What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

World's Greatest Draft (2 Viewers)

Lincoln is obviously one of the greatest of American heroes, (and in my opinion, our greatest President, though Andy ranked him #3), but I'm wondering what the rest of the world thinks of him. The United States is such a new country compared to most of the world. If you're a student in Italy or Japan, do you think Lincoln is a name you learn about? Just wondering...

 
Lincoln is obviously one of the greatest of American heroes, (and in my opinion, our greatest President, though Andy ranked him #3), but I'm wondering what the rest of the world thinks of him. The United States is such a new country compared to most of the world. If you're a student in Italy or Japan, do you think Lincoln is a name you learn about? Just wondering...
In Latin America, he is very highly thought of. P.S. I believe that in North Korea, not so much.
 
As for the Socratic method - the method itself might be the best way to teach a given subject. It allows the student to see a problem from multiple facets and challenges him to "know" the subject in order to learn the subject.The problem with the method is that most of the talentless hacks that couldn't make it in a courtroom that we call law professors use it as a blanket card to throw some downright stupid stuff into a classroom discussion. And they do it to make themselves look smarter, education on the actual law be damned.
I loved after a discussion in Torts, I approached the professor to answer a question we'd been discussing in class without resolution. Her response "Well, thats the issue, isnt it?" ARRRGGGGGHHHHH. I still want to strangle her to this day.
GB legal theorists. It is one of the things I love and hate about the law, often there isn't a "right" answer. It's also one of the things commanders (my clients) hate.
Ahh, but there is a right answer on the final.
 
Question concerning the categories. I'm unclear on the judging parameters for the Musician/Performer category. Are the chosen figures in this category being judged purely on their performance? Say Band X has terrible songwriting skills, but puts on one of the greatest live acts of all time. Is that what this category is looking for? Pure performance? Or is the whole package taken into account?

 
Question concerning the categories. I'm unclear on the judging parameters for the Musician/Performer category. Are the chosen figures in this category being judged purely on their performance? Say Band X has terrible songwriting skills, but puts on one of the greatest live acts of all time. Is that what this category is looking for? Pure performance? Or is the whole package taken into account?
Whole package. I did not mean live performances, per se. Recordings are fine too. I'm just separating this from the writers of the music, (though even that you can take into account.)It's basically a means to include popular music in the mix.
 
Question concerning the categories. I'm unclear on the judging parameters for the Musician/Performer category. Are the chosen figures in this category being judged purely on their performance? Say Band X has terrible songwriting skills, but puts on one of the greatest live acts of all time. Is that what this category is looking for? Pure performance? Or is the whole package taken into account?
Whole package. I did not mean live performances, per se. Recordings are fine too. I'm just separating this from the writers of the music, (though even that you can take into account.)It's basically a means to include popular music in the mix.
Phew.
 
Thank goodness Short Story author was added to the Novelist category. That way Tolstoy can be included as he's the least long-winded of the Russian novelists.

 
Thank goodness Short Story author was added to the Novelist category. That way Tolstoy can be included as he's the least long-winded of the Russian novelists.
A Russian short story is around 600 pages and covers about ten years of misery rather than the standard century or two...
 
2.07 - Abraham Lincoln - Leader

Too tired to write, will post more in the morning.
Interesting pick here. I feel like there is at least one other U.S. Leader who belongs before Lincoln. Perhaps more.
Probably just one. The interesting thing about American Presidents relative to the other leaders who will be chosen is that they will, in most cases, have vastly less power and influence than their counterparts. It really wouldn't surprise me if only one or two more are chosen, and one might be better in another category.
 
2.07 - Abraham Lincoln - Leader

Too tired to write, will post more in the morning.
Interesting pick here. I feel like there is at least one other U.S. Leader who belongs before Lincoln. Perhaps more.
Probably just one. The interesting thing about American Presidents relative to the other leaders who will be chosen is that they will, in most cases, have vastly less power and influence than their counterparts. It really wouldn't surprise me if only one or two more are chosen, and one might be better in another category.
checking in.
 
