Not sure why the Sutton owner would do that but ok...Complete PPR rebuild:
Lockett for Sutton/Mooney
Not sure why the Sutton owner would do that but ok...Complete PPR rebuild:
Lockett for Sutton/Mooney
I hate to use the name but Fant reminds me of Hernandez...his athleticism is very noticeable.Concept Coop said:Sounds like we just disagree on Fant. He’s 22 YO and only in his second season. That he’s already a mid-TE1 is a great sign, but that’s not why he’s valuable. You’re buying his ceiling, not his floor. Fant doesn’t need TDs to be relevant. He’s on a 76/880 over 16 game pace. Those are Ertz numbers. Already. Small sample size, but again, you’re buying his ceiling.
He seems to be going from over-rated to under-rated at warp speed.James Robinson for a late first doesn't appear to even start a conversation in non-ppr dynasty.
I think that makes sense though. He's not as young as Lamb/Metcalf and not as productive as Hopkins/Thomas/Adams.What to people think about Golladay? He seems to be a little bit of a forgotten/over-looked WR right now...not one of the young studs like Lamb or Metcalf but not really in the Hopkins/Thomas/Adams conversation as well.
James Robinson for a late first doesn't appear to even start a conversation in non-ppr dynasty.
Hold the phone...I got one! A mid to late first.He seems to be going from over-rated to under-rated at warp speed.
People say this a lot. I have not found it to be true. I think it's a variant of the Mandela Effect.I have Robinson in my only non-PPR league and wouldn't sell him for a late 1st.
Non-ppr is all about the RBs. That also makes late 1sts less valuable than a typical PPR league since 2nd tier WR prospects like Ruggs, Pittman, etc aren't as valuable there and you have to REALLY hit on a true stud (like Jefferson this year) to get much out of the pick.
I think Robinson is probably worth somewhere around a late 1st in PPR, maybe a little more. In non-PPR which both increases his value and decreases the value of the pick, I would pretty quickly reject it if that offer came my way, personally.
I think he’s worth more than that in PPR leagues, even. At best you’re looking at RBs with 3rd round pedigree in a questionable landing spot in the later part of the first round of rookie drafts. We’ve been spoiled recently by guys like Hunt and Kamara, but they’re outliers. You’re lucky if your late first round RB ever has the opportunity that Robinson has today. Those who appear to on draft day (Montgomery comes to mind) go early/mid. You’re usually looking at Zack Moss types. I guess if you’re not at all sold on the talent, a late 1st makes sense. But draft pedigree should be all but moot by now. It’s clear that the NFL missed and Robinson would be drafted in a redo. Likely ahead of Moss, Dillon, and maybe even Akers, in my opinion.I have Robinson in my only non-PPR league and wouldn't sell him for a late 1st.
Non-ppr is all about the RBs. That also makes late 1sts less valuable than a typical PPR league since 2nd tier WR prospects like Ruggs, Pittman, etc aren't as valuable there and you have to REALLY hit on a true stud (like Jefferson this year) to get much out of the pick.
I think Robinson is probably worth somewhere around a late 1st in PPR, maybe a little more. In non-PPR which both increases his value and decreases the value of the pick, I would pretty quickly reject it if that offer came my way, personally.
Likewise, it's few and far between that undrafted rookie RBs who flash a bit sustain any form of long term value. I think Robinson has looked solid, but he's not special. I'm insta-trading Robinson for a late 1st in ppr leagues without giving it much consideration. Especially for a 2021 1st, as that WR class looks stacked once again.I think he’s worth more than that in PPR leagues, even. At best you’re looking at RBs with 3rd round pedigree in a questionable landing spot in the later part of the first round of rookie drafts. We’ve been spoiled recently by guys like Hunt and Kamara, but they’re outliers. You’re lucky if your late first round RB ever has the opportunity that Robinson has today. Those who appear to on draft day (Montgomery comes to mind) go early/mid. You’re usually looking at Zack Moss types. I guess if you’re not at all sold on the talent, a late 1st makes sense. But draft pedigree should be all but moot by now. It’s clear that the NFL missed and Robinson would be drafted in a redo. Likely ahead of Moss, Dillon, and maybe even Akers, in my opinion.
He’s the only undrafted rookie RB In history to produce this much this early. The sample is one. I don’t see value in correlating by UDFA status anymore. It won’t play a role in him keeping or losing the job, which I think he is on his way to securing for the foreseeable future. None of the rookies have looked special, but Robinson has looked better than all of them, with the exception of CEH. He hasn’t just flashed a bit, he’s been one of the better backs in the league. If your only exposure and context was watching the 2020 season, would anyone say Zeke is a better football player than James Robinson, for example?Likewise, it's few and far between that undrafted rookie RBs who flash a bit sustain any form of long term value. I think Robinson has looked solid, but he's not special. I'm insta-trading Robinson for a late 1st in ppr leagues without giving it much consideration. Especially for a 2021 1st, as that WR class looks stacked once again.
