What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Yankees / RSox 5 Game Fenway Series Thread (1 Viewer)

You know, NOTHING, and the Rock means NOTHING will ever make up for 2004. But...I'll feel pretty good if the Yanks slap the dickoutta the Sox's mouth tomorrow.
lol @ comparing a regular season series in august to the greatest comeback in sports history in october.
I think he clearly put 2004 in a different category. :shrug:
Sorry fred.. I gotta agree here. The mouth comment was classless (though not surprising coming from him), however he did have NOTHING in caps twice... pretty emphatic way to say it's NOT the same thing :)
 
' date='Aug 21 2006, 10:46 AM' post='5367946']

You know, NOTHING, and the Rock means NOTHING will ever make up for 2004. But...I'll feel pretty good if the Yanks slap the dickoutta the Sox's mouth tomorrow.
lol @ comparing a regular season series in august to the greatest comeback in sports history in october.
I think he clearly put 2004 in a different category. :shrug:
Sorry fred.. I gotta agree here. The mouth comment was classless (though not surprising coming from him), however he did have NOTHING in caps twice... pretty emphatic way to say it's NOT the same thing :)
Curse of the CLASSY Jeter Avatar continues :thumbup:
 
You know, NOTHING, and the Rock means NOTHING will ever make up for 2004.

But...

I'll feel pretty good if the Yanks slap the dickoutta the Sox's mouth tomorrow.
lol @ comparing a regular season series in august to the greatest comeback in sports history in october.
I think he clearly put 2004 in a different category. :shrug:
even brought out The Rock's shtick to put extra emphasis on the word NOTHING
I understand his methods to protect 2004, because quite frankly, it's all he's got.
It's all he needs. Chances are we will never see that again. I am speaking of being down 0-3 and winning 8 straight games to win the WS.
 
You know, NOTHING, and the Rock means NOTHING will ever make up for 2004.

But...

I'll feel pretty good if the Yanks slap the dickoutta the Sox's mouth tomorrow.
lol @ comparing a regular season series in august to the greatest comeback in sports history in october.
I think he clearly put 2004 in a different category. :shrug:
even brought out The Rock's shtick to put extra emphasis on the word NOTHING
I understand his methods to protect 2004, because quite frankly, it's all he's got.
It's all he needs. Chances are we will never see that again. I am speaking of being down 0-3 and winning 8 straight games to win the WS.
If it happens once every 86 years, so be it.
 
You know, NOTHING, and the Rock means NOTHING will ever make up for 2004.

But...

I'll feel pretty good if the Yanks slap the dickoutta the Sox's mouth tomorrow.
lol @ comparing a regular season series in august to the greatest comeback in sports history in october.
I think he clearly put 2004 in a different category. :shrug:
even brought out The Rock's shtick to put extra emphasis on the word NOTHING
I understand his methods to protect 2004, because quite frankly, it's all he's got.
It's all he needs. Chances are we will never see that again. I am speaking of being down 0-3 and winning 8 straight games to win the WS.
If it happens once every 86 years, so be it.
:confused: Baseball's been around much longer than that.
 
You know, NOTHING, and the Rock means NOTHING will ever make up for 2004.

But...

I'll feel pretty good if the Yanks slap the dickoutta the Sox's mouth tomorrow.
lol @ comparing a regular season series in august to the greatest comeback in sports history in october.
I think he clearly put 2004 in a different category. :shrug:
even brought out The Rock's shtick to put extra emphasis on the word NOTHING
I understand his methods to protect 2004, because quite frankly, it's all he's got.
It's all he needs. Chances are we will never see that again. I am speaking of being down 0-3 and winning 8 straight games to win the WS.
If it happens once every 86 years, so be it.
:confused: Baseball's been around much longer than that.
:rolleyes:
 
You know, NOTHING, and the Rock means NOTHING will ever make up for 2004.

But...

