What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

WR Gabriel Davis, BUF (3 Viewers)

Since it's all a hypothetical, no it isn't.  His value is >2.01 for people who own him and <2.01 for people who want him.  The actual value is that mythical range where an actual trade gets made.
Fair. 

Full disclosure, I own zero shares of Davis.  I sold them all before the 2021 season and I don't believe his actual tradeable value has stretched into the 1st round of rookie picks.
Noted. 

 
Yes he will take Beasley's targets but weren't Davis owners hoping Beasely would be released so that some of those targets would now go to Davis? I suppose there may be some who thought that but I assumed it would happen and that they would bring in another slot guy. IMO it just makes the Bills better. It was 100% about taking over the Sanders role.

the notion that Crowder lost a step between his time in Washington and New York is just not true. I thought he looked really good and I agree 29 is not a problem. Not for the Bills for another couple years anyway.

 
I don't believe his actual tradeable value has stretched into the 1st round of rookie picks.
Yeah I have only seen one actual trade where a 1st was involved. It wasn't me.

I had 18 shares of him in FFPC leagues at the end of the season and have traded away two shares and sold four teams that had him on it. I can only speculate but I *think* having him helped sell them. 

 
They say history is the best teacher. Also something about those who fail to learn from mistakes being doomed to repeat them. 

I'm sure that's not relevant here though. :whistle:


2021

1.10 Moore, Elijah (NYJ, WR) (R10)

1.12 Toney, Kadarius (NYG, WR) (R12)

2.1 Moore, Rondale (ARI, WR) (R13)

2.2 Marshall, Terrace (CAR, WR) (R14)

2020

1.11 Claypool, Chase (PIT, WR, Age: 22)® (R11)

2.1 Aiyuk, Brandon (SFO, WR, Age: 22)® (R13)

2.2 Reagor, Jalen (PHI, WR, Age: 21)® (R14)

2.3 Mims, Denzel (NYJ, WR, Age: 23)® (R15)

2.4 Pittman, Michael (IND, WR, Age: 23)® (R16)

2019

1.11 Brown, Marquise (BAL, WR, Age: 22)® (R11)

1.12 Samuel, Deebo (SFO, WR, Age: 23)® (R12)

2.3 Williams, Preston (MIA, WR)® (R15)

2.4 Campbell, Parris (IND, WR, Age: 22)® (R16)

2.6 Arcega-Whiteside, JJ (PHI, WR)® (R18)

2.8 Johnson, Diontae (PIT, WR)® (R20)

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Yeah I have only seen one actual trade where a 1st was involved. It wasn't me.

I had 18 shares of him in FFPC leagues at the end of the season and have traded away two shares and sold four teams that had him on it. I can only speculate but I *think* having him helped sell them. 
Was any of those sold teams a SF league? Maybe had R Wilson, Stafford and Tanehill as QB’s? I have purchased a few 😎

 
2021

1.10 Moore, Elijah (NYJ, WR) (R10) - love the player, don't love the landing spot

1.12 Toney, Kadarius (NYG, WR) (R12) - oft injured, issues, bad QB on a bad team

2.1 Moore, Rondale (ARI, WR) (R13) - Jury's out - but I like the player 

2.2 Marshall, Terrace (CAR, WR) (R14) - I'm not high on him. 

2020

1.11 Claypool, Chase (PIT, WR, Age: 22)® (R11) - good player, not sure he's better than Davis rn. Certainly has a worse QB 

2.1 Aiyuk, Brandon (SFO, WR, Age: 22)® (R13) - I love Aiyuk, and at the time thought the Niners should have taken Lamb. He's had a lot of issues though, reportedly not running routes correctly resulting in turnovers, which got him a brief demotion. Still not sure he's 100% out of Shanny's doghouse. 

2.2 Reagor, Jalen (PHI, WR, Age: 21)® (R14) - Results haven't been great so far

2.3 Mims, Denzel (NYJ, WR, Age: 23)® (R15) - Another Jet.  Like Moore, Zach Wilson is a less than ideal situation, but I do like Mims. It was weird that he was in limbo so long 

2.4 Pittman, Michael (IND, WR, Age: 23)® (R16) - Best example here. Good player, good team - now he has Ryan, so upside might manifest. 