His value is similar to Ekeler in that sense imo.He’s the only undrafted rookie RB In history to produce this much this early. The sample is one. I don’t see value in correlating by UDFA status anymore. It won’t play a role in him keeping or losing the job, which I think he is on his way to securing for the foreseeable future. None of the rookies have looked special, but Robinson has looked better than all of them, with the exception of CEH. He hasn’t just flashed a bit, he’s been one of the better backs in the league. If your only exposure and context was watching the 2020 season, would anyone say Zeke is a better football player than James Robinson, for example?
Additionally, go look at his thread for the combine metrics I posted from him. Other than his 40-time, everything jumped off the page. Let’s not forget it was a COVID year where he didn’t get to run a pro day 40-time (and improve on his 4.65, which isn’t really problematic anyway) or have any in-person team visits to wow a team and become a 4th rounder.He’s the only undrafted rookie RB In history to produce this much this early. The sample is one. I don’t see value in correlating by UDFA status anymore. It won’t play a role in him keeping or losing the job, which I think he is on his way to securing for the foreseeable future. None of the rookies have looked special, but Robinson has looked better than all of them, with the exception of CEH. He hasn’t just flashed a bit, he’s been one of the better backs in the league. If your only exposure and context was watching the 2020 season, would anyone say Zeke is a better football player than James Robinson, for example?
This is the beauty of dynasty leagues. Odds are one of us is going to be likely very clearly correct. If Robinson maintains his role as feature back for a few years, he’s easily worth a late 1st. If he doesn’t, his value most definitely isn’t a 1st. Consider me as betting on the latter. Additionally, IMO despite solid production to date, draft pedigree absolutely plays a role in sustainability of value in dynasty leagues. If Robinson and Swift both blow out their ACLs this week and you don’t think their draft pedigree and the investment of the 35th overall pick vs UDFA plays any role in future opportunities, we’d have to disagree.He’s the only undrafted rookie RB In history to produce this much this early. The sample is one. I don’t see value in correlating by UDFA status anymore. It won’t play a role in him keeping or losing the job, which I think he is on his way to securing for the foreseeable future. None of the rookies have looked special, but Robinson has looked better than all of them, with the exception of CEH. He hasn’t just flashed a bit, he’s been one of the better backs in the league. If your only exposure and context was watching the 2020 season, would anyone say Zeke is a better football player than James Robinson, for example?
They've been just about as bad as can be and he's still producing. Not sure what could happen that would make his situation worse other than losing lineman to injury or free agency.I think my biggest problem with Robinson is that he's a Jaguar.
How long is a flash?Likewise, it's few and far between that undrafted rookie RBs who flash a bit sustain any form of long term value. I think Robinson has looked solid, but he's not special. I'm insta-trading Robinson for a late 1st in ppr leagues without giving it much consideration. Especially for a 2021 1st, as that WR class looks stacked once again.
Easily Mims. Would expect their values to head in opposite directions next year. Ekeler returns from injury, and Mims likely gets a generational QB talent in Lawrence.Josh Kelley vs Mims in a 12 team PPR dynasty league?
I don’t know if we disagree.This is the beauty of dynasty leagues. Odds are one of us is going to be likely very clearly correct. If Robinson maintains his role as feature back for a few years, he’s easily worth a late 1st. If he doesn’t, his value most definitely isn’t a 1st. Consider me as betting on the latter. Additionally, IMO despite solid production to date, draft pedigree absolutely plays a role in sustainability of value in dynasty leagues. If Robinson and Swift both blow out their ACLs this week and you don’t think their draft pedigree and the investment of the 35th overall pick vs UDFA plays any role in future opportunities, we’d have to disagree.
Will be fun to watch. Great discussion.
And his last 5 (of 6) games have included 4 of the worst 7 teams in the league against the rush, with the fifth being against the Lions (14th worst).Robinson is eighth in points for the season but 13th the last three weeks (although the difference from 6 to 13 is admittedly small) so he's trending downward. The last part is what makes some jumpy.