I'll feel pretty good if the Yanks slap the dickoutta the Sox's mouth tomorrow.
lol @ comparing a regular season series in august to the greatest comeback in sports history in october.
I think he clearly put 2004 in a different category. :shrug:
even brought out The Rock's shtick to put extra emphasis on the word NOTHING
I understand his methods to protect 2004, because quite frankly, it's all he's got.
It's all he needs. Chances are we will never see that again. I am speaking of being down 0-3 and winning 8 straight games to win the WS.
If it happens once every 86 years, so be it.
It would probably take another favored team with a stacked lineup falling into the surprising 0-3 hole after their ace gets injured.....

But, you would need a damn good team to start with.

I could see a Yankee team pulling it off with their lineup now. The majority of the time, the team in the 0-3 hole isn't that good or doesn't have an ace up it's sleeve, that's what makes the come back so improbable.

To me, I always take playoff series pitch by pitch, I never thought that series was wrapped up. A hot pitcher and / or a Hot batter or 2 can take over a series, Yankee fans have surely seen both sides of that.

I don't see that series as shocking or heart breaking at the 1986 Buckner debacle - Heck, as a Yankee fan I was actually rooting for the Sox in that one since, I hated the Mets and their fans a lot more at the time. Just a lot more Met fans around at that time and the Yankees and Sox weren't as competitve at the same times then. When it was Yankees VS Sox it was mostly the Yankees winning then so, Sox fans and their pity parade weren't really a threat.

 
You know, NOTHING, and the Rock means NOTHING will ever make up for 2004.

But...

I'll feel pretty good if the Yanks slap the dickoutta the Sox's mouth tomorrow.
lol @ comparing a regular season series in august to the greatest comeback in sports history in october.
I think he clearly put 2004 in a different category. :shrug:
even brought out The Rock's shtick to put extra emphasis on the word NOTHING
I understand his methods to protect 2004, because quite frankly, it's all he's got.
It's all he needs. Chances are we will never see that again. I am speaking of being down 0-3 and winning 8 straight games to win the WS.
If it happens once every 86 years, so be it.
:confused: Baseball's been around much longer than that.
:rolleyes:
Why did you pick 86 then?
 
You know, NOTHING, and the Rock means NOTHING will ever make up for 2004.

But...

I'll feel pretty good if the Yanks slap the dickoutta the Sox's mouth tomorrow.
lol @ comparing a regular season series in august to the greatest comeback in sports history in october.
I think he clearly put 2004 in a different category. :shrug:
even brought out The Rock's shtick to put extra emphasis on the word NOTHING
I understand his methods to protect 2004, because quite frankly, it's all he's got.
It's all he needs. Chances are we will never see that again. I am speaking of being down 0-3 and winning 8 straight games to win the WS.
If it happens once every 86 years, so be it.
:confused: Baseball's been around much longer than that.
:rolleyes:
Why did you pick 86 then?
because that's the time it took for Boston to finally win a WS.
 
because that's the time it took for Boston to finally win a WS.
Oh. I am talking about the path the Red Sox took not necessarily the # of years it took. I couldn't care less about that. I don't really care about the teams involved, though it adds to historic aspect given it was Yankees vs Red Sox. It had never happened in all of baseball's history until then.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
because that's the time it took for Boston to finally win a WS.
Oh. I am talking about the path the Red Sox took not necessarily the # of years it took. I couldn't care less about that. I don't really care about the teams involved, though it adds to historic aspect given it was Yankees vs Red Sox. It had never happened in all of baseball's history until then.
Then you can appreciate that the law of averages dictates it would have to happen to the Yankees because they are ALWAYS in the playoffs.
 
I think Jeter took the lead in the MVP race last night with that hit.
I think he has always been near the top. I think this series may have taken some votes from Papi and given them to Manny, which should hurt both guys. Jeter has been the rock for the Yanks this year. He had 2 huge hits in the last 3 games in the most important series of the season.
 
' date='Aug 21 2006, 12:18 PM' post='5368475']

I think Jeter took the lead in the MVP race last night with that hit.
:no:He's having a helluva year, but that hit has zero impact on the MVP race. Voters look at the big picture...stats and team standing (which I disagree;with).
Moments like that on national TV make the difference in these things. He's actually earned it this year, considering no Sheff and Matsui and A-Rod having an off year. For the Yanks to be in first with much of the rag tag they sent out there is incredible.
 