2019

1.11 Brown, Marquise (BAL, WR, Age: 22)® (R11) - I don't see him as a WR1. Maybe you do. 

1.12 Samuel, Deebo (SFO, WR, Age: 23)® (R12) - Obv I like Deebo. 

2.3 Williams, Preston (MIA, WR)® (R15) - meh

2.4 Campbell, Parris (IND, WR, Age: 22)® (R16) - meh

2.6 Arcega-Whiteside, JJ (PHI, WR)® (R18) - super meh

2.8 Johnson, Diontae (PIT, WR)® (R20) - He & Pittman are the only two on this list I really love. 
Opinions may vary, but IMO, 2019, 2020 and 2021 are all better WR draft classes than 2022. 

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Opinions may vary, but IMO, 2019, 2020 and 2021 are all better WR draft classes than 2022. 
There are almost always hits available thru the turn of the 1st/2nd round and even later. There are misses there as well. 

I can't fault anyone for preferring the pick over Davis. It is a perfectly reasonable take that reflects market. 

 
There are almost always hits available thru the turn of the 1st/2nd round and even later. There are misses there as well. 
Of course. Some years it seems easier to identify the hits in advance though. 

I can't fault anyone for preferring the pick over Davis. It is a perfectly reasonable take that reflects market. 
I don't fault them either - but if we're in the context of "Yes I would deal Gabe Davis for pick 1.07 -> 2.01" it seems very fair to ask which of those players one believes will have more upside than Davis. 

The topic is Gabe Davis. To prefer the pick, one has to believe there's a target there that will be more valuable (assuming spending the pick and not acquiring it to make it part of a larger trade package on value alone, which we can all agree is a thing that happens, though irrelevant to this discussion). 

 
To prefer the pick, one has to believe there's a target there that will be more valuabl
I mildly disagree that the target has to have a name. For me it can just be a range of picks and the faith that a hit will be there. If there is a trade partner (right now, not later during the draft) that for whatever reason might make a better deal with his 1.11 or 2.02 than this other guy that has 2.01, then I don't necessarily care about the specific name(s) that might correspond. It is never going to play out exactly as planned anyway.

If I'm not a Davis believer I make that trade (I try to get more than 2.01) today based on my experience of consistently finding those hits in that range. As we get closer to the NFL draft and then the rookie draft the prices of picks goes up. But by the time I'm OTC with those picks that I had faith in, I *should* have a very clear picture of "my guys". I have consistently hit there. I've had missed but seriously if I wasn't a believer I would be flipping Davis like crazy. I don't care what the rookie ADP ranks look just yet. Give me draft capital for guys I don't like all day.

 
I mildly disagree that the target has to have a name. For me it can just be a range of picks and the faith that a hit will be there. If there is a trade partner (right now, not later during the draft) that for whatever reason might make a better deal with his 1.11 or 2.02 than this other guy that has 2.01, then I don't necessarily care about the specific name(s) that might correspond. It is never going to play out exactly as planned anyway.

If I'm not a Davis believer I make that trade (I try to get more than 2.01) today based on my experience of consistently finding those hits in that range. As we get closer to the NFL draft and then the rookie draft the prices of picks goes up. But by the time I'm OTC with those picks that I had faith in, I *should* have a very clear picture of "my guys". I have consistently hit there. I've had missed but seriously if I wasn't a believer I would be flipping Davis like crazy. I don't care what the rookie ADP ranks look just yet. Give me draft capital for guys I don't like all day.
All fair.  For me, I am a believer, and do have faith that I'll get return on Davis. Especially considering what I paid (very little). 

In that light, I would also kick myself forever if Davis does have that season resembling ~80/1000/10 and the rookie I picked either sucks or doesn't come close to that. 

 
In that light, I would also kick myself forever if Davis does have that season resembling ~80/1000/10 and the rookie I picked either sucks or doesn't come close to that. 
If I'm a betting man right now I'd take the over on those stats, think he's gonna have a real nice season. Course they could sign/draft a big name but Davis has done nothing to indicate to me that he isn't going to be a big part of their offense. He's good. 

 
Are you from the future?
It was tongue in cheek. I've had my share of flops drafting 1.10-1.12. Still hopeful Terrace Marshall doesn't become one of them. Surprisingly I've had better luck, for whatever reason, drafting in the 2nd round than late 1st.

 
It was tongue in cheek. I've had my share of flops drafting 1.10-1.12. Still hopeful Terrace Marshall doesn't become one of them. Surprisingly I've had better luck, for whatever reason, drafting in the 2nd round than late 1st.
slightly off-topic, but last year mid-season I was trying to acquire Marshall from the owner in my league. I couldn't get him to budge on any inclusion of him, and in fact at one point he said, "if you keep including Marshall in these talks, I'm just not interested". He was untouchable. 

