Steel Mike Tomczak
Footballguy
Instead of worst Lose Lose trade, how about worst one-sided trade.
Atl. Farve to GB
Stl. Bettis to Pitt
TB. Young to SF
Atl. Farve to GB
Stl. Bettis to Pitt
TB. Young to SF

That's got to be the one. But don't forget about the Ricky Williams trade.Dallas/Minny for Hershel
That came to mind as well. Those two are tops in my book.That's got to be the one. But don't forget about the Ricky Williams trade.Dallas/Minny for Hershel
Obviously the players in these trades were good...but what was the compensation for the teams trading the players? I'm curious what Bettis was traded for in particular since he was an established player at the time of the trade.Instead of worst Lose Lose trade, how about worst one-sided trade.Atl. Farve to GBStl. Bettis to PittTB. Young to SF![]()
I once read some article, about what Jimmy Johnson turned their end of the deal into, and it was unreal. It was very complicated, but some of the picks he turned into more picks, by trading down, etc., and they had some great drafts.He essentially turned Herschel into a dynasty.This is the only choice.Dallas/Minny for Hershel
Agreed.I once read some article, about what Jimmy Johnson turned their end of the deal into, and it was unreal. It was very complicated, but some of the picks he turned into more picks, by trading down, etc., and they had some great drafts.He essentially turned Herschel into a dynasty.This is the only choice.Dallas/Minny for Hershel
The Cowboys got draft picks that turned into Emmitt Smith, Darren Woodson, and (via more trading) Russell Maryland. Those guys were pretty darned good, but I don't think they got anyone else of note. So while the trade was lopsided, I don't think it was any worse than the Colts-Broncos trade in 1983 (Mark Hermann, Chris Hinton, and Ron Solt for John Elway).The Chargers had a doozy when they traded Jim Lachey for John Clay and Napoleon McCallum.I once read some article, about what Jimmy Johnson turned their end of the deal into, and it was unreal. It was very complicated, but some of the picks he turned into more picks, by trading down, etc., and they had some great drafts.He essentially turned Herschel into a dynasty.This is the only choice.Dallas/Minny for Hershel
Wow...So the Bills turned OJ Simpson into Jim Kelly...hmm...Bad Trade for the Bills:Buffalo trading their #1 draft pick to Jacksonville for Rob Johnson.The #1 pick turned out to be Fred Taylor.Good Trade for the Bills:5 draft picks from the 49ers for O.J. Simpson. One of those players drafted turned out to be Tom Cousineau, who refused to play for the Bills. His rights were traded to the Browns for a #1 pick, and that #1 pick turned out to be Jim Kelly.(Not to mention that the Bills also ended up with Joe Cribbs out of that deal)
![]()
Maybe, but right now it has to be New orleans giving up an entire draft for Ricky Williams.One day, you will be able to add Manning for Rivers, Merriman, Kaeding, and Oben.
Who was drafted with those picks though?Maybe, but right now it has to be New orleans giving up an entire draft for Ricky Williams.One day, you will be able to add Manning for Rivers, Merriman, Kaeding, and Oben.
Then SD got Brees in the second.what about the SD and ATL trade of 1st round picksATL traded Vick #1 overall and SD draft LT am I remembering this correctly
Which one?Ditka? or to the Fins?But don't forget about the Ricky Williams trade.
The Dolphins basically traded Reggie Brown to the Eagles for nothing.Eagles trade AJ to miami...Philly couldnt look better in that.
One day, you will be able to add Manning for Rivers, Merriman, Kaeding, and Oben.
