mphtrilogy
Footballguy
Watkins or mitchell? I have a chance to add him, would you drop watkins?
I have a plethora of wrs... I'd rank him over moncrief , Hopkins, Watkins, and Pryor this week but behind adams
Basically because he's a top 10 wr, they play at home, no earl Thomas, and they can't runAgree on Mitchell but more curious why so high on Adams this week? With the exception of Hopkin own every WR you listed above on various teams and I'd have Mitchell ranked over all of them this week. I basically got Mitchell as a must start weeks 14 and 16 and likely must bench in week 15.
I would start him over all those guys.I picked up Mitchell on waivers this week and am considering playing him over Cobb, Maclin, Coleman, and Boyd.
That is a tough call? Experts gave Watkins a top add a few weeks ago. Well, that was then, this is now. I added both Watkins and Mitchell back then. As of today, right now...I would rather have Mitchell and swing for the fences with his upside. Brady the QB and Mitchell a top 2 option. He will get targets and redzone chances I believe. Personally, I have to decide between a red hot Tyrell Williams or Malcolm Mitchell as my WR #2 this week and looking at ROS. Yes, the DEN matchup next week is not a good one.mphtrilogy said:Watkins or mitchell? I have a chance to add him, would you drop watkins?
mitchell has only 1 double digit target game, last week. is it an anomaly? it would be an overreaction to put him in the top 24 after just two games that he did well.Is Mitchell hype or the real deal? By all accounts he is the real deal. Brady likes him and his hands. How come most sites have him ranked as a low WR #3 at best? Who is willing to start him with the belief that he's at least a strong WR #2?
Bloom....
Is Mitchell hype or the real deal? By all accounts he is the real deal. Brady likes him and his hands. How come most sites have him ranked as a low WR #3 at best? Who is willing to start him with the belief that he's at least a strong WR #2?
Real deal in sense he has shown ability and has a future HOF QB throwing to him on a team with essentially only 2 other healthy usable non-RB passing options. He is WR2 least in weeks 14 and 16. He is a WR4 week 15.Is Mitchell hype or the real deal? By all accounts he is the real deal. Brady likes him and his hands. How come most sites have him ranked as a low WR #3 at best? Who is willing to start him with the belief that he's at least a strong WR #2?
I also have Moncrief, Crabtree and Cooper. I'm starting Cooper for sure. He ripped off 129 against KC before. Crabtree is definitely on the bench. He got shut down against Marcus Peters last time and there's no reason to believe that will change this time. Moncrief is so TD dependent that I have such a difficult time starting him. Especially against a Houston Pass D that has been doing pretty well. When Mitchell is not on Jimmy Smith he has a good matchup. At this point I'm rolling with Mitchell over Moncrief and Crabtree. I know TY is very good, but I'm not a fan of that matchup, which is why I'm not trusting Moncrief.Team Smokin' said:I am warming up to starting Mitchell as a strong WR #2, with WR #1 upside and a better than 50/50 chance to score one TD, let along multiple. I am seriously looking to start him over the likes of: Moncrief, Crabtree, Cooper, Moncrief, Ty Williams, Sanders. My other starting WR is TY Hilton. By the way in a heavy TD league I would rank TY, Mitchell, Williams (proving to be studly), and then Crabtree. Most sites would put TY and Cooper as their top two from this group.
This tells me to bench him... Bloom is a flavor of the week/month kind of guy. Him and Lammey I usually do the opposite of what they say/think and I'm usually making the right choice.Bloom.
Right or wrong this week, I love Bloom's style.
This is what I think too. I could see him posting 14 points. Obviously a TD increases that. 10+ would be great. I see that as Diggs' floor though so I will likely not start Mitchell. One or two games where a guy is heavily involved in an offense is not enough for me to chance a playoff win. We'll see if my balls get any bigger as the week goes on. I have a fairly easy matchup week 1 of our playoffs so playing it safe is a better option for me.I believe Edelman is due for a big game. Mitchell will have a 5/50, 4/60 type day and maybe a little more. I think this week his numbers will be alright and perhaps a mid WR3 level game. Nobody should cry in PPR if he continues to give you double digits. I just think Edelman will have the spotlight this week.