2.05 - Genghis Khan was the founder, Khan (ruler) and Khagan (emperor) of the Mongol Empire, the largest contiguous empire in history.

He came to power by uniting many of the nomadic tribes of northeast Asia. After founding the Mongol Empire and being proclaimed "Genghis Khan", he started the Mongol invasions and raids of the Kara-Khitan Khanate, Caucasus, Khwarezmid Empire, Western Xia and Jin dynasties. During his life, the Mongol Empire eventually occupied a substantial portion of Central Asia.

Before Genghis Khan died, he assigned {someone else} as his successor and split his empire into khanates among his sons and grandsons. He died in 1227 after defeating the Tanguts. He was buried in an unmarked grave somewhere in Mongolia at a location unknown. His descendants went on to stretch the Mongol Empire across most of Eurasia by conquering and/or creating vassal states out of all of modern-day China, Korea, the Caucasus, Central Asian countries, and substantial portions of modern Eastern Europe and the Middle East.
So in other words, he got involved in a land war in Asia...AND WON. Beat that!!! :popcorn: There were probably some other picks that might be "bigger" but I expect this draft to be Euro/American centric in its selections and I wanted to get one of the top Asian selections in my bag.
And flush goes my dream of stealing the top spot in two categories...
I could be convinced otherwise, but I don't think Genghis is the #1 leader.
I don't either. But he's very arguably the #1 military guy.
 
Thank goodness Short Story author was added to the Novelist category. That way Tolstoy can be included as he's the least long-winded of the Russian novelists.
A Russian short story is around 600 pages and covers about ten years of misery rather than the standard century or two...
Every happy Russian short story is alike. But every unhappy Russian short story is unhappy in its own way.
 
Thank goodness Short Story author was added to the Novelist category. That way Tolstoy can be included as he's the least long-winded of the Russian novelists.
A Russian short story is around 600 pages and covers about ten years of misery rather than the standard century or two...
Every happy Russian short story is alike. But every unhappy Russian short story is unhappy in its own way.
As a famous American lyricist once wrote""With love to lead the wayI've found more clouds of grayThan any Russian play could guarantee"
 
2.07 - Abraham Lincoln - Leader

Too tired to write, will post more in the morning.
Interesting pick here. I feel like there is at least one other U.S. Leader who belongs before Lincoln. Perhaps more.
Probably just one. The interesting thing about American Presidents relative to the other leaders who will be chosen is that they will, in most cases, have vastly less power and influence than their counterparts. It really wouldn't surprise me if only one or two more are chosen, and one might be better in another category.
I was contemplating between Lincoln & another President. I'm pretty sure that I know who you guys are talking about. I picked Lincoln because he led our country through a tough time when the Nation was at war with itself and also led to the freedom of the slaves. The Emancipation Proclamation was one of the most important documents in our nation's history even with some of it's hidden agendas.
 
2.07 - Abraham Lincoln - Leader

Abraham Lincoln (February 12, 1809 – April 15, 1865) was the 16th President of the United States. He successfully led the country through its greatest internal crisis, the American Civil War, preserving the Union and ending slavery. As the war was drawing to a close, Lincoln became the first American president to be assassinated. Before his election in 1860 as the first Republican president, Lincoln had been a country lawyer, an Illinois state legislator, a member of the United States House of Representatives, and twice an unsuccessful candidate for election to the U.S. Senate.

As an outspoken opponent of the expansion of slavery in the United States, Lincoln won the Republican Party nomination in 1860 and was elected president later that year. His tenure in office was occupied primarily with the defeat of the secessionist Confederate States of America in the American Civil War. He introduced measures that resulted in the abolition of slavery, issuing his Emancipation Proclamation in 1863 and promoting the passage of the Thirteenth Amendment to the Constitution, which passed Congress before Lincoln's death and was ratified by the states later in 1865.