Atlanta also gave up a 3rd... I think the Chargers picked up Reche Caldwell with that pick. Not drafting Vick allowed them to take Brees with their own 2nd rounder.As long as we are discussing the Chargers and draft trades concerning QBs, how about giving up a 1st in the subsequent year, a 3rd, and two starters just to move up one spot and draft Ryan Leaf? That's a pretty bad deal.what about the SD and ATL trade of 1st round picksATL traded Vick #1 overall and SD draft LTam I remembering this correctly
I think today is a good day to add it. IT's pretty lopsided. I love seeing arrogant punks like Ellie flop. He hasn't been a bust at this point, but he's sure been a Value Added Trade for the Chargers. IIRC, the Pats traded away Bledsoe (who was then a backup)for a #1 that later became Vince Wilfork. Nice lopsided thade there. But, I have to agree. The Cowboys dynasty was built on the Herschel trade and the genius of Jimmy Johnson, who I consider to be one of the great pro development/eyes. He had the 'phins on the upswing, but turned it over to Wanstedt for easy street. Conversely, we have Ditka, who I don't think could find his #### if searching with both hands. He may be tough, and he may have played great, but I honestly don't think the guy is lost in discussing the finer points of the game developing. His title was the genius of Buddy Ryan and the convergence of talent around him. IE, the right place at the right time. But mostly, it was Buddy Ryan and the new 46 that nobody had figured out yet. Yes, he let him run it, but that's it. I just have to say the Herschel trade, and the eventual outcome of what they generated with it, the award has to go to the 'Boys. But, it transcends to hockey. The Peter Lindros trade to the Nordiques/Avalanche. The 'Diques trade Lindros for Peter Forsberg, Ron Hextall, Mike Ricci, Chris Simon, Kerry Huffman, two first round draft picks in 1993 (Jocelyn Thibault) & 1994 that they traded away before using and $15 million cash. After moving to Colorado, the Avs package Thibault w/ Martin Rucinsky and Andrei Kovalenko for a slight upgrade to Patrick Roy and Mike Keane. They went on to 8 division titles and 2 Stanley Cups,. Not football, but still a hugely lopsided trade that built a dynasty of sorts with that trade.One day, you will be able to add Manning for Rivers, Merriman, Kaeding, and Oben.
I think one could call that a bad deal. But to be fair, he looked great. He was just a head case. If we don't have the Ryan Leaf debacle, I think Roethlisberger gets drafted much higher 3 years ago. Just my opinion, but I think he hurt Big Ben, even though Roethlisberger was far more established. I bought into the Leaf hype.One day, you will be able to add Manning for Rivers, Merriman, Kaeding, and Oben.Atlanta also gave up a 3rd... I think the Chargers picked up Reche Caldwell with that pick. Not drafting Vick allowed them to take Brees with their own 2nd rounder.As long as we are discussing the Chargers and draft trades concerning QBs, how about giving up a 1st in the subsequent year, a 3rd, and two starters just to move up one spot and draft Ryan Leaf? That's a pretty bad deal.what about the SD and ATL trade of 1st round picksATL traded Vick #1 overall and SD draft LTam I remembering this correctly
Don't forget, they also gave up a 1st and 3rd the following year.Maybe, but right now it has to be New orleans giving up an entire draft for Ricky Williams.One day, you will be able to add Manning for Rivers, Merriman, Kaeding, and Oben.
Anybody know who the actual players were that Miami selected?Don't forget, they also gave up a 1st and 3rd the following year.Maybe, but right now it has to be New orleans giving up an entire draft for Ricky Williams.One day, you will be able to add Manning for Rivers, Merriman, Kaeding, and Oben.![]()
Shut up.While this isn't at the same level as the Walker or Williams trades it's worth mentioning. Indy traded Faulk to STL. Faulk did ok for the Rams.![]()
I don't think it's fair to spell out whom each pick became. Excellent drafting from the Chargers no doubt but you could pick a real large number of teams similar round picks and not come away with anywhere near that level of success. A 1st for 1st,2nd,3rd etc is a much more fair way of looking at it IMO.Also, in time I think Brees will be though of as having stopped off/played briefly etc at San Diego. Right now it's the majority of his career but in time he'll become more like a guy that kept the seat warm for Rivers.I have no problem with a team giving up ALOT for a franchise QB or RB. I think the Saints went way overboard but giving up alot for Ricky (back then) was reasonable. Eli, maybe a pick or two too much but giving up alot for a franchise QB isn't crazy at all.Older Charger fans surely remember the gap between top QB Fouts and top QB Brees/Rivers. Look at Minnesota or Miami or Cleveland and the number of starters they've had. I'd bet Fins fans would give up alot for a great college QB if it means they won't be reminded that it's been a long time since Marino. It's VERY hard to land that franchise QB.Too much given up but alot for a franchise QB or RB isn't crazy at all IMOMaybe, but right now it has to be New orleans giving up an entire draft for Ricky Williams.One day, you will be able to add Manning for Rivers, Merriman, Kaeding, and Oben.