He's since softened on his position on selling Marshall as have I on buying. Things change fast in the NFL.  

 
On March 19, in a 1QB FFPC league, Davis was traded for Trevor Lawrence, Trey Lance and the 4.03.

For context: Teams in FFPC leagues have to cut down to 16 players (including a defense and kicker) by the end of March, so these deals are fairly common. The guy who traded away the QBs has Josh Allen. 

 
That's gotta be considered about on par with a late 1st/early 2nd right?


The guy who traded away the QBs took Lawrence at 1.11 and Lance at 2.03, which was curious, because he already had Allen coming off a breakout season. By FFPC rookie ADP, Lawrence was a late-first pick and Lance a mid-second. 

 
Question about Davis's trade value in a bit of a weirder league context. It's a 12 team league with really big rosters, Superflex IDP and 16 total starters w/ 9 on offense 7 on defense. I'm taking over a team that earned the 1.01 and needs a lot of WR help overall and has Davis.

I'm honestly not a big Davis believer and I've got another owner who has tried a few times to get him from me, but not really sending great stuff. The best package I think I could probably get is the 3.01 and a later 3rd back in this draft. Anyone think that's good enough with this league setup? You can typically get some pretty premium IDP players in the 3rd, and that is probably the direction I'd go.

I'm not really sold on Davis's long term value, I don't think he'll ever be more than the #2 guy and I'm not a fan of holding those types of players in general barring some really specific circumstances (very high WR production from two guys) and I don't really see Davis as that kind of player.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I'm honestly not a big Davis believer and I've got another owner who has tried a few times to get him from me, but not really sending great stuff. The best package I think I could probably get is the 3.01 and a later 3rd back in this draft.
I hate holding guys I don't believe in but that is nowhere close to enough. Just my ten cents. If you have any other deals you're working on or thinking about doing with someone else, try including Davis and getting better value coming back by packaging him. Maybe.

 
Question about Davis's trade value in a bit of a weirder league context. It's a 12 team league with really big rosters, Superflex IDP and 16 total starters w/ 9 on offense 7 on defense. I'm taking over a team that earned the 1.01 and needs a lot of WR help overall and has Davis.

I'm honestly not a big Davis believer and I've got another owner who has tried a few times to get him from me, but not really sending great stuff. The best package I think I could probably get is the 3.01 and a later 3rd back in this draft. Anyone think that's good enough with this league setup? You can typically get some pretty premium IDP players in the 3rd, and that is probably the direction I'd go.

I'm not really sold on Davis's long term value, I don't think he'll ever be more than the #2 guy and I'm not a fan of holding those types of players in general barring some really specific circumstances (very high WR production from two guys) and I don't really see Davis as that kind of player.
That seems really light even in an IDP league.  A lot of this hinges on how important are IDP's in your league.  Do they score on par with offense?  If not then this is definitely not worth it.  If you can build your team around IDP's and marquee guys are available at 3.01 then maybe it makes sense.  I would have to think, though, that you can do better than 3.01

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Question about Davis's trade value in a bit of a weirder league context. It's a 12 team league with really big rosters, Superflex IDP and 16 total starters w/ 9 on offense 7 on defense. I'm taking over a team that earned the 1.01 and needs a lot of WR help overall and has Davis.

I'm honestly not a big Davis believer and I've got another owner who has tried a few times to get him from me, but not really sending great stuff. The best package I think I could probably get is the 3.01 and a later 3rd back in this draft. Anyone think that's good enough with this league setup? You can typically get some pretty premium IDP players in the 3rd, and that is probably the direction I'd go.

I'm not really sold on Davis's long term value, I don't think he'll ever be more than the #2 guy and I'm not a fan of holding those types of players in general barring some really specific circumstances (very high WR production from two guys) and I don't really see Davis as that kind of player.
I do not think a 3rd and a future 3rd is good enough, no. 

Your points are well-taken, but I would suggest that being the WR2 in that Bills offense > being the WR2 in any other offense.

Byron Pringle is the WR2 on the Bears, for example. I wouldn’t say he’s equal to Davis. 

