through the old scriptures and by relating the moral problems of the present to past political events (like the Annals) or past expressions of feelings by common people and reflective members of the elite (preserved in the poems of the Book of Odes[25]).[26]

In times of division, chaos, and endless wars between feudal states, he wanted to restore the Mandate of Heaven “天命” that could unify the "world" (i.e. China) and bestow peace and prosperity on the people.[27] Because his vision of personal and social perfections was framed as a revival of the ordered society of earlier times, Confucius is often considered a great proponent of conservatism, but a closer look at what he proposes often shows that he used (and perhaps twisted) past institutions and rites to push a new political agenda of his own: a revival of a unified royal state, whose rulers would succeed to power on the basis of their moral merit, not their parentage;[28][29] these would be rulers devoted to their people, reaching for personal and social perfection.[30] Such a ruler would spread his own virtues to the people instead of imposing proper behavior with laws and rules.[31]

One of the deepest teachings of Confucius may have been the superiority of personal exemplification over explicit rules of behavior. Because his moral teachings emphasise self-cultivation, emulation of moral exemplars, and the attainment of skilled judgment rather than knowledge of rules, Confucius's ethics may be considered a type of virtue ethics. His teachings rarely rely on reasoned argument, and ethical ideals and methods are conveyed more indirectly, through allusions, innuendo, and even tautology. This is why his teachings need to be examined and put into proper context in order to be understood.[32][33] A good example is found in this famous anecdote:

廄焚。子退朝,曰:“傷人乎?”不問馬。

When the stables were burnt down, on returning from court, Confucius said, "Was anyone hurt?" He did not ask about the horses.

Analects X.11, tr. A. Waley

The passage conveys the lesson that by not asking about the horses, Confucius demonstrated that a sage values human beings over property; readers of this lesson are led to reflect on whether their response would follow Confucius's, and to pursue ethical self-improvement if it would not. Confucius, an exemplar of human excellence, serves as the ultimate model, rather than a deity or a universally true set of abstract principles. For these reasons, according to many Eastern and Western commentators, Confucius's teaching may be considered a Chinese example of humanism.[34]

Perhaps his most famous teaching was the Golden Rule stated in the negative form, often called the silver rule:

子貢問曰、有一言、而可以終身行之者乎。子曰、其恕乎、己所 不欲、勿施於人。

Adept Kung asked: "Is there any one word that could guide a person throughout life?"

The Master replied: "How about 'shu' [reciprocity]: never impose on others what you would not choose for yourself?"

Analects XV.24, tr. David Hinton
Leader - Mohandas GandhiMilitary

Scientist

Inventor

Discoverer/Explorer

Humanitarian/Saint/Martyr

Novelist/short story

Playwright/Poet

Villain

Athlete

Composer

Muscian/ Performer

Painter

Artist/ Non Painter

Philosopher - Confucius

Religious Figure

Celebrity

Intellectual

Rebel

Wildcard

Wildcard

Wildcard
This is who I thought was a #1 before the Greeks started going off the board. Someone else pointed out about the number of people living under his philosophies. But like I said, wrong hemisphere.
 
New rule: the first selection in each round must be Chinese (and ancient).

J/K. If you post two or more categories for your pick, I will always place them in the first category. It's up to you to instruct me to switch later, if you want.

 
Darwin is probably the most controversial scientist in history, mainly because his ideas, if carried to their logical conclusion, challenge the more literal minded religionists among us. For a guy like CrossEyed here, for example, who believes that the Bible is the word of God and should be taken literally- macroevolution cannot occur or have occurred. It must be challenged or God's word is incorrect. Other religious people who take parts of the Bible to be metaphors rather than literal (especially the Book of Genesis) have no problem accepting Darwin's teachings. According to them, Darwin just discovered the way God does things. But there is no doubt that even for someone in this latter case, one cannot accept Darwin without at least altering the way one thinks about God, faith, and the Bible.
As a Christian who believes the Bible is right but humans have misinterpreted and things were explained in a way they could be understood at the time, I believe God put Darwin on this planet to make us question the faith and to help explain his methods.
This seems reasonable to me, except I'm not quite sure why God would want us to "question the faith". As a believer, isn't it your view that those who "question the faith" do not end up in Heaven, but in the other place? Why would God want this?
No. Questioning the faith makes one's faith stronger. At least it does for me. As a kid, when your parents told you to brush your teeth, did you ever question why? After learning the reason, didn't it make you want to brush? Instead of blind faith, IMO God wants us to look at everything and choose to follow, it's why he gave us freedom of choice. I don't mean doubting in the end and never choosing to follow, but questions are a good thing.
 
everyone questions...heck, I've spent most of the last 2 years not at all living "for God" because of various doubts and issues with the church and other things...I'm past it now (mostly), and my faith in God is stronger than ever because of it...but everyone questions their faith... and if someone doesn't, I would argue they might not have as much of a faith as they think they do...
OK, Larry, but do you accept the idea that God might put someone here (like Darwin) in order to CAUSE you to question your faith (and in many cases, have people abandon their faith)?
I don't know if I think He does, but at the same time looking at the Scriptures (especially Job), I don't think its outside of Scriptural possibility...
He tempted Christ. He puts hot women out here to make us question our wedding vows. He put the snake in the garden to tempt XXX.
 
everyone questions...

heck, I've spent most of the last 2 years not at all living "for God" because of various doubts and issues with the church and other things...

