What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Your opinion on the job that President Obama is doing so far (2 Viewers)

Your opinion on the job that President Obama is doing so far

  • strongly approve

    Votes: 43 17.8%
  • mildly approve

    Votes: 43 17.8%
  • mildly disapprove

    Votes: 31 12.8%
  • strongly disapprove

    Votes: 121 50.0%
  • neutral/no opinion

    Votes: 4 1.7%

  • Total voters
    242
What would you do if that was your kid?
Not keep him in a country harboring people who attack America. Not allow him to be used as a shield.And certainly not post something as derpderp as https://fbcdn-sphoto...210515159_n.jpg about it when the facts are for America to defend herself.
obama has caused more American deaths in Afghanistan than bush...Be proud...
That's what happens when you actually fight-the-fight and go after AQ and Osama.
Okay so we now know that civilians in whatever country he attacks are irrelevant as well as American military...You are an amazing individual...

You should have family over there, maybe they could be part of the sacrifice you have no problem with...
The Paki civilians aren't irrelevant.And I lost my best friend over there, at the onset.

Now stop sniveling, baby boy.

And get a grasp of what the repercussion are when a country harbors and works with the people who actually attacked us, like Afghanistan and Pakistan.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I'm gonna go out on a limb and assume you've found some way to support Obama's use of troops to guard Afghan poppy fields. Just unreal.

On a lighter note, it looks like Obama is going to change his tune on the persecution of medicinal cannabis users.

http://youtu.be/pDetFnxHA2w

 
What would you do if that was your kid?
Not keep him in a country harboring people who attack America. Not allow him to be used as a shield.And certainly not post something as derpderp as https://fbcdn-sphoto...210515159_n.jpg about it when the facts are for America to defend herself.
obama has caused more American deaths in Afghanistan than bush...Be proud...
I am a little confused by your comments on this BYD.Are you saying that we should not be there? WHich I think would be backwards from what every other TeaParty/Republicans I know of.

 
Looks like he pretty much has the government running like a well oiled machine - no wasteful spending, no lavish vacations, addressing the debt issue head on, race is no longer an issue, borders are under control, secret service not "laying" around, great consensus building relationship with Congress, not wasting his valuable time trying to single out certain classes of people as villains, really getting people to be accountable and reap the rewards of their efforts instead of relying on some govt handout, has a super energy policy, really attacking tax reform, Middle East totally under control... god, I'm going to be sick.... :X

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Looks like he pretty much has the government running like a well oiled machine - no wasteful spending, no lavish vacations, addressing the debt issue head on, race is no longer an issue, borders are under control, secret service not "laying" around, great consensus building relationship with Congress, not wasting his valuable time trying to single out certain classes of people as villains, really getting people to be accountable and reap the rewards of their efforts instead of relying on some govt handout, has a super energy policy, really attacking tax reform, Middle East totally under control... god, I'm going to be sick.... :X
:goodposting: I don't know what Romney is going to do but it has to be better than Obama. I can't take the divisiveness anymore. There's just way too much finger-pointing and lack of accountability on so many levels and like most things that starts from the top. Lets bring someone in who has a positive attitude about moving forward and not a pessimistic, negative view all the time. Obama can have his legacy as the first black President and Osama-slayer but this country neads a leader. I don't know if Romney is that leader but I do know Obama isn't. Time to move on.
 
Looks like he pretty much has the government running like a well oiled machine - no wasteful spending, no lavish vacations, addressing the debt issue head on, race is no longer an issue, borders are under control, secret service not "laying" around, great consensus building relationship with Congress, not wasting his valuable time trying to single out certain classes of people as villains, really getting people to be accountable and reap the rewards of their efforts instead of relying on some govt handout, has a super energy policy, really attacking tax reform, Middle East totally under control... god, I'm going to be sick.... :X
:goodposting: I don't know what Romney is going to do but it has to be better than Obama. I can't take the divisiveness anymore. There's just way too much finger-pointing and lack of accountability on so many levels and like most things that starts from the top. Lets bring someone in who has a positive attitude about moving forward and not a pessimistic, negative view all the time. Obama can have his legacy as the first black President and Osama-slayer but this country neads a leader. I don't know if Romney is that leader but I do know Obama isn't. Time to move on.
I'm pretty sure we could install Barney the purple dinosaur as POTUS, and the finger-pointing from both sides wouldn't go away.
 