Lincoln closely supervised the victorious war effort, especially the selection of top generals, including Ulysses S. Grant. Historians have concluded that he handled the factions of the Republican Party well, bringing leaders of each faction into his cabinet and forcing them to cooperate. Lincoln successfully defused the Trent Affair, a war scare with Britain in 1861. Under his leadership, the Union took control of the border slave states at the start of the war. Additionally, he managed his own reelection in the 1864 presidential election.

Copperheads and other opponents of the war criticized Lincoln for refusing to compromise on the slavery issue. Conversely, the Radical Republicans, an abolitionist faction of the Republican Party, criticized him for moving too slowly in abolishing slavery. Even with these road blocks, Lincoln successfully rallied public opinion through his rhetoric and speeches; his Gettysburg Address is but one example of this. At the close of the war, Lincoln held a moderate view of Reconstruction, seeking to speedily reunite the nation through a policy of generous reconciliation. His successor in the White House, Andrew Johnson, also wanted reconciliation among white Americans, but failed to protect the rights of newly freed slaves. Lincoln's assassination in 1865 was the first presidential assassination in U.S. history. He has since consistently been ranked by scholars as one of the greatest U.S. Presidents.

 
2.07 - Abraham Lincoln - Leader

Too tired to write, will post more in the morning.
Interesting pick here. I feel like there is at least one other U.S. Leader who belongs before Lincoln. Perhaps more.
Probably just one. The interesting thing about American Presidents relative to the other leaders who will be chosen is that they will, in most cases, have vastly less power and influence than their counterparts. It really wouldn't surprise me if only one or two more are chosen, and one might be better in another category.
I was contemplating between Lincoln & another President. I'm pretty sure that I know who you guys are talking about. I picked Lincoln because he led our country through a tough time when the Nation was at war with itself and also led to the freedom of the slaves. The Emancipation Proclamation was one of the most important documents in our nation's history even with some of it's hidden agendas.
Please, no more spotlighting of G.W.Bush.
 
When I made my pick of Alexander in R1 I was choosing between 4 people.

Alexander

Genghis Khan

Charles Darwin

The above 2 I’d put in a different categories to what they’ve been drafted under, but that’s another story.

My other choice is still here and I’m going to take it.

Tremendous value at this point and a phenomenon the likes of which we’ll probably never see again.

Their impact is still enormous now and will be in future.

They were the first singer/songwriters to go mega huge.

Each new release was a major event and they were Biiiiiig all over the world.

2:08 – The Beatles

Musicians/Performers

The Beatles were a rock and pop band from Liverpool, England that formed in 1960. During their career, the group primarily consisted of **** ******(rhythm guitar, vocals), **** *********(bass guitar, vocals), ****** ******** (lead guitar, vocals) and ***** ***** (drums, vocals). Although their initial musical style was rooted in 1950s rock and roll and skiffle, the group worked with different musical genres, ranging from Tin Pan Alley to psychedelic rock. Their clothes, style and statements made them trend-setters, while their growing social awareness saw their influence extend into the social and cultural revolutions of the 1960s. After the band broke up in 1970, all four members embarked upon successful solo careers.

The Beatles are one of the most commercially successful and critically acclaimed bands in the history of popular music, selling over one billion records internationally.[1] In the United Kingdom, The Beatles released more than 40 different singles, albums, and EPs that reached number one, earning more number one albums (15) than any other group in UK chart history. This commercial success was repeated in many other countries; their record company, EMI, estimated that by 1985 they had sold over one billion records worldwide.[2] According to the Recording Industry Association of America, The Beatles have sold more albums in the United States than any other band.[3] In 2004, Rolling Stone magazine ranked The Beatles number one on its list of 100 Greatest Artists of All Time.[4] According to that same magazine, The Beatles' innovative music and cultural impact helped define the 1960s, and their influence on pop culture is still evident today. In 2008, Billboard magazine released a list of top-selling Hot 100 artists to celebrate the chart's fiftieth anniversary; The Beatles topped it.[5]
 
2.9 -- Mother Teresa, Humanitarian.

By topic definition (Humanitarian/Saint/Martyr), this pick should be tops. Noble Peace Prize for humanitarian work, who was beatified by Pope John Paul II and given the title Blessed Teresa of Calcutta.

link

By the 1970s she was internationally famed as a humanitarian and advocate for the poor and helpless.