I understand what you are saying but you are off topic. This isn't the "Worst Reasoning in a Trade Ever" Thread. Reasoning is not relevant here. Its How the trade panned out and who Ultimately stood to gain one sidedly. In other words....Its what actually happened as a result of the trade, not what was thought to happen.I don't think it's fair to spell out whom each pick became. Excellent drafting from the Chargers no doubt but you could pick a real large number of teams similar round picks and not come away with anywhere near that level of success. A 1st for 1st,2nd,3rd etc is a much more fair way of looking at it IMO.Also, in time I think Brees will be though of as having stopped off/played briefly etc at San Diego. Right now it's the majority of his career but in time he'll become more like a guy that kept the seat warm for Rivers.I have no problem with a team giving up ALOT for a franchise QB or RB. I think the Saints went way overboard but giving up alot for Ricky (back then) was reasonable. Eli, maybe a pick or two too much but giving up alot for a franchise QB isn't crazy at all.Older Charger fans surely remember the gap between top QB Fouts and top QB Brees/Rivers. Look at Minnesota or Miami or Cleveland and the number of starters they've had. I'd bet Fins fans would give up alot for a great college QB if it means they won't be reminded that it's been a long time since Marino. It's VERY hard to land that franchise QB.Too much given up but alot for a franchise QB or RB isn't crazy at all IMOMaybe, but right now it has to be New orleans giving up an entire draft for Ricky Williams.One day, you will be able to add Manning for Rivers, Merriman, Kaeding, and Oben.
:whoosh:I understand what you are saying but you are off topic. This isn't the "Worst Reasoning in a Trade Ever" Thread. Reasoning is not relevant here. Its How the trade panned out and who Ultimately stood to gain one sidedly. In other words....Its what actually happened as a result of the trade, not what was thought to happen.I don't think it's fair to spell out whom each pick became. Excellent drafting from the Chargers no doubt but you could pick a real large number of teams similar round picks and not come away with anywhere near that level of success. A 1st for 1st,2nd,3rd etc is a much more fair way of looking at it IMO.Also, in time I think Brees will be though of as having stopped off/played briefly etc at San Diego. Right now it's the majority of his career but in time he'll become more like a guy that kept the seat warm for Rivers.I have no problem with a team giving up ALOT for a franchise QB or RB. I think the Saints went way overboard but giving up alot for Ricky (back then) was reasonable. Eli, maybe a pick or two too much but giving up alot for a franchise QB isn't crazy at all.Older Charger fans surely remember the gap between top QB Fouts and top QB Brees/Rivers. Look at Minnesota or Miami or Cleveland and the number of starters they've had. I'd bet Fins fans would give up alot for a great college QB if it means they won't be reminded that it's been a long time since Marino. It's VERY hard to land that franchise QB.Too much given up but alot for a franchise QB or RB isn't crazy at all IMOMaybe, but right now it has to be New orleans giving up an entire draft for Ricky Williams.One day, you will be able to add Manning for Rivers, Merriman, Kaeding, and Oben.![]()
I agree. The Patriots probably would have won a few Super Bowls over the last decade if he was still there.IIRC The Pats gave up a HOF RB Curtis Martin for a 1st and 3rd (Robert Edwards and ??) that's pretty brutal IMO. Ya can't predict injuries but that was pretty rough
Sarcasm, I suppose you could say the losing is what brought BB there, that's a fair pointI agree. The Patriots probably would have won a few Super Bowls over the last decade if he was still there.IIRC The Pats gave up a HOF RB Curtis Martin for a 1st and 3rd (Robert Edwards and ??) that's pretty brutal IMO. Ya can't predict injuries but that was pretty rough
not sure if you are being rhetorical, but here it is:http://www.drafthistory.com/articles/article23.htmlSabertooth said:Who was drafted with those picks though?renesauz said:Maybe, but right now it has to be New orleans giving up an entire draft for Ricky Williams.moleculo said:One day, you will be able to add Manning for Rivers, Merriman, Kaeding, and Oben.
That wasn't even the most one-sided trade made by Miami during that timeframe. They sent a 2nd rounder to St. Louis for Lamar Freaking Gordon, who had 35 carries for 64 yards (ONE POINT EIGHT YPC) and was cut after the season.Eagles trade AJ to miami...Philly couldnt look better in that.