I would counter for a 2nd round pick. Preferably 2023. Tell him that’s your best offer. See if they bite. :shrug:  

 
That seems really light even in an IDP league.  A lot of this hinges on how important are IDP's in your league.  Do they score on par with offense?  If not then this is definitely not worth it.  If you can build your team around IDP's and marque guys are available at 3.01 then maybe it makes sense.  I would have to think, though, that you can do better than 3.01
Thanks -- top IDP guys are scoring in the low 200's and absolute max would probably be 250ish. So, at best around the level of the WR14-WR24 in this league. So, potentially higher than what I'd really expect Davis to be putting up, but I think you and @barackdhouse are right that this feels light for the perceived value others have on Davis. I'll probably hold on to him at least until close to the draft. I've got him on the block but there hasn't been a ton of interest yet.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I'm honestly not a big Davis believer and I've got another owner who has tried a few times to get him from me, but not really sending great stuff. The best package I think I could probably get is the 3.01 and a later 3rd back in this draft.
Count me among those who don't think that the 3.01 and a later third is enough. It is SF and IDP, but you're probably looking at some real misses at the 3.01. For context, you might...say...draft a guy like Willie Gay at 3.01 or something like that. 

:bag:

I did that. Point is, that's still pretty far back in the draft for Davis's value. 

 
Hot Sauce Guy said:
Your points are well-taken, but I would suggest that being the WR2 in that Bills offense > being the WR2 in any other offense.
Using FBG PPR scoring, the WR2 in that Bills offense was WR40 last season, behind the WR2 for the Buccaneers (WR13),  Chargers (WR14), Seahawks(!) (WR16), Bengals (WR24), Cowboys (WR27), Vikings (WR28), WR3 for the Bengals (WR31),  Patriots(!!) (WR32), Rams (WR36), Steelers (WR38), and the MOTHER####ING WR3 for the Vikings (WR39).

You may believe that the WR2 for the Bills is the greatest potential secondary receiver in the league, but unless Davis takes an unfathomable leap this season along with the rest of the team's passing offense, it's just not happening.

I mean seriously, the Bills WR2 was outscored by 12 TEs!

 
Using FBG PPR scoring, the WR2 in that Bills offense was WR40 last season, behind the WR2 for the Buccaneers (WR13),  Chargers (WR14), Seahawks(!) (WR16), Bengals (WR24), Cowboys (WR27), Vikings (WR28), WR3 for the Bengals (WR31),  Patriots(!!) (WR32), Rams (WR36), Steelers (WR38), and the MOTHER####ING WR3 for the Vikings (WR39).

You may believe that the WR2 for the Bills is the greatest potential secondary receiver in the league, but unless Davis takes an unfathomable leap this season along with the rest of the team's passing offense, it's just not happening.

I mean seriously, the Bills WR2 was outscored by 12 TEs!
Is that Sanders from last year or Beasley?

 
Using FBG PPR scoring, the WR2 in that Bills offense was WR40 last season, behind the WR2 for the Buccaneers (WR13),  Chargers (WR14), Seahawks(!) (WR16), Bengals (WR24), Cowboys (WR27), Vikings (WR28), WR3 for the Bengals (WR31),  Patriots(!!) (WR32), Rams (WR36), Steelers (WR38), and the MOTHER####ING WR3 for the Vikings (WR39).

You may believe that the WR2 for the Bills is the greatest potential secondary receiver in the league, but unless Davis takes an unfathomable leap this season along with the rest of the team's passing offense, it's just not happening.

I mean seriously, the Bills WR2 was outscored by 12 TEs!
I’m estimating for 2022, not focusing on 2021 with an oft-middling/injured Emmanuel Sanders.  The point was “full time as a Josh Allen target this year”, not that the Bills have some historic precedent penchant for the WR2. 

Seems somewhat obvious in my post. 

Not  to accuse you of cherry picking, but you’re totally cherry picking here.  All due respect, but it’s fallacious. 

 
Last edited by a moderator:
unless Davis takes an unfathomable leap this season
Cmon. It's not a stretch for a guy with 18 TDs before age 23 going into year 3 is it? Really?!

Unfathomable? Fine if you say you don't think he will emerge but unfathomable?

You throw the ball to where the receiver is going to be. Not where he was.* We are projecting forward not looking backward.

*curl routes I know I know

 
Cmon. It's not a stretch for a guy with 18 TDs before age 23 going into year 3 is it? Really?!

Unfathomable? Fine if you say you don't think he will emerge but unfathomable?

You throw the ball to where the receiver is going to be. Not where he was.* We are projecting forward not looking backward.