I would have a hard time proclaiming a DH the MVP anyway, but if the BoSox miss the playoffs, no way in hell should Ortiz win it.

 
' date='Aug 21 2006, 12:18 PM' post='5368475']

I think Jeter took the lead in the MVP race last night with that hit.
:no:He's having a helluva year, but that hit has zero impact on the MVP race. Voters look at the big picture...stats and team standing (which I disagree;with).
Moments like that on national TV make the difference in these things. He's actually earned it this year, considering no Sheff and Matsui and A-Rod having an off year. For the Yanks to be in first with much of the rag tag they sent out there is incredible.
If the sox make hte playoffs Ortiz will get it..... they won't though, so I think it comes down to Mauer/Jeter... I think if the Twins make it then Mauer gets the vote..... otherwise Jeter has the inside track. I'm in the camp that it's extremely gay that a team's overall success (ie playoff picture) is a deciding factor in who is most valuable to their team. Stick Jeter on the Royals and they are still not a playoff team.... but he's by far the most valuable player on the team and still having one of the best seasons in the majors. :thumbdown:
 
' date='Aug 21 2006, 12:24 PM' post='5368513']

' date='Aug 21 2006, 12:18 PM' post='5368475']

I think Jeter took the lead in the MVP race last night with that hit.
:no:He's having a helluva year, but that hit has zero impact on the MVP race. Voters look at the big picture...stats and team standing (which I disagree;with).
Moments like that on national TV make the difference in these things. He's actually earned it this year, considering no Sheff and Matsui and A-Rod having an off year. For the Yanks to be in first with much of the rag tag they sent out there is incredible.
If the sox make hte playoffs Ortiz will get it..... they won't though, so I think it comes down to Mauer/Jeter... I think if the Twins make it then Mauer gets the vote..... otherwise Jeter has the inside track. I'm in the camp that it's extremely gay that a team's overall success (ie playoff picture) is a deciding factor in who is most valuable to their team. Stick Jeter on the Royals and they are still not a playoff team.... but he's by far the most valuable player on the team and still having one of the best seasons in the majors. :thumbdown:
I'm not sure that Ortiz is the most valuable player on the BoSox. Manny is having a tremendous year.
 
' date='Aug 21 2006, 10:24 AM' post='5368513']

' date='Aug 21 2006, 12:18 PM' post='5368475']

I think Jeter took the lead in the MVP race last night with that hit.
:no:He's having a helluva year, but that hit has zero impact on the MVP race. Voters look at the big picture...stats and team standing (which I disagree;with).
Moments like that on national TV make the difference in these things. He's actually earned it this year, considering no Sheff and Matsui and A-Rod having an off year. For the Yanks to be in first with much of the rag tag they sent out there is incredible.
If the sox make hte playoffs Ortiz will get it..... they won't though, so I think it comes down to Mauer/Jeter... I think if the Twins make it then Mauer gets the vote..... otherwise Jeter has the inside track. I'm in the camp that it's extremely gay that a team's overall success (ie playoff picture) is a deciding factor in who is most valuable to their team. Stick Jeter on the Royals and they are still not a playoff team.... but he's by far the most valuable player on the team and still having one of the best seasons in the majors. :thumbdown:
But who is more important, Papi or Manny?? Ramirez can do it in any kind of lineup...he proved that with the Indians. Papi needs Manny hitting behind him. It's the reason why people keep pitching to him.Manny is more important to the Sox than Papi, IMO.
 