She won the Nobel Peace Prize in 1979.

Following her death she was beatified by Pope John Paul II and given the title Blessed Teresa of Calcutta.

Mother Teresa's Missionaries of Charity at the time of her death was operating 610 missions in 123 countries, including hospices and homes for people with HIV/AIDS, leprosy and tuberculosis, soup kitchens, children's and family counseling programs, orphanages, and schools.

Bonus pic

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Couple of solid picks there. I'm curious to see how the judging plays out in the "performers" category, The Beatles were certainly high on my list. Mother Teresa is definitely the most renowned humanitarian of the last century.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Revisiting the inventors debate – what make the best inventor? Everyone jumped on board with Gutenberg as the number 1 inventor. But really? The man invented one thing. Granted, it is likely the most influential invention in history after the wheel and written language, but is Gutenberg a great inventor? Compare him to the man everyone said was a “major reach,” Tesla. Tesla invented (1) a whole lot more things, (2) things that are much more complicated and (3) things that have a huge impact on the world today and have for over 100 years.

My point is that Tesla’s ability to invent useful, groundbreaking things dwarfs Gutenberg’s (at least by our knowledge of what thing Gutenberg invented). It just so happens that Gutenberg’s one invention was huge. If one huge invention makes you #1 in the category, then there’s a clear-cut #2. If you are looking at the inventor’s full body of work, then #1 gets awfully fuzzy and Tesla’s much more in the mix.

Everyone on this message board has used the results of Gutenberg’s printing press our whole lives. Of course, everyone on this message board has used the results of Tesla’s coil our whole lives, and his AC inventions, and his microwave inventions, and his vacuum tubes, and his florescent lights, and his radar, etc.

Just a thought.

 
Couple of solid picks there. I'm curious to see how the judging plays out in the "performers" category, The Beatles were certainly high on my list. Mother Teresa is definitely the most renown humanitarian of the last century.
Christopher Hitchens might disagree with you.During the deliberations over the Second Vatican Council, MT was to the fore in opposing all suggestions of reform. What was needed, she maintained, was more work and more faith, not doctrinal revision. Her position was ultra-reactionary and fundamentalist even in orthodox Catholic terms. Believers are indeed enjoined to abhor and eschew abortion, but they are not required to affirm that abortion is "the greatest destroyer of peace," as MT fantastically asserted to a dumbfounded audience when receiving the Nobel Peace Prize*. Believers are likewise enjoined to abhor and eschew divorce, but they are not required to insist that a ban on divorce and remarriage be a part of the state constitution, as MT demanded in a referendum in Ireland (which her side narrowly lost) in 1996. Later in that same year, she told Ladies Home Journal that she was pleased by the divorce of her friend XXXX, because the marriage had so obviously been an unhappy one …

This returns us to the medieval corruption of the church, which sold indulgences to the rich while preaching hellfire and continence to the poor. MT was not a friend of the poor. She was a friend of poverty. She said that suffering was a gift from God. She spent her life opposing the only known cure for poverty, which is the empowerment of women and the emancipation of them from a livestock version of compulsory reproduction. And she was a friend to the worst of the rich, taking misappropriated money from the atrocious XXXX family in XXX (whose rule she praised in return). Where did that money, and all the other donations, go? The primitive hospice in Calcutta was as run down when she died as it always had been—she preferred California clinics when she got sick herself—and her order always refused to publish any audit. But we have her own claim that she opened 500 convents in more than a hundred countries, all bearing the name of her own order. Excuse me, but this is modesty and humility?

The rich world has a poor conscience, and many people liked to alleviate their own unease by sending money to a woman who seemed like an activist for "the poorest of the poor." People do not like to admit that they have been gulled or conned, so a vested interest in the myth was permitted to arise, and a lazy media never bothered to ask any follow-up questions. Many volunteers who went to Calcutta came back abruptly disillusioned by the stern ideology and poverty-loving practice of the "Missionaries of Charity," but they had no audience for their story. XXXX admonition in his essay on Gandhi—that saints should always be presumed guilty until proved innocent—was drowned in a Niagara of soft-hearted, soft-headed, and uninquiring propaganda.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
When I made my pick of Alexander in R1 I was choosing between 4 people.