Looks like he pretty much has the government running like a well oiled machine - no wasteful spending, no lavish vacations, addressing the debt issue head on, race is no longer an issue, borders are under control, secret service not "laying" around, great consensus building relationship with Congress, not wasting his valuable time trying to single out certain classes of people as villains, really getting people to be accountable and reap the rewards of their efforts instead of relying on some govt handout, has a super energy policy, really attacking tax reform, Middle East totally under control... god, I'm going to be sick.... :X
:goodposting: I don't know what Romney is going to do but it has to be better than Obama. I can't take the divisiveness anymore. There's just way too much finger-pointing and lack of accountability on so many levels and like most things that starts from the top. Lets bring someone in who has a positive attitude about moving forward and not a pessimistic, negative view all the time. Obama can have his legacy as the first black President and Osama-slayer but this country neads a leader. I don't know if Romney is that leader but I do know Obama isn't. Time to move on.
I'm pretty sure we could install Barney the purple dinosaur as POTUS, and the finger-pointing from both sides wouldn't go away.
That may be but Obama came in from Day One proclaiming "you lost, we won" and has continued that type of discourse throughout his presidency. As if it was all Bush and the Republicans fault and had nothing to do with the Democratic controlled Congress, of which he was a part of. The country needs a uniter, not a divider.
 
Ill see that, and raise you another SNL almunis and the...

Lighten up Butter Cup. Its the same type of Abbot-n-Costello routine, one plays all serious and one plays all silly.And the funniest part may be the actual blues singer from the latenite band dropping the Kanye/Kim and Tebow remarks.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Surprised they didn't do something that would have portrayed Obama in a more cool light, like utilize his singing somehow. Instead he just came off as a typical dorky politician.
It's supposed to be slow jam the news. Fallon was playing his part but instead of slow jamming the news, we get Barack attempting to slow jam a campaign pitch.
I don't watch the show so I don't know the bit but I assumed that was what Obama was supposed to do. Just act like he would appear in a news broadcast.
 
“We are witnessing the bipartisan normalization and legitimization of a national security state,” Jack Balkin, a liberal Yale University Law School professor, told the New Yorker in a 2011 feature about a prominent NSA whistle-blower. “The question is not whether we will have a surveillance state in the years to come, but what sort of state we will have,” he wrote in a prescient law review article published early in Obama’s presidency.
Whole thing is spot on and I enjoyed the bolded quote. Obama has been abysmal at civil liberties.
 
Rochester, New York (The Weekly Vice) - Christine Wright-Darrisaw, a 36-year-old Rochester woman was jailed after she allegedly called the White House and threatened to kill President Barack Obama over child custody laws.

According to Rochester police, Wright-Darrisaw repeatedly called the White House in regards to her child custody issues.

On February 24, she reportedly called again. This time, the operator stated that she was screaming into the phone, stating that current child custody laws were unfair and that she needed Obama to fix it.

Investigators say Wright-Darrisaw threatened to kill the president while speaking to the operator. The operator informed Secret Service officials of that phone call, along with the previous calls they had received from the suspect.

Wright-Darrisaw was booked into jail on federal charges of threatening to kill the president.

http://www.theweeklyvice.com/2012/03/christine-wright-darrisaw-jailed-after.html
 
President Obama's budget suffered a second embarrassing defeat Wednesday, when senators voted 99-0 to reject it.Coupled with the House's rejection in March, 414-0, that means Mr. Obama's budget has failed to win a single vote in support this year.
Guy went ofer-Congress.
 
President Obama's budget suffered a second embarrassing defeat Wednesday, when senators voted 99-0 to reject it.Coupled with the House's rejection in March, 414-0, that means Mr. Obama's budget has failed to win a single vote in support this year.
Guy went ofer-Congress.
IT ISN'T HIS JOB TO PRODUCE A REAL BUDGET!!!!!! god!!!!!!!!!
 
Did White House Administration 'back patting' lead to exposing a covert op?

As a result of the news leaks, however, U.S. and allied officials told Reuters that they were forced to end an operation which they hoped could have continued for weeks or longer.

Several days after the first leaks, counter-terrorism sources confirmed to Reuters that a central role in the operation had been played by MI-5 and MI-6, Britain's ultra-secretive domestic and foreign intelligence services, whose relationship with their American counterparts has been periodically strained by concern about leaks.

