@ShanePHallam
You can see why Derrick Henry always falls forward, that is a fast load to tackle. He may not be super agile, but impossible to tackle.
12:07pm - 26 Feb 16
@ShanePHallam
I can understand the knocks on Henry, but I still really like him. One on one, he will win with power AND speed.
12:08pm - 26 Feb 16
@ShanePHallam
Derrick Henry’s thickness is what hurts his change of direction ability. He carries it well, but could be so dangerous a tad lighter too
12:40pm - 26 Feb 16
Better for the linebackers and defensive backs he's facing, sure.Yeah I'm not sure how hard it would be for him to drop 15 pounds but I think he would be a better RB if he did.
Not sure how true this is. But rumor in Gainesville is that Henry wanted to go to UF, but Muschamp recruited him as a LB. Henry refused to switch positions, and thus another Bama Heisman RB is born.He should be a linebacker
LOL Yea because 230+ pounds is small.Better for the linebackers and defensive backs he's facing, sure.
Depends on the league, but he's in the conversation imo.Over all the WRs?
Matt Miller @nfldraftscout
7.20 3-Cone drill for Derek Henry is not good. Short shuttle time will also be interesting
That's how you miss on the next David Johnson and over draft the next bust like Melvin Gordon. I know it's not popular on here but there is some merit to seeing what's under the hood.Not sure why anyone' opinion of Henry changes much...the numbers seem to confirm what we largely knew...really big guy with straightline speed who might not change directions and/or start and stop that well. your hope for excellence is that henry so much dude that he is tough for defenses to handle
I spoke specifically on Henry's numbers (checking the hood)...you are adding the part about ignoring the combine on your own.That's how you miss on the next David Johnson and over draft the next bust like Melvin Gordon. I know it's not popular on here but there is some merit to seeing what's under the hood.
Fair enough it seemed like you were alluding to that when I first read it but after rereading it I see what you meant. If he had put up jumps like Elliot he would have dropped significantly. He needs to cut some weight before his pro-day.I spoke specifically on Henry's numbers (checking the hood)...you are adding the part about ignoring the combine on your own.I spoke specifically on Henry's numbers (checking the hood)...you are adding the part about ignoring the combine on your own.
Quoting for posterity. The book is not written on either of these players.That's how you miss on the next David Johnson and over draft the next bust like Melvin Gordon. I know it's not popular on here but there is some merit to seeing what's under the hood.
ShrugQuoting for posterity. The book is not written on either of these players.
Agree. I woke up today thinking his closest comp was Brandon Jacobs and I'll got bed tonight thinking his closest comp is Brandon Jacobs.Not sure why anyone' opinion of Henry changes much...the numbers seem to confirm what we largely knew...really big guy with straightline speed who might not change directions and/or start and stop that well. your hope for excellence is that henry so much dude that he is tough for defenses to handle
As in good Brandon Jacobs or bad?Agree. I woke up today thinking his closest comp was Brandon Jacobs and I'll got bed tonight thinking his closest comp is Brandon Jacobs.
Both.As in good Brandon Jacobs or bad?
Well good luck to you if you think Henry is the next Peterson and if you don't not sure why you bring him up.Adrian Peterson has been a two down back most of his career. Just saying.
ESPN's Mark Dominik, the former general manager of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers, believes Alabama RB Derrick Henry will go in the first round regardless of what happens at the Combine in Indianapolis.
The 6-foot-3 1/2, 247-pound jackhammer rumbled for 2,219 yards and 28 touchdowns to lead the Crimson Tide to the championship last season. He was the heaviest of all runners who checked into the Combine. Bleacher Report thinks that a Trent Richardson association may end up hurting Henry. We disagree with that. Henry may go later than casual fans assume he should, but that's because a back of his skills is a perfect fit for some clubs (old-school, grinding scheme with a complimentary Tiki Barber-like shifty, receiving-type RB also on the roster) and an awful fit for others (bad line, no complimentary back, a scheme that asks him to stretch laterally or dance around in the backfield, etc.). Henry would be at home in the top half of Round 2, but he may just sneak into the first stanza yet. But only if a perfect situation presents itself or a team, assuming that doesn't matter, makes a Richardson-esque mistake by miscasting Henry.
Source: Mark Dominik on Twitter
Feb 26 - 12:45 PM
NFL Media analyst Bucky Brooks compares Alabama RB Derrick Henry to Eddie George.
"Big-bodied ball carrier with outstanding straight-line speed and burst," Brooks wrote. "Henry is a high-volume runner ideally suited to plow between the tackles as a "one-cut" back in a zone-based scheme. ... If Henry lands with right squad (a team that features a power-gap or zone-based scheme), the 'Bama product could quickly develop into the NFL's ultimate hammer in the backfield." The Denver Broncos, Minnesota Vikings and Dallas Cowboys run schemes that would suit Henry, he continued. Fit is important here because of Henry's limitations. "For all of Henry's positive attributes as a runner, he needs a bit of a runway to be an effective weapon in the backfield," Brooks wrote. "He lacks the 'pitter-pat' and lateral quickness to create in the hole, which makes it essential for him to play behind a solid offensive line."
Source: NFL.com
Feb 26 - 12:02 PM
Of course that's not the comp. The idea is that being a two down back isn't a death knell.Well good luck to you if you think Henry is the next Peterson and if you don't not sure why you bring him up.
Fair enough it seemed like you were alluding to that when I first read it but after rereading it I see what you meant. If he had put up jumps like Elliot he would have dropped significantly. He needs to cut some weight before his pro-day.