Alexander

Genghis Khan

Charles Darwin

The above 2 I’d put in a different categories to what they’ve been drafted under, but that’s another story.

My other choice is still here and I’m going to take it.

Tremendous value at this point and a phenomenon the likes of which we’ll probably never see again.

Their impact is still enormous now and will be in future.

They were the first singer/songwriters to go mega huge.

Each new release was a major event and they were Biiiiiig all over the world.

2:08 – The Beatles

Musicians/Performers

The Beatles were a rock and pop band from Liverpool, England that formed in 1960. During their career, the group primarily consisted of **** ******(rhythm guitar, vocals), **** *********(bass guitar, vocals), ****** ******** (lead guitar, vocals) and ***** ***** (drums, vocals). Although their initial musical style was rooted in 1950s rock and roll and skiffle, the group worked with different musical genres, ranging from Tin Pan Alley to psychedelic rock. Their clothes, style and statements made them trend-setters, while their growing social awareness saw their influence extend into the social and cultural revolutions of the 1960s. After the band broke up in 1970, all four members embarked upon successful solo careers.

The Beatles are one of the most commercially successful and critically acclaimed bands in the history of popular music, selling over one billion records internationally.[1] In the United Kingdom, The Beatles released more than 40 different singles, albums, and EPs that reached number one, earning more number one albums (15) than any other group in UK chart history. This commercial success was repeated in many other countries; their record company, EMI, estimated that by 1985 they had sold over one billion records worldwide.[2] According to the Recording Industry Association of America, The Beatles have sold more albums in the United States than any other band.[3] In 2004, Rolling Stone magazine ranked The Beatles number one on its list of 100 Greatest Artists of All Time.[4] According to that same magazine, The Beatles' innovative music and cultural impact helped define the 1960s, and their influence on pop culture is still evident today. In 2008, Billboard magazine released a list of top-selling Hot 100 artists to celebrate the chart's fiftieth anniversary; The Beatles topped it.[5]
:lmao: ETA: I don't think you have to redact their individual names since they have now been drafted.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Revisiting the inventors debate – what make the best inventor? Everyone jumped on board with Gutenberg as the number 1 inventor. But really? The man invented one thing. Granted, it is likely the most influential invention in history after the wheel and written language, but is Gutenberg a great inventor? Compare him to the man everyone said was a “major reach,” Tesla. Tesla invented (1) a whole lot more things, (2) things that are much more complicated and (3) things that have a huge impact on the world today and have for over 100 years.

My point is that Tesla’s ability to invent useful, groundbreaking things dwarfs Gutenberg’s (at least by our knowledge of what thing Gutenberg invented). It just so happens that Gutenberg’s one invention was huge. If one huge invention makes you #1 in the category, then there’s a clear-cut #2. If you are looking at the inventor’s full body of work, then #1 gets awfully fuzzy and Tesla’s much more in the mix.

Everyone on this message board has used the results of Gutenberg’s printing press our whole lives. Of course, everyone on this message board has used the results of Tesla’s coil our whole lives, and his AC inventions, and his microwave inventions, and his vacuum tubes, and his florescent lights, and his radar, etc.

Just a thought.
And a VERY good thought at that......
 
Revisiting the inventors debate – what make the best inventor? Everyone jumped on board with Gutenberg as the number 1 inventor. But really? The man invented one thing. Granted, it is likely the most influential invention in history after the wheel and written language, but is Gutenberg a great inventor? Compare him to the man everyone said was a “major reach,” Tesla. Tesla invented (1) a whole lot more things, (2) things that are much more complicated and (3) things that have a huge impact on the world today and have for over 100 years.