*curl routes I know I know
It’s a stretch for an offense that doesn’t produce WR2s at the top of the fantasy standings to start doing so out of nowhere. 

 
Using FBG PPR scoring, the WR2 in that Bills offense was WR40 last season, behind the WR2 for the Buccaneers (WR13),  Chargers (WR14), Seahawks(!) (WR16), Bengals (WR24), Cowboys (WR27), Vikings (WR28), WR3 for the Bengals (WR31),  Patriots(!!) (WR32), Rams (WR36), Steelers (WR38), and the MOTHER####ING WR3 for the Vikings (WR39).

You may believe that the WR2 for the Bills is the greatest potential secondary receiver in the league, but unless Davis takes an unfathomable leap this season along with the rest of the team's passing offense, it's just not happening.

I mean seriously, the Bills WR2 was outscored by 12 TEs!
Unfathomable? That's what you're going with here?

JMHO, would love to better understand how they tabulated WR2 for the Bills in 2021. There really was no guy when Emmanuel Sanders somewhat fizzled. I guess you'd consider Beasley and his 82 recs as the WR2. In terms of targets, Beasley got 112 targets, Sanders 72, and Davis 63. And now Beasley and Sanders are gone, and 184 targets are up for grabs. Who do you have getting those targets?   

 
I’m estimating for 2022, not focusing on 2021 with an oft-middling/injured Emmanuel Sanders.  The point was “full time as a Josh Allen target this year”
What in Davis’s career suggests that he himself is more than oft-middling/injured?

He had 10 games last season under 10 points with 4 zeroes 

 
Vacated targets are a fallacy. Targets are earned. 
Well, there's this one guy who seemed to 'earn' greater role in the most recent Bills game... sort of a historic performance type deal. Could be a factor in the decision that bringing back Beasley and Sanders was not a priority. Probably unfathomable though that he'd get that opportunity, so no point in naming him.

 
Well, there's this one guy who seemed to 'earn' greater role in the most recent Bills game... sort of a historic performance type deal. Could be a factor in the decision that bringing back Beasley and Sanders was not a priority. Probably unfathomable though that he'd get that opportunity, so no point in naming him.
Was this the same guy who blew up in the 2020 playoffs and then mostly disappeared from the entire 2021 regular season?

 
What in Davis’s career suggests that he himself is more than oft-middling/injured?

He had 10 games last season under 10 points with 4 zeroes 
He was the WR 4 who’s only started a handful of games, yet has a mountain of TDs & a team that loves him. And he’s never been injured or middling - when given targets he’s produced. 

if say that’s a pretty good start 

 
Was this the same guy who blew up in the 2020 playoffs and then mostly disappeared from the entire 2021 regular season?
Yes, with Sanders out, the WR 4 became a WR3, as sometimes happens. Then Davis actually participated in games. He had a pretty good one there at the end of the playoffs. You should Google it. 

 
It’s a stretch for an offense that doesn’t produce WR2s at the top of the fantasy standings to start doing so out of nowhere. 
It’s an even bigger stretch to attempt to make this point based on the thinnest of premises. Your implied if/then statement (if, based on these wonky cherry-picked numbers from 2021 where Sanders was hurt/sucked, then the Bills don’t use their WR2) is like tissue paper that got wet, then was hung out to dry on a 110 degree, 0% humidity day. 

C’mon man.

Maybe in this particular chicken / egg scenario, they didn’t use their WR2 as much in 2021 because he was hurt/ineffective?

At least I admit when I’m doing a schtick. 

 
It’s a stretch for an offense that doesn’t produce WR2s at the top of the fantasy standings to start doing so out of nowhere. 
The last 10 or more years are full of high passing offenses that supported 2 multiple FF relevant WRs. The fact that Josh Allen hasn't done it yet is a reflection of the depth chart he has had. Davis is super young and probably wasn't ready to be that 2nd guy. I think he is now. Others don't - that is fine but "out of nowhere" or "unfathomable" seems pretty wild to me for such a common occurrence.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
The last 10 or more years are full of high passing offenses that supported 2 multiple FF relevant WRs. The fact that Josh Allen hasn't done it yet is a reflection of the depth chart he has had. Davis is super young and probably wasn't ready to be that 2nd guy. I think he is now. Others don't - that is fine but "out of nowhere" or "unfathomable" seems pretty wild to me for such a common occurrence.
To be fair, he did only have access to 2021 data, apparently. 

:rolleyes:

 
Last edited by a moderator:

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top