If Mitchell can garner 8-10 targets again this week, I'm fine with 6/65 and then really trusting this guy the next couple weeks as NE closes in on Division and either the 1 or 2 seed, every reason to feel once they get past Denver win or lose they will be pretty solid on offense the rest of the way. Denver is a terrible match up but Pats typically find a way.Going back and watching some of the routes Mitchell ran against the Rams and so much of that is very encouraging for future weeks. Whether that was just game plan specific for StL is obviously unknown but given how successful it was one would doubt the Patriots would abandon it going forward. Without Gronk and with Bennett really hobbling (Patriot beat writers are saying he's really beat up and just gutting it out right now) it appears Mitchell has taken on Gronk's role in a lot of ways, especially with the intermediate and RZ routes. Those would seem to be the types of things that will keep him permanently entrenched in the offense moving forward as long as he shows he can continue to earn Brady's trust.
Again, with no Gronk (and no Amendola) and with Bennett really laboring, Brady needs Mitchell right now so I think the Patriots will keep him heavily involved. I don't wanna jinx all of us who have him but this could be one of those perfect storm moments where a player is putting things together in exactly the right moment with the right QB and the right situation. This week's matchup is looks good, next week's is obviously more difficult but Week 16 is off the charts sensational. Mitchell may be the type of WW pickup who helps bring home some hardware this year for some folks.
Let us know if you do indeed strap on a set of those iron ballsThis tells me to bench him... Bloom is a flavor of the week/month kind of guy. Him and Lammey I usually do the opposite of what they say/think and I'm usually making the right choice.
This is what I think too. I could see him posting 14 points. Obviously a TD increases that. 10+ would be great. I see that as Diggs' floor though so I will likely not start Mitchell. One or two games where a guy is heavily involved in an offense is not enough for me to chance a playoff win. We'll see if my balls get any bigger as the week goes on. I have a fairly easy matchup week 1 of our playoffs so playing it safe is a better option for me.
A lot of people have similar WRs they are starting him over, and that is probably the right move considering some of your options. I think he could be a difference maker for those teams. I am sitting pretty good at WR (OBJ, DT, Diggs) so I can play it safe and be sitting pretty good. I see Diggs and Mitchell as producing similarly this week. Mitchell is a much bigger TD threat.
Hence the, "Right or wrong", preface, and, "style", love rather than, "reliability", love. I was just answering the question.This tells me to bench him... Bloom is a flavor of the week/month kind of guy. Him and Lammey I usually do the opposite of what they say/think and I'm usually making the right choice.
...
Ministry, don't ya just kinda get the feeling that Brady will be looking to integrate Mitchell into the game plan going forward? I mean in order for NE to win they are going to have to put up 27-30 points or more a game? Who else do they have? I can see 50/50 TD's every week and 50-75 yards on average every game. That is top 15 material.If Mitchell can garner 8-10 targets again this week, I'm fine with 6/65 and then really trusting this guy the next couple weeks as NE closes in on Division and either the 1 or 2 seed, every reason to feel once they get past Denver win or lose they will be pretty solid on offense the rest of the way. Denver is a terrible match up but Pats typically find a way.
Right now Mitchell is seen as a low end WR #3. Three scenario's after MNF. He remains the same (5-6 catches for 50-60 yards and a .5 TD), he falls (3-4 catches 30-40 yards), or he rises (60-75 yards and a TD or more)? I lean toward the latter. And remember this is NE's offense and next week that cancels out the vaunted DEN D. My money is on Mitchell. It could pay off, or not? That's why we play the game.And Baltimore is a decent match up for Mitchell. You gotta use him this week because next week it's Denver, that's gonna be a tough roll of the dice.