My point is that Tesla’s ability to invent useful, groundbreaking things dwarfs Gutenberg’s (at least by our knowledge of what thing Gutenberg invented). It just so happens that Gutenberg’s one invention was huge. If one huge invention makes you #1 in the category, then there’s a clear-cut #2. If you are looking at the inventor’s full body of work, then #1 gets awfully fuzzy and Tesla’s much more in the mix.

Everyone on this message board has used the results of Gutenberg’s printing press our whole lives. Of course, everyone on this message board has used the results of Tesla’s coil our whole lives, and his AC inventions, and his microwave inventions, and his vacuum tubes, and his florescent lights, and his radar, etc.

Just a thought.
I think #1 is the guy who invented beer pong.
 
Couple of solid picks there. I'm curious to see how the judging plays out in the "performers" category, The Beatles were certainly high on my list. Mother Teresa is definitely the most renowned humanitarian of the last century.
Perhaps not quite. But I don't want to spotlight.
 
2.07 - Abraham Lincoln - Leader

Too tired to write, will post more in the morning.
C'mon guys, Lincoln is a MUCH worse pick than Tesla..... throw some abuse this guys way.
Tesla wasn't a bad pick. But if you think that this pick was bad, please let us know why. I know of a few reasons why, but I still think that his positives outweigh his negatives.
No, I don't think it's bad, I just want someone else to take some abuse.
 
When I made my pick of Alexander in R1 I was choosing between 4 people.

Alexander

Genghis Khan

Charles Darwin

The above 2 I’d put in a different categories to what they’ve been drafted under, but that’s another story.

My other choice is still here and I’m going to take it.

Tremendous value at this point and a phenomenon the likes of which we’ll probably never see again.

Their impact is still enormous now and will be in future.

They were the first singer/songwriters to go mega huge.

Each new release was a major event and they were Biiiiiig all over the world.

2:08 – The Beatles

Musicians/Performers

The Beatles were a rock and pop band from Liverpool, England that formed in 1960. During their career, the group primarily consisted of **** ******(rhythm guitar, vocals), **** *********(bass guitar, vocals), ****** ******** (lead guitar, vocals) and ***** ***** (drums, vocals). Although their initial musical style was rooted in 1950s rock and roll and skiffle, the group worked with different musical genres, ranging from Tin Pan Alley to psychedelic rock. Their clothes, style and statements made them trend-setters, while their growing social awareness saw their influence extend into the social and cultural revolutions of the 1960s. After the band broke up in 1970, all four members embarked upon successful solo careers.

The Beatles are one of the most commercially successful and critically acclaimed bands in the history of popular music, selling over one billion records internationally.[1] In the United Kingdom, The Beatles released more than 40 different singles, albums, and EPs that reached number one, earning more number one albums (15) than any other group in UK chart history. This commercial success was repeated in many other countries; their record company, EMI, estimated that by 1985 they had sold over one billion records worldwide.[2] According to the Recording Industry Association of America, The Beatles have sold more albums in the United States than any other band.[3] In 2004, Rolling Stone magazine ranked The Beatles number one on its list of 100 Greatest Artists of All Time.[4] According to that same magazine, The Beatles' innovative music and cultural impact helped define the 1960s, and their influence on pop culture is still evident today. In 2008, Billboard magazine released a list of top-selling Hot 100 artists to celebrate the chart's fiftieth anniversary; The Beatles topped it.[5]
Can we still take individual Beatles?
 
2.07 - Abraham Lincoln - Leader

Too tired to write, will post more in the morning.
C'mon guys, Lincoln is a MUCH worse pick than Tesla..... throw some abuse this guys way.
Tesla wasn't a bad pick. But if you think that this pick was bad, please let us know why. I know of a few reasons why, but I still think that his positives outweigh his negatives.
I don't think it's a bad pick, but I'm having trouble personally weighing the US Presidents against other historical leaders. Typically they have a much shorter span of influence, and, as I mentioned before, had less direct authority over the events happening during their time. Whoever the judge is for that category is going to have to weigh all that out, which is going to be a tough job.
 
