Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.
Engram isn't worth anything anymore now that more TE's have broken out. I'm not the biggest fan of Pittman but he's looked solid so far and better than I thought he would be. I'd easily go 1st and Pittman here. Especially in non-TE premium
I don't agree with that at all. Engram was never valuable because of scarcity, he was valuable because he had reset the market type upside. He still does. Very few TE are capable of being regulars in the 20 point club, and with Barkley out Engram's got an even better chance. I've turned the corner on my Engram addiction but I'd still be acquiring him if people are offering him at isn't-worth-anything level pricing.
And there's more and more TE's now that can regularly be in the 20 point club. We're seeing a bunch of breakout TE's right before our eyes already this year. That just pushes Engram's value down. Agree he'll get an uptick without Barkley, but how much does that realistically increase his long term value? I'd argue very little because people just don't like him, he hasn't been healthy regularly, and there's younger TE's who are in better positions to succeed long term than Engram is.
Boyd > Aiyuk pretty easily for me, but I am not a big Aiyuk fan. Boyd reminds me a lot of a little bit younger Robert Woods where he'll just keep producing but nobody really wants him.
Probably back to what you paid for him in a rookie draft (mid-late first)?
Not if you're a contender. He will continue to produce while CMc is out. And even once he's back, Davis will be one of the better handcuffs. Chances of hitting on a rookie in the 3rd aren't great.
Even if CMC were back tomorrow I would rather have Davis over a 3rd round pick now that we know he is the clear handcuff and will produce in that role.
Auto accept for me with the caveat being that I am dumbfounded at what level people still value Kirk.I inquired about Allen Robinson. 16 team IDP dynasty PPR. I am 3-0 and loaded at RB, TE, DL, LB and above average at every other position except for WR.
was offered Robinson for
C Kirk + 2 2021 2nd rounders.
(In 2021 and 2022 I have a 1st and 3 2nds each year)
i just traded for Crowder and now my WR are Lockett, Crowder, DJ Moore, Kirk, Ruggs, Pittman, LFitz. We start 2-4 WR
Any thoughts would be appreciated. I am leaning towards accepting the trade but not 100% sure if his value. Feel free to ignore if too much of an asst coach question.
Smash accept.I inquired about Allen Robinson. 16 team IDP dynasty PPR. I am 3-0 and loaded at RB, TE, DL, LB and above average at every other position except for WR.
was offered Robinson for
C Kirk + 2 2021 2nd rounders.
(In 2021 and 2022 I have a 1st and 3 2nds each year)
i just traded for Crowder and now my WR are Lockett, Crowder, DJ Moore, Kirk, Ruggs, Pittman, LFitz. We start 2-4 WR
Any thoughts would be appreciated. I am leaning towards accepting the trade but not 100% sure if his value. Feel free to ignore if too much of an asst coach question.
I wouldn't trade Aiyuk for Boyd straight up. The younger guy and same production is worth more for obvious reasons. Boyd is under-appreciated for sure but I don't see the point in acquiring him for a young ascending player. Boyd isnt even 26 yet, but with Burrow I question which direction that team is heading towards. He's a good player on not so great offense. Those guys I generally stay away from acquiring. Not that Aiyuk is in any different a situation, but he has more youth and the perceived potential for more.
A bit premature to call it same production after Aiyuk put up one good game where most of his production came on the ground.
Premature but it's kind of safe to say the floor has been established no? When Deebo and Kittle come back maybe something changes but his outlook looks promising where Boyd's is questionable. I totally agree with you he could be similar to Woods, but Aiyuk has shown that too IMO.
What’s a “flex RB” mean? Can’t imagine many Sanders owners giving up a top 10 dynasty RB for a random 1st to downgrade to a RB without much value.
been trying to trade Aaron jones all year and i got one real offer but it involved mostly 2022 picks. i dont know what to do with jones. I'm not going to sell him for peanuts but people are scared of what is going to happen next year. my goodness if he signed an extension with GB today his dynasty value would nearly double IMO
Parker is worth a 1st. Tua has the potential to create a dynamic offense & Parker & Williams will be beneficiaries of that. There’s risk, sure, but that’s a team on the up.northern exposure said:
Superflex makes it tougher because the talent really stretches out through most of the 1st round in that format. CeeDee Lamb was 1.10 ADP in that format this year, for instance.
I'm not the hugest fan of calling guys injury prone but Fuller is in his 5th year and has missed time with nagging injuries in every single one of them. I don't think I'd give up any 1st for Fuller but if you want to take a big upside swing there are few guys available at that price that will provide a higher upside.
that’s the thought. I lose nothing from my roster & get help for my BYEs. That he just had a hammy scare is a concern, but he’s also in a contract year. Players often find a way to stay on the field.
or 
but I like having some depth for a change. 
I own Kupp and wouldn't accept that offer - not close, IMO. Parker and Kupp are the two best players in that deal.
I am not getting this at all...I love what I see with Robinson but he is far from a definite and not the guy I am gonna over-pay for after three games...Kupp and Parker are two high-end WRs while Mims is a solid but nothing special prospect in a very bad situation... I find the fact the Kupp/Parker owner has to add a #3 or a #2 as almost offensive...if I was the Kupp/Parker Owner this would take me a second to reject.
He wouldn't do the deal either. He wants Mims, Edwards, a fourth, a sixth, Robinson, Corey Davis for Cooper Kupp and DeVante Parker. What's close, in your eyes?
Yeah, he's the one who inquired about Robinson, so...I don't know. He asked for Mims, Edwards, a fourth, a sixth, Corey Davis, and Mims for Parker and Kupp.
I would do that deal...you are nibbling around the edges of your roster and getting two quality WRs...Mims has very limited value to me, Davis is Davis, Edwards is very intriguing but not a core member of your roster and while I am high on Robinson he is a guy who was on the waiver wire in most leagues prior to Fournette getting cut...if you can add Kupp and Parker for that I would do it in a heartbeat.