He’s looked pretty average this year. He’s not the same player he was as a rookie. Signing him to that massive contract was a huge mistake and it’s going to look worse and worse until they cut him in a couple years.Just offered Zeke for a combination of Aaron Jones/Justin Jefferson or Kareem Hunt/Justin Jefferson/1st rounder and was pretty much rejected out of hand because the owner didn't want to part with receiver a in start-nine offense (1-5 RB, 2-5 WR, 1-5 TE, 1 QB). Zeke's value is not what it once was.
He looked, to me, better than he did last year. His line is just in shambles. I totally agree with what you're saying about not the same as a rookie or that contract. I happened to inherit him on a dynasty team and I'm sort of looking to get out from under it while it still has albatross-looking value.He’s looked pretty average this year. He’s not the same player he was as a rookie. Signing him to that massive contract was a huge mistake and it’s going to look worse and worse until they cut him in a couple years.
I was going to bring up Arian Foster. But, when I looked up his stats, I found he played 6 games his 1st NFL season and broke out in his first full (16 game) season.He’s the only undrafted rookie RB In history to produce this much this early. The sample is one. I don’t see value in correlating by UDFA status anymore. It won’t play a role in him keeping or losing the job, which I think he is on his way to securing for the foreseeable future. None of the rookies have looked special, but Robinson has looked better than all of them, with the exception of CEH. He hasn’t just flashed a bit, he’s been one of the better backs in the league. If your only exposure and context was watching the 2020 season, would anyone say Zeke is a better football player than James Robinson, for example?
This is an interesting idea. Do you have access to start up ADP data? I suppose the mizelle data could be used for this. I noticed that goes several years back last time I looked at it. Yeah 2013 so we could compare the 2014 ADPs to 2020 for WR using this.This has been the foundation of my dynasty strategy for the last 3+ years now. It seems like every year I'm getting in a discussion with someone on here who is saying "don't overreact to 4-5 weeks" and I'm replying with "underreacting to these 4-5 weeks is even more detrimental". Glad to see someone coming in on the same side this year.
Like you said, it doesn't apply only to rookies. Dynasty rankings change wildly from year to year but people/rankers are tentative about making big moves in-season, instead saving them for the following offseason even though the likely path is pretty clear in-season.
While I realize startup ADP isn't a perfect reflection of trade value it is probably the closest thing we have to putting a historic number to it. Look at some of the guys that made moves in startup ADP from 2019 pre-season to 2019 4-5 weeks into the season and how that trend continued and amplified into the following offseason.
David Johnson fell from late 1st startup value to late 2nd startup value 4-5 weeks into last season.
Le"veon Bell fell from late 1st startup to early 2nd startup.
Odell Beckham early 1st -> late 1st
James Conner early 2nd -> mid 3rd
And the same thing in the other direction
Derrick Henry mid 4th startup pre-season to mid-3rd in October
AJ Brown mid 8th -> early 5th
DK Metcalf late 7th -> early 5th
Chris Godwin mid 5th -> late 2nd
Obviously it's not perfect and there are guys like Mixon who bounce back. But consider that at this time last year selling OBJ for 1st round startup value was "selling low". Selling Le'Veon/DJ for 2nd round startup value was "selling low". Buying Derrick Henry at 3rd round startup value or AJB/DK at 5th round value were all "buying high". Then consider what all those guys were worth once the offseason rolled around even though their pace through the rest of the season didn't really change.
There are plenty of guys that will follow that same trend this year, even if they seem obvious. "Overpaying" for Claypool or Lamb or those guys is fine by me because buying high now might be the cheapest they will ever be moving forward. Even obvious ones like Metcalf. I look around trade threads and I see people wary about trading away Michael Thomas for DK+. Yet it seems fairly likely/predictable that next offseason MT will not be enough for DK and even something like MT+1st probably won't be enough. So he's a guy I'm buying "high" everywhere I can even at "outrageous" value because I don't think we've even begun to see "outrageous".
This season scoring is up across the board and most of it is going to the WR position. So the tide is lifting all boats. More viable choices at WR because of that right now.I have felt this way for years and it's amplified even more this year.
If your opponents are savvy enough they should be able to find match ups that mitigate your advantage somewhat. That doesn't mean that the players they are starting that week are more valuable than your WR every week.In my main league I am rolling out Hopkins/Tyreek/Lockett (or Jefferson for Lockett some weeks) and it feels like an unbeatable group. But every week when I look across at the matchup my opponent is rolling out options that are basically a toss-up against them.
The scarcity issue has always been there. Not many teams have more than two or so viable RB starters so anyone trading away a RB needs to have 4 or more good ones or they are hurting their starting line up. That said if you make a strong enough offer you should be able to get a top RB if you are willing to give up Hopkins or Hill for one.I actually had this discussion with someone 2 days ago when they were looking to move WR strength (Evans) for a RB and getting frustrated they couldn't make something happen. I basically told them guys like Evans just aren't attractive to people anymore because everyone has plenty of good startable WRs, and everyone needs RBs.