I'm past it now (mostly), and my faith in God is stronger than ever because of it...

but everyone questions their faith... and if someone doesn't, I would argue they might not have as much of a faith as they think they do...
OK, Larry, but do you accept the idea that God might put someone here (like Darwin) in order to CAUSE you to question your faith (and in many cases, have people abandon their faith)?
I don't know if I think He does, but at the same time looking at the Scriptures (especially Job), I don't think its outside of Scriptural possibility...
He tempted Christ. He puts hot women out here to make us question our wedding vows. He put the snake in the garden to tempt XXX.
I thought we eliminated the myths/legends category.
 
everyone questions...heck, I've spent most of the last 2 years not at all living "for God" because of various doubts and issues with the church and other things...I'm past it now (mostly), and my faith in God is stronger than ever because of it...but everyone questions their faith... and if someone doesn't, I would argue they might not have as much of a faith as they think they do...
OK, Larry, but do you accept the idea that God might put someone here (like Darwin) in order to CAUSE you to question your faith (and in many cases, have people abandon their faith)?
I don't know if I think He does, but at the same time looking at the Scriptures (especially Job), I don't think its outside of Scriptural possibility...
He tempted Christ. He puts hot women out here to make us question our wedding vows. He put the snake in the garden to tempt XXX.
God didn't tempt Christ personally...but, yes, those are other examples of God allowing us to be tempted/allowing things to happen to cause us to doubt...
 
everyone questions...

heck, I've spent most of the last 2 years not at all living "for God" because of various doubts and issues with the church and other things...

I'm past it now (mostly), and my faith in God is stronger than ever because of it...

but everyone questions their faith... and if someone doesn't, I would argue they might not have as much of a faith as they think they do...
OK, Larry, but do you accept the idea that God might put someone here (like Darwin) in order to CAUSE you to question your faith (and in many cases, have people abandon their faith)?
I don't know if I think He does, but at the same time looking at the Scriptures (especially Job), I don't think its outside of Scriptural possibility...
He tempted Christ. He puts hot women out here to make us question our wedding vows. He put the snake in the garden to tempt XXX.
I thought we eliminated the myths/legends category.
the story is a myth, but there is no evidence that there was no person by that name that the story is about...
 
Sun Tzu? There's someone I'd like you to meet. Mr. Sun, this is Mr. Tesla. Mr. Tesla, Mr. Sun. Now the two of you are going to wait in this room over here. That's right, the room for those who were drafted about 4-5 rounds too early. Yes, this is the "Major Reach" room! Enjoy yourselves, gentlemen...
:lmao:
 
I was kicking myself for missing out on this pick at 1.18.

Again, the write-up is weak here - what value can my commentary possibly add to his man's legacy?. I'm just here to drop names for now.

2.02 - Siddhartha Gautama -or is it Gautama Buddha? I hope I'm not drafting the wrong Ricky Williams .... Religious Figure

WIKI

Siddhārtha Gautama (Sanskrit; Pali: Siddhattha Gotama) was a spiritual teacher in the northern region of the Indian subcontinent who founded Buddhism. He is generally seen by Buddhists as the Supreme Buddha (Sammāsambuddha) of our age. The time of his birth and death are uncertain: most early 20th-century historians date his lifetime from c. 563 BCE to 483 BCE; more recently, however, at a specialist symposium on this question, the majority of those scholars who presented definite opinions gave dates within 20 years either side of 400 BCE for the Buddha's death, with others supporting earlier or later dates.

Gautama, also known as Śākyamuni or Shakyamuni ("sage of the Shakyas"), is the key figure in Buddhism, and accounts of his life, discourses, and monastic rules are believed by Buddhists to have been summarized after his death and memorized by his followers. Various collections of teachings attributed to Gautama were passed down by oral tradition, and first committed to writing about 400 years later. Early Western scholarship tended to accept the biography of the Buddha presented in the Buddhist scriptures as largely historical, but currently "scholars are increasingly reluctant to make unqualified claims about the historical facts of the Buddha's life and teachings."
It's a long wait for the 3.18. Hopefully my personal 1.01 is still available.
 