' date='Aug 21 2006, 10:24 AM' post='5368513']

' date='Aug 21 2006, 12:18 PM' post='5368475']

I think Jeter took the lead in the MVP race last night with that hit.
:no:He's having a helluva year, but that hit has zero impact on the MVP race. Voters look at the big picture...stats and team standing (which I disagree;with).
Moments like that on national TV make the difference in these things. He's actually earned it this year, considering no Sheff and Matsui and A-Rod having an off year. For the Yanks to be in first with much of the rag tag they sent out there is incredible.
If the sox make hte playoffs Ortiz will get it..... they won't though, so I think it comes down to Mauer/Jeter... I think if the Twins make it then Mauer gets the vote..... otherwise Jeter has the inside track. I'm in the camp that it's extremely gay that a team's overall success (ie playoff picture) is a deciding factor in who is most valuable to their team. Stick Jeter on the Royals and they are still not a playoff team.... but he's by far the most valuable player on the team and still having one of the best seasons in the majors. :thumbdown:
But who is more important, Papi or Manny?? Ramirez can do it in any kind of lineup...he proved that with the Indians. Papi needs Manny hitting behind him. It's the reason why people keep pitching to him.Manny is more important to the Sox than Papi, IMO.
I agree. The reason that Papi gets so many walk-off home runs is because, unlike many of the league's big power hitters, he gets good pitches to hit in those situatiuons.If Manny batted ahead of Ortiz, he'd be the one being protected by another power hitter. Plus, he's got a twenty point lead in average.
 
The Yanks are running out a spring training "B" game in Kissimee lineup today. No Giambi, no Damon, no Jorge, Jeter DH.

If the Sox can't pull it out with Nick Green and Sal Fasano in the lineup, they really are done maybe.

Who would have imagined we'd be here at this time on Friday?

 
The Yanks are running out a spring training "B" game in Kissimee lineup today. No Giambi, no Damon, no Jorge, Jeter DH.If the Sox can't pull it out with Nick Green and Sal Fasano in the lineup, they really are done maybe. Who would have imagined we'd be here at this time on Friday?
Why the hell would they do that - Even after all that has happened, today's game is still Big and a 1 game swing either way. :(
 
because that's the time it took for Boston to finally win a WS.
Oh. I am talking about the path the Red Sox took not necessarily the # of years it took. I couldn't care less about that. I don't really care about the teams involved, though it adds to historic aspect given it was Yankees vs Red Sox. It had never happened in all of baseball's history until then.
Then you can appreciate that the law of averages dictates it would have to happen to the Yankees because they are ALWAYS in the playoffs.
Yes, I do appreciate it. I also appreciate what kind of mental meltdown they underwent. Not sure what your point is though.
 
because that's the time it took for Boston to finally win a WS.
Oh. I am talking about the path the Red Sox took not necessarily the # of years it took. I couldn't care less about that. I don't really care about the teams involved, though it adds to historic aspect given it was Yankees vs Red Sox. It had never happened in all of baseball's history until then.
Then you can appreciate that the law of averages dictates it would have to happen to the Yankees because they are ALWAYS in the playoffs.
Yes, I do appreciate it. I also appreciate what kind of mental meltdown they underwent. Not sure what your point is though.
:rolleyes: Doesn't that kind of give little credit to an incredible Boston team that was favored going in?I saw it as some great pitching and timely hitting on the Sox part but, hey..... Just call the Sox only World Series win 86 year a fluke and a Yankee meltdown.... Not my opinion, but, an interesting Point of View.
 
because that's the time it took for Boston to finally win a WS.
Oh. I am talking about the path the Red Sox took not necessarily the # of years it took. I couldn't care less about that. I don't really care about the teams involved, though it adds to historic aspect given it was Yankees vs Red Sox. It had never happened in all of baseball's history until then.
Then you can appreciate that the law of averages dictates it would have to happen to the Yankees because they are ALWAYS in the playoffs.
Yes, I do appreciate it. I also appreciate what kind of mental meltdown they underwent. Not sure what your point is though.
:rolleyes: Doesn't that kind of give little credit to an incredible Boston team that was favored going in?I saw it as some great pitching and timely hitting on the Sox part but, hey..... Just call the Sox only World Series win 86 year a fluke and a Yankee meltdown.... Not my opinion, but, an interesting Point of View.
I don't think it was a fluke and I do think that the Red Sox had the better team. I do question on how much better it was. Let's face it, they weren't THAT far apart. It's not like they lost a bunch of players to injury either. Face it, they screwed up and let it slip away. This wasn't the first time the Red Sox had a better team and the Yankees overcame those to dominate, this time they didn't. Instead they had a meltdown and lost.
 
