KarmaPolice
Footballguy
I know I will be the first to admit 100% that it very well could be an age thing.I'd argue that says more about your age than the quality of a movie. Kids can't see bad acting. Kids can't see terrible writing. If you watch the first Star Wars movie from 1977, that is some TERRIBLE acting by Hammil and Fisher. If you saw that for the first time as a 45 year old, you'd be disappointed.
It is a bonus if it is present, but I honestly don't expect great acting and story for a big blockbuster movie. A lot of what made me fall in love with movies was the "oh #### - how did they do that??" moments from the movies I remember seeing as a kid. IF a movie can come close to that now, I will forgive the story and acting because it still engrossed me enough to gloss over those things. This is why I get grumpy with the overdone CG in most movies - very very rarely can I get myself to that point of being into a movie if it looks like a video game and I know it was just done on a computer. That is when I would need the story and acting to kick in, and as we know, that is rare in the blockbuster type movies, so the the nitpicking rises and the enjoyment drops.
I really liked the first F&F, but IMO it has long jumped the shark as our small time crooks are teaming now jumping off of planes, crashing through skyscrapers, driving tanks and whatever nonsense is going on. I would forgive it more if they started that ridiculous from the first movie like The Expendables or something, but I just thought they got dumber and dumber as they pumped more and more out.