I was kicking myself for missing out on this pick at 1.18.

Again, the write-up is weak here - what value can my commentary possibly add to his man's legacy?. I'm just here to drop names for now.

2.02 - Siddhartha Gautama -or is it Gautama Buddha? I hope I'm not drafting the wrong Ricky Williams .... Religious Figure

WIKI

Siddhārtha Gautama (Sanskrit; Pali: Siddhattha Gotama) was a spiritual teacher in the northern region of the Indian subcontinent who founded Buddhism. He is generally seen by Buddhists as the Supreme Buddha (Sammāsambuddha) of our age. The time of his birth and death are uncertain: most early 20th-century historians date his lifetime from c. 563 BCE to 483 BCE; more recently, however, at a specialist symposium on this question, the majority of those scholars who presented definite opinions gave dates within 20 years either side of 400 BCE for the Buddha's death, with others supporting earlier or later dates.

Gautama, also known as Śākyamuni or Shakyamuni ("sage of the Shakyas"), is the key figure in Buddhism, and accounts of his life, discourses, and monastic rules are believed by Buddhists to have been summarized after his death and memorized by his followers. Various collections of teachings attributed to Gautama were passed down by oral tradition, and first committed to writing about 400 years later. Early Western scholarship tended to accept the biography of the Buddha presented in the Buddhist scriptures as largely historical, but currently "scholars are increasingly reluctant to make unqualified claims about the historical facts of the Buddha's life and teachings."
It's a long wait for the 3.18. Hopefully my personal 1.01 is still available.
Darwin and Buddha? Very nice haul.
 
I was kicking myself for missing out on this pick at 1.18.

Again, the write-up is weak here - what value can my commentary possibly add to his man's legacy?. I'm just here to drop names for now.

2.02 - Siddhartha Gautama -or is it Gautama Buddha? I hope I'm not drafting the wrong Ricky Williams .... Religious Figure

WIKI

Siddhārtha Gautama (Sanskrit; Pali: Siddhattha Gotama) was a spiritual teacher in the northern region of the Indian subcontinent who founded Buddhism. He is generally seen by Buddhists as the Supreme Buddha (Sammāsambuddha) of our age. The time of his birth and death are uncertain: most early 20th-century historians date his lifetime from c. 563 BCE to 483 BCE; more recently, however, at a specialist symposium on this question, the majority of those scholars who presented definite opinions gave dates within 20 years either side of 400 BCE for the Buddha's death, with others supporting earlier or later dates.

Gautama, also known as Śākyamuni or Shakyamuni ("sage of the Shakyas"), is the key figure in Buddhism, and accounts of his life, discourses, and monastic rules are believed by Buddhists to have been summarized after his death and memorized by his followers. Various collections of teachings attributed to Gautama were passed down by oral tradition, and first committed to writing about 400 years later. Early Western scholarship tended to accept the biography of the Buddha presented in the Buddhist scriptures as largely historical, but currently "scholars are increasingly reluctant to make unqualified claims about the historical facts of the Buddha's life and teachings."
It's a long wait for the 3.18. Hopefully my personal 1.01 is still available.
Great pick. Dodged a bullet, as this was my other consideration for the previous pick. :lmao:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I was kicking myself for missing out on this pick at 1.18.

Again, the write-up is weak here - what value can my commentary possibly add to his man's legacy?. I'm just here to drop names for now.

2.02 - Siddhartha Gautama -or is it Gautama Buddha? I hope I'm not drafting the wrong Ricky Williams .... Religious Figure

WIKI

Siddhārtha Gautama (Sanskrit; Pali: Siddhattha Gotama) was a spiritual teacher in the northern region of the Indian subcontinent who founded Buddhism. He is generally seen by Buddhists as the Supreme Buddha (Sammāsambuddha) of our age. The time of his birth and death are uncertain: most early 20th-century historians date his lifetime from c. 563 BCE to 483 BCE; more recently, however, at a specialist symposium on this question, the majority of those scholars who presented definite opinions gave dates within 20 years either side of 400 BCE for the Buddha's death, with others supporting earlier or later dates.

Gautama, also known as Śākyamuni or Shakyamuni ("sage of the Shakyas"), is the key figure in Buddhism, and accounts of his life, discourses, and monastic rules are believed by Buddhists to have been summarized after his death and memorized by his followers. Various collections of teachings attributed to Gautama were passed down by oral tradition, and first committed to writing about 400 years later. Early Western scholarship tended to accept the biography of the Buddha presented in the Buddhist scriptures as largely historical, but currently "scholars are increasingly reluctant to make unqualified claims about the historical facts of the Buddha's life and teachings."
It's a long wait for the 3.18. Hopefully my personal 1.01 is still available.
Another pick I was looking at for 1.10. I really wanted to go East, but in a category with Muhammed and Jesus, he's almost a lock for 3rd. Unless LB wants to put Jesus in the martyr category so he doesn't chance losing out to Muhammed.This is probably the first instance of categories affecting overall value, or at least the biggest.