' date='Aug 21 2006, 10:24 AM' post='5368513']

' date='Aug 21 2006, 12:18 PM' post='5368475']

I think Jeter took the lead in the MVP race last night with that hit.
:no:He's having a helluva year, but that hit has zero impact on the MVP race. Voters look at the big picture...stats and team standing (which I disagree;with).
Moments like that on national TV make the difference in these things. He's actually earned it this year, considering no Sheff and Matsui and A-Rod having an off year. For the Yanks to be in first with much of the rag tag they sent out there is incredible.
If the sox make hte playoffs Ortiz will get it..... they won't though, so I think it comes down to Mauer/Jeter... I think if the Twins make it then Mauer gets the vote..... otherwise Jeter has the inside track. I'm in the camp that it's extremely gay that a team's overall success (ie playoff picture) is a deciding factor in who is most valuable to their team. Stick Jeter on the Royals and they are still not a playoff team.... but he's by far the most valuable player on the team and still having one of the best seasons in the majors. :thumbdown:
But who is more important, Papi or Manny?? Ramirez can do it in any kind of lineup...he proved that with the Indians. Papi needs Manny hitting behind him. It's the reason why people keep pitching to him.Manny is more important to the Sox than Papi, IMO.
Manny needs protection as well..... look at the yankees series. He was walked 5-6 times intentionally. They are both in the same boat.
 
' date='Aug 21 2006, 12:45 PM' post='5369478']

' date='Aug 21 2006, 10:24 AM' post='5368513']

' date='Aug 21 2006, 12:18 PM' post='5368475']

I think Jeter took the lead in the MVP race last night with that hit.
:no:He's having a helluva year, but that hit has zero impact on the MVP race. Voters look at the big picture...stats and team standing (which I disagree;with).
Moments like that on national TV make the difference in these things. He's actually earned it this year, considering no Sheff and Matsui and A-Rod having an off year. For the Yanks to be in first with much of the rag tag they sent out there is incredible.
If the sox make hte playoffs Ortiz will get it..... they won't though, so I think it comes down to Mauer/Jeter... I think if the Twins make it then Mauer gets the vote..... otherwise Jeter has the inside track. I'm in the camp that it's extremely gay that a team's overall success (ie playoff picture) is a deciding factor in who is most valuable to their team. Stick Jeter on the Royals and they are still not a playoff team.... but he's by far the most valuable player on the team and still having one of the best seasons in the majors. :thumbdown:
But who is more important, Papi or Manny?? Ramirez can do it in any kind of lineup...he proved that with the Indians. Papi needs Manny hitting behind him. It's the reason why people keep pitching to him.Manny is more important to the Sox than Papi, IMO.
Manny needs protection as well..... look at the yankees series. He was walked 5-6 times intentionally. They are both in the same boat.
Manny has hurt the Yankees A LOT more than Ortiz has in their careers.
 
because that's the time it took for Boston to finally win a WS.
Oh. I am talking about the path the Red Sox took not necessarily the # of years it took. I couldn't care less about that. I don't really care about the teams involved, though it adds to historic aspect given it was Yankees vs Red Sox. It had never happened in all of baseball's history until then.
Then you can appreciate that the law of averages dictates it would have to happen to the Yankees because they are ALWAYS in the playoffs.
There is no such thing as the law of averages.
 
I'm just watching the GameCast.

question: Is Wells still fat?

How much would you pay for a Wells/Ponson/Colon 3-way cage match? How long would it take Wells to win?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
' date='Aug 21 2006, 12:45 PM' post='5369478']

' date='Aug 21 2006, 10:24 AM' post='5368513']

' date='Aug 21 2006, 12:18 PM' post='5368475']

