ConstruxBoy
Kate's Daddy
FWIW, I decided right before the draft that I loved Cobb and ranked him 6th on my board so I traded the 4th pick for the 6th and 8th picks. I liked Little as well and once I saw how hyped he was immediately post draft, I decided to take him 6th in my rookie draft and grab Cobb 8th. Worked out well. Sometimes you draft differently looking at ADP than you do looking purely at your own rankings. Not sure I can describe why I fell for Cobb. Just a combination of versatility, maturity and excellence on tape. I agree that he may be a guy who is better as an NFL player than a fantasy player. However if in 3 years he turns out to be the 8th best WR but the 13th best fantasy WR, I think I'll still be pretty happy.I think you would find few people that would take him over Little. Looks like eak would, but he is probably in the minority. In my 3 rookie drafts he went earliest at the 9th pick and as late as the 16th. Very few picks in that range will pan out anyway, so usually best IMO to just pick the best player in that range, without putting too much weight on situation. Certainly Little would rarely be found in that range.SSOG - great points all around, excellent post. My league mates have been debating talent vs opportunity the past couple weeks, and you've done a great job of illustrating why talent matters AND how to properly set expectations for that talent.
One piece that I think you've missed (or underplayed) - whether intentionally or unintentionally - is "relative acquisition cost." The cost to acquire Cobb right now (particularly if he's a 1st rd pick) is quite high vs near-term expectations for performance. Not all Cobb owners will have the same long-term perspective....I would argue that most FF GMs are very near-term focused.....so a smart GM can pass up Cobb this year, select someone else who is more likely to produce (Greg Little for example?), and then trade for Cobb later this year when his owner is disappointed by lack of production.
In other words, his "relative acquisition cost" will be lower later this year than it is today. Probably by a meaningful amount.
Just food for thought. Again, thanks for a great post.





More like a cross between Matt Suhey and Crash Jensen.