2.07 - Abraham Lincoln - Leader

Too tired to write, will post more in the morning.
C'mon guys, Lincoln is a MUCH worse pick than Tesla..... throw some abuse this guys way.
Tesla wasn't a bad pick. But if you think that this pick was bad, please let us know why. I know of a few reasons why, but I still think that his positives outweigh his negatives.
I don't think it's a bad pick, but I'm having trouble personally weighing the US Presidents against other historical leaders. Typically they have a much shorter span of influence, and, as I mentioned before, had less direct authority over the events happening during their time. Whoever the judge is for that category is going to have to weigh all that out, which is going to be a tough job.
Good point about being limited to a short span of time in which to lead the country. I just feel that the liberation of slaves was an instrumental part in his success.
 
2.07 - Abraham Lincoln - Leader

Too tired to write, will post more in the morning.
C'mon guys, Lincoln is a MUCH worse pick than Tesla..... throw some abuse this guys way.
Tesla wasn't a bad pick. But if you think that this pick was bad, please let us know why. I know of a few reasons why, but I still think that his positives outweigh his negatives.
I'm as big of a Lincoln fan as anyone, but in the 2nd round of a world draft, you have a LOT of people on the board who were more powerful/important/influential for a lot longer period of time than Lincoln.
 
When I made my pick of Alexander in R1 I was choosing between 4 people.

Alexander

Genghis Khan

Charles Darwin

The above 2 I’d put in a different categories to what they’ve been drafted under, but that’s another story.

My other choice is still here and I’m going to take it.

Tremendous value at this point and a phenomenon the likes of which we’ll probably never see again.

Their impact is still enormous now and will be in future.

They were the first singer/songwriters to go mega huge.

Each new release was a major event and they were Biiiiiig all over the world.

2:08 – The Beatles

Musicians/Performers

The Beatles were a rock and pop band from Liverpool, England that formed in 1960. During their career, the group primarily consisted of **** ******(rhythm guitar, vocals), **** *********(bass guitar, vocals), ****** ******** (lead guitar, vocals) and ***** ***** (drums, vocals). Although their initial musical style was rooted in 1950s rock and roll and skiffle, the group worked with different musical genres, ranging from Tin Pan Alley to psychedelic rock. Their clothes, style and statements made them trend-setters, while their growing social awareness saw their influence extend into the social and cultural revolutions of the 1960s. After the band broke up in 1970, all four members embarked upon successful solo careers.

The Beatles are one of the most commercially successful and critically acclaimed bands in the history of popular music, selling over one billion records internationally.[1] In the United Kingdom, The Beatles released more than 40 different singles, albums, and EPs that reached number one, earning more number one albums (15) than any other group in UK chart history. This commercial success was repeated in many other countries; their record company, EMI, estimated that by 1985 they had sold over one billion records worldwide.[2] According to the Recording Industry Association of America, The Beatles have sold more albums in the United States than any other band.[3] In 2004, Rolling Stone magazine ranked The Beatles number one on its list of 100 Greatest Artists of All Time.[4] According to that same magazine, The Beatles' innovative music and cultural impact helped define the 1960s, and their influence on pop culture is still evident today. In 2008, Billboard magazine released a list of top-selling Hot 100 artists to celebrate the chart's fiftieth anniversary; The Beatles topped it.[5]
Can we still take individual Beatles?
I would think not, I mean if Larry slots Jesus Christ as his religous, I can't take him later as my leader. Tim?
 
Btw: are these eventually going to be voted on by the FFA or merely the selected judges? I know that in the GA draft, the judges' results will dictate seeding, with the FFA finally weighing in to determine winners -- is this also going to be the case with this draft, or are the judges' results final?

 
2:08 – The Beatles
I wonder if this is the "sure category #1" krista was thinking about?
She said earlier it was Guttenberg.Recalling all the catcalls and guffaws when thatguy took Elvis in the 1st round of the G.A.D., all I can say is nice pick.
At the time I didn't realize there was a "group" exception for musicians. If I had, might have thought of them as a clear #1, too. Even if not, no way to argue with this great pick.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top