I think Jeter took the lead in the MVP race last night with that hit.
:no:He's having a helluva year, but that hit has zero impact on the MVP race. Voters look at the big picture...stats and team standing (which I disagree;with).
Moments like that on national TV make the difference in these things. He's actually earned it this year, considering no Sheff and Matsui and A-Rod having an off year. For the Yanks to be in first with much of the rag tag they sent out there is incredible.
If the sox make hte playoffs Ortiz will get it..... they won't though, so I think it comes down to Mauer/Jeter... I think if the Twins make it then Mauer gets the vote..... otherwise Jeter has the inside track. I'm in the camp that it's extremely gay that a team's overall success (ie playoff picture) is a deciding factor in who is most valuable to their team. Stick Jeter on the Royals and they are still not a playoff team.... but he's by far the most valuable player on the team and still having one of the best seasons in the majors. :thumbdown:
But who is more important, Papi or Manny?? Ramirez can do it in any kind of lineup...he proved that with the Indians. Papi needs Manny hitting behind him. It's the reason why people keep pitching to him.Manny is more important to the Sox than Papi, IMO.
Manny needs protection as well..... look at the yankees series. He was walked 5-6 times intentionally. They are both in the same boat.
Manny has hurt the Yankees A LOT more than Ortiz has in their careers.
In their careers? No doubt. In the last couple years? Not so much. And the comment about Manny doing well in all lineups "including indians"..... I suggest he step back and look at that indians lineup :yes:
 
because that's the time it took for Boston to finally win a WS.
Oh. I am talking about the path the Red Sox took not necessarily the # of years it took. I couldn't care less about that. I don't really care about the teams involved, though it adds to historic aspect given it was Yankees vs Red Sox. It had never happened in all of baseball's history until then.
Then you can appreciate that the law of averages dictates it would have to happen to the Yankees because they are ALWAYS in the playoffs.
Yes, I do appreciate it. I also appreciate what kind of mental meltdown they underwent. Not sure what your point is though.
:rolleyes: Doesn't that kind of give little credit to an incredible Boston team that was favored going in?I saw it as some great pitching and timely hitting on the Sox part but, hey..... Just call the Sox only World Series win 86 year a fluke and a Yankee meltdown.... Not my opinion, but, an interesting Point of View.
I don't think it was a fluke and I do think that the Red Sox had the better team. I do question on how much better it was. Let's face it, they weren't THAT far apart. It's not like they lost a bunch of players to injury either. Face it, they screwed up and let it slip away. This wasn't the first time the Red Sox had a better team and the Yankees overcame those to dominate, this time they didn't. Instead they had a meltdown and lost.
I saw it as two real close teams with the Sox the favorite.. Yanks won 3 games Sox won 4 game, interesting season and series. Next.I do believe though that after many years of not winning and the whole 1918 thing and movies mentioning it and the whole "Curse" thing in Boston taking a life of its' own, it meant so many times more to a Sox fan than a Yankee fan.. Again, just my opinion, yeah it was painful but, The losses to the Diamondbacks and Marlins IN the World Series were pretty painful as well. Again, that's just my opion and I can't talk for all Yankee and Sox fans.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
because that's the time it took for Boston to finally win a WS.
Oh. I am talking about the path the Red Sox took not necessarily the # of years it took. I couldn't care less about that. I don't really care about the teams involved, though it adds to historic aspect given it was Yankees vs Red Sox. It had never happened in all of baseball's history until then.
Then you can appreciate that the law of averages dictates it would have to happen to the Yankees because they are ALWAYS in the playoffs.
Yes, I do appreciate it. I also appreciate what kind of mental meltdown they underwent. Not sure what your point is though.
:rolleyes: Doesn't that kind of give little credit to an incredible Boston team that was favored going in?I saw it as some great pitching and timely hitting on the Sox part but, hey..... Just call the Sox only World Series win 86 year a fluke and a Yankee meltdown.... Not my opinion, but, an interesting Point of View.
I don't think it was a fluke and I do think that the Red Sox had the better team. I do question on how much better it was. Let's face it, they weren't THAT far apart. It's not like they lost a bunch of players to injury either. Face it, they screwed up and let it slip away. This wasn't the first time the Red Sox had a better team and the Yankees overcame those to dominate, this time they didn't. Instead they had a meltdown and lost.
I saw it as two real close teams with the Sox the favorite.. Yanks won 3 games Sox on 4 game, interesting season and series. Next.I do believe though that after many years of not winning and the whole 1918 thing and movies mentioning it and the whole "Curse" thing in Boston taking a life of its' own, it meant so many times more to a Sox fan than a Yankee fan.. Again, just my opinion, yeah it was painful but, The losses to the Diamondbacks and Marlins IN the World Series were pretty painful as well. Again, that's just my opion and I can't talk for all Yankee and Sox fans.
Maybe it's getting older, and maybe it's living life and maybe it was lost innocence, but the most despondent I was after any loss in this Yankee run was the one in Seattle. I think that squad had a world series pedigree and Mariano if he got to the next round might have been the original K-Rod. That one hurt for a few months, I was over the Boston loss in a week or 10 days, despite it being so epically cataclysmic. Maybe it was living through 9/11 I couldn't take this crap so seriously.In all honesty though, I've lived through the worst possible thing a sports fan could live through, and you know what, it was kind of ok, and I was actually personally inspired by what the Sox did in my own life, to stare down that much history and shake all those ghosts(recent Yank history, the Bambino, the 3-0 down, Mariano in 9th in Game 4)
 