 
Another pick I was looking at for 1.10. I really wanted to go East, but in a category with Muhammed and Jesus, he's almost a lock for 3rd. Unless LB wants to put Jesus in the martyr category so he doesn't chance losing out to Muhammed.This is probably the first instance of categories affecting overall value, or at least the biggest.
Agreed. Religious figure with these 3 and leaders with a slew of people are examples of where judging this by categories can lead to a weird draft.
 
I was kicking myself for missing out on this pick at 1.18.

Again, the write-up is weak here - what value can my commentary possibly add to his man's legacy?. I'm just here to drop names for now.

2.02 - Siddhartha Gautama -or is it Gautama Buddha? I hope I'm not drafting the wrong Ricky Williams .... Religious Figure

WIKI

Siddhārtha Gautama (Sanskrit; Pali: Siddhattha Gotama) was a spiritual teacher in the northern region of the Indian subcontinent who founded Buddhism. He is generally seen by Buddhists as the Supreme Buddha (Sammāsambuddha) of our age. The time of his birth and death are uncertain: most early 20th-century historians date his lifetime from c. 563 BCE to 483 BCE; more recently, however, at a specialist symposium on this question, the majority of those scholars who presented definite opinions gave dates within 20 years either side of 400 BCE for the Buddha's death, with others supporting earlier or later dates.

Gautama, also known as Śākyamuni or Shakyamuni ("sage of the Shakyas"), is the key figure in Buddhism, and accounts of his life, discourses, and monastic rules are believed by Buddhists to have been summarized after his death and memorized by his followers. Various collections of teachings attributed to Gautama were passed down by oral tradition, and first committed to writing about 400 years later. Early Western scholarship tended to accept the biography of the Buddha presented in the Buddhist scriptures as largely historical, but currently "scholars are increasingly reluctant to make unqualified claims about the historical facts of the Buddha's life and teachings."
It's a long wait for the 3.18. Hopefully my personal 1.01 is still available.
Darwin and Buddha? Very nice haul.
I'm pleased, with the caveat that neither one will likely be voted top-2 in either category.
 
I was kicking myself for missing out on this pick at 1.18.

Again, the write-up is weak here - what value can my commentary possibly add to his man's legacy?. I'm just here to drop names for now.

2.02 - Siddhartha Gautama -or is it Gautama Buddha? I hope I'm not drafting the wrong Ricky Williams .... Religious Figure

WIKI

Siddhārtha Gautama (Sanskrit; Pali: Siddhattha Gotama) was a spiritual teacher in the northern region of the Indian subcontinent who founded Buddhism. He is generally seen by Buddhists as the Supreme Buddha (Sammāsambuddha) of our age. The time of his birth and death are uncertain: most early 20th-century historians date his lifetime from c. 563 BCE to 483 BCE; more recently, however, at a specialist symposium on this question, the majority of those scholars who presented definite opinions gave dates within 20 years either side of 400 BCE for the Buddha's death, with others supporting earlier or later dates.

Gautama, also known as Śākyamuni or Shakyamuni ("sage of the Shakyas"), is the key figure in Buddhism, and accounts of his life, discourses, and monastic rules are believed by Buddhists to have been summarized after his death and memorized by his followers. Various collections of teachings attributed to Gautama were passed down by oral tradition, and first committed to writing about 400 years later. Early Western scholarship tended to accept the biography of the Buddha presented in the Buddhist scriptures as largely historical, but currently "scholars are increasingly reluctant to make unqualified claims about the historical facts of the Buddha's life and teachings."
It's a long wait for the 3.18. Hopefully my personal 1.01 is still available.
Great pick. Dodged a bullet, as this was my other consideration for the previous pick. :lmao:
I had Confucius and one other Easterner queued for consolation.
 
Another pick I was looking at for 1.10. I really wanted to go East, but in a category with Muhammed and Jesus, he's almost a lock for 3rd. Unless LB wants to put Jesus in the martyr category so he doesn't chance losing out to Muhammed.

This is probably the first instance of categories affecting overall value, or at least the biggest.
:lmao: The Buddha is an easy top-5 in a draft without categories. Still in all, Mr. CIA does have a lock on a high score in the Religious Figures category.

 
What do Jesus and Buddha have in common? One answer is, the religions that were eventually formed around both of them have always been more popular among other peoples than the original people it was preached to.