I agree I just think it's a lot lot harder to hit on them but that's my opinion, and like I said earlier when I comped Henry to Jacobs that was not meant as some kind of insult, Jacobs for sure had use. More than anything I was just trying to say that Henry is who I thought he was, today was not some kind of game changer.Of course that's not the comp. The idea is that being a two down back isn't a death knell.
This is my take as well. I think another potential comp is Steven Jackson. Jackson was 6'2, 240, ran a 4.45, 37 in vertical and was built similarly. In fact, he's closer to Jackson than he is to Jacobs in terms of size. However, I don't think Henry has the receiving chops that Jackson had nor do I think he's as powerful/violent runner that Jackson was. I also don't think he possesses quite the same lateral agility and acceleration that Jackson had.menobrown said:Both.
There are slight differences in the two. Jacobs was actually bigger and faster, Henry is a little more laterally elusive to me, but all in all very similar to me.
Jacobs was a good RB, like Henry a nightmare to bring down, had a healthy YPC and was a big time goal line runner. That's the good part and I think Henry can do all of those things.
I think Henry is a two down back like Jacobs which is a major negative to me and I also think due to his size and immense workload I don't like his chances of staying healthy or being productive over the long haul, not consistently anyway.
zeeshan2 said:Very similar measurables to Von Miller
FWIW Jacobs' Giants led the NFL in rushing when they used him in the first, big Ward in the 2nd, both in the 3rd, and fresh Bradshaw in the 4th.menobrown said:Both.
There are slight differences in the two. Jacobs was actually bigger and faster, Henry is a little more laterally elusive to me, but all in all very similar to me.
Jacobs was a good RB, like Henry a nightmare to bring down, had a healthy YPC and was a big time goal line runner. That's the good part and I think Henry can do all of those things.
I think Henry is a two down back like Jacobs which is a major negative to me and I also think due to his size and immense workload I don't like his chances of staying healthy or being productive over the long haul, not consistently anyway.
I think Jackson is top of the line athleticism, maybe Jim Brown is the only more athletic big back. (If Ricky is a big back, then I'd put Jax third)This is my take as well. I think another potential comp is Steven Jackson. Jackson was 6'2, 240, ran a 4.45, 37 in vertical and was built similarly. In fact, he's closer to Jackson than he is to Jacobs in terms of size. However, I don't think Henry has the receiving chops that Jackson had nor do I think he's as powerful/violent runner that Jackson was. I also don't think he possesses quite the same lateral agility and acceleration that Jackson had.
Jackson was an animal and truly a physical specimen and elite talent. I think Henry could be close to him as a runner but will be limited in reaching that status due to his receiving ability.
That was selective. I mentioned Chiefs backs, Brown, Earl, Alstott, Bam, and Ward. I didn't make it cause and effect with Jacobs getting tired so Henry will.And while I agree that wearing down can be an issue for big backs, you can't ding Henry because Jacobs got tired with too many carries. Look at the season Henry just put up, and against quality competition. He can carry the load for as long as his body will allow.
Yeah I agree with this and was skeptical before the combine "but" Henry should have put those fears to rest with his combine performance. He just showed he's above average athletically almost across the board. Sure his 3 cone was bad but he was never going to make people miss much in the NFL. He's going to wear teams down. One cut and go.I can't help but think of all the other highly touted RBs who put up crazy numbers behind monster offensive lines but flamed out or just fully busted in the NFL. Have not seen data on this but the anecdotal data leads me to be skeptical on Henry.
Fox Sports' Peter Schrager reported that Alabama RB Derrick Henry' "blew everyone away" at the Combine and now has a chance to go in Rd. 1.
Schrager believes that the marketplace will dictate this one. And that running back marketplace is so thin that "Doug Martin and/or Lamar Miller [may] fetch $7 mil [plus]," he wrote. The 6-foot-3, 247-pound Henry put on a Combine show for the ages. He posted a positively stupid 4.54 second 40-yard dash as well as an impressive broad jump (10-foot-10) and vertical leap (37 inches). Henry isn't out of the woods yet, though. He's a one-tricky, full-steam-ahead pony who doesn't have much wiggle in him. That profile bore out at the Combine, where Henry was a high-speed freight train on the track and stiffer than Ted Cruz in the three-cone drill, managing a 7.20 second showing that was bested by Northwestern FB Dan Vitale and similar to UCLA C Jake Brendel and Oregon T Tyler Johnstone.
Source: Peter Schrager on Twitter
Feb 29 - 2:21 PM
Your point, if I understand it correctly, is if he loses 15 lbs he'll be quicker, or his lateral agility will get better.LOL Yea because 230+ pounds is small.
I can't help but think of all the other highly touted RBs who put up crazy numbers behind monster offensive lines but flamed out or just fully busted in the NFL. Have not seen data on this but the anecdotal data leads me to be skeptical on Henry.
It's not a zero sum game. Losing this % of weight doesn't necessarily mean he's going to lose this % of power.Your point, if I understand it correctly, is if he loses 15 lbs he'll be quicker, or his lateral agility will get better.
My point is that if he's at his 100% most powerful at 250 - and you want him to come down to 95%, the incremental increase to his lateral quickness or agility will not be worth the 5% he lost from power.
He's not going to ever going to be a Barry Sanders type. Let him be the Okoye type and do what he does well. If you know anything about him as a prospect you know that the knock on him was never "he's not fast," it was lacking the lateral movement and "moves" other backs have had. He's not going to learn those or get good enough for them to matter at this stage in his career.