because that's the time it took for Boston to finally win a WS.
Oh. I am talking about the path the Red Sox took not necessarily the # of years it took. I couldn't care less about that. I don't really care about the teams involved, though it adds to historic aspect given it was Yankees vs Red Sox. It had never happened in all of baseball's history until then.
Then you can appreciate that the law of averages dictates it would have to happen to the Yankees because they are ALWAYS in the playoffs.
Yes, I do appreciate it. I also appreciate what kind of mental meltdown they underwent. Not sure what your point is though.
:rolleyes: Doesn't that kind of give little credit to an incredible Boston team that was favored going in?I saw it as some great pitching and timely hitting on the Sox part but, hey..... Just call the Sox only World Series win 86 year a fluke and a Yankee meltdown.... Not my opinion, but, an interesting Point of View.
I don't think it was a fluke and I do think that the Red Sox had the better team. I do question on how much better it was. Let's face it, they weren't THAT far apart. It's not like they lost a bunch of players to injury either. Face it, they screwed up and let it slip away. This wasn't the first time the Red Sox had a better team and the Yankees overcame those to dominate, this time they didn't. Instead they had a meltdown and lost.
I saw it as two real close teams with the Sox the favorite.. Yanks won 3 games Sox on 4 game, interesting season and series. Next.I do believe though that after many years of not winning and the whole 1918 thing and movies mentioning it and the whole "Curse" thing in Boston taking a life of its' own, it meant so many times more to a Sox fan than a Yankee fan.. Again, just my opinion, yeah it was painful but, The losses to the Diamondbacks and Marlins IN the World Series were pretty painful as well. Again, that's just my opion and I can't talk for all Yankee and Sox fans.
Maybe it's getting older, and maybe it's living life and maybe it was lost innocence, but the most despondent I was after any loss in this Yankee run was the one in Seattle. I think that squad had a world series pedigree and Mariano if he got to the next round might have been the original K-Rod. That one hurt for a few months, I was over the Boston loss in a week or 10 days, despite it being so epically cataclysmic. Maybe it was living through 9/11 I couldn't take this crap so seriously.In all honesty though, I've lived through the worst possible thing a sports fan could live through, and you know what, it was kind of ok, and I was actually personally inspired by what the Sox did in my own life, to stare down that much history and shake all those ghosts(recent Yank history, the Bambino, the 3-0 down, Mariano in 9th in Game 4)
Agreed but, I never believed in Curses or Ghosts and never had that whole thing on my back, on my Dad's back and on my Grandfather's back like Sox fans did.... The level of emotions and significance just couldn't compare. And afterwards the post game emotions just couldnt' be the same, as if Sox fans expected us to react like we've been beaten for 86 years. I have partied in the Bronx I have been there when the final out was made, I've sipped the champagne, I just couldn't get as depressed and bowled over as a Sox fan that has been beaten up and heard about being beated up for generations. Al lI've grown up with was stories of Greatness and then experienced it....******** BUT I'M A Jets fan - So I consider myself grounded -And most of my Childhood, other than 1978, the two teams weren't really Good teams at the same time and the rivalry was kinda dormant for a bit. To me growing up, it was Yankee and Met fans battling..... Like I said earlier, and it sounds INCREDIBLE even as I type it - I rooted for Boston in 1986.... Could never happen again, but, in NY there was nothing worse then seeing the Mets and the Biggest Band Wagon in the history of Sports win - It was always Hernandez Vs Mattingly and who owns NY back then and those pesky littel chumps like Dykstra and the rest of what turned out to be a Drug Fest..... By the time that series came, I was on top of a Bar in college rooting for Buckner to get that out and I was as shocked as anyone..... BAM.. WTF? I was even wounded on that one. If only I had that Yankee / Sox rivalry in my blood back then I wouldn't know who to root for and probably would have rooted for exactly what happened.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