This sounds like something I have been saying for years except I would never say to put all of your capital into a certain position of players. Its still BPA.It's why I've been against the idea of building around WRs, which seems to be the popular strategy in dynasty, for years now. People always say things like "once you get there you're set there for years and you can spend all your capital moving forward on RBs" and "if you are really stuck at RB you can always just trade some of that WR strength for RBs".
Passing up a good player for a meh one is always a bad idea. Jefferson was a 1st round pick, Vaughn was a 3rd round RB with a questionable starter already on the team.In practice neither of these are as romantic or realistic as they sound on paper. Like I said in my main league I have Hopkins/Hill/Lockett (and several other good players) in my main league so it probably didn't make much sense to target a WR with my late 1st round pick. But that doesn't mean it would have been a smart move to pass up on Justin Jefferson in favor of a RB hail marry like Vaughn. Thank goodness I didn't do that but the idea of just "ignoring WRs because you're set there" just makes you perpetually lose out on good players that are relatively cheap to acquire.
I have traded top RB for top WR before. Even when I don't necessarily need the WR but the trade allows me to upgrade.Likewise the idea of trading WR strength for RB help sounds better on paper than it works out, mainly because pretty much every other team has WR strength and needs RB help so why would they trade a RB for a WR, which is the opposite of what they need? To make a WR for RB trade you have to give up a bunch of value. You can't just make a lateral trade between two guys that have similar value. You usually have to move down a tier or two at RB to move a WR.
Well Aaron Jones has outperformed him for the last two seasons and (I think) is younger - but agree Zeke's trade value is not the same. I've had trouble trying to find anyone that wants to give fair value.Just offered Zeke for a combination of Aaron Jones/Justin Jefferson or Kareem Hunt/Justin Jefferson/1st rounder and was pretty much rejected out of hand because the owner didn't want to part with receiver a in start-nine offense (1-5 RB, 2-5 WR, 1-5 TE, 1 QB). Zeke's value is not what it once was.
Unlikely either one is ever a feature back imo.What are people's thoughts on Brian Hill and Deejay Dallas for dynasty purposes?
Looking to rebuild for next year and Gurley and Carson are set to be free agents. New coaching regime in Atlanta obviously has to weigh in.
Agreed...they are end-of-bench cross your fingers guys...they would barely hold any value to me as far as a deal I was doing.Unlikely either one is ever a feature back imo.
1QB? I would consider doing that.hispeedthinmint said:DK Metcalf value is through the roof it seems in PPR...
His owner said he would want AJB + Lamar Jackson + more for him...
Any other thoughts on Kelley vs Mims?Dawg Pound 69 said:Easily Mims. Would expect their values to head in opposite directions next year. Ekeler returns from injury, and Mims likely gets a generational QB talent in Lawrence.
I agree. With Russ and that offense he is going to be a beast for awhile.I think there's a pretty decent chance that Metcalf is the 1.01 startup pick next offseason.
I think he's already the favorite for WR1 in the offseason. 1.01 overall? I have trouble seeing that. There are just so many startable WRs that I think most will prioritize elite RBs.I think there's a pretty decent chance that Metcalf is the 1.01 startup pick next offseason.
I agree on the plethora of WRs but I'm not sure there is going to be a clear cut RB to take at the top. The current elite crop are hitting the age where dynasty owners start to lose interest that early, and the really young guys haven't played well enough to go that early.I think he's already the favorite for WR1 in the offseason. 1.01 overall? I have trouble seeing that. There are just so many startable WRs that I think most will prioritize elite RBs.
Maybe I’m just a bit slow to catch on but this seems crazy to me. Even WR1 does.I think there's a pretty decent chance that Metcalf is the 1.01 startup pick next offseason.
He's WR3 in PPG at age 22 and is tied to one of the league's best quarterbacks for likely the majority of his career.Maybe I’m just a bit slow to catch on but this seems crazy to me. Even WR1 does.
To me, he’s in a fairly big group of young, high upside WRs who are already producing. That’s great, but I don’t see what he’s done to get all this WR1 hype this last couple of weeks. He’s been very good but so have plenty of other guys. He’s also only caught more than 4 passes in one game this year. That’s a bit shaky to me.
I do understand ranking him over a couple of those slightly older guys now because age is such a huge factor for market value but it’s getting crazy IMO. Dynasty is surprisingly reactionary sometimes.