Jump to content
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

Dynasty & Redraft: RB Derrick Henry, Titans


Recommended Posts

That's an unfortunate auto-correct.

:lmao::lmao::lmao:

It was from my phone, so I guess RBs becomes Arabs in Apple world!

First thing I thought was that you were trying to reference Arabians...as in the horse...which is similar in concept to thoroughbreds.

So I was thinking "that's a little off the beaten path, but I can see where he's going with it".

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 3.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Oh hell no I ain’t reading that 

there is no presser on Saturday. There are usually guessers on ff sites- because that's what we want them to do- but don't leap like it's news.  Jim Wyatt will absolutely have ya covered here. He

Derrick Henry going 99 yards while stiff-arming people into the sun weeks after everyone who drafted him cut him, traded him or vowed never to start him again is the most Derrick Henry thing ever.

Quote

Senior Bowl executive director Phil Savage expects Alabama RB Derrick Henry to run the 40-yard dash in under 4.50 seconds.

 

Savage refers to Henry as a "humble giant" and adds that he "never saw him angled off or caught from behind." We're on-board with this assessment, no matter how much it seems to defy the laws of physics. The 6-foot-3, 238-pounder showed a consistent second-level burst and some of his most impressive runs of the season came when he simply ran away from the pursuing secondary. An NFL college scouting director indicated on Monday that he could envision Henry playing for the Saints, Patriots, Jets, Cowboys or Vikings. Just as interesting--if not more--than Henry's possible 40-yard time, his performance in agility drills like the three-cone drill. If he can convince scouts he's not just a strong straight-line runner, that could lead to him possibly cracking the back of the first round in April, though the second round remains his most likely selection window.
 
 
Feb 22 - 11:44 PM

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
38 minutes ago, Xue said:

For those who think Henry is "slow":

 

I didn't think anyone thought he was slow. 

What do you think the chances are he runs under 4.5? I think there's about a 50/50 chance he runs under. 

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, zeeshan2 said:

Came in at 247 pounds at the combine measurement. 

Last time a RB over 225 pounds led the league in rushing was Shaun Alexander in 2002 who was also a 'Bama back

Can you put up a link for where ever you're following the weigh ins?

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, zeeshan2 said:

Sure its a tweet though:

 

#NFLCombine RB measurements

Heaviest: Derrick Henry (247 lbs)
Lightest: Tyler Ervin (192 lbs)

Just on Twitter? Sorry I thought you were watching or following a live blog or something. 

I have a long day of waiting for phone calls/sitting on hold ahead of me. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Borden said:

Just on Twitter? Sorry I thought you were watching or following a live blog or something. 

I have a long day of waiting for phone calls/sitting on hold ahead of me. 

It's ok; yea that twitter account is really good for following the combine

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hands are a bit small but I don't see that being much of an issue. The 247 might be though. If he's looking soft/sloppy that will be a major concern because of what Eddie Lacy did this year. Even if it's all muscle it will still be a point of concern. Unless he destroys the 40 and 3 cone. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hands are a bit small?  Hands are way too small so he's almost off my draft list.   At 195 lbs my hands are Gronk-sized 10.5"+ and I can't imagine hands almost 2 inches smaller on a guy 50 pounds heavier than me.   He must be missing half a thumb.  

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

To compare to some prospects hand size:
Adrian Peterson: 9 1/2"
Jamaal Charles: 9 1/8"
Le'Veon Bell: 9 5/8"
Eddie Lacy: 9 1/2"
Todd Gurley: 10"
Zeke Elliott: 10 1/4"
Carlos Hyde: 9 5/8"

 

However Henry only fumbled four time on 406 touches this past season. I am not pro nor against Henry; just getting both sides in. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Are there actual data that hand size leads to more fumbles? Or is this just people's gut feel. I think way too simplistic of an argument to say well he's got small hands so avoid him. People say this all the time but is it actually true? Show me some data on this someone.

Edited by Gandalf
Link to post
Share on other sites

Other random prospects fumbles/handsize:

Elliott 1 10 1/4
Collins 5 9 1/4
Dixon 4 9 1/2
Booker 3 8 5/8
Howard 1 9   
Prosise 5 8 1/2
Perkins 1 9   
Drake 1 9 3/4
Madden 0 9 3/8
Ferguson 1 9   

 

 

Edited by kneeshooter
Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, Gandalf said:

Are there actual data that hand size leads to more fumbles? Or is this just people's gut feel. I think way too simplistic of an argument to say well he's got small hands so avoid him. People say this all the time but is it actually true? Show me some data on this someone.

What about arm length? Henry's got an inch+ on every other good prospect.  Mean anything, other than being a part of that brutal stiff arm?

Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, Gandalf said:

Are there actual data that hand size leads to more fumbles? Or is this just people's gut feel. I think way too simplistic of an argument to say well he's got small hands so avoid him. People say this all the time but is it actually true? Show me some data on this someone.

I think the whole process has gone way too far.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I can't imagine having to run a 40 yard dash with literally millions of dollars at stake on the final fraction of a second on a stop watch.  If he breaks 4.5, he's a first or second round pick.  If he doesn't,  that weight could make him drop like a rock in the draft.   

Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, Dr. Octopus said:

I think the whole process has gone way too far.

I agree. However, I think that certain drills and measurements are helpful for certain positions. Is arm length helpful for an OL? Most likely. How much does a 40 time matter for an OL? Zero. The 40 for OL is more of a funny goof around event. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, bostonfred said:

I can't imagine having to run a 40 yard dash with literally millions of dollars at stake on the final fraction of a second on a stop watch.  If he breaks 4.5, he's a first or second round pick.  If he doesn't,  that weight could make him drop like a rock in the draft.   

When they put the 40 runs all into one video and you see the gap between a 4.34 and a 4.61 it does make some sense as to why it's important for certain positions. 

*Side note: Beware of these videos as sometimes they are made wrong. There was a bad one made last year. This contradicts my point but I'd rather error on this side of honest and wrong than deceitful in any way. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, Borden said:

I agree. However, I think that certain drills and measurements are helpful for certain positions. Is arm length helpful for an OL? Most likely. How much does a 40 time matter for an OL? Zero. The 40 for OL is more of a funny goof around event. 

It's more the level of minutia and over analysis that is starting to bug me. I agree some drills and measurables certainly have at least some level of merit, but even the way a tenth of a second in a run from a starting position not even seen on a football field is treated like gospel is getting a bit out of hand.

With the said, I'll watch all I can and absorb every bit of information of course.

 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Wouldn't hand size really only be a negative for catching passes. If he has smaller hands, but they're strong, who cares? He'll still hold onto the football well as long as he uses good technique (cradles it against his forearm, etc.).

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, flysack said:

Wouldn't hand size really only be a negative for catching passes. If he has smaller hands, but they're strong, who cares? He'll still hold onto the football well as long as he uses good technique (cradles it against his forearm, etc.).

I'd tend to agree. RB's don't really carry the ball using just their hand(s). In fact it's poor form when they do.

Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, flysack said:

Wouldn't hand size really only be a negative for catching passes. If he has smaller hands, but they're strong, who cares? He'll still hold onto the football well as long as he uses good technique (cradles it against his forearm, etc.).

Be careful. Next year they might start measuring forearm circumference. ... Now that I think of it. I actually wouldn't mind seeing thigh circumference with running backs. Might be toeing the line of helpful and creepy. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, mikel2014 said:

Be careful. Next year they might start measuring forearm circumference. ... Now that I think of it. I actually wouldn't mind seeing thigh circumference with running backs. Might be toeing the line of helpful and creepy. 

You're wasting your time with forearm and thigh circumference.  Sack displacement... that is the next gen stat of the future! 

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, DropKick said:

You're wasting your time with forearm and thigh circumference.  Sack displacement... that is the next gen stat of the future! 

Measuring specific body parts is so last decade. They should just take an anatomically-complete millimeter-precise 3D body scan of each player, and make the information available online. Then analytics folks who want to look at specific attributes like thigh circumference could extract that measurement. Folks who want to find historically comparable players could calculate full-body similarity scores. Folks who want to compare quarterbacks' leadership attributes could do that. Everybody wins; there is no downside.

Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, ZWK said:

Measuring specific body parts is so last decade. They should just take an anatomically-complete millimeter-precise 3D body scan of each player, and make the information available online. Then analytics folks who want to look at specific attributes like thigh circumference could extract that measurement. Folks who want to find historically comparable players could calculate full-body similarity scores. Folks who want to compare quarterbacks' leadership attributes could do that. Everybody wins; there is no downside.

Too complicated when you can guage everything, including coaching, on sack displacement.

I can hear an announcer now... "Wow - they converted!  How do you go for it on 4th and 1 from your own 16 yard line?  That takes big balls!  You know, it's said he has the largest sack displacement since Holden McGroin measured 18.3 cubic inches in the 2019 combine...

Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Alabama RB Derrick Henry indicated that he views his draft position " like an underdog, working [his] way up."

 
Henry's using his second-round evaluation from the draft advisory committee as motivation. Said the Heisman Trophy winner, "I just use it as fuel every day." The 6-foot-3, 247-pound Tide product could sneak into the first round of this spring's draft, but he understands that there's still work to do in convincing scouts. "The questions are my quickness, catching the ball, my protection. I definitely want to get better at that and showcase what I can do," Henry said. Last weekend, a college scouting director tossed out the Patriots, Panthers, Saints, Jets and Vikings as potential nice fits for the Bama boomer.
 
 
Source: al.com
Feb 25 - 8:57 PM

 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

10'10 broad jump for Henry. He smashed Elliot in the jumps. Pretty sure I'll have Henry ranked higher than Elliot after today's performance. He's bigger/more explosive and he might be faster in the 40. He's the better athlete. 

Edited by Milkman
Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, Hankmoody said:

And an absurd 10'10" in the broad jump.  None of which helps him with lateral quickness, which I think will doom his ceiling as a runner.

Yep, I'm really interested in the short shuttle and 3 cone scores

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...