because that's the time it took for Boston to finally win a WS.
Oh. I am talking about the path the Red Sox took not necessarily the # of years it took. I couldn't care less about that. I don't really care about the teams involved, though it adds to historic aspect given it was Yankees vs Red Sox. It had never happened in all of baseball's history until then.
Then you can appreciate that the law of averages dictates it would have to happen to the Yankees because they are ALWAYS in the playoffs.
Yes, I do appreciate it. I also appreciate what kind of mental meltdown they underwent. Not sure what your point is though.
:rolleyes: Doesn't that kind of give little credit to an incredible Boston team that was favored going in?I saw it as some great pitching and timely hitting on the Sox part but, hey..... Just call the Sox only World Series win 86 year a fluke and a Yankee meltdown.... Not my opinion, but, an interesting Point of View.
I don't think it was a fluke and I do think that the Red Sox had the better team. I do question on how much better it was. Let's face it, they weren't THAT far apart. It's not like they lost a bunch of players to injury either. Face it, they screwed up and let it slip away. This wasn't the first time the Red Sox had a better team and the Yankees overcame those to dominate, this time they didn't. Instead they had a meltdown and lost.
I saw it as two real close teams with the Sox the favorite.. Yanks won 3 games Sox on 4 game, interesting season and series. Next.I do believe though that after many years of not winning and the whole 1918 thing and movies mentioning it and the whole "Curse" thing in Boston taking a life of its' own, it meant so many times more to a Sox fan than a Yankee fan.. Again, just my opinion, yeah it was painful but, The losses to the Diamondbacks and Marlins IN the World Series were pretty painful as well. Again, that's just my opion and I can't talk for all Yankee and Sox fans.
Maybe it's getting older, and maybe it's living life and maybe it was lost innocence, but the most despondent I was after any loss in this Yankee run was the one in Seattle. I think that squad had a world series pedigree and Mariano if he got to the next round might have been the original K-Rod. That one hurt for a few months, I was over the Boston loss in a week or 10 days, despite it being so epically cataclysmic.
'95 was brutal. It was without question the low light of my sports watching life. Between missing out on a chance to get to the WS in '94 because of the strike, Donnie's last hurrah, and watching it in a dorm room surrounded by Yankee fans on 10 different floors it still gets me a little to this day. I guess it just made '96 a little sweeter.I'll never forget Gary Thorn's call of Mattingly's Homer in Game 2 of that series.
 
John Sterling guaranteed that Rivera would be going in the 9th if needed today. More proof that he is a complete and utter buffoon/homer, although still not as bad as his broadcast partner Susie Waldman.

 
Sing along with us!

New york, new york

Start spreading the news, Im leaving today

I want to be a part of it - new york, new york

These vagabond shoes, are longing to stray

Right through the very heart of it - new york, new york

I wanna wake up in a city, that doesnt sleep

And find Im king of the hill - top of the heap

These little town blues, are melting away

Ill make a brand new start of it - in old new york

If I can make it there, Ill make it anywhere

Its up to you - new york, new york

New york, new york

I want to wake up in a city, that never sleeps

And find Im a number one top of the list, king of the hill

A number one

These little town blues, are melting away

Im gonna make a brand new start of it - in old new york

And if I can make it there, Im gonna make it anywhere

It up to you - new york new york

New york

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top