Another similarity is that the portrayal of Jesus and Buddha is usually based on the ethnicity of the people worshipping him. Just as Americans of English and German descent have generally worshipped a blue-eyed fair skinned Jesus, Buddha in China is always Chinese.

 
As far as categories affecting overall value, making things rather strange: this is one of the reasons we will have public voting as well as category judging. Any apparent inequities that arise from the category judging should correct themselves when people are allowed to vote on the teams.

 
1.19 - Charles Darwin - Scientist
Solid pick within the category to be sure. I think you trepidation is well founded though; this is a category that gets pretty messy after the first few, so it depends on how the judge weighs out historical vs. more recent advances in scientific thought. Should be solidly in the second teir though.
He was one of the 4 I was deciding between when I chose Alexander. The other 2 are still available.I had another category in mind for Darwin. Just wish I could say what it was

 
What do Jesus and Buddha have in common? One answer is, the religions that were eventually formed around both of them have always been more popular among other peoples than the original people it was preached to.Another similarity is that the portrayal of Jesus and Buddha is usually based on the ethnicity of the people worshipping him. Just as Americans of English and German descent have generally worshipped a blue-eyed fair skinned Jesus, Buddha in China is always Chinese.
he wasn't Chinese?
 
What do Jesus and Buddha have in common? One answer is, the religions that were eventually formed around both of them have always been more popular among other peoples than the original people it was preached to.Another similarity is that the portrayal of Jesus and Buddha is usually based on the ethnicity of the people worshipping him. Just as Americans of English and German descent have generally worshipped a blue-eyed fair skinned Jesus, Buddha in China is always Chinese.
he wasn't Chinese?
He was an Indian prince.
 
For those of you who may be interested, there were two options at #1 when I picked. The first was Sun Tzu and the other option was Alexander the Great.Sun Tzu because of his philosophy towards war and the fact many war time participants have followed his writing (plus many other applications of said writing such as business wise) and the fact that those writings are still being used today in many more applicable ways.Alexander the Great because he spawned an empire that had not been seen before and has not been seen since. He practically ruled the known world... not a part of it but all of it... at that time. He stands above and beyond any General, King, President or any other high government official because nobody has duplicated what he had.
:shrug:
 
I've never been a huge fan of Gandhi. I've always been skeptical of the fact that he found the British to be so abhorrent that he was willing to work with the Nazis and Japanese during WWII. This soured him for me.

Plus, he was the instigator of a wave of anti-colonialism and liberation for the Third World. Has this been a good thing? My honest answer is no, not for us in the west, and not for the Third World either. Mostly it's resulted in a lot of bloody dictatorships in whose politics the United States has often been forced to intervene. In the land of Gandhi, his "liberation" of that land may eventually result in the world's first nuclear exchange.
Have you got a link for that?Also I think you are either #### stirring or making Gandhi out to be something he isn't responsible for.

When George Washington & Co threw off the British, they're heroes & revolutionaries.

When Gandhi does it he's responsible for tin pot dictators?

Gandhi did it peacefully.

 
When I saw that I was picking 18th, my first thought was it's going to be tough from there.

I had no idea that I would end up with two solid candidates for #1 in category picks after the turn.

2.03 (23rd pick) - Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart - Composer

A child prodigy, Mozart wrote his first symphony when he was eight years old and his first opera at 12. He went on to write some of the most important masterpieces of the Classical era, including symphonies, operas, string quartets and piano music. One of the most significant and influential of all composers of Western classical music. His works are loved by many and are frequently performed.

Eine kleine Nachtmusik is perhaps the most beautiful sound ever know to mankind. Listen and see if you agree:

(born Salzburg, 27 January 1756; died Vienna, 5 December 1791). Son of Leopold Mozart.

He showed musical gifts at a very early age, composing when he was five and when he was six playing before the Bavarian elector and the Austrian empress. Leopold felt that it was proper, and might also be profitable, to exhibit his children's God-given genius (Maria Anna, 'Nannerl', 1751-1829, was a gifted keyboard player): so in mid-1763 the family set out on a tour that took them to Paris and London, visiting numerous courts en route. Mozart astonished his audiences with his precocious skills; he played to the French and English royal families, had his first music published and wrote his earliest symphonies. The family arrived home late in 1766; nine months later they were off again, to Vienna, where hopes of having an opera by Mozart performed were frustrated by intrigues.

They spent 1769 in Salzburg; 1770-73 saw three visits to Italy, where Mozart wrote two operas (Mitridate, Lucio Silla) and a serenata for performance in Milan, and acquainted himself with Italian styles. Summer 1773 saw a further visit to Vienna, probably in the hope of securing a post; there Mozart wrote a set of string quartets and, on his return, wrote a group of symphonies including his two earliest, nos.25 in g Minor and 29 in A, in the regular repertory. Apart from a joumey to Munich for the premiere of his opera La finta giardiniera early in 1775, the period from 1774 to mid-1777 was spent in Salzburg, where Mozart worked as Konzertmeister at the Prince- Archbishop's court; his works of these years include masses, symphonies, all his violin concertos, six piano sonatas, several serenades and divertimentos and his first great piano concerto, K271.

