Watson is a good QB and Cooks a great receiver. When they single covered him, Watson found him.Anyone who watched game and/or has followed the Texans: did today seem the product of a change in approach or more flukish? I know it’s probably too early to tell...
Also had him on the bench but did not cut him. So we always have that going for us.Didn't put him in the lineup this week (he'll be in as my conditional flex if the Bills-Titans game ends up getting cancelled) but still very happy to see this. Obviously 25 points aint gonna happen every week but I'd be very surprised if he's not a top 30 guy the rest of the way. (barring injury).
He's talented, in his prime (feels like he's older because of how many teams he's been on) and Watson is obviously good.
Glad I kept the faith.
This talked me into running him out there this week with Adams and Golliday on byes.With BOB it wouldn't surprise me if the guy was frozen out for some reason and he just wasn't getting plays called for him or high in the read progressions. I'm in buy low mode.
Dad, is that you?brun said:Son is beside himself after dropping him this week.
Debating...I need to choose 3 of the 4: Claypool, Boyd, Gallup and Cooks....currently leaning on leaving him on the bench as he has been known to be inconsistent throughout his career. Still debating and hopefully someone can make a compelling argument as to why to start to himAre people trusting Cooks this week after last week’s breakout performance??
I’m debating between Gallup & Cooks...I’m trying to talk myself into thinking that the Red Rifle might look Gallup’s way more than Dak did.Debating...I need to choose 3 of the 4: Claypool, Boyd, Gallup and Cooks....currently leaning on leaving him on the bench as he has been known to be inconsistent throughout his career. Still debating and hopefully someone can make a compelling argument as to why to start to him
Similar. Opted for Claypool over Cooks in wr2. I need to see this as an actual shift in scheme to focus on him in passing game before I trot him out again.Debating...I need to choose 3 of the 4: Claypool, Boyd, Gallup and Cooks....currently leaning on leaving him on the bench as he has been known to be inconsistent throughout his career. Still debating and hopefully someone can make a compelling argument as to why to start to him
Kind of where I am at too.....but always second guessing HA HASimilar. Opted for Claypool over Cooks in wr2. I need to see this as an actual shift in scheme to focus on him in passing game before I trot him out again.
I'd play him over Gallup though. They could be running a lot more now, at least out of gate.Kind of where I am at too.....but always second guessing HA HA
Brandin Cooks caught 9-of-9 targets for 68 yards and a touchdown in the Texans' Week 6 loss to the Titans.
Cooks now has 17 catches for 229 yards and two touchdowns in two games since the Texans fired Bill O'Brien. The Texans' clear-cut No. 2 wideout is finally being treated like it by Deshaun Watson. Despite his deep-threat game, Cooks' score was a one-yarder on 4th-and-goal with under two minutes remaining in regulation. Cooks also received a goal-line carry he failed to convert for a touchdown. Heating up in time for bye weeks, Cooks will be an upside WR3 for next week's showdown with the Packers.
Oct 18, 2020, 6:23 PM ET
Agreed. I was kind of surprised with people ready to throw dirt on him, especially in dynasty. I got him as an afterthought throw in and think he'll be a very viable WR2 type for several more years. He's only 26!!!Looking like a solid WR3 now, with WR2/1 upside. His catch rate has been crazy good the past 2 weeks.
I think its much more likely they deal someone like Stills, or Mercilus, or a high priced LB.Rumors over the weekend that both Cooks and Fuller are on the trade block as well as a few other Texans. Worth mentioning especially since neither WR could be back with the team next year due to salary cap reasons (Fuller a FA, Cooks due a large unguaranteed salary) so it would make sense to deal them for whatever the Texans can get.
No way to know what Easterby is thinking, but if they lose to the Pack this weekend they are going to be likely 4 games back from the final playoff spot without much hope of catching up. Taking away weapons from Watson is not ideal, but with no premium draft picks next year and a horrible cap situation they will have to make some hard decisions. Fuller seems to be the most likely to go, odds of resigning him are low but likely no one will give much for a half season rental. Cooks may have more trade interest with guaranteed money not a factor and a higher return in trade but he could be retained and restructured next year.I think its much more likely they deal someone like Stills, or Mercilus, or a high priced LB.
I don't see them giving up on the season, as they are a couple bad breaks from being 4-2. They were right there with 2 undefeated teams in Pittsburgh and Tennessee. With 7 playoff teams I don't think teams will be as quick to pull the plug in their seasons.
Would be unhappy to see that (I own both) as they are both well suited by Watson's talents.Rumors over the weekend that both Cooks and Fuller are on the trade block as well as a few other Texans. Worth mentioning especially since neither WR could be back with the team next year due to salary cap reasons (Fuller a FA, Cooks due a large unguaranteed salary) so it would make sense to deal them for whatever the Texans can get.
I think the saints and pats moved him because they didn't want to pay him after his rookie contract, and they both got back what they spent. Saints because they had Thomas and didn't want to pay 2 WRs, and Pats because who knows.I'm not sure why Cooks has as many stickers on his suitcase as he does. He's been a productive player. Size maybe?
Also its tougher to trade because of COVID rules. Tougher to learn a new system, and tougher to get on the same page with teammates. Other than QB, nobody needs these things more than WR's.Would be unhappy to see that (I own both) as they are both well suited by Watson's talents.
Potential trade destinations I would be happy to see:
Fuller: Green Bay, Rams, NE (?), NO, PHI,
Cooks: BAL, CHI, DEN, DET, IND, KC, NE, PHI, SF, WASH
But I'm not sure anyone is hurting enough for starting WRs to trade away a draft pick. NE doesn't usually do that, although they are clearly weakest at the position. PHI has a need because of injuries, but do they see themselves as contenders?
No idea about the salary space on any of these teams.
Man, all those seem like big downgrades, especially considering how in season trade guys struggle. Maybe GB would be a wash after a few weeks.Would be unhappy to see that (I own both) as they are both well suited by Watson's talents.
Potential trade destinations I would be happy to see:
Fuller: Green Bay, Rams, NE (?), NO, PHI,
Cooks: BAL, CHI, DEN, DET, IND, KC, NE, PHI, SF, WASH
But I'm not sure anyone is hurting enough for starting WRs to trade away a draft pick. NE doesn't usually do that, although they are clearly weakest at the position. PHI has a need because of injuries, but do they see themselves as contenders?
No idea about the salary space on any of these teams.
Is there data around this to support it? First I've heard of it -- seems like there are a lot of guys who get traded and are instantly more productive given new roles, system, breath of fresh air, etc.Man, all those seem like big downgrades, especially considering how in season trade guys struggle. Maybe GB would be a wash after a few weeks.
I'm definitely hoping for no trade.
I have no data to support it, just going on feel. I would be happy to be proven wrong.Is there data around this to support it? First I've heard of it -- seems like there are a lot of guys who get traded and are instantly more productive given new roles, system, breath of fresh air, etc.
Fit certainly matters, but believe law of averages would show that traded guys go to teams that help their production as equally as much as to teams that hurt their prior levels.
Not a team looking for WR's, that have a better QB. If they stay put, Fuller and Cooks are both top-20 WR's going forward in my opinion.Even still, I prefer the comfort of both these guys staying in Houston.
Emmanuel Sanders last year as well.I have no data to support it, just going on feel. I would be happy to be proven wrong.
Who are some good examples of in season traded WRs that improved post trade? Now that you mention it, Amari Cooper jumps out as a plus.
Brandin Cooks caught 7-of-9 targets for 60 yards in Houston's Week 7 loss to the Packers.
It was Cook's third consecutive game with at least nine targets as he finished with one fewer than Randall Cobb (10) for the team lead Sunday. Cooks has been the clear focal point for Romeo Crennel and OC Tim Kelly, seeing 30 concerted targets since Bill O'Brien was cut loose. The volume alone will continue to propel Cooks as a WR3 when the Texans return from the bye against the Jaguars.
- Rotoworld
RISER: WR BRANDIN COOKS, HOUSTON TEXANS
Unsurprisingly, going from Jared Goff to Deshaun Watson has revived Cooks’ dynasty value in just one offseason. Cooks currently leads the Texans in targets (58) and is second in air yards (646), only 51 behind Will Fuller V. While many expect Fuller to operate as the No. 1 receiver in Houston, Cooks shouldn’t be so easily written off as the top pass-catcher for Watson.
He dominated at Oregon State to the tune of 1,947 yards from scrimmage and 18 scores in his junior season. The Saints then spent first-round draft capital on him, and he broke out in his second NFL season. After his age 25 season in 2018, Cooks had 5,147 receiving yards. That total was the fifth-most in NFL history for a player before turning 26 years old. That put him between DeAndre Hopkins and Amari Cooper on that list. He was a historic player with nothing but an impeccable track record of production to his name.
Then, last year, Cooks popped up on the injury report with a concussion twice and played for a quarterback who averaged 7.7 air yards per attempt. Cooks has posted an average depth of target below 11.8 yards since his rookie season.
He’s now healthy and playing for a quarterback who can properly utilize his skill set. Having just turned 27, Cooks easily projects to post multiple WR2 seasons in the coming years as long as Houston holds on to him. Despite recouping some of his lost value through half a season with Houston, he remains underpriced in dynasty leagues.
Brandin Cooks caught 6-of-8 targets for 39 yards in the Texans' Week 10 loss to the Browns.
The passing game wasn't it for the Texans today, as it was not an effective means of moving the ball in windy Cleveland. Cooks' 39 yards were by far his fewest since Bill O'Brien's firing. Cooks has been a WR1 since BOB was sent packing, but he should settle in as a mid-range WR2 for the season's stretch run. The Patriots are an approachable Week 11 matchup.
- Rotoworld
I think this will impact Watson much more than Cooks. But, Cooks will probably become a target monster.So....do we think the Fuller suspension is good or bad for Cooks?
Probably in line for more targets but also increased attention. I'm kinda thinking slight negative.
Colts haven't been a tough defense since early in the season. That isn't a tough matchup at all. Bears could be, but could also have a bad enough offense that the short fields more than make up for it.Buckna said:He’s been WR14 in PPG since BOB was fired, seems like a big positive in terms of targets. Biggest issue is a much rougher schedule coming up with 2 games against the Colts and Chicago still has a top 10 pass defense as well. Nice week 16 matchup
The #4 pass defense in the league isn't tough?Colts haven't been a tough defense since early in the season. That isn't a tough matchup at all. Bears could be, but could also have a bad enough offense that the short fields more than make up for it.
Very skewed by the first half of the season, which also was packed with easy matchups.The #4 pass defense in the league isn't tough?
that would workHow do we feel about him with both fuller and Cobb now out? I assume stills is still out?
I think he can run most of the deeper routes that fuller does.
i actually had a dream last night that he 20 catches and 4 touchdowns.
edit: I see now that stills was released so...
Putting the fantasy in football there.i actually had a dream last night that he 20 catches and 4 touchdowns.
Yeah. Scary for him for sure. Selfish want him you score more points. But more thankful its not another concussion as you would think it would be something that could end his career.While it wasn't nice that he was 3rd in yards on the team today, I'm happy to see he didn't get a concussion on that bad head hit (they evaluated him for awhile but he came back in). That's encouraging given his history.
Brandin Cooks (foot, neck) was limited in Wednesday's practice.
Cooks was checked for a concussion in Week 13 but cleared the evaluation and returned against the Colts. He's obviously dealing with a neck issue instead but should be fine for Week 14 against the Bears.
Dec 9, 2020, 5:45 PM ET