These sources acknowledged that British authorities were deeply distressed that anything at all had leaked out about the operation.
Of course, nothing is EVER their fault
The White House places the blame squarely on AP, calling the claim that Brennan contributed to a leak "ridiculous."
Wait, what?
 
4 more years, 4 more years...

$12,984--Increase in Debt Per Household Since First 2011 Bipartisan Spending Deal

By Terence P. Jeffrey

May 18, 2012

Subscribe to Terence P. Jeffrey's posts

The White House and the congressional leaders of both parties in Congress have begun maneuvering this week over the issue of the federal debt and what to do when the government hits the latest statutory limit on that debt--$16.394 trillion—which Congress and the president agreed to when they cut a deal on the debt limit last August.

The federal debt is currently $15.709 trillion, or about $685 billion below the limit.

The first spending deal the White House and leaders of both parties in Congress made last year was on March 2. On that day, the president signed a continuing resolution to keep the government funded past March 4, when the previous continuing resolution, passed by a lame-duck Congress in late 2010, expired.

The March 4 CR kept the government funded for two weeks and was approved by a bipartisan 335-91 vote in the House and a bipartisan 91-9 vote in the Senate.

Since that March 4, 2011 bipartisan continuing resolution, the federal government has been funded by a series of bipartisan deals cut between the White House and congressional leaders.

In the meanwhile, under these bipartisan spending deals, according to official figures published by the U.S. Treasury, the federal debt has climbed from $14,182,627,184,881.03 to $15,708,753,671,767.64.

That is an increase of $1,526,126,486,886.61.

Given that the Census Bureau estimates there are about 117,538,000 households in the United States, the per household increase in the federal debt since Congress enacted its March 4, 2011 bipartisan spending deal has been approximately $12,984.
 
4 more years, 4 more years...

$12,984--Increase in Debt Per Household Since First 2011 Bipartisan Spending Deal

By Terence P. Jeffrey

May 18, 2012

Subscribe to Terence P. Jeffrey's posts

The White House and the congressional leaders of both parties in Congress have begun maneuvering this week over the issue of the federal debt and what to do when the government hits the latest statutory limit on that debt--$16.394 trillion—which Congress and the president agreed to when they cut a deal on the debt limit last August.

The federal debt is currently $15.709 trillion, or about $685 billion below the limit.

The first spending deal the White House and leaders of both parties in Congress made last year was on March 2. On that day, the president signed a continuing resolution to keep the government funded past March 4, when the previous continuing resolution, passed by a lame-duck Congress in late 2010, expired.

The March 4 CR kept the government funded for two weeks and was approved by a bipartisan 335-91 vote in the House and a bipartisan 91-9 vote in the Senate.

Since that March 4, 2011 bipartisan continuing resolution, the federal government has been funded by a series of bipartisan deals cut between the White House and congressional leaders.

In the meanwhile, under these bipartisan spending deals, according to official figures published by the U.S. Treasury, the federal debt has climbed from $14,182,627,184,881.03 to $15,708,753,671,767.64.

That is an increase of $1,526,126,486,886.61.

Given that the Census Bureau estimates there are about 117,538,000 households in the United States, the per household increase in the federal debt since Congress enacted its March 4, 2011 bipartisan spending deal has been approximately $12,984.
Debt is irrelevant. There is this thing called a printing press.
 
Seth Myers on Weekend Update tonight:

According to insiders, a group of wealthy Republicans are working on a new Super Pac campaign that would use an "extremely literate, conservative African-American" to attack President Obama. The group did have someone in mind, but had to start their search over when they found out Carlton Banks was fictional.
:lmao: :lmao:
 
So we've learned something new about how the democrat mind works.

When a democrat is in the White House, and the GOP has at least part of congress...

IF the economy is booming, all credit must go to the democrat in the White House (Bill Clinton) and none goes to the GOP in congress (Newt Gingrich and the GOP). This one was well established.

now we've got a new one:

IF the economy is in trouble, all blame must go to the GOP in congress. (Boehner and the House) and no blame goes to the democrat in the White House (Obama).

So the hypocrisy of the democrats is complete on that front at last. Of course, if you point this out, they'll flip to page 5 in the democrat playbook, accuse the GOP of doing the same thing, drag the discussion into the gutter, and hope the spinless GOP moderates quit.

 
With unemployment rising to 8.2% today, the solution is clear: someone needs to give Obama the Nobel Prize for Economics. We also need to blame the BLS for criminally undermining the Obama Administration with this clearly forged and hurtful (to Obama) number.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top