In 1777 the Mozarts, seeing limited opportunity in Salzburg for a composer so hugely gifted, resolved to seek a post elsewhere for Wolfgang. He was sent, with his mother, to Munich and to Mannheim, but was offered no position (though he stayed over four months at Mannheim, composing for piano and flute and falling in love with Aloysia Weber). His father then dispatched him to Paris: there he had minor successes, notably with his Paris Symphony, no.31, deftly designed for the local taste. But prospects there were poor and Leopold ordered him home, where a superior post had been arranged at the court. He returned slowly and alone; his mother had died in Paris. The years 1779-80 were spent in Salzburg, playing in the cathedral and at court, composing sacred works, symphonies, concertos, serenades and dramatic music. But opera remained at the centre of his ambitions, and an opportunity came with a commission for a serious opera for Munich. He went there to compose it late in 1780; his correspondence with Leopold (through whom he communicated with the librettist, in Salzburg) is richly informative about his approach to musical drama. The work, Idomeneo, was a success. In it Mozart depicted serious, heroic emotion with a richness unparalleled elsewhere in his works, with vivid orchestral writing and an abundance of profoundly expressive orchestral recitative.

Mozart was then summoned from Munich to Vienna, where the Salzburg court was in residence on the accession of a new emperor. Fresh from his success, he found himself placed between the valets and the cooks; his resentment towards his employer, exacerbated by the Prince-Archbishop's refusal to let him perform at events the emperor was attending, soon led to conflict, and in May 1781 he resigned, or was kicked out of, his job. He wanted a post at the Imperial court in Vienna, but was content to do freelance work in a city that apparently offered golden opportunities. He made his living over the ensuing years by teaching, by publishing his music, by playing at patrons' houses or in public, by composing to commission (particularly operas); in 1787 he obtained a minor court post as Kammermusicus, which gave him a reasonable salary and required nothing beyond the writing of dance music for court balls. He always earned, by musicians' standards, a good income, and had a carriage and servants; through lavish spending and poor management he suffered times of financial difficulty and had to borrow. In 1782 he married Constanze Weber, Aloysia's younger sister.

In his early years in Vienna, Mozart built up his reputation by publishing (sonatas for piano, some with violin), by playing the piano and, in 1782, by having an opera performed: Die Entführung aus dem Serail, a German Singspiel which went far beyond the usual limits of the tradition with its long, elaborately written songs (hence Emperor Joseph II's famous observation, 'Too many notes, my dear Mozart'). The work was successful and was taken into the repertories of many provincial companies (for which Mozart was not however paid). In these years, too, he wrote six string quartets which he dedicated to the master of the form, Haydn: they are marked not only by their variety of expression but by their complex textures, conceived as four-part discourse, with the musical ideas linked to this freshly integrated treatment of the medium. Haydn told Mozart's father that Mozart was 'the greatest composer known to me in person or by name; he has taste and, what is more, the greatest knowledge of composition'.

In 1782 Mozart embarked on the composition of piano concertos, so that he could appear both as composer and soloist. He wrote 15 before the end of 1786, with early 1784 as the peak of activity. They represent one of his greatest achievements, with their formal mastery, their subtle relationships between piano and orchestra (the wind instruments especially) and their combination of brilliance, lyricism and symphonic growth. In 1786 he wrote the first of his three comic operas with Lorenzo da Ponte as librettist, Le nozze di Figaro: here and in Don Giovanni (given in Prague, 1787) Mozart treats the interplay of social and sexual tensions with keen insight into human character that - as again in the more artificial sexual comedy of Cosi fan tutte (1790) - transcends the comic framework, just as Die Zauberflöte (1791) transcends, with its elements of ritual and allegory about human harmony and enlightenment, the world of the Viennese popular theatre from which it springs.

