Whether one agrees or not, civil lawsuits mean very little to the NFL.
Antonio Brown and Deshaun Watson were sent away for extremely long times over civil lawsuits.
Those cases were a bit different though, right?
I mean every case is different, those two are not like each other at all really.
AB also pleaded no contest to felony burglary and battery a month before his suspension, I imagine that factored in a bit (not too minimize his alleged multiple sexual assaults and rape per the civil suit.) Watson's situation was so beyond the pale it's not even worth bringing up as an actual example.
I think you are understimating PR in both cases and Rice is also facing felony charges.
In AB's case if you recall he was pleading with Goodell to suspend him but he was dangling his cases being unresolved and not until he settled his civil lawsuit did they suspend him.
If the Civil trial or situation leads to public outcry the NFL generally acts accordingly, have always believed suspensions length that's not directly mandated by the CBA is in proportion to the public outcry.
But as concise as I can say this I respectfully disagree wholeheartedly that you can make a blanket statement that civil trials don't matter. In fact in both of these cases I'm pretty sure they one of the reasons they both settled was so more damaging information that turned the public against them more could not come out.
I expect Rice to do the same. He won't want to hear victim testimony of the fright, injuries, health and job issues some of them claim to have had while he's offered no assistance post-accident or any time since. You start introducing testimony of parents whose kids and their injuries and risk of more injury and that's how public sentiment changes on you you move from maybe a 2-3 game suspension to 6-8. Not suggesting he's getting suspended like those two did. but I am absolutely saying the civil trials matter.