After I wrote that I thought to myself, well if I see Diggs and Mitchell about equal, but Mitchell is a better TD threat, then why wouldn't I start Mitchell......Let us know if you do indeed strap on a set of those iron balls
No guarantees, but Brady, RZ targets, 6-10 total targets, limited WR passing options, BAL pass D not great, it's NE on MNF... What's not to like? But hey, do not believe what I have to say! Fantasy football has a way of messing with us.After I wrote that I thought to myself, well if I see Diggs and Mitchell about equal, but Mitchell is a better TD threat, then why wouldn't I start Mitchell......
I'm about as confused as I am with my survivor pick. But hey, could be worse, I could have zero fantasy football decisions to make this week!
Because they're too busy putting busts like Allen Robinson and DeAndre Hopkins ahead of himHow come most sites have him ranked as a low WR #3 at best?
Well Hopkins does get the Colts this week so I can kinda see that one at least. But I do know what your point is.Because they're too busy putting busts like Allen Robinson and DeAndre Hopkins ahead of him
Terrelle Pryor vs. Bengals: From a matchup standpoint, this isn’t a great spot for Pryor. The Bengals are fifth in fantasy points allowed to receivers and 17th in pass-defense DVOA. Their weakness is definitely tight end coverage. But Pryor’s volume is too hard to ignore. Over the past four weeks, Pryor is fifth among all wide receivers, averaging 10.3 targets per game. On the year, he’s 10th in targets. First-round rookie Corey Coleman has yet to find his groove since coming back from a broken hand, and Pryor has emerged as a legitimate No. 1 receiver, even playing with a cast of subpar quarterbacks. The Browns are expected to start Robert Griffin III under center this week for the first time since the season opener. If anything, RGIII has a monster arm, and Pryor has 4.38 speed. Griffin has never been afraid to uncork deep balls, and these two hooked up on a couple in the preseason. Pryor also caught a 44-yard pass from RGIII in Week 1 against the Eagles.
Donte Moncrief vs. Texans: Like Pryor above, Moncrief isn’t in a great on-paper matchup against a Texans defense allowing the fourth-fewest fantasy points to receivers. But since Moncrief returned from a shoulder blade injury in Week 8, he has scored a touchdown in all five games. He hasn’t topped 55 yards in any of those five, but Moncrief is Andrew Luck’s go-to guy in the red zone with six targets inside the 20-yard line in that span to lead the Colts. At some point, Moncrief is going to fail to find the end zone, but he’s scored in 10 of his past 12 games with Luck at quarterback. With a 26.5-point implied team total, the Colts project to be one of the highest-scoring teams of the week playing at home inside Lucas Oil Stadium on the turf. Over the last five weeks, the Texans are 25th in fantasy points allowed to receivers. They’re breaking down on the back end.
Sits
Allen Robinson vs. Vikings: Like Todd Gurley mentioned earlier, owners who drafted Robinson at his first-round price are likely on the outside looking in on the fantasy playoffs. If you made it, Robinson surely didn’t help you very much. Despite being sixth among all receivers with 110 targets, Robinson is 104th among 117 qualified receivers with a 50.9 percent catch rate. Over the last three games, Robinson has corralled just 8-of-21 targets for 73 total yards and one score. He now figures to draw shadow coverage from Vikings emerging star CB Xavier Rhodes. He’s Pro Football Focus’ No. 22 cover corner out of 122 qualifiers. But Rhodes’ 46.9 passer rating against him is second-best among all corners, behind only Aqib Talib. Robinson, Blake Bortles, and OC Nathaniel Hackett had a sit-down earlier this week to try and find a solution to their problems. It’s unlikely to get fixed against Minnesota’s No. 2-ranked unit in pass-defense DVOA.