ESPN had a show devoted to worst draft trades. I didn't see all of it so don't know who they had at #1, but I think Seattle deserves an honorable mention. They traded away to Dallas the pick used to take Tony Dorsett, and then from the package of picks they got for that trade away to the 49ers the pick used to take Joe Montana.The Cowboys got draft picks that turned into Emmitt Smith, Darren Woodson, and (via more trading) Russell Maryland. Those guys were pretty darned good, but I don't think they got anyone else of note. So while the trade was lopsided, I don't think it was any worse than the Colts-Broncos trade in 1983 (Mark Hermann, Chris Hinton, and Ron Solt for John Elway).The Chargers had a doozy when they traded Jim Lachey for John Clay and Napoleon McCallum.I once read some article, about what Jimmy Johnson turned their end of the deal into, and it was unreal. It was very complicated, but some of the picks he turned into more picks, by trading down, etc., and they had some great drafts.He essentially turned Herschel into a dynasty.This is the only choice.Dallas/Minny for Hershel
Yeah, but at least they got a packageof picks for Dorsett, who I think was unwilling to play in Seattle.Of course the other (eventually) big deal they made was pretty good - a 1977 8th round pick to acquire Steve Largent from the Oilers.ESPN had a show devoted to worst draft trades. I didn't see all of it so don't know who they had at #1, but I think Seattle deserves an honorable mention. They traded away to Dallas the pick used to take Tony Dorsett, and then from the package of picks they got for that trade away to the 49ers the pick used to take Joe Montana.The Cowboys got draft picks that turned into Emmitt Smith, Darren Woodson, and (via more trading) Russell Maryland. Those guys were pretty darned good, but I don't think they got anyone else of note. So while the trade was lopsided, I don't think it was any worse than the Colts-Broncos trade in 1983 (Mark Hermann, Chris Hinton, and Ron Solt for John Elway).The Chargers had a doozy when they traded Jim Lachey for John Clay and Napoleon McCallum.I once read some article, about what Jimmy Johnson turned their end of the deal into, and it was unreal. It was very complicated, but some of the picks he turned into more picks, by trading down, etc., and they had some great drafts.He essentially turned Herschel into a dynasty.This is the only choice.Dallas/Minny for Hershel
How about this: the Giants drafted a franchise QB, but liked another frianchise QB better. So, to get other franchise QB, they traded their franchise QB + a future first round + two additional thirds. It cost the Giants a first round plus two third round picks to have a different franchise QB - not necessarily a better QB, just a different QB.I don't think it's fair to spell out whom each pick became. Excellent drafting from the Chargers no doubt but you could pick a real large number of teams similar round picks and not come away with anywhere near that level of success. A 1st for 1st,2nd,3rd etc is a much more fair way of looking at it IMO.Maybe, but right now it has to be New orleans giving up an entire draft for Ricky Williams.One day, you will be able to add Manning for Rivers, Merriman, Kaeding, and Oben.
It was a 3rd rounder for Gordon. Besides that and the Feely debacle, Waanstedt/Spielman also traded away two 1st round picks for Ricky Williams (getting one good year in return plus a lot of bong-related problems), Adewele Ogunyele and a 3rd round pick for Marty Booker, and Jamar Fletcher and a 6th round pick for David Boston.That wasn't even the most one-sided trade made by Miami during that timeframe. They sent a 2nd rounder to St. Louis for Lamar Freaking Gordon, who had 35 carries for 64 yards (ONE POINT EIGHT YPC) and was cut after the season.Eagles trade AJ to miami...Philly couldnt look better in that.
That wasn't the deal. The Jets moved down about a dozen picks, getting a high second, and another later pick.Doug Jolley for a 1st is bad.
you snip the part where I said they gave up too much then reply that they gave up too much?How about this: the Giants drafted a franchise QB, but liked another frianchise QB better. So, to get other franchise QB, they traded their franchise QB + a future first round + two additional thirds. It cost the Giants a first round plus two third round picks to have a different franchise QB - not necessarily a better QB, just a different QB.I don't think it's fair to spell out whom each pick became. Excellent drafting from the Chargers no doubt but you could pick a real large number of teams similar round picks and not come away with anywhere near that level of success. A 1st for 1st,2nd,3rd etc is a much more fair way of looking at it IMO.Maybe, but right now it has to be New orleans giving up an entire draft for Ricky Williams.One day, you will be able to add Manning for Rivers, Merriman, Kaeding, and Oben.
This wins hands down!!!!Dallas/Minny for Hershel
http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=2042767Oakland gets the 26th overall selection, moving back into the first round after trading the seventh overall pick to Minnesota for Randy Moss in March.That wasn't the deal. The Jets moved down about a dozen picks, getting a high second, and another later pick.Doug Jolley for a 1st is bad.