Yep.It's a religion.
How is it better?Better than christianity but still ridiculous.
No women drivers under Sharia LawHow is it better?Better than christianity but still ridiculous.
I agree with this sentiment, but I tend to think that there are more radicals that are willing to take to action in Islam then in all of the other religions and their actions as radicals involve violence, whereas a group like the born-agains (who I would consider to be the more radical Christian sect) all they do is ring a few door bells and recruit people. Plus there are many Islamic leaders who teach and preach hatred to their mostly uneducated masses, which also leads to more violence and acts of revenge for the last 1000 years of random injustices someone has suffered somewhere.Like every other "legitimate religion" (Yes, i realize how open to interpretation this is) its good at its core. Most of the teachings of Islam are good and morally defensible. But like every other religion, there are radical morons who pervert those teachings in order to serve their own ignorant and violent agenda.
Dictionary sent.I can state objectively without the slightest doubt that in our current society, Christianity is a much more moral religion than is Islam.
Muslim radicals have gotten more publicity in the last 8 years (and rightfully so) but 9/11 aside, Christian radicals have been significantly more hurtful throughout history. While Christian radicals here in America dont tend to be violent, their closed-mindedness bible-thumping conservatism makes headlines and headaches as well. (although obviously on a very diferent level)Obviously I'm not defending radical muslims, but at least i can see their point. The fact of the matter is that their home land IS being invaded by people of other religions. Their very way of life is being threatened (Again, I DO NOT agree with their way of life). In America, radical Christians are free to live their life pretty much however they want. Nobody's invading their home to stop them. However, they still manage to stirr up trouble and make headlines by trying to push their beliefs and lifestyle on others. (pro-life, for example)And for the record, I was raised Roman catholic and have absolutely no political leanings. (quite frankly, i dont care).I agree with this sentiment, but I tend to think that there are more radicals that are willing to take to action in Islam then in all of the other religions and their actions as radicals involve violence, whereas a group like the born-agains (who I would consider to be the more radical Christian sect) all they do is ring a few door bells and recruit people. Plus there are many Islamic leaders who teach and preach hatred to their mostly uneducated masses, which also leads to more violence and acts of revenge for the last 1000 years of random injustices someone has suffered somewhere.Like every other "legitimate religion" (Yes, i realize how open to interpretation this is) its good at its core. Most of the teachings of Islam are good and morally defensible. But like every other religion, there are radical morons who pervert those teachings in order to serve their own ignorant and violent agenda.
The other thing with muslims is that they have managed to get entire countries to themselves where they can flourish and not be influenced dramatically but other influences. Other influences tend to temper radicalism....now however they are in a situation where they finally feel like their beliefs are being challenged and much like most humans when their beliefs are challenged they actually are becoming more radical in their ideology to protect their ego and what they believe to be their identity...Muslim radicals have gotten more publicity in the last 8 years (and rightfully so) but 9/11 aside, Christian radicals have been significantly more hurtful throughout history. While Christian radicals here in America dont tend to be violent, their closed-mindedness bible-thumping conservatism makes headlines and headaches as well. (although obviously on a very diferent level)Obviously I'm not defending radical muslims, but at least i can see their point. The fact of the matter is that their home land IS being invaded by people of other religions. Their very way of life is being threatened (Again, I DO NOT agree with their way of life). In America, radical Christians are free to live their life pretty much however they want. Nobody's invading their home to stop them. However, they still manage to stirr up trouble and make headlines by trying to push their beliefs and lifestyle on others. (pro-life, for example)And for the record, I was raised Roman catholic and have absolutely no political leanings. (quite frankly, i dont care).I agree with this sentiment, but I tend to think that there are more radicals that are willing to take to action in Islam then in all of the other religions and their actions as radicals involve violence, whereas a group like the born-agains (who I would consider to be the more radical Christian sect) all they do is ring a few door bells and recruit people. Plus there are many Islamic leaders who teach and preach hatred to their mostly uneducated masses, which also leads to more violence and acts of revenge for the last 1000 years of random injustices someone has suffered somewhere.Like every other "legitimate religion" (Yes, i realize how open to interpretation this is) its good at its core. Most of the teachings of Islam are good and morally defensible. But like every other religion, there are radical morons who pervert those teachings in order to serve their own ignorant and violent agenda.
As wacky as the rest of them.
As far as I know, they don't pick and choose what they believe in.How is it better?Better than christianity but still ridiculous.
They are talking about the religions, not the people practicing them.As far as I know, they don't pick and choose what they believe in.How is it better?Better than christianity but still ridiculous.
Don't the practitioners make it what it is?They are talking about the religions, not the people practicing them.As far as I know, they don't pick and choose what they believe in.How is it better?Better than christianity but still ridiculous.