Rishard Matthews vs. Broncos: Matthews has averaged a healthy 8.75 targets as the Titans’ new No. 1 receiver over the past four games. The volume is obviously there, but the matchup is incredibly tough. Not only are the Broncos No. 1 against the pass, allowing the fewest fantasy points to receivers, Matthews figures to run most of his routes at LCB Aqib Talib. Talib is Pro Football Focus’ No. 2 cover corner among 122 qualifiers, and his 45.1 passer rating in his coverage is No. 1. This is a week to leave Matthews on benches in fantasy leagues.
DeVante Parker vs. Cardinals: Like the two receivers mentioned before him here, Parker also draws a very tough individual matchup. As the Dolphins’ top outside weapon, he figures to see a ton of Patrick Peterson on Sunday. Peterson is Pro Football Focus’ No. 11 cover corner out of 122 qualifiers and has surrendered just two touchdowns in his coverage all season. Jarvis Landry gets the best draw on the inside with Tyrann Mathieu still trying to work his way back from a shoulder issue.
Yahoo also has Mitchell at 21... highest I've seen himBecause they're too busy putting busts like Allen Robinson and DeAndre Hopkins ahead of him
Same gut feeling I get! Wax on, wax off.For you guys on the fence putting him in your lineup, lock him in. Guarantee Pats spent all week working on their Gronk-less RZ offense after settling for a bunch of FGs last week. With Bennett still gimpy, Mitchell & Hogan seem like the best RZ threats in passing game - along with White/Lewis dump offs - so I expect 2-3 TDs between Mitchell, Hogan & the RBs this week. Mitchell has already proven himself strong in this area in his nose for the ball and strong hands.
I think he's a bigger factor for NE offense than fantasy, but this game has markings of national coming out part for MM where the lazy driveby national sports media walks away with "Tom Brady can make superstars out of anyone" narrative.
Yup. I just feel McD/Brady have gotten super comfortable with him and are going to start treating him like a second-year player and just put their faith & trust in him.Same gut feeling I get! Wax on, wax off.
As a Mitchell and Gostkowski owner I'd kinda like to get both this week but I'm really greedyFor you guys on the fence putting him in your lineup, lock him in. Guarantee Pats spent all week working on their Gronk-less RZ offense after settling for a bunch of FGs last week. With Bennett still gimpy, Mitchell & Hogan seem like the best RZ threats in passing game - along with White/Lewis dump offs - so I expect 2-3 TDs between Mitchell, Hogan & the RBs this week. Mitchell has already proven himself strong in this area in his nose for the ball and strong hands.
I think he's a bigger factor for NE offense than fantasy, but this game has markings of national coming out part for MM where the lazy driveby national sports media walks away with "Tom Brady can make superstars out of anyone" narrative.
Same boat packersfan! It's okay to be greedy this weekAs a Mitchell and Gostkowski owner I'd kinda like to get both this week but I'm really greedy
I suspect that things will play out differently against teams like the Ravens and Broncos than they did against the Niners, Jets, and Rams.Mitchell was used as more than just a deep threat against the Rams. That's what makes him so intriguing going forward. Without Gronk he was used as an intermediate route runner and he's been used often in the Red Zone as well. This is why he's become such a hot commodity for fantasy purposes right now. He's not just a one-trick pony anymore. He's evolving into a multi-purpose option in the NE passing game and with Gronk and Amendola out and Bennett a shell of himself there are plenty of reasons to believe it's going to continue as long as he shows he can make plays and continue to keep Brady's trust.
I don't know what Belichick will plan to do and I'm certainly not going to try and predict that. I just know that there have been three straight productive games now for Mitchell and he's proven he can handle a diverse set of responsibilities in the New England offense. It would make sense given the number of injuries the team has offensively they would want to keep using him in that diverse set of roles as long as he continues to be productive. I don't know why you would scale his role back when he's doing well. That wouldn't seem to make sense.I suspect that things will play out differently against teams like the Ravens and Broncos than they did against the Niners, Jets, and Rams.