Mozart lived in Vienna for the rest of his life. He undertook a number of joumeys: to Salzburg in 1783, to introduce his wife to his family; to Prague three times, for concerts and operas; to Berlin in 1789, where he had hopes of a post; to Frankfurt in 1790, to play at coronation celebrations. The last Prague journey was for the premiere of La clemenza di Tito (1791), a traditional serious opera written for coronation celebrations, but composed with a finesse and economy characteristic of Mozart's late music. Instrumental works of these years include some piano sonatas, three string quartets written for the King of Prussia, some string quintets, which include one of his most deeply felt works (K516 in g Minor) and one of his most nobly spacious (K515 in C), and his last four symphonies - one (no.38 in D) composed for Prague in 1786, the others written in 1788 and forming, with the lyricism of no.39 in E-flat, the tragic suggestiveness of no.40 in g Minor and the grandeur of no.41 in C, a climax to his orchestral music. His final works include the Clarinet Concerto and some pieces for masonic lodges (he had been a freemason since 1784; masonic teachings no doubt affected his thinking, and his compositions, in his last years). At his death from a feverish illness whose precise nature has given rise to much speculation (he was not poisoned), he left unfinished the Requiem, his first large-scale work for the church since the c Minor Mass of 1783, also unfinished; a completion by his pupil Süssmayr was long accepted as the standard one but there have been recent attempts to improve on it. Mozart was buried in a Vienna suburb, with little ceremony and in an unmarked grave, in accordance with prevailing custom.

 
2.4 Socrates

In his use of critical reasoning, by his unwavering commitment to truth, and through the vivid example of his own life, fifth-century Athenian Socrates set the standard for all subsequent Western philosophy. Since he left no literary legacy of his own, we are dependent upon contemporary writers like Aristophanes and Xenophon for our information about his life and work. As a pupil of Archelaus during his youth, Socrates showed a great deal of interest in the scientific theories of Anaxagoras, but he later abandoned inquiries into the physical world for a dedicated investigation of the development of moral character. Having served with some distinction as a soldier at Delium and Amphipolis during the Peloponnesian War, Socrates dabbled in the political turmoil that consumed Athens after the War, then retired from active life to work as a stonemason and to raise his children with his wife, Xanthippe. After inheriting a modest fortune from his father, the sculptor Sophroniscus, Socrates used his marginal financial independence as an opportunity to give full-time attention to inventing the practice of philosophical dialogue.

For the rest of his life, Socrates devoted himself to free-wheeling discussion with the aristocratic young citizens of Athens, insistently questioning their unwarranted confidence in the truth of popular opinions, even though he often offered them no clear alternative teaching. Unlike the professional Sophists of the time, Socrates pointedly declined to accept payment for his work with students, but despite (or, perhaps, because) of this lofty disdain for material success, many of them were fanatically loyal to him. Their parents, however, were often displeased with his influence on their offspring, and his earlier association with opponents of the democratic regime had already made him a controversial political figure. Although the amnesty of 405 forestalled direct prosecution for his political activities, an Athenian jury found other charges—corrupting the youth and interfering with the religion of the city—upon which to convict Socrates, and they sentenced him to death in 399 B.C.E. Accepting this outcome with remarkable grace, Socrates drank hemlock and died in the company of his friends and disciples.

Our best sources of information about Socrates's philosophical views are the early dialogues of his student Plato, who attempted there to provide a faithful picture of the methods and teachings of the master. (Although Socrates also appears as a character in the later dialogues of Plato, these writings more often express philosophical positions Plato himself developed long after Socrates's death.) In the Socratic dialogues, his extended conversations with students, statesmen, and friends invariably aim at understanding and achieving virtue {Gk. areth [aretê]} through the careful application of a dialectical method that employs critical inquiry to undermine the plausibility of widely-held doctrines. Destroying the illusion that we already comprehend the world perfectly and honestly accepting the fact of our own ignorance, Socrates believed, are vital steps toward our acquisition of genuine knowledge, by discovering universal definitions of the key concepts governing human life.

Interacting with an arrogantly confident young man in Euqufrwn (Euthyphro), for example, Socrates systematically refutes the superficial notion of piety (moral rectitude) as doing whatever is pleasing to the gods. Efforts to define morality by reference to any external authority, he argued, inevitably founder in a significant logical dilemma about the origin of the good. Plato's Apologhma (Apology) is an account of Socrates's (unsuccessful) speech in his own defense before the Athenian jury; it includes a detailed description of the motives and goals of philosophical activity as he practiced it, together with a passionate declaration of its value for life. The Kritwn (Crito) reports that during Socrates's imprisonment he responded to friendly efforts to secure his escape by seriously debating whether or not it would be right for him to do so. He concludes to the contrary that an individual citizen—even when the victim of unjust treatment—can never be justified in refusing to obey the laws of the state.

The Socrates of the Menwn (Meno) tries to determine whether or not virtue can be taught, and this naturally leads to a careful investigation of the nature of virtue itself. Although his direct answer is that virtue is unteachable, Socrates does propose the doctrine of recollection to explain why we nevertheless are in possession of significant knowledge about such matters. Most remarkably, Socrates argues here that knowledge and virtue are so closely related that no human agent ever knowingly does evil: we all invariably do what we believe to be best. Improper conduct, then, can only be a product of our ignorance rather than a symptom of weakness of the will {Gk. akrasia [akrásia]}. The same view is also defended in the PrwtagoraV (Protagoras), along with the belief that all of the virtues must be cultivated together.

