Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.
The whole offer isn't worth Morris. Rice is borderline waiver material, Miller is coming off a huge injury and no value and Johnson is of very little value. On top of that I give the 1.02, Tate and Gresham for free. And the worst part is including ridiculous rookie draft picks where I wouldn't want to drop someone from my roster to use them.
This trade could put you back for YEARS Give me the trent side ALLLLLLL day
Sorry, but Julio and Calvin aren't anywhere near the same value, but even if they were and canceled each other, look at the rest of the trade. That offer is extremely lopsided.
Now that's the sort of thing that belongs here.'Skeletore Eh said:
Maybe he meant less experienced? LOL
That last deal was silly; but the first three (especially Jennings and Colston) aren't terrible.
You would trade one of those WRs for Andre Brown?
For Andre Brown?
What goes through someones mind that they would offer this? Like it isn't foolish enough anyway, but then to ask 2.03 as well.
Andre Brown is only going a few rounds after these guys (especially Jennings) in startup drafts. I wouldn't have accepted the deals straight up, but I probably wouldn't have needed a ton with Brown, especially if I'm low on RBs and relying on Wilson.Not seeing how the first three aren't terrible too.
That guy needs to join a league with I'mtheScientistghostguy123 said:
He is only 26 and has the potential to be the lead guy in a RBBC, I wouldn't give him up for a 2nd rounder. FJax on the other hand I would trade for a 2nd.Andre Brown is only going a few rounds after these guys (especially Jennings) in startup drafts. I wouldn't have accepted the deals straight up, but I probably wouldn't have needed a ton with Brown, especially if I'm low on RBs and relying on Wilson.
Good luck getting Martin for AP straight up
Sad that I can beat that.Big keeper league where keeping players costs your earliest picks. Someone offered Peyton for a 1st. So essentially would have given a first and then had to drop entire roster including Peyton.
Worst in the last few months.
Level headed post to be sure but it misses the main point. Trades aren't made knowing the outcomes will justify them. They are made based on present day value mostly with a little prognostication thrown in. If you trade away Russell Wilson and get way less than market value, the trade is not vindicated if indeed Wilson fails. You still should have gotten fair market value.
I guess what I am meaning is that the "present day value" is, in itself, biased and the post was more of an illustration about perception. I mena, I know that the value of Dez Bryant is high. Not because he will 100% justify it but because the masses believe it is high. But what I mean is that, the reality might be very different.
Its still a bad trade in that you didn't get proper value. Whether the deal worked in your favor or against you is irrelavant. We do our best to look into the crystal ball and predict future production but our best information (flawed and biassed as it is) is the current thinking which is usually based on production, most recent stats, etc...
Another offer that probably doesn't belong in a "worst offer ever" kind of thread.
Ahhh, nothing better than rejecting an offer and having the guy tell you that you should have taken it. If it was such a great offer and he was offering you such great players...................then why on Earth is he offering them to you???? If they are so awesome he would keep them, especially if he truly thinks he is giving you the better players, lol.
all 4 are worth a mid 2nd at best.