+1i voted highly unfavorable but i would vote that for every religion
No women drivers under Sharia LawHow is it better?Better than christianity but still ridiculous.![]()
![]()
NoDon't the practitioners make it what it is?They are talking about the religions, not the people practicing them.As far as I know, they don't pick and choose what they believe in.How is it better?Better than christianity but still ridiculous.
of course the definition of any religion depends on the individual you are asking.They are talking about the religions, not the people practicing them.As far as I know, they don't pick and choose what they believe in.How is it better?Better than christianity but still ridiculous.
I am only referring to today's world and not the world of 100 years ago or even 1000 years ago, when the Christian push to dominate the world destroyed cultures and crushed other religions. I am surprised that Muslim is thriving as it is today since they refuse to adapt to a changing world. I might be wrong on this a bit, because radical Muslim seems to be growing as its leaders adapt to a changing world and grow thru hatred of others. Hatred and ignorance is a powerful tool and when wielded by someone who wants mayhem, things like Nazi Germany get built and their atrocities happen.Muslim radicals have gotten more publicity in the last 8 years (and rightfully so) but 9/11 aside, Christian radicals have been significantly more hurtful throughout history. While Christian radicals here in America dont tend to be violent, their closed-mindedness bible-thumping conservatism makes headlines and headaches as well. (although obviously on a very diferent level)Obviously I'm not defending radical muslims, but at least i can see their point. The fact of the matter is that their home land IS being invaded by people of other religions. Their very way of life is being threatened (Again, I DO NOT agree with their way of life). In America, radical Christians are free to live their life pretty much however they want. Nobody's invading their home to stop them. However, they still manage to stirr up trouble and make headlines by trying to push their beliefs and lifestyle on others. (pro-life, for example)And for the record, I was raised Roman catholic and have absolutely no political leanings. (quite frankly, i dont care).I agree with this sentiment, but I tend to think that there are more radicals that are willing to take to action in Islam then in all of the other religions and their actions as radicals involve violence, whereas a group like the born-agains (who I would consider to be the more radical Christian sect) all they do is ring a few door bells and recruit people. Plus there are many Islamic leaders who teach and preach hatred to their mostly uneducated masses, which also leads to more violence and acts of revenge for the last 1000 years of random injustices someone has suffered somewhere.Like every other "legitimate religion" (Yes, i realize how open to interpretation this is) its good at its core. Most of the teachings of Islam are good and morally defensible. But like every other religion, there are radical morons who pervert those teachings in order to serve their own ignorant and violent agenda.
That's really the difference, though. When were the crusades? 800 years ago? Sorry, but any religion that thinks it's appropriate to kill people over cartoons isn't civilized, and it wasn't just "radicals" that believe that is appropriate.If we were to have the poll shortly after the Crusades, I would have voted the same way. No religion is good when the extremists view kills people.
How much less could you care?Could care less option down?
This is sort of a shocking statement coming from you, but I am encouraged by itof course the definition of any religion depends on the individual you are asking.They are talking about the religions, not the people practicing them.As far as I know, they don't pick and choose what they believe in.How is it better?Better than christianity but still ridiculous.
The OP, the thread, or Islam?Ignorant %&%&%
did christianity evolve with the times, or did it evolve with power and influenceif the roles were flipped, if christianity was way outnumbered and confined to a small region, and the world was dominated by muslims, would there be christains still calling for the slaughter of muslims as the bible makes clear was done all the time? Would christianity be more old testament flavored if they were the minority?i don't think we can answer this questionwhen judeao-christian religions were just growing they used brutality and genocide freely and in fact we still celebrate those who did ithard to say what it would be like were the tables turnedThat's really the difference, though. When were the crusades? 800 years ago? Sorry, but any religion that thinks it's appropriate to kill people over cartoons isn't civilized, and it wasn't just "radicals" that believe that is appropriate.If we were to have the poll shortly after the Crusades, I would have voted the same way. No religion is good when the extremists view kills people.
So you are saying the christian god changed the religion over the last 800 years? In what way?That's really the difference, though. When were the crusades? 800 years ago? Sorry, but any religion that thinks it's appropriate to kill people over cartoons isn't civilized, and it wasn't just "radicals" that believe that is appropriate.If we were to have the poll shortly after the Crusades, I would have voted the same way. No religion is good when the extremists view kills people.
How is it better than Christianity? Christians don't tell their people to blow up themselves and innocent people. Christians don't treat their woman like objects. You are a fool.Better than christianity but still ridiculous.
That's not what I said at all.So you are saying the christian god changed the religion over the last 800 years? In what way?That's really the difference, though. When were the crusades? 800 years ago? Sorry, but any religion that thinks it's appropriate to kill people over cartoons isn't civilized, and it wasn't just "radicals" that believe that is appropriate.If we were to have the poll shortly after the Crusades, I would have voted the same way. No religion is good when the extremists view kills people.
That was my thinking. Please be cool in this thread. Take the jokes or shots to another board.JYeah. This thread will end well.