 
Its pretty provincial that consensus on Budda and Confucius is that they're good picks, but not in the running for the top spot.

And Sun Tzu is far and away the most influential military thinker of all time (and there's really only 1 other with broad influence) Its somewhat like the issue in the American draft where we had musical performers and songwriters lumped together.

BTW Tim, I have no idea why you're so down on Tesla, but he's a giant and his inventions are as responsible for modern life as anyone. Oh yeah, and unlike the guy ahead of him in the cat, he actually invented the stuff he's credited with.

And I wouldnt put Einstein or Newton first in the scientist category.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Its pretty provincial that consensus on Budda and Confucius is that they're good picks, but not in the running for the top spot.

And Sun Tzu is far and away the most influential military thinker of all time (and there's really only 1 other with broad influence) Its somewhat like the issue in the American draft where we had musical performers and songwriters lumped together.

BTW Tim, I have no idea why you're so down on Tesla, but he's a giant and his inventions are as responsible for modern life as anyone. Oh yeah, and unlike the guy ahead of him in the cat, he actually invented the stuff he's credited with.

And I wouldnt put Einstein or Newton first in the scientist category.
:goodposting:
 
2.05 - Genghis Khan was the founder, Khan (ruler) and Khagan (emperor) of the Mongol Empire, the largest contiguous empire in history.

He came to power by uniting many of the nomadic tribes of northeast Asia. After founding the Mongol Empire and being proclaimed "Genghis Khan", he started the Mongol invasions and raids of the Kara-Khitan Khanate, Caucasus, Khwarezmid Empire, Western Xia and Jin dynasties. During his life, the Mongol Empire eventually occupied a substantial portion of Central Asia.

Before Genghis Khan died, he assigned {someone else} as his successor and split his empire into khanates among his sons and grandsons. He died in 1227 after defeating the Tanguts. He was buried in an unmarked grave somewhere in Mongolia at a location unknown. His descendants went on to stretch the Mongol Empire across most of Eurasia by conquering and/or creating vassal states out of all of modern-day China, Korea, the Caucasus, Central Asian countries, and substantial portions of modern Eastern Europe and the Middle East.
So in other words, he got involved in a land war in Asia...AND WON. Beat that!!! :goodposting: There were probably some other picks that might be "bigger" but I expect this draft to be Euro/American centric in its selections and I wanted to get one of the top Asian selections in my bag. I'm not sure what category I'm going to put him in yet. For now we'll say "leader".

 
Last edited by a moderator:
2.05 - Genghis Khan was the founder, Khan (ruler) and Khagan (emperor) of the Mongol Empire, the largest contiguous empire in history.

He came to power by uniting many of the nomadic tribes of northeast Asia. After founding the Mongol Empire and being proclaimed "Genghis Khan", he started the Mongol invasions and raids of the Kara-Khitan Khanate, Caucasus, Khwarezmid Empire, Western Xia and Jin dynasties. During his life, the Mongol Empire eventually occupied a substantial portion of Central Asia.

Before Genghis Khan died, he assigned {someone else} as his successor and split his empire into khanates among his sons and grandsons. He died in 1227 after defeating the Tanguts. He was buried in an unmarked grave somewhere in Mongolia at a location unknown. His descendants went on to stretch the Mongol Empire across most of Eurasia by conquering and/or creating vassal states out of all of modern-day China, Korea, the Caucasus, Central Asian countries, and substantial portions of modern Eastern Europe and the Middle East.
So in other words, he got involved in a land war in Asia...AND WON. Beat that!!! :goodposting: There were probably some other picks that might be "bigger" but I expect this draft to be Euro/American centric in its selections and I wanted to get one of the top Asian selections in my bag.
And flush goes my dream of stealing the top spot in two categories...
 
Its pretty provincial that consensus on Budda and Confucius is that they're good picks, but not in the running for the top spot.

And Sun Tzu is far and away the most influential military thinker of all time (and there's really only 1 other with broad influence) Its somewhat like the issue in the American draft where we had musical performers and songwriters lumped together.

BTW Tim, I have no idea why you're so down on Tesla, but he's a giant and his inventions are as responsible for modern life as anyone. Oh yeah, and unlike the guy ahead of him in the cat, he actually invented the stuff he's credited with.

And I wouldnt put Einstein or Newton first in the scientist category.
Again, the category isn't military thinker or theorist. It's military. It's hard to compare and contrast thinkers and doers, but Tzu isn't the #1 guy when they're all lumped together. As long as you're not judging science, I'm ok with that though I disagree. Unfortunately the guy I sniped for Newton is...

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top