Hill had 52 receiving yards in that game. He scored his TDs on a kick return, a jet sweep, and a three-yard out. I don't think that really makes the case that WRs are suddenly feasting on Denver's pass D.I don't want to look too far ahead because first things first but as far as Denver goes we have seen some receivers have success against the Broncos recently like Ty Hill.
Didn't say feasting but Hill put up 20 receiving points in PPR with Alex Smith as his QB. Mitchell has Tom Brady. My primary point, though, is whenever people view matchups they always view them in favor of the defense first. Never is an offense viewed as the difficult matchup. Brady happens to be a difficult matchup for any defense, including Denver's. Certainly he's far more formidable than Alex Smith is and Denver gave up a 20-point PPR game to a Smith-led WR just recently. I'm not saying that guarantees Mitchell will do well but what I am saying is I'm not just gonna automatically bench Mitchell in Week 15 because it's Denver, especially if Mitchell has another good game this week.Hill had 52 receiving yards in that game. He scored his TDs on a kick return, a jet sweep, and a three-yard out. I don't think that really makes the case that WRs are suddenly feasting on Denver's pass D.
This has some merit.Didn't say feasting but Hill put up 20 receiving points in PPR with Alex Smith as his QB. Mitchell has Tom Brady. My primary point, though, is whenever people view matchups they always view them in favor of the defense first. Never is an offense viewed as the difficult matchup. Brady happens to be a difficult matchup for any defense, including Denver's. Certainly he's far more formidable than Alex Smith is and Denver gave up a 20-point PPR game to a Smith-led WR just recently. I'm not saying that guarantees Mitchell will do well but what I am saying is I'm not just gonna automatically bench Mitchell in Week 15 because it's Denver, especially if Mitchell has another good game this week.
But most importantly let's have that good game this week first and then we can worry about what a matchup against the Broncos might look like.
Brady seems to get up for challenges when things look bleak and then he uncovers them and tears them apart. Just saying...next week.This has some merit.
People are not playing Denver's defense next week because they play New England. Fair.
People are cautious about playing NE offensive players because of DEN defense. Fair.
But one has to give, right? Someone has to win. Unless people think the game will be 3-0, but then DEN defense would be a good start. So people shy away from both sides saying it's a bad matchup.... well, someone has to score points. If Denver is that good and holds NE then we should be recommending people start the Denver defense. Since no one in the Playoff Streaming Defense thread is suggesting this, I would imagine it's because they view NE as a bad matchup for the DEN defense. So then you'd imagine people here would be saying Mitchell would do well vs DEN. Unfortunately not. Everyone has their cake and is eating it too... That's simply impossible.
No not really. Pretty easy for Brady to toss for 220-250, 1-2 TD's and if as usual he does not turn it over then will work out to not a good matchup for Brady or Denver D.People are not playing Denver's defense next week because they play New England. Fair.
People are cautious about playing NE offensive players because of DEN defense. Fair.
But one has to give, right?
Next Tuesday morning we may or may not be discussing this? This week it seems like some of us feel that Mitchell will emerge as perhaps a strong WR #2 with upside. It may not happen like others have suggested 2 for 17 yards makes this all a moot point. But, 7 for 75 and one or two TD's means we will be back here next week discussing...No not really. Pretty easy for Brady to toss for 220-250, 1-2 TD's and if as usual he does not turn it over then will work out to not a good matchup for Brady or Denver D.
You got a QB who has only been picked once and a defense that has only given up two or more passing TD's in two games. That's a bad matchup for both.
I am in the same boat. with Thomas not practicing the last 2 days, Mitchell may make the start in his stead at this point.Team Smokin' said:In another league we start 3 WR's. In are ODJ and Dez. WR #3 goes to M Thomas, R Matthews, Watkins, or Mitchell? I have Thomas penciled in but may change to Mitchell? R Matthews has been awesome, but he gets DEN this week.