Stop feeding the troll, Ace.
I'm not a troll for calling someone out who is completely clueless.This guy knows nothing about basketball and clearly doesn't know anything about fantasy football.I'm not a troll for calling someone out who is completely clueless.
You can't even follow a simple conversation. Nice try though.This guy knows nothing about basketball and clearly doesn't know anything about fantasy football.
Nah, you are a troll for your excessive use of the ROFL emoji and 1 sentence straw man repliesI'm not a troll for calling someone out who is completely clueless.
You should educate the squares in here if you are such an expert.I am amazed that all the skilled gamblers in here don't understand why Vegas sets their lines the way they do.
Strength of schedule falls somewhere between awesomeness of the team logo and the number of Capricorns in the defensive backfield.You should educate the squares in here if you are such an expert.
Todd FuhrmanVerified account @ToddFuhrman Aug 26And one last thing, if you don't understand how Vegas betting lines work...then it's pointless to even engage with you. They aren't "predicting" 7.5 wins, they are simply setting the line where the most betting is likely to occur on BOTH sides of the line. That's how they make money...I know it's an astronomical concept to comprehend...but try it and then come back.
Right city, wrong team and that's an easy call you have but you this is a not a WDIS forum.What do people see for Parker this week? hard to tell what to make of Rams defense and admittedly didn't watch to much pre-season for these guys. Trying to figure my flex spot between him, Hurns and Carson.
fine. is this better?Right city, wrong team and that's an easy call you have but you this is a not a WDIS forum.
I'm just interested in some info on him. That's all. Its to help in making a decision on my team...like all discussion on this board. I'm not asking who you would start over him, I'm asking for feedback on what your expectations are for him. Don't see the problem, but whatever.What do people see for Parker this week? hard to tell what to make of Chargers defense and admittedly didn't watch to much pre-season for these guys.
What a dooshbag response. Ignore the post if it upsets you so much.Right city, wrong team and that's an easy call you have but you this is a not a WDIS forum.
I corrected him on the team, told him it was an easy decision but this was the wrong forum. Between the two of us one of provided dooshbag post and it's not the guy looking at me in the mirror.What a dooshbag response. Ignore the post if it upsets you so much.
As for the question, I'd go with Parker.
Thanks! my understanding is that Parker fits the mold of the WR's that Cutler has had success with in the past. Seems like a good start.What a dooshbag response. Ignore the post if it upsets you so much.
As for the question, I'd go with Parker. Cutler and Parker seem to have a nice repoir and the way he can throw the ball, should make him their number one over Landry.
Not much on it lately but the reports all summer were solid on their rapport.Thanks! my understanding is that Parker fits the mold of the WR's that Cutler has had success with in the past. Seems like a good start.
Love him for the season, not this week.fine. is this better?
I'm just interested in some info on him. That's all. Its to help in making a decision on my team...like all discussion on this board. I'm not asking who you would start over him, I'm asking for feedback on what your expectations are for him. Don't see the problem, but whatever.
Good luck this week!
Anytime buddy. Sorry about the trolls.Thanks! my understanding is that Parker fits the mold of the WR's that Cutler has had success with in the past. Seems like a good start.
cool, thanks for the insight.Love him for the season, not this week.
Chargers CB's and defense in general is vastly underrated. They should be able to put a lot of pressure on Cutler and the Chargers CB's cover very well but what they don't do is tackle well. This to me shapes up as a better Landry game, shorter passes due to lack of time and he is strong after the catch.
Again love Parker this year, more than Landry for sure, just not as much this week.
Starting Fitz over him in one league but I'm rolling Parker in another. I'm a little worried about the match up but Parker can still break one off.Love him for the season, not this week.
Chargers CB's and defense in general is vastly underrated. They should be able to put a lot of pressure on Cutler and the Chargers CB's cover very well but what they don't do is tackle well. This to me shapes up as a better Landry game, shorter passes due to lack of time and he is strong after the catch.
Again love Parker this year, more than Landry for sure, just not as much this week.
Agree - I'm rolling with M.Bryant at my WR3 over Parker for their respective matchups.Love him for the season, not this week.
Chargers CB's and defense in general is vastly underrated. They should be able to put a lot of pressure on Cutler and the Chargers CB's cover very well but what they don't do is tackle well. This to me shapes up as a better Landry game, shorter passes due to lack of time and he is strong after the catch.
Again love Parker this year, more than Landry for sure, just not as much this week.
Bryant seems more risky.Agree - I'm rolling with M.Bryant at my WR3 over Parker for their respective matchups.
Might bite me in the A, but seems sensible.![]()
I considered that. He should face weaker coverage, and Steelers always seem to find him deep at home.Bryant seems more risky.
for him. Kinda where I'm at.i want to see him in a regular season game now that Cutler is Qb'ing before committing him to a start. there's a lot to love here but i'd rather wait a week.
Would any of you start him over Cooper?
Cooper at home against the Jets could be Top 3.Than again Cooper could be sitting on the sidelines eating hot dogs by halftime as the B and C squads play mop up.sped1103 said:Cooper at home against the Jets could be Top 3.
Are you high? You might as well cut JefferyRay Barboni said:Cooper is an easy start over Parker ..
im currently benching him for Pryor and Alshon.
the Chargers have a great pass rush, and top CB's.
Until Parker demonstrates a consistency in production, Cooper is must-start... always.Would any of you start him over Cooper?
I think Parker sees a lot of Hayward. I could be wrong.Does Verrett not practicing today and if he misses the game change anyone's mind about starting Parker?
Is that good or bad?I think Parker sees a lot of Hayward. I could be wrong.
He was graded out as PFF's #6 CB out of 119 qualifiers last year. PFF thinks he'll shadow Parker and that it's the least advantageous match-up for a WR this week.Is that good or bad?
Don't do this, Marshall is washed.Rolling Brandon Marshall over him as my WR2 (Nelson is my first)
Don't like the matchup and he burned me a few times last season.
This is the exact scenario I face and I'm leaning Parker but I'm very much undecided. After watching what Theilen did vs. NO out of the slot I really want to start Hogan. They profile super similarly.Starting him over Hogan. Hogan has a great opportunity for a high ceiling but a lot of mouths to feed even without Amendola.
Parker up against a tough D but may have a higher floor given chemistry with Cutler.
Mostly excited to see him in action when the games count.
Yeah, this is a rough one. I think this is the kind of game Parker may have a tough time against two bona fide shutdown corners in Hayward and Verrett. With Bosa providing heat up the middle, if MIA's O-line falters could make it hard on Cutler who isn't exactly grace under pressure. But I can totally see Parker blowing over the top and taking that one pass for 50 yards and a score.This is the exact scenario I face and I'm leaning Parker but I'm very much undecided. After watching what Theilen did vs. NO out of the slot I really want to start Hogan. They profile super similarly.
Also per PFF's shadow coverage matrix, Hayward lined up opposite DT 73.5% of the time. DT was targeted 6 times and